scholarly journals Retroperitoneal fibrosis (ormond’s disease). Clinical case

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-144
Author(s):  
E. N. Skryabina ◽  
N. A. Magdeeva ◽  
I. S. Badurgov
1998 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-256
Author(s):  
D. Schiavone ◽  
G. Carluccio

A presentation is given of the stages through which Ormond in 1962 managed to define Idiopathic Retroperitoneal Fibrosis (RPF), thereby giving it a precise clinical identity while the disease became known with his name. In the following years Ormond examined some etiopathogenetic hypotheses and showed that the etiology of RPF was still unknown, even if in some cases the cause had been traced to some medicines, such as methysergide, which were thought to act as haptens. The anatomical limits of the retroperitoneum and its structures are then outlined, in particular the retroperitoneal connective tissue.


2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 432-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Wu ◽  
Edison Catalano ◽  
Domenico Coppola

2015 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miroslav Průcha ◽  
Ivan Kolombo ◽  
Petr Štádler

Ormond’s disease is a relatively rare disease with unclear etiology, characterized by chronic periaortitis and retroperitoneal fibrosis. The inflammatory process affects the infrarenal part of the abdominal aorta and the iliac arteries, and the presence of infiltrates encasing the ureters and inferior vena cava. This disease is currently classed as an IgG4-related disease. In our review we analyse the clinical history, diagnostic approaches, surgical and immunosuppressive therapies.


1998 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-271
Author(s):  
M. Chilosi ◽  
G. Mariuzzi

Histopathological studies have significantly contributed to clarifing the pathogenetic mechanisms of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (Ormond's disease), confirming in most cases its inflammatory nature. In this review we describe the principal pathologic features of the lesion, describing the different inflammatory and fibrogenic cell components. In addition, the differential diagnosis of Ormond's disease and the clinical role of histopathology and immunophenotypical analysis are briefly discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-49
Author(s):  
S.А. Trypilka ◽  
Ye.D. Yehudina

Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare disease cha­racterized by the proliferation of inflammatory and fibrous tissue in the retroperitoneum. These masses are commonly loca­lized around the infrarenal part of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries, often covering the ureters or other organs of the abdominal cavity; idiopathic diseases accounting for 70 % of cases. RPF may be associated with immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), which accounts for two-thirds of idiopathic RPF cases. Secondary RPF may develop due to infections, malignant neoplasms, medication, retroperitoneal bleeding, or various other diseases. A cli­nical case of idiopathic RPF, probably associated with IgG4, was described in a patient who had undergone a symptomatic surgical treatment in an urological clinic and continued being trea­ted by a rheumatologist, given pathogenetic therapy (methylpredni­solone and mycophenolate mofetil) with a significant improvement. For rheumatologists, this pathology is of an undoubted clinical interest, since these changes are based on processes si­milar to those occurring in systemic diseases of the connective tissue, and the RPF is extremely rare, ranging from 0.1 to 1.3 cases per 100,000 patients per year. However, more often than not, such patients are referred to the doctors of ancillary specialties (urologists, nephrologists, surgeons, vascular surgeons). All of the abovementioned facts emphasize the importance of analyzing such a clinical case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document