Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery colectomy versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colonic tumors: intermediate follow up of a randomized trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 46-46
Author(s):  
Karen Lok Man Tung ◽  
Michael Ka Wah Li
Nano LIFE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 1930001
Author(s):  
Zheng-Wei Fu ◽  
Li-Xia Wang ◽  
Hai-Yan Ge

Although laparoscopic colectomy shows superior short-term outcomes and similar oncologic outcomes in comparison to conventional open colectomy, incision-related complications have weakened its advantages. The natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been considered as the most perfect surgical approach. However, monumental technical hurdles have precluded widely adoption of this technique. As a transient mode, the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) emerges as the times require. Although it is accepted by surgeons for the treatment of colorectal cancer, there are still many disputes that need to be solved.


Author(s):  
Katrien Nulens ◽  
Ilse Van Genechten ◽  
Jan Baekelandt

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is an emerging minimally invasive technique in benign gynaecologic surgery whereby surgical access to the peritoneal cavity is achieved through natural orifices, namely through a vaginal colpotomy. Experience in repeat vNOTES cases is limited and so far, repeat vNOTES cases have not been described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of vNOTES hysterectomy in women with a history of previous vNOTES adnexal surgery. <b><i>Design:</i></b> We performed a retrospective cohort study of the first 11 repeat vNOTES cases in our centre. All vNOTES procedures, primary adnexal surgery as well as repeat vNOTES hysterectomy, were performed by one surgeon (J.B.). <b><i>Materials, Setting, Methods:</i></b> Between March 2016 and May 2020, 11 patients underwent a vNOTES hysterectomy after prior vNOTES adnexectomy or cystectomy in Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium. Relevant patient characteristics and outcome data were collected after written informed consent. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Median age was 49 years (range 44–65) at the moment of the first vNOTES procedure. Two patients had one or more caesarean sections in history, and 2 women were nulliparous. Median interval between primary and repeat vNOTES procedure was 15 months (range 0.8–37 months). All patients underwent a vaginally assisted NOTES hysterectomy (VANH) as repeat vNOTES procedure. Performing a colpotomy and entering the peritoneal cavity after prior vNOTES was technically feasible in all cases. All VANHs were successfully performed. There were 3 minor complications after repeat vNOTES, of which one was anaesthesia-related. The 2 complications associated with the surgical procedure were both cystitis. In one of these 2 patients, there were high post-void residues, which were easily managed by bladder training. There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy, neither serious nor life-threatening complications. No ureteric, bladder, or intestinal injuries have occurred. <b><i>Limitations:</i></b> The retrospective design and small sample size are the main limitations of this study. Moreover, the follow-up period of the most recently operated patients was too short to draw conclusions on long-term outcomes, including sexual function. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In all patients in this case series, vNOTES hysterectomy after prior vNOTES adnexal surgery was successfully performed. Large-scale prospective trials with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of multiple consecutive vNOTES procedures in 1 patient.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
En-Chun Li ◽  
Jian-Quan Hou ◽  
Lin-Bin Yang ◽  
He-Xing Yuan ◽  
Li-Hua Hang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
alexander burnett ◽  
Martha Rojo

Study Objective: To review our experience with low-grade endometrial cancer managed with vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) to determine the feasibility of this approach. Design: Retrospective review of the first fifty cases of endometrial cancer treated by vNOTES Setting: Academic University Population: Fifty consecutive cases of vNOTES management of women with low-grade endometrial cancer were reviewed to detail patient characteristics, operative procedures and outcomes, complications and follow-up. Methods: Patients underwent vNOTES hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. If Mayo criteria for lymphadenectomy were met, a laparoscopic lymph node removal was performed. Main Results: Mean age was 63 (33-90); mean BMI was 35.4 (22-58). In 44 women, both tubes and ovaries were removed via vNOTES. Three women had their ovaries retained due to early age, one woman had exploration for removal of an ovary with metastatic disease, and two women had neither tubes nor ovaries removed due to atresia and inability to identify these organs. Two patients underwent laparoscopic lymphadenectomy on the bases of frozen section evaluation. Mean operative time was 98 minutes (30-215). Fourteen patients were discharged the day of surgery; 34 discharged after overnight observation; hospitalization was prolonged in one patient due to ileus and one patient underwent laparotomy 30 hours after vNOTES for bleeding. Conclusion: VNOTES is a feasible management strategy for women with low-grade endometrial cancer. It permits laparoscopic inspection of the abdomen and direct visualization of vascular pedicles. It can provide a rapid recovery with minimal discomfort and no visible scar.


2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 153-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Qadir Khan ◽  
Enyu Liu ◽  
Weibo Niu ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
Hazrat Gul ◽  
...  

This paper represents an evaluation of a hybrid approach to natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and its performance relative to conventional procedures. Globally, numerous institutions have successfully implemented minimally invasive surgeries by applying NOTES techniques and achieved decreased morbidity while performing incision-less surgery. However, these techniques are still not common in surgical practice in China and Pakistan. Documenting the experiences and challenges encountered in implementing NOTES in such environments can provide guidance for NOTES implementation elsewhere. From May 2010 to April 2012, 16 human transvaginal appendectomies were carried out applying a hybrid NOTES technique using a solo-umbilical trocar, which provided a safe access for laparoscopic assistance during surgical procedure. After removal of the appendix transvaginally, the colpotomy was sutured under direct vision with absorbable stitches. The outcomes of cases treated with hybrid NOTES techniques were compared to those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. All patients underwent a successful surgical procedure with no intra- or postoperative complications and provided no specific complaints during the 10th day and a monthly follow-up for 2 years. The patients convalesced promptly with healthy and satisfactory cosmetic results. Compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy, the hybrid NOTES operation had less postoperative pain, lower cost, and shorter hospitalization. Hybrid NOTES procedures can be performed safely using a solo-umbilical trocar. Our initial experience reveals that this hybrid technique is practically feasible and associated with minimal postoperative pain, reasonable convalescence time, and improved cosmetic outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document