scholarly journals Open and endovascular surgery for stenosis of the peripheral regions of arteriovenous fistula

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-174
Author(s):  
Z. B. Kardanakhishvili ◽  
A. B. Zulkarnaev
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Neointimal Hyperplasia ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Autologous Vein ◽  
Endovascular Interventions ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Vein Stenosis

Vascular access is the cornerstone of hemodialysis. With vascular access dysfunction, the results of treatment of patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease significantly deteriorate. One of the most common causes of vascular access failure is peripheral venous stenosis. Despite the variety of initiating factors, the morphological substrate of stenotic damage to the arteriovenous fistula (or arteriovenous anastomosis) in most cases is neointimal hyperplasia. Stenotic lesions of the arterivenous fistula are strongly associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and loss of vascular access. There are 4 typical localizations of stenosis: arteriovenous or arteriograft anastomosis, stenosis of the juxta-anastomotic segment of the fistula, stenosis of the functional segment of the fistula, and stenosis of the cephalic arc.The most common indication for surgical treatment is vascular access failure; less common indications are clinical symptoms of venous insufficiency.There are various methods of open reconstruction of the stenotic segment of the fistula vein: resection, prosthetics with a synthetic vascular graft, prosthetics or plastic repair of the autologous vein wall, complete or partial drainage of the prestenotic segment of the vein, etc. Currently an alternative method of stenosis repair using endovascular interventions is gaining popularity. In contrast to central vein stenosis, where endovascular interventions are the gold standard, in peripheral vein stenosis it is only an adjuvant method. Complications of endovascular interventions are extremely rare.Despite the fact that endovascular interventions have almost absolute probability of technical success, the primary patency is not high and is about 50% in six months. The use of bare stents is not accompanied by an increase in primary patency. The use of stent-grafts can increase the primary patency, especially in the plastic repair of challenging stenoses of the graft-vein anastomosis or cephalic arch.Many issues related to endovascular interventions remain unresolved, which requires further research. 

MO765CENTRAL VEIN STENOSES IN HD PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksei Zulkarnaev ◽  
Andrey Vatazin ◽  
Vadim Stepanov ◽  
Ekaterina Parshina ◽  
Mariya Novoseltseva
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Dwell Time ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Important Risk Factor ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background and Aims The prevalence of central vein stenosis (CVS) in patients on hemodialysis (HD) is difficult to be assessed directly. This is mainly caused by the variety of clinical signs and the high frequency of asymptomatic CVS. Aim: to assess the frequency of occurrence of various CVS forms in HD patients. Method The retrospective observational study is based on the results of treatment of 1865 HD patients who underwent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures on vascular access in our center. In case of vascular access dysfunction, patients were examined according to a local protocol: ultrasound of the peripheral (to exclude lesion of peripheral AVF segments) and central veins (over the available length), followed with CT-angiography or percutaneous angiography, if necessary. Results AVF/AVG dysfunction was observed in 29.4% of patients (549 of 1865). 211 patients were diagnosed with CVS. The prevalence of CVS was 11.3% (211 of 1865) among all HD patients and 38.4% (211 of 549) in patients with AVF dysfunction. Among patients with CVS, 37% (78 of 211) had vein lesions without clinical symptoms or with minimal manifestations (a tendency to decrease KT/V). The prevalence of asymptomatic CVS was 4.2% (78 of 1865) in the general population of HD patients and 14.2% (78 of 549) in patients with AVF dysfunction. In case of asymptomatic CVS it was detected by an ultrasound examination during CVC implantation (N=38), during unsuccessful attempts to implant CVC (N=29), in the case of recurrent AVF thrombosis without underlying peripheral segments lesion (N=9) or during echocardiography (N=2). The prevalence of asymptomatic CVS among patients without AVF dysfunction was 5.9% (78 of 1316). True prevalence of subclinical CVS among HD patients without obvious signs of AVF dysfunction may vary widely. A total of 48.8% (103 of 211) of all CVS cases were treated. At the same time, in 10.7% (11 of 103) of cases, patients did not present symptoms of CVS, and surgery was performed due to recurrent AVF thrombosis without damage of the peripheral parts of AVF. Patients with clinically manifest CVS who received endovascular interventions had a significantly higher risk of AVF loss compared to patients with asymptomatic CVS: HR=2.566 [95% CI 1.706; 3.86], log rank p<0.0001. However, patients with an asymptomatic CVS had a higher risk of AVF function loss compared to the general HD population (HR=2,051 [95% CI 1,243; 3,384], log rank p= 0.0004) – fig. 1. The use of CVC is a known risk factor of CVS development. We analyzed the relationship of CVS risk with multiply CVC placements and catheter dwell time using the Cox proportional hazards regression model (fig. 2). In the univariate model, a greater No of CVCs as well as longer time in place increased the risk of CVS. In the multivariate model (χ2=105.516, df=2, p<0.0001), catheter dwell time was no longer associated with an increased risk of CVC, while the mean number of inserted catheters remained an important risk factor. Conclusion The prevalence of both symptomatic and asymptomatic forms of CVS in HD patients is high. Patients with vascular access dysfunction should be carefully examined to identify the asymptomatic CVS. The mean No of catheterizations is a more important risk factor of CVS than longer catheter dwell time.

P1329STENTING VERSUS ISOLATED BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY FOR CENTRAL VEIN STENOSIS IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksei Zulkarnaev ◽  
Zurab Kardanakhishvili ◽  
Boris Baykov
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Endovascular Intervention ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Endovascular Interventions ◽  
Vein Stenosis ◽  
Central Vein Stenosis

Abstract Background and Aims comparative analysis of the results of isolated balloon angioplasty (BA) and BA with stenting of central veins stenosis in patients on hemodialysis. Method A retrospective study included 62 patients with confirmed stenosis of the central veins: subclavian, brachiocephalic veins, vena cava inferior, or multiple lesions. In 39 patients, stents are not used; isolated balloon angioplasty (BA) was performed. In 23 patients we used bare metal stents. Results Functional primary patency (the time interval between the start of AVF using and the first endovascular intervention) did not differ in the groups – fig. 1A; HR 1.142 [95% CI 0.6875; 1.897], p = 0.5994. The use of stents leads to increase primary patency (the time interval between the first and second endovascular interventions) – fig. 1B; HR 2.064 [95% CI 1.252; 3.404], p = 0.0017. The use of stents allows to increase the functional secondary patency (total duration of use of the AVF) – fig 1C; HR 2.099 [95% CI 1.272; 3.463], p = 0.0016. Secondary patency (the time interval between the first endovascular intervention and the complete cessation of the use of AVF) was higher after BA with stenting: HR 2.03 [95% CI 1.232; 3.347], p = 0.0021; fig 1D. The use of stents allows to increase functional primary assisted patency (non-occlusive period from the start of AVF use) – fig. 1E and primary assisted patency (non-occlusive period from the first surgical intervention) – fig 1F: HR 1.936 [95% CI 1.175; 3.188], p= 0.0053 and HR 2.0 [95% CI 1.213; 3.295], p = 0.0042. The need for open reconstructive interventions after the first BA or BA with stenting was the same 0.374 [95% CI 0.24; 0.556] and 0.45 [95% CI 0.291; 0.664] per 10 patient-months, incidence rate ratio (IRR)= 0.831 [95% CI 0.471; 1.464] р=0.521. The need for endovascular interventions did not differ between isolated BA and BA with stenting 1.137 [95% CI 0.8913; 1.43] and 0.827 [95% CI 0.606; 1.104] per 10 patient-months, IRR=1.374 [95% CI 0.952; 1.999] p=0.09. Total need for surgical interventions (open + endovascular) also did not differ: 1.511 [95% CI 1.225; 1.843] and 1.277 [95% CI 0.997; 1.611] per 10 patient-months, IRR 1.183 [95% CI 0.872; 1.612] p=0.2822. We found a strong negative correlation between functional primary patency and primary patency (r = -0.627; p <0.0001) – fig. 2, as well as a between functional primary patency and secondary patency in patients after isolated BA (= -0.53; p = 0.0005, respectively), but not after stenting (r = -0.351; p = 0.101 and r = -0.304; p = 0.159, respectively). In a case of isolated BA, the success of the first intervention largely determines the secondary patency, which is expressed in a strong, statistically significant positive correlation of primary patency and secondary patency. In a case of BA with stenting, the correlation between these estimates is also statistically significant, but significantly lower. Conclusion 1. The results of balloon angioplasty without stenting are significantly influenced by the duration of the period between the start of AVF use and the manifestation of central vein stenosis. 2. The use of stents can slightly improve the results of endovascular interventions in central vein stenosis, regardless the its time of development. 3. The use of stents leads to a moderate increase in the median patency of AVF and a significant increase in the proportion of patients with functional AVF in the late postoperative period. 4. The use of stents does not reduce the need for surgical interventions

Feasibility of routine ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of native arteriovenous fistula dysfunction

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982094307
Author(s):  
Antonio Granata ◽  
Rosario Maccarrone ◽  
Luca Di Lullo ◽  
Walter Morale ◽  
Giovanni Giorgio Battaglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Neointimal Hyperplasia ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Dialysis Unit ◽  
Percutaneous Transluminal ◽  
Vascular Access Stenosis

Background: Stenosis is the main cause of arteriovenous fistula failure and is due to neointimal hyperplasia. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is the gold standard for patients with vascular access stenosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of native arteriovenous fistula venous stenosis. Methods: The need for intervention was determined by physical examination and duplex ultrasound in 162 patients. All patients with failing or not maturing arteriovenous fistula were treated in the outpatient setting under ultrasound guidance. Procedural success was assessed with repeated post-procedural ultrasound examinations. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia by a single nephrologist and were performed in a single vascular laboratory, while follow-up ultrasound was performed in the dialysis unit of destination. Results: Early technical success was obtained in 95.6% of cases (154 of 162). Complications occurred in 22 patients (13.5%) with no major complication requiring surgical or fluoroscopic endovascular intervention. Primary patency at 6 and 12 months was 84% and 69.8%, respectively. Risk factors for arteriovenous fistula failure/secondary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were vascular access low blood flow rate and vintage, as well as the need for thrombolysis during the first percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is a valuable tool to treat vascular access stenosis.

Venous stent versus conventional stent for the treatment of central vein obstruction in hemodialysis patients: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110051
Author(s):  
Surasit Akkakrisee ◽  
Keerati Hongsakul
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Patency Rate ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Primary Patency Rate ◽  
Patient Demographic Data ◽  
Upper Thoracic ◽  
Vein Stenosis

Background Endovascular treatment is a first-line treatment for upper thoracic central vein obstruction (CVO). Few studies using bare venous stents (BVS) in CVO have been conducted. Purpose To evaluate the treatment performance of upper thoracic central vein stenosis between BVS and conventional bare stent (CBS) in hemodialysis patients. Methods Hemodialysis patients with upper thoracic central vein obstruction who underwent endovascular treatment at the interventional unit of our institution from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018 were enrolled in the present study. CBS was used to treat central vein obstruction in 43 patients and BVS in 34 patients. We compared the primary patency rates and complications between the two stent types. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The patient demographic data between the CBS and BVS groups were similar. The characteristics of the lesions, procedures, and complications were not significantly different between the two groups ( P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences of primary patency rates at three and six months between the BVS and CBS groups (94.1% vs. 86.0% and 73.5% vs. 58.1%, respectively; P > 0.05). The primary patency rate at 12 months in the BVS group was significantly higher than that in the CBS group (61.8% vs. 32.6%; P = 0.008). Conclusion Endovascular treatment of central vein obstruction with BVS provided a higher primary patency rate at 12 months than CBS.

Catheter-related obstruction of the right brachiocephalic vein following hemodialysis in a patient with lupus nephritis

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982092608
Author(s):  
Mitsutoshi Shindo ◽  
Kenichi Oguchi ◽  
Chihiro Kimikawa ◽  
Kiyonori Ito ◽  
Jyunki Morino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Brachiocephalic Vein ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Axillary Vein ◽  
Arteriovenous Graft ◽  
Complete Obstruction ◽  
Hemodialysis Catheter ◽  
The Right

Vascular access is necessary for hemodialysis, and in some cases where it is difficult to establish an arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft, a permanent hemodialysis catheter may be used. However, serious catheter-related complications, such as central vein stenosis or thrombosis, can occur. We herein present a case of complete brachiocephalic vein obstruction in a patient with lupus nephritis receiving hemodialysis using a tunneled hemodialysis catheter. A 64-year-old patient underwent maintenance hemodialysis while taking an anticoagulant, with a tunneled hemodialysis catheter in the right internal jugular vein, because of arteriovenous fistula failure when hemodialysis was introduced. However, the catheter was removed because of a catheter-related bloodstream infection. Following the administration of antibiotics, an arteriovenous graft was implanted between the brachial artery and axillary vein in the right arm. Surprisingly, arteriovenous graft failure and complete obstruction of the right brachiocephalic vein were observed 3 days after arteriovenous graft creation. In conclusion, we report the case of tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related complete obstruction of the right brachiocephalic vein in a lupus nephritis patient undergoing hemodialysis. Clinicians should be aware of this potential complication when tunneled hemodialysis catheters are used and consider the next vascular access type before a tunneled hemodialysis catheter has been indwelled for the long term.

Use of dehydrated human amnion chorion membrane allograft on infected ruptured arteriovenous fistula: revision and closure

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (Sup10) ◽  
pp. S10-S12
Author(s):  
Mutaz Al-Khateeb ◽  
Zaki Al-Muzakki ◽  
Mohammed Ftyan ◽  
Hussam Itani ◽  
Niki Istwan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Haemodialysis Patient ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Human Amnion ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Hemodialysis Vascular Access ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Objective: Over two million individuals worldwide, with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), depend on dialysis therapy or a kidney transplant for survival. Every haemodialysis patient requires vascular access. The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is preferred for long-term hemodialysis vascular access due to long-term primary patency rates. Given the limited options for haemodialysis access and placement, preservation of existing AVF sites is always a clinical priority. This case report describes a novel approach to wound closure with the application of dehydrated amnion chorion human membrane (dHACM) at an AVF surgical site known to be complicated with issues of scarring and tissue breakdown. The patient was treated successfully with the imperative preservation of his AVF given that he had few other vascular access options.

P1319AMBIGUOUS RESULTS OF CENTRAL VEIN STENOSIS ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksei Zulkarnaev ◽  
Zurab Kardanakhishvili ◽  
Boris Baykov
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Main Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Vein Stenosis ◽  
Central Vein Stenosis

Abstract Background and Aims Balloon angioplasty (BA) without the use of stents has unsatisfactory results, which may cast doubt on its expediency. At the same time, BA is a very expensive treatment method. We conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of the native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) patency rates in hemodialysis patients with central venous stenosis (CVS) after endovascular BA and «open» palliative surgery. Method A retrospective study included 80 patients with confirmed central vein stenosis: subclavian, brachiocephalic veins, vena cava inferior, or multiple lesions. The main group included 39 patients who underwent percutaneous balloon angioplasty. The control group included 41 patients who did not have balloon angioplasty for various reasons. In this patients we performed only «open» palliative interventions: thrombectomy, proximalization of arteriovenous anastomosis, AVF blood flow reduction. Results Functional primary patency (the time interval between the start of AVF using and the first intervention) did not differ: groups were comparable in time of stenosis manifestation (fig. 1A). Primary patency (the time interval between the first and second interventions) after BA was statistically significantly better than in the main group (fig. 1B), but difference was minimal: median survival in the study group of 8 months [95% CI 6; 10] vs. - 6 months [95% CI 4.9; 7.1]. There was the strong negative correlation between the primary patency and functional primary patency in the main group (r = –0.627 [95%CI –0.787; –0.388], p &lt;0.0001) but not in the control group (r = 0.049 [95%CI –0.262; –0.351], p = 0.7599). Thus, the later manifestation of CVS related with lower effectiveness of BA. The functional secondary patency (total duration of AVF use) in the main group was significantly better: median survival was 47 months [95% CI 40.9; 53.1] vs. 34 months [95% CI 29.8; 38.2] as well as secondary patency (the time interval between the first intervention and the complete cessation of AVF use): median survival was 16 months [95% CI 12.5; 19.5] vs. 7 months [95% CI 4.9; 9.1] (fig. 1 C and D). The occlusion-free period from the moment of starting the AVF use (functional primary assisted patency – fig. 1E) was higher in the main group, but difference was minimal: median survival was 39 months [95% CI 36.5; 41.5] vs. 32 months [95% CI 27.5; 36.5], as well as occlusion-free period from the moment of the first surgical intervention (primary assisted patency – fig. 1F) median survival was 9 months [95% CI 7; 11], in the control group - 7 months [95% CI 5.6; 8.4]. The need for open interventions was lower in the main group: 0.374 [95% CI 0.24; 0.556] and 2.451 [95% CI 1.1963; 3.023] per 10 patient-months, incidence rate ratio (IRR)= 0.153 [95% CI 0.095; 0.237], р&lt;0.0001; as well as overall need for interventions: 1.511 [95% CI 1.225; 1.843] and 2.451 [95% CI 1.963; 3.023] per 10 patient-months, IRR 0.617 [95% CI 0.461; 0.825] p=0.0011. The value of AVF volume blood flow had a strong negative correlation with the primary patency in both groups (r = –0.529, p =0.0027; r = –0.419, p =0.0101). Conclusion 1. Central vein stenosis is inevitably leads to loss of vascular access on the ipsilateral side. 2. Balloon angioplasty allows to extend the period of AVF use but it is not a radical treatment method of CVS. 3. The results of balloon angioplasty are significantly affected by the length of the period from the start of AVF use to the CVS manifestation. 4. Multiple repeated BA are apparently justified in patients for whom the possibility of creating a new vascular access is doubtful. 4. The AVF volume blood flow is an important factor determining the severity of CVS clinical manifestations and the need for repeated surgical interventions.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes and Economic Impact of Starting Hemodialysis with a Catheter after Predialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Creation

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alian Al-Balas ◽  
Saad Shariff ◽  
Timmy Lee ◽  
Carlton Young ◽  
Michael Allon
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Economic Impact ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Annual Cost ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Access Management ◽  
Surgical Access ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Annual Frequency ◽  
Stage Renal Disease

Background: Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease frequently undergo arteriovenous fistula creation prior to reaching end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but some initiate hemodialysis with a central vein catheter, if their fistula is not yet usable. The clinical consequences of the delay in fistula use have not been quantified in such patients. We compared patients with pre-ESRD fistula surgery who initiated dialysis with a catheter versus a fistula in terms of the frequency of post-dialysis vascular access procedures and complications and their economic impact. Methods: We identified 205 patients with predialysis fistula creation from 2006 to 2012 at a large dialysis center who started hemodialysis within the ensuing 2 years. Of these, 91 (44%) initiated dialysis with a catheter and 114 (56%) with a fistula. We compared these 2 groups in terms of their annual frequency of percutaneous vascular access procedures, surgical access procedures, total access procedures, hospitalizations due to catheter-related bacteremia, and overall cost of vascular access management. Results: The 2 groups were similar in demographics, comorbidities, and fistula type. As compared to patients initiating dialysis with a fistula, those initiating with a catheter had a significantly greater annual frequency of percutaneous access procedures (1.29 [1.19–1.40] vs. 0.75 [0.68–0.82]), surgical access procedures (0.69 [0.61–0.76] vs. 0.59 [0.53–0.66]), total access procedures (1.98 [1.86–2.11] vs. 1.34 [1.26–1.44]), and hospitalizations due to catheter-related bacteremia (0.09 [0.07–0.12] vs. 0.02 [0.01–0.03]). Patients initiating dialysis with a catheter incurred a median overall annual cost of access management that was USD 2,669 higher (USD 6,372 [3,121–12,242) vs. USD 3,703 [1,867–6,953], p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Among patients with predialysis fistula creation, those initiating dialysis with a catheter versus a fistula had substantially more frequent percutaneous, surgical, and total vascular access procedures, as well as hospitalizations due to catheter-related bacteremia. The annual cost of access management was substantially higher in those initiating dialysis with a catheter.

Bilateral brachiocephalic vein stenosis in a chronic hemodialysis patient with well-functioning arteriovenous fistula – A rare entity

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
MAJ GEN SINGH ◽  
VINOD KUMAR
Keyword(s):  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Young Female ◽  
Chronic Hemodialysis ◽  
Brachiocephalic Vein ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Chronic Hemodialysis Patient ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Vein Stenosis ◽  
Central Vein Stenosis

<b>Introduction:</b> Central vein stenosis has been reported in patients of end stage renal disease with subclavian vein being more commonly affected than brachiocephalic vein. <br><b>Case report:</b> We present a case of young female with bilateral brachiocephalic vein obstruction following arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document