A Critical Discourse Analysis of Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan

The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the political speech. This article analyzes Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech, mainly in Festival 11 by Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI), that is exclusively based on the perspective of Teun Adrianus van Dijk. It reveals that we can learn how to deliver our ideology to public. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan

The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the political speech. This article analyzes Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech, mainly in Festival 11 by Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI), that is exclusively based on the perspective of Teun Adrianus van Dijk. It reveals that we can learn how to deliver our ideology to public. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaina Singh

On August 13th 2010, the MV Sun Sea ship carrying 492 Tamil asylum seekers arrived off of the coast of British Columbia. Immediately upon arrival the Tamil asylum seekers were detained for a prolonged period of time, subjected to intensified interrogation techniques, and unfairly questioned even when in possession of identifying documents. This paper examines how the government used political discourse to try and justify the unusually harsh detention of asylum seekers. Through a critical discourse analysis strategy, eight newspaper articles will be analyzed and the theories of securitization, discourse, and orientalism will be used to advance certain political ideologies. The political justifications of detention operate through the theme of the egocentric state, and the theme of categorizing and demonizing asylum seekers. The final theme discussed is the concept of victimization, which will offer an alternate perspective to this paper’s main focus on political discourse.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayquni Bayquni ◽  
Prasetya Yoga Santoso

The coverage of the Covid 19 vaccine on Kompas.com is the object of this research. The purpose of this study is to find out, analyze, and reveal how the political discourse in the news of the Covid 19 Vaccine and how post-commodification of information occurs through the news of the Covid 19 vaccine on Kompas.com. The technique used is documentation. This research is an interpretive qualitative research with a critical paradigm with Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse analysis in this theory is carried out at three levels, namely text, discursive practice, and sociocultural practice. The results showed that the political discourse that developed in the news of the Covid 19 vaccine on Kompas.com was in the practice of media commodification. Political discourse in the news of the Covid-19 vaccine is represented as an identity battle between related parties, especially in government circles. The news on the Covid 19 vaccine, narrated by Kompas.com, is very political to gain recognition, support, and representation of media ideology by turning news into a millennial industry, ammunition for political competition and political partisan identity within the government.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mufatihatul Islam ◽  
Sudono Syueb

One of the political religious organizations whose influence is strong enough is Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia with Islamic Political Discourse Khilafah Islamiyah. The political discourse adopted by Hizb ut-Tahrir certainly reap the controversy in Indonesia whose status is the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia which is based on the ideology of Pancasila. Various efforts were made by Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia to enforce its political discourse to penetrate mass communication media such as magazines, tabloids and weekly bulletins. The construction of news in such a way is also always in the sequence as interesting and sepersuasif possible as to influence its readers.Critical discourse analysis is a model of media text analysis that will construct how a medium writes its message, through critical discourse analysis to know the purpose of writing the news. In this study, researchers will construct news content on Al Wa'ie magazine Hizb ut-Tahrir Indonesia especially on the news "Religion Religion and State" in Rubric Afkar.Keywords: Discourse Analysis, Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, Politic


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Herlina Yuni Astuti

AbstractCritical Discourse Analysis on Political Speech by The Former Head of Golkar,Abu Rizal Bakrie. Discourse is a unit of language based on words used tocommunicate in social contexts. Therefore, it cannot be denied that language isan effective tool in all aspects of life, including on the political stage. This studyaims to analyze the structure of the political speech of the former chairman of theGolkar Party, Aburizal Bakrie, entitled "Flowing But Not Drifting". The type ofthis research is descriptive qualitative with the Van Dijk's model of criticaldiscourse analysis. The results of this study indicate that the macro structure ofthe ARB speech text is "Flowing But Not Drifting". In the study of the textsuperstructure, ARB's speech was arranged in a simple way which then becamea strategy in delivering a discourse in front of the cadres. The final element ofvan Dijk's critical discourse analysis study is the micro or semantic structure.The ARB speech consists of background elements, details, presuppositions andnominalization in the semantic section. The use of pronouns, and the tenses usedare active and passive sentences, and tend to use aspects of conditionalcoherence. ARB also tends to use diction in a style that leads to the use oflanguage that is simple and easy to understand because it starts the speech bygiving greetings, thanks and also insertion of a pantun, which is understood as away to give a more positive nuance to the Golkar Party.Key words: CDA, speech, politics, Golkar, ARB AbstrakAnalisis Wacana Kritis Pada Pidato Politik Mantan Ketua Umum PartaiGolkar Aburizal Bakrie. Wacana merupakan satuan bahasa berdasarkan katayang digunakan untuk berkomunikasi dalam konteks sosial. Oleh karena itu,tidak bisa dipungkiri lagi bahwa bahasa adalah alat yang efektif dalam segalaaspek kehidupan termasuk dalam panggung politik. Penelitian ini bertujuanuntuk menganalisis struktur pidato politik mantan ketua umum Partai Golkar,Aburizal Bakrie, yang berjudul “Mengalir Tapi Tak Hanyut”. Jenis penelitian iniadalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan metode analisis wacana kritis model Van Dijk.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa struktur makro teks pidato ARBadalah “Mengalir Tapi Tak Hanyut”. Pada kajian sisi superstruktur teks, pidatoARB tersusun secara sederhana yang kemudian menjadi sebuah strategi dalammenyampaikan suatu wacana di hadapan para kader. Elemen terakhir darikajian analisis wacana kritis oleh van Dijk adalah struktur mikro atau semantik.Pidato ARB terdiri dari elemen latar, detail, pra-anggapan dan nominalisasipada bagian semantik. Penggunaan kata ganti, dan bentuk kalimat yangdigunakan adalah kalimat aktif dan pasif, serta cenderung menggunakan aspekkoherensi kondisional. ARB juga cenderung menggunakan diksi dengan gayayang mengarah kepada penggunaan bahasa yang sederhana dan mudahdipahami karena mengawali pidato dengan memberi salam, ucapan terima kasihdan juga disisipi sebuah pantun, yang mana hal tersebut dipahami sebagai carauntuk memberikan nuansa yang lebih positif atas Partai Golkar.Kata-kata kunci:AWK, pidato, politik, Golkar, ARB


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Ali Al-Momani

Based on the critical discourse analysis theory, the main purpose of this study is to highlight the social and psychological dimensions of the political discourse of Jordan through analyzing king Abdullah’s address to the American Congress in 2007 from socio-cognitive, socio-ideological, and socio-stylistic perspectives. Additionally, the paper uses the critical discourse analysis theory to examine selected quotations from the king’s address in order to see how the Jordanian political discourse is influenced by the status, ideologies, and attitudes of the congressmen to whom it is directed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaina Singh

On August 13th 2010, the MV Sun Sea ship carrying 492 Tamil asylum seekers arrived off of the coast of British Columbia. Immediately upon arrival the Tamil asylum seekers were detained for a prolonged period of time, subjected to intensified interrogation techniques, and unfairly questioned even when in possession of identifying documents. This paper examines how the government used political discourse to try and justify the unusually harsh detention of asylum seekers. Through a critical discourse analysis strategy, eight newspaper articles will be analyzed and the theories of securitization, discourse, and orientalism will be used to advance certain political ideologies. The political justifications of detention operate through the theme of the egocentric state, and the theme of categorizing and demonizing asylum seekers. The final theme discussed is the concept of victimization, which will offer an alternate perspective to this paper’s main focus on political discourse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document