PS01.218: MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Jeroen Hol ◽  
Joos Heisterkamp ◽  
Barbara Langenhoff

Abstract Background Elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery are at higher risk for postoperative complications and mortality. Currently available literature on elderly patients undergoing an esophagectomy is inconclusive and dates back from the time before minimally invasive techniques were implemented. Methods Length of hospital stay, 90-day morbidity and mortality were analyzed from patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) between 2014 and 2017 in a single center. Data from patients aged 76 years or older was compared to the cohort of patients aged 71 to 75 years old. Results From a consecutive series of in total 187 patients two cohorts were retrieved: 19 patients 76 years or older (group 1) were compared to 41 patients 71 to 75 years old (group 2). Median age was 77 years (76–83) in group 1 and 72 years (71–75) in group 2 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in sex, Charlson comorbidity score, number of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiaton, histological tumor type, tumor stage, number of lymph nodes harvested and type of anastomosis. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay, 90-day morbidity and mortality. The percentage of anastomotic leakage was 21.2% in group 1 and 14.6% in group 2. Mortality was 10.5% and 4.9% respectively. Conclusion No difference was seen in morbidity and mortality after MIE comparing the eldest old to younger old patients. Therefore, patient selection should not be based on calendar age alone. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Markar Sheraz ◽  
Ni Melody ◽  
Gisbertz Suzanne ◽  
Straatman Jennifer ◽  
van der Peet Donald ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims The TIME trial showed reduced pulmonary complications from minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) over an open approach, and led to widespread adoption of MIE in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes from minimally invasive esophagectomy in the DUCA (national dataset) and the TIME trial (RCT) for transthoracic esophagectomy1. Methods Original patient data from the TIME trial1 was extracted along-with data from the Dutch National Cancer Audit (DUCA) (2011-2017). Initially univariate analysis was used to compare patient and tumor demographics and clinical and pathological outcomes from patients receiving MIE in the TIME trial and in the DUCA-dataset. Secondly multivariate analysis, with adjustment patient and tumor factors, was performed for the effect of MIE vs. Open esophagectomy on clinical outcomes in both datasets. Thirdly the datasets were combined and multivariate analysis, was performed for the effect of patient inclusion in TIME trial or DUCA-dataset. Results 115 patients from TIME (59 MIE vs. 56 open) and 4605 patients from the DUCA-dataset (2652 MIE vs. 1953 open) were included. Univariate analysis showed, in TIME trial, MIE reduced postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. However in the DUCA-dataset, MIE increased postoperative complications, re-intervention rate and length of hospital stay, however pathological benefits included increased proportion of R0 margin and lymph nodes harvested. Multivariate analysis confirmed the TIME data showed MIE reduced postoperative complications (OR=0.38, 95%CI 0.16–0.90). In the DUCA-dataset, MIE was associated with increased postoperative complications (OR=1.37, 95%CI 1.20–1.55), re-intervention (OR=1.84, 95%CI 1.57–2.14), and length of hospital stay (Coeff=1.57, 95%CI 0.06–3.08). Pathological benefits to MIE in the DUCA-dataset included a reduction in proportion of R1 margin, and increased lymph node harvest. Multivariate analysis of the combined dataset, showed inclusion in the TIME trial was associated with a reduction in postoperative complications (OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.15–0.36) and reoperation rate (OR=0.34, 95%CI 0.17–0.66). Conclusions MIE when adopted nationally outside the TIME-trial, was associated with an increase in postoperative complications and reoperation rate, which may reflect surgeons on a national level going through their proficiency-gain curve in the technique and outside of expert MIE centers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (19) ◽  
pp. 2130-2139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheraz R. Markar ◽  
Melody Ni ◽  
Suzanne S. Gisbertz ◽  
Leonie van der Werf ◽  
Jennifer Straatman ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to examine the external validity of the randomized TIME trial, when minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was implemented nationally in the Netherlands, using data from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) for transthoracic esophagectomy. METHODS Original patient data from the TIME trial were extracted along with data from the DUCA dataset (2011-2017). Multivariate analysis, with adjustment for patient factors, tumor factors, and year of surgery, was performed for the effect of MIE versus open esophagectomy on clinical outcomes. RESULTS One hundred fifteen patients from the TIME trial (59 MIE v 56 open) and 4,605 patients from the DUCA dataset (2,652 MIE v 1,953 open) were included. In the TIME trial, univariate analysis showed that MIE reduced pulmonary complications and length of hospital stay. On the contrary, in the DUCA dataset, MIE was associated with increased total and pulmonary complications and reoperations; however, benefits included increased proportion of R0 margin and lymph nodes harvested, and reduced 30-day mortality. Multivariate analysis from the TIME trial showed that MIE reduced pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.61). In the DUCA dataset, MIE was associated with increased total complications (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.57), pulmonary complications (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29 to 1.74), reoperations (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.14), and length of hospital stay. Multivariate analysis of the combined and MIE datasets showed that inclusion in the TIME trial was associated with a reduction in reoperations, Clavien-Dindo grade > 1 complications, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION When adopted nationally outside the TIME trial, MIE was associated with an increase in total and pulmonary complications and reoperation rate. This may reflect nonexpert surgeons outside of high-volume centers performing this minimally invasive technique in a nonstandardized fashion outside of a controlled environment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 123-123
Author(s):  
Atila Eroglu ◽  
Yener Aydin ◽  
Ali Ulas ◽  
Coskun Daharli

Abstract Background Development of hiatal hernia after esophageal resection is a known complication. However, due to the spread of minimally invasive esophagectomy, complications of hiatal hernia seems to increase. This study aimed to present our cases with hiatal hernia after Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy. Methods After Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy, five cases of hiatal hernia were observed. Patients' age, sex, symptoms, diagnosis, herniated organs, surgical method, morbidity and mortality rates and hospital stay were reviewed. Results Three of the patients were male and two were female. The mean age of the patients was 56.2 years (35–71 years). Hiatal hernia was detected after an average of 1.4 years with minimal invasive esophagectomies (5 months, 1 year, 1 year, 18 months and 3 years respectively). Three of the cases were symptomatic and two cases were asymptomatic. Thorax CT was used in all cases, and two cases were additionally imaged with barium esophagography. Herniated organs were: omentum in 5 cases, transverse colon in 4 cases, small bowel in two cases. All cases were laparoscopically approached. Diaphragmatic defects were repaired using nonabsorbable sutures in all cases. No complication and mortality was observed in patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.9 days (range, 3 to 10 days). Conclusion Hiatal hernia is more frequently seen in minimally invasive esophagectomies than open esophagectomies. Patients undergoing minimal esophagectomy should be closely monitored for hiatal hernia postoperatively. These cases can also be treated by minimally invasive laparoscopy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 3-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen C. Hol ◽  
Joos Heisterkamp ◽  
Ingrid S. Martijnse ◽  
Robert A. Matthijsen ◽  
Barbara S. Langenhoff

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 124-125
Author(s):  
Atila Eroglu ◽  
Coskun Daharli ◽  
Yener Aydin ◽  
Ali Ulas ◽  
Haci Alici

Abstract Background In this study, the efficiency of minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer was examined. Methods A total of 100 consecutive patients who were hospitalized due to esophageal cancer and planned minimally invasive esophagectomy were evaluated prospectively between September 2013 and December 2017 in our clinic. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy was performed in all of the patients included in the study. Inoperable cases were not included in the study. Age and sex of the patients, symptoms, localization of tumor, histopathological type, surgical modality, operation time, length of hospital stay and morbidity and mortality rates were reviewed. Results Thirty-eight (38%) patients were male and 62 (62%) patients were female. The mean age was 55.5 ± 10.8 (32–75 years). The most symptoms were dysphagy (96%) and weight loss (39%). Eighty-one patients (81%) had squamous cell cancer, ten (10%) had adenocarcinoma and nine had another form of esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was performed in 36 of the 100 patients. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy and intrathoracic anastomosis were performed in 94 patients (94%). Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy and neck anastomosis were performed in six patients (6%). The mean duration of operation was 260.1 ± 33.4 minutes (185–335 minutes). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 114.2 ± 191.4 ml (10–800 ml). In 51 (51%) of the patients, complications occurred in perioperative, early postoperative and late postoperative periods. In postoperative complications, anastomotic leak rate was eight patients (8%) and pulmonary complication rate was 21 patients (21%). While mortality was seen in three patients that had diabetes mellitus and hypertension, the 30-day mortality was 2% and the hospital mortality was 3%. The mean hospital stay was 11.2 ± 8.3 days (range 8–44). In our study, the probability of one-year overall survival was 91% and the probability of two years overall survival was 66%. Conclusion Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a safe and preferred method with low mortality, acceptable morbidity, short operative time and short hospital stay and has become a routine approach in the treatment of esophageal cancers. Multicenter studies to be performed in the near future will further assist in defining the benefits of minimally invasive esophagectomy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 230-235
Author(s):  
Ramachandra Chowdappa ◽  
Anvesh Dharanikota ◽  
Ravi Arjunan ◽  
Syed Althaf ◽  
Chennagiri S. Premalata ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is a recent rise in the incidence of esophageal carcinoma in India. Surgical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation is the current treatment modality of choice. Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect many patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) could reduce the pulmonary complications and reduce the postoperative stay. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 114 patients with esophageal cancer in the department of surgical oncology at a tertiary cancer center in South India between January 2019 and March 2020. We included patients with resectable cancer of middle or lower third of the esophagus, and gastroesophageal junction tumors (Siewert I). MIE was performed in 27 patients and 78 patients underwent open esophagectomy (OE). The primary outcome measured was postoperative complications of Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher within 30 days. Other outcomes measured include overall mortality within 30 days, intraoperative complications, operative duration and the length of hospital stay. Results A postoperative complication rate of 18.5% was noted in the MIE group, compared with 41% in the OE group (p = 0.034). Pulmonary complications were noted in 7.4% in the MIE group compared to 25.6% in the OE group (p = 0.044). Postoperative mortality rates, intraoperative complications, and other nonpulmonary postoperative complications were almost similar with MIE as with open esophagectomy. Although the median operative time was more in the MIE group (260 minutes vs. 180 minutes; p < 0.0001), the median length of hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing MIE (9 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.0001). Conclusions We found that MIE resulted in lower incidence of postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications. Although, MIE was associated with prolonged operative duration, it resulted in shorter hospital stay.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5569-5569
Author(s):  
M. A. Gerardi ◽  
A. Santillan ◽  
B. Meisner ◽  
T. P. Diaz-Montes ◽  
G. J. Gardner ◽  
...  

5569 Background: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and economic impact of a clinical pathway including rapid diet advancement for patients undergoing rectosigmoid colectomy as part of cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. Methods: Post-operative management was dictated by surgeon preference in 45 consecutive patients (Group 1) and according to the prescribed clinical pathway in 19 consecutive patients (Group 2). Critical elements of the clinical pathway included: rapid diet advancement, early discontinuance of nasogastric suction, criteria-based utilization of parenteral nutrition, selective laboratory testing, and deferring initiation of chemotherapy until after discharge. Results: The median age was 58 years for Group 1 patients and 67 years for Group 2 patients. Median time to flatus was 6 days for both groups; however, the median time to tolerating diet was 6 days for Group 1, and 4 days for Group 2. Patients in Group 1 had a median length of hospital stay of 12 days (range=5–30 days), a median total 30-day post-operative hospital charge of $42,868 (range=$19,960-$130,252), and a 30-day readmission rate of 33%, compared to 8 days (range=4–28 days) (p=0.020), $32,840 (range=$18,353-$140,283) (p=0.016), and 21% (p=0.379) for Group 2, respectively. Clinical pathway-directed management was associated with a median reduction in hospital charges of $10,027 per patient. Conclusions: A critical pathway incorporating rapid diet advancement for patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery with rectosigmoid colectomy for ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer is feasible, safe, and associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and hospital-related charges and did not increase morbidity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4319-4319
Author(s):  
Meghana Trivedi ◽  
Sue Corringham ◽  
Sam Martinez ◽  
Katherine Medley ◽  
Edward D Ball

Abstract Background: Recovery of neutrophilic granulocytes after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), and thus overall outcome, depends on 2 main factors: the quality and quantity of mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell products (CD34+ cells) and the use of myeloid growth factors, such as granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Methods: We performed a 5-year (from February 2003 to January 2008) retrospective analysis of data to evaluate independent and interdependent influence of number of CD34+ cells and use of G-CSF on outcomes in autologous PBSCT patients. At the time of analysis, the practice at our institution was as follows: Autologous PBSCT patients receiving infusion of &lt; 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg were treated with daily subcutaneous injection of G-CSF (filgrastim 300 mg for &lt; 80 kg; 480 mg for ≥ 80 kg). In these patients, G-CSF was started on Day +5 and was continued until the ANC was &gt; 500/μl. On the other hand, autologous transplant patients who received ≥ 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg did not typically receive G-CSF. If engraftment did not occur after an “expected” length of time, G-CSF treatment was initiated at the discretion of the treating physician. The definition of “expected” length of time, however, varied from practitioner to practitioner. For the analysis, patients were divided in 3 groups: patients who collected &lt; 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg and received G-CSF (group 1, n=103), patients who were infused with ≥ 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg and did not receive G-CSF (group 2, n=155), and patients who received ≥ 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg and were given G-CSF (group 3, n=47). Time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC &gt;500/ml), time to platelet engraftment (platelets &gt; 20,000/ml), and post-transplant length of hospital stay were compared. Results: Median time to neutrophil engraftment was significantly shorter in patients who were treated with G-CSF (11 days) in groups 1 and 3, compared to those who were not (13 days) in group 2 (table 1). Similarly, median post-transplantation hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who did not receive G-CSF (14 days) in group 2 compared to patients who were treated with G-CSF (13 days) in groups 1 and 3. There was no significant difference in time to neutrophil engraftment and post-transplant hospital stay between groups 1 and 3, suggesting that these outcome parameters did not significantly depend on number of CD34+ cells infused in our patients if G-CSF was used. Median time to platelet engraftment was significantly longer in patients receiving &lt; 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg (12 days) in group 1 compared to patients infused with ≥ 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg (10 days) in groups 2 and 3. There was no significant difference in time to platelet engraftment between groups 2 and 3, indicating that G-CSF use did not influence platelet engraftment. Summary: These results suggest that a higher number of CD34+ cells helps accelerate platelet engraftment, but does not influence neutrophil engraftment and post-transplant length of hospital stay, as long as G-CSF treatment is instituted. The use of G-CSF accelerates neutrophil recovery, regardless of the number of CD34+ cells infused, without affecting platelet engraftment in patients undergoing autologous PBSCT. Based on this analysis, the practice at our institution has been revised to use G-CSF in all autologous transplant patients, regardless of the number of CD34+ cells, since this practice reduces the length of hospital stay. Table 1. A retrospective data analysis for patients treated at the UCSD BMT unit with autologous PBPCT from February 2003 to January 2008. The data is represented as a median value with a range indicated in parenthesis. * indicates significant difference from group 1, † indicates significant difference from group 2, and ‡ indicates significant difference from group 3 (p &lt; 0.001, Mann Whitney U test; Graph Pad Prism, version 3.02 (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA)). Abbreviations: ANC-absolute neutrophil count, LOS-length of hospital stay. Group 1 &lt; 5×106/kg (G) (N = 103) Group 2 ≥5×106/kg (no G) (N = 155) Group 3 ≥5×106/kg (G) (N = 47) CD34+ cells (×106/kg) 3.2 †,‡ (1.4–4.98) 6.8 * (5.0–16.7) 7.0 * (5.0–12.3) Initiation of G-CSF Day +5 N/A Day +5 (day 0–day +16) Time to ANC &gt; 500/ml (days) 11 † (9–28) 13 *,‡ (9–21) 11 † (8–17) Time to Platelet &gt; 20,000/ml (days) 12 †,‡ (6–42) 10 * (0–29) 10 * (0–27) Post-Transplant LOS (days) 13 † (10–38) 14 *,‡ (1–43) 13 † (10–18)


Author(s):  
Y Sugita ◽  
T Nakamura ◽  
R Sawada ◽  
G Takiguchi ◽  
N Urakawa ◽  
...  

Summary The number of elderly patients with esophageal cancer has increased in recent years. The use of thoracoscopic esophagectomy has also increased, and its minimal invasiveness is believed to contribute to postoperative outcomes. However, the short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly patients. This retrospective study included 207 patients who underwent radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at Kobe University Hospital between 2005 and 2014. Patients were divided into non-elderly (&lt;75 years) and elderly (≥75 years) groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed for sex and clinical T and N stage, with a total of 29 matched pairs. General preoperative data, surgical procedures, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, in-hospital death, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were compared between groups. The elderly group was characterized by lower preoperative serum albumin levels and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. Intraoperative data and postoperative complications did not differ between the groups. The in-hospital death rate was 4% in the elderly group, which did not significantly differ from the non-elderly group. Cancer-specific survival was similar between the two groups. Although overall survival tended to be poor in the elderly group, it was not significantly worse than that of the non-elderly group. In conclusion, the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly versus non-elderly patients were acceptable. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a safe and feasible modality for elderly patients with appropriate indications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document