scholarly journals KETERLIBATAN AYAH DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN RASIONAL UNTUK MENIKAH MELALUI PROSES TA’ARUF

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
ANNA ARMEINI RANGKUTI

This study aims to determine the influencer of fathers involvement on rational decision making. This study is a quantitative research with sample of early adult women amount 101 respondents. The method of data collection is using Rational Decision Making, Nurturant Fathering Scale, and Reported Father Involvement Scale questionnaires that has been constructed by the relevant theory. Hypothesis testing in this study is using regression analysis. Regression analysis shows that the value of F count = 4,894 > F tabel = 3,94. Additionally significant value show that p = 0,029 < α = 0,05. The regression equation generated in this study is positive, which means that higher fathers involvement then makes rational decision making higher too. Besides, this reseaech R square of 0,047, which explains the influence of fathers involvement against rational decision making amount 47%. Based on the calculation of data shows that there is a significant influence of fathers involvement against rational decision making.

2013 ◽  
Vol 409-410 ◽  
pp. 1629-1632
Author(s):  
Xin Chun Wang ◽  
Yu Bo Jiang

This paper applied the interval AHP to analyze the problems of consistency and weights of interval judgment matrixes in group decision, and applied the models of the least upper approximation and the greatest lower approximation based on interval regression analysis to solute them, and showed the differences between the two models in application by numerical analysis. In order to reduce the uncertainty in ranking weights, the study applied the weight possible value model to obtain the approximate estimate of interval weight, and then combined with the interval weight, which provided more objective and rational decision-making bases for decision maker.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
Rahul Bhui ◽  
Lucy Lai ◽  
Samuel J Gershman

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz Breithaupt

This article examines the relation of empathy and rational judgment. When people observe a conflict most are quick to side with one of the parties. Once a side has been taken, empathy with that party further solidifies this choice. Hence, it will be suggested that empathy is not neutral to judgment and rational decision-making. This does not mean, however, that the one who empathizes will necessarily have made the best choice.


2021 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
Nurmaidah Ginting ◽  
Mila sari Br Ginting ◽  
, Ine Selvia Br Tarigan

in this study is to find out how the influence of service quality, price and promotion on customer satisfaction with the aim of testing and analyzing the effect of service quality, price and promotion on customer satisfaction at PT. Benua Trans Maju Bersama Cabang Medan. The research was started in October 2020 – May 2021. In this study, the researcher used quantitative research techniques with the type of research being descriptive quantitative and the nature of the research was descriptive explanatory research. The population in this study were all customers has 223 customers. where validity and reliability were first tested in order to determine whether a questionnaire was valid or not, and researchers did it to 30 customers and the rest were 143 customers as a sample test. Then it is processed using the classical assumption test which includes: normality test, multicollinearity test, and heteroscedasticity test. The data analysis model in this study uses multiple regression analysis. The conclusion from the results of this study is that there is a service quality partially positive and significant effect on customer satisfaction. The price partially positive and significant effect on customer satisfaction. Promotion positive and significant effect on customer satisfaction Simultaneously the variables of service quality (X1), price (X2) and promotion (X3), there is a positive and significant influence on customer satisfaction (Y).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Ahmed

Evidential Decision Theory is a radical theory of rational decision-making. It recommends that instead of thinking about what your decisions *cause*, you should think about what they *reveal*. This Element explains in simple terms why thinking in this way makes a big difference, and argues that doing so makes for *better* decisions. An appendix gives an intuitive explanation of the measure-theoretic foundations of Evidential Decision Theory.


Author(s):  
Michael R. Gottfredson ◽  
Don M. Gottfredson

Elements ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Moretti

Policy and intelligence are intimately intertwined. Policymakers need intelligence to make decisions, while the intelligence community derives significance from its ability to provide policy makers with reliable information. In this symbiotic relationship, it is healthy for intelligence consumers to at times check and direct the work of intelligence producers. However, if undertaken maliciously, this checking mechanism manifests as top-down politicization. Here, leaders use intelligence post facto to legitimize their policies instead of using it to guide them, reversing the rational decision-making process. Certain factors may compel leaders to manipulate intelligence to reflect their policy preferences. This essay demonstrates how three distinct processes of top-down politicization can arise from ambiguous evidence, the psychology of intelligence consumers, and the nature of the leaders’ political positions and responsibilities. It then proceeds to argue that political leaders’ psychology is the most potent source of top-down politicization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document