scholarly journals Morbidity and mortality in elderly patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 3-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen C. Hol ◽  
Joos Heisterkamp ◽  
Ingrid S. Martijnse ◽  
Robert A. Matthijsen ◽  
Barbara S. Langenhoff
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

PS01.218: MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Jeroen Hol ◽  
Joos Heisterkamp ◽  
Barbara Langenhoff
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery are at higher risk for postoperative complications and mortality. Currently available literature on elderly patients undergoing an esophagectomy is inconclusive and dates back from the time before minimally invasive techniques were implemented. Methods Length of hospital stay, 90-day morbidity and mortality were analyzed from patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) between 2014 and 2017 in a single center. Data from patients aged 76 years or older was compared to the cohort of patients aged 71 to 75 years old. Results From a consecutive series of in total 187 patients two cohorts were retrieved: 19 patients 76 years or older (group 1) were compared to 41 patients 71 to 75 years old (group 2). Median age was 77 years (76–83) in group 1 and 72 years (71–75) in group 2 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in sex, Charlson comorbidity score, number of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiaton, histological tumor type, tumor stage, number of lymph nodes harvested and type of anastomosis. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay, 90-day morbidity and mortality. The percentage of anastomotic leakage was 21.2% in group 1 and 14.6% in group 2. Mortality was 10.5% and 4.9% respectively. Conclusion No difference was seen in morbidity and mortality after MIE comparing the eldest old to younger old patients. Therefore, patient selection should not be based on calendar age alone. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy for elderly esophageal cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Sugita ◽  
T Nakamura ◽  
R Sawada ◽  
G Takiguchi ◽  
N Urakawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Short And Long Term

Summary The number of elderly patients with esophageal cancer has increased in recent years. The use of thoracoscopic esophagectomy has also increased, and its minimal invasiveness is believed to contribute to postoperative outcomes. However, the short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly patients. This retrospective study included 207 patients who underwent radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at Kobe University Hospital between 2005 and 2014. Patients were divided into non-elderly (&lt;75 years) and elderly (≥75 years) groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed for sex and clinical T and N stage, with a total of 29 matched pairs. General preoperative data, surgical procedures, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, in-hospital death, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were compared between groups. The elderly group was characterized by lower preoperative serum albumin levels and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. Intraoperative data and postoperative complications did not differ between the groups. The in-hospital death rate was 4% in the elderly group, which did not significantly differ from the non-elderly group. Cancer-specific survival was similar between the two groups. Although overall survival tended to be poor in the elderly group, it was not significantly worse than that of the non-elderly group. In conclusion, the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly versus non-elderly patients were acceptable. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a safe and feasible modality for elderly patients with appropriate indications.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: The First Experience from Pakistan

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farrukh Hassan Rizvi ◽  
Syed Shahrukh Hassan Rizvi ◽  
Aamir Ali Syed ◽  
Shahid Khattak ◽  
Ali Raza Khan
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Transhiatal Esophagectomy ◽  
Learning Phase ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

Background. Two common procedures for esophageal resection are Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and transhiatal esophagectomy. Both procedures have high morbidity rates of 20–46%. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has been introduced to decrease morbidity. We report initial experience of MIE to determine the morbidity and mortality associated with this procedure during learning phase.Material and Methods. Patients undergoing MIE at our institute from January 2011 to May 2013 were reviewed. Record was kept for any morbidity and mortality. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and continuous variables were presented as median. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier curves.Results. We performed 51 minimally invasive esophagectomies. Perioperative morbidity was in 16 (31.37%) patients. There were 3 (5.88%) anastomotic leaks. We encountered 1 respiratory complication. Reexploration was required in 3 (5.88%) patients. Median operative time was 375 minutes. Median hospital stay was 10 days. The most frequent long-term morbidity was anastomotic narrowing observed in 5 (9.88%) patients. There were no perioperative mortalities. Our mean overall survival was 37.66 months (95% confidence interval 33.75 to 41.56 months). Mean disease-free survival was 24.43 months (95% CI 21.26 to 27.60 months).Conclusion. Minimally invasive esophagectomy, when performed in the learning phase, has acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 925-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingpei Li ◽  
Yaxing Shen ◽  
Lijie Tan ◽  
Mingxiang Feng ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

2019 ◽  
pp. 308-318
Author(s):  
Brandon Merling ◽  
Frank Dupont
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Anesthetic Management ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Common Causes

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy worldwide, producing a high morbidity and mortality rate around the globe. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is most commonly performed on patients with this devastating disease. Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure, and perioperative mortality remains around 5%–8%. Because esophageal cancer is associated with chronic alcohol and tobacco use, patients have serious comorbid conditions that affect anesthetic management and perioperative care. Among them, pulmonary complications and anastomotic failure remain the most common causes of perioperative morbidity and mortality. The anesthesiologist managing a patient during MIE must be able to reduce the effect of the patient’s multiple comorbidities intraoperatively while mitigating the factors that lead to adverse postoperative outcomes.

scholarly journals TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY 3D HD FOR THORACIC ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-146
Author(s):  
F. Achim ◽  
M. Gheorghe ◽  
A. Constantin ◽  
P. Hoara ◽  
C. Popa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Advanced Technology ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Esophageal Reconstruction ◽  
Thoracic Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

Esophagectomy is a major surgical procedure with morbidity, and mortality related to the patient&#39;scondition, stage of the disease at the moment of diagnosis, complementary treatments and surgicalexperience of the surgeon. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) may lead to a reduction inperioperative morbidity and mortality with an acceptable quality of life and similar oncologic resultsto an open approach. We present an experience of the Center of Excellence in Esophageal Surgeryregarding totally MIE through thoracolaparoscopic modified McKeown triple approach, followedby esophageal reconstruction by gastric intrathoracic pull-up and cervical esophagogastricanastomosis and feeding jejunostomy in a patient with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwentpreoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The short-term outcomes of the totally minimallyinvasive esophagectomy procedure were very encouraging. The overall operative times were:thoracoscopic - 120 minutes, laparoscopic - 130 minutes and cervical - 50 minutes with a total of360 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 200 ml. The postoperative outcome was favorablewith early feeding on the jejunostomy. The control of cervical anastomosis was performed in the 6thday postoperative and the patient was discharged in the 10th day postoperative without anysymptomatology. At the first and third-month follow-up was not reported any postoperativecomplications. The totally minimally invasive approach using advanced technology of endoscopicsurgery allowed for this patient a simple postoperative evolution, no major complications and agood recovery after extensive surgery. The solid experience in open esophageal surgery ofUpper Gastro-Intestinal surgeons provides a fast learning curve of complex minimally invasivesurgical procedures with reduced perioperative morbidity. Long-term follow-up can confirm theresults from the literature regarding the survival, which is expected to be for these patients atleast equivalent with outcomes after open esophagectomy.

551 INCREASED POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY AFTER TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaj Baranov ◽  
Nikolaj Baranov ◽  
Frans Van Workum ◽  
Camiel Rosman
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Outcome Parameters ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract   The incidence of elderly patients with esophageal cancer is increasing. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy between elderly patients and younger patients and to compare outcomes after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) in these age groups. Methods Data was retrieved from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA), a national surgical outcome registry. The primary outcome parameter was severe complications, defined as Clavien Dindo ≥3. Secondary outcome parameters were postoperative complications, reintervention rate, length of hospital stay and mortality. Outcome parameters were compared between patients aged ≥75 years and &lt; 75 years and between TMIE and OE in these age groups. We adjusted for the following casemix parameters: gender, Charlson Co-morbidity Index score ASA score and neoadjuvant therapy. A sensitivity analysis was performed with different age groups: &lt;65, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79 and ≥ 80 years. Results Of all 5539 included patients 14.0% were aged ≥75 years and 86.0% were aged &lt;75 years. Severe complications were observed more frequently in the elderly group compared to the younger group (RR = 1.15 [1.04–1.27], p = 0.007). Interestingly, there was an increased risk of severe complications after TMIE in both the elderly group (RR = 1.50 [1.19–1.90], p = 0.001) and the younger group (RR = 1.41 [1.28–1.56], p &lt; 0.001). No difference in mortality between TMIE and OE was found. Sensitivity analyses of TMIE compared to OE across all age groups showed increased risk of severe complications. Adjustment for casemix for all analysis did not change the results. Conclusion Severe complications after esophagectomy occur more frequently in elderly compared to younger patients. TMIE in elderly patients did not result in less morbidity and was in fact associated with more severe complications compared to OE across all age groups, which may be due to a learning curve effect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document