Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy for elderly esophageal cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Sugita ◽  
T Nakamura ◽  
R Sawada ◽  
G Takiguchi ◽  
N Urakawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Short And Long Term

Summary The number of elderly patients with esophageal cancer has increased in recent years. The use of thoracoscopic esophagectomy has also increased, and its minimal invasiveness is believed to contribute to postoperative outcomes. However, the short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly patients. This retrospective study included 207 patients who underwent radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at Kobe University Hospital between 2005 and 2014. Patients were divided into non-elderly (<75 years) and elderly (≥75 years) groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed for sex and clinical T and N stage, with a total of 29 matched pairs. General preoperative data, surgical procedures, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, in-hospital death, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were compared between groups. The elderly group was characterized by lower preoperative serum albumin levels and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. Intraoperative data and postoperative complications did not differ between the groups. The in-hospital death rate was 4% in the elderly group, which did not significantly differ from the non-elderly group. Cancer-specific survival was similar between the two groups. Although overall survival tended to be poor in the elderly group, it was not significantly worse than that of the non-elderly group. In conclusion, the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly versus non-elderly patients were acceptable. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a safe and feasible modality for elderly patients with appropriate indications.

PS01.229: SHORT- AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSTHORACIC ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
Yusuke Muneoka ◽  
Yasuyuki Kawachi ◽  
Shigeto Makino ◽  
Yu Sato ◽  
Chie Kitami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Transthoracic Esophagectomy ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Background Recently, the number of elderly patients with esophageal cancer is increasing as the aging of population in Japan. Because of the benefit to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications, minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (MIE) is being increasingly implemented in surgical treatment for esophageal cancer. However, short- and long-term outcomes of MIE in elderly patients have not been fully investigated. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 86 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent MIE between January 2010 and December 2014 at Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital. We classified the patients into two groups according to their age: the elderly group (≥ 75 years old, n = 19) and the non-elderly group (< 75 years old, n = 67). We compared the short- and long-term outcomes between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender, comorbidity, the extent of lymphadenectomy, TNM status, or Stage (0/I/II/III/IVa/IVb: elderly group 1/1/9/8/0/0 vs. non-elderly group 5/12/26/21/2/1). Conversion rate to open esophagectomy is 10.5% in the elderly group and 6.0% in the non-elderly group (P = 0.610). The proportion of patients who received preoperative chemotherapy was significantly lower in the elderly group (21.1% vs. 67.2%, P < 0.01). With regard to surgical outcomes, there were no significant differences in operative time (301 vs. 343 min), the amount of blood loss (126 vs. 110 ml), or the median length of hospital stay (14 vs. 14 days) between the two groups. Overall morbidity was not significantly different between the two groups (47.4% vs. 49.3%, P = 0.885). The incidence of postoperative complications that were ≥  grade II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification was higher in the elderly group, but the difference was not statistically significant (42.1% vs. 25.4%, P = 0.156). The 5-year overall survival rates were 56.8% and 62.9% (P = 0.449), and the 5-year disease specific survival rates were 67.4% and 69.3% in the elderly and non-elderly groups (P = 0.564), respectively. Conclusion MIE in elderly patients with esophageal cancer can be safely performed and the long-term outcome was acceptable. However, there is a possibility of selection bias in this retrospective single-institutional study. Further multi-institutional prospective study is necessary to establish the evidence for clinical benefit of MIE for this disease. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

551 INCREASED POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY AFTER TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaj Baranov ◽  
Nikolaj Baranov ◽  
Frans Van Workum ◽  
Camiel Rosman
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Outcome Parameters ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract   The incidence of elderly patients with esophageal cancer is increasing. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy between elderly patients and younger patients and to compare outcomes after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) in these age groups. Methods Data was retrieved from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA), a national surgical outcome registry. The primary outcome parameter was severe complications, defined as Clavien Dindo ≥3. Secondary outcome parameters were postoperative complications, reintervention rate, length of hospital stay and mortality. Outcome parameters were compared between patients aged ≥75 years and &lt; 75 years and between TMIE and OE in these age groups. We adjusted for the following casemix parameters: gender, Charlson Co-morbidity Index score ASA score and neoadjuvant therapy. A sensitivity analysis was performed with different age groups: &lt;65, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79 and ≥ 80 years. Results Of all 5539 included patients 14.0% were aged ≥75 years and 86.0% were aged &lt;75 years. Severe complications were observed more frequently in the elderly group compared to the younger group (RR = 1.15 [1.04–1.27], p = 0.007). Interestingly, there was an increased risk of severe complications after TMIE in both the elderly group (RR = 1.50 [1.19–1.90], p = 0.001) and the younger group (RR = 1.41 [1.28–1.56], p &lt; 0.001). No difference in mortality between TMIE and OE was found. Sensitivity analyses of TMIE compared to OE across all age groups showed increased risk of severe complications. Adjustment for casemix for all analysis did not change the results. Conclusion Severe complications after esophagectomy occur more frequently in elderly compared to younger patients. TMIE in elderly patients did not result in less morbidity and was in fact associated with more severe complications compared to OE across all age groups, which may be due to a learning curve effect.

Short- and long-term outcomes in patients operated with total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Hauge ◽  
Dag T Førland ◽  
Hans-Olaf Johannessen ◽  
Egil Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Short And Long Term

Summary At our hospital, the main treatment for resectable esophageal cancer (EC) has since 2013 been total minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE). The aim of this study was to present the short- and long-term results in patients operated with TMIE. This cross-sectional study includes all patients scheduled for TMIE from June 2013 to January 2016 at Oslo University Hospital. Data on morbidity, mortality, and survival were retrospectively collected from the patient administration system and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Long-term postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQL) and level of dysphagia were assessed by patients completing the following questionaries: EORTC QLQ-OG25, QLQ-C30, and the Ogilvie grading scale. A total of 123 patients were included in this study with a median follow-up time of 58 months (1–88 months). 85% had adenocarcinoma, 15% squamous cell carcinoma. Seventeen patients (14%) had T1N0M0, 68 (55%) T2-T3N0M0, or T1-T2N1M0 and 38 (31%) had either T3N1M0 or T4anyNM0. Ninety-eight patients (80%) received neoadjuvant (radio)chemotherapy and 104 (85%) had R0 resection. Anastomotic leak rate and 90-days mortality were 14% and 2%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 53%. Patients with tumor free resection margins of &gt;1 mm (R0) had a 5-year survival of 57%. Median 60 months (range 49–80) postoperatively the main symptoms reducing HRQL were anxiety, chough, insomnia, and reflux. Median Ogilvie score was 0 (0–1). In this study, we report relatively low mortality and good overall survival after TMIE for EC. Moreover, key symptoms reducing long-term HRQL were identified.

scholarly journals Specific complications and limitations of robotic esophagectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas E Abbas ◽  
Inderpal S Sarkaria
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Vocal Cord Palsy ◽  
Robotic Platform ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Robotic Esophagectomy ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Careful Assessment

SUMMARY Regardless of the approach to esophagectomy, it is an operation that may be associated with significant risk to the patient. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has the same potential for short- and long-term complications as does open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. These complications include among others, the risk for anastomotic leak, gastric tip necrosis, vocal cord palsy, and chylothorax. Moreover, there are additional risks that are unique to the robotic platform such as hardware or software malfunction. These risks are heavily influenced by numerous factors including the patient’s comorbidities, whether neoadjuvant therapy was administered, and the extent of the surgical team’s experience. The limitations of RAMIE are therefore based on the careful assessment of the patient for operability, the tumor for resectability and the team for surgical ability. This article will tackle the topic of complications and limitations of RAMIE by examining each of these issues. It will also describe the recommended terminology for reporting post-esophagectomy complications.

scholarly journals Short and long-term outcomes of elderly patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with primary anastomosis for cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Kryzauskas ◽  
Augustinas Bausys ◽  
Justas Kuliavas ◽  
Klaudija Bickaite ◽  
Audrius Dulskas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Colorectal Resection ◽  
Primary Anastomosis ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Background The proportion of elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients requiring surgery is increasing. Colorectal resection for left-sided cancers is the most controversial as the primary anastomosis or end-colostomy and open or minimally invasive approaches are available. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients after resection with primary anastomosis for left-sided CRC. Methods The cohort study included left-sided colorectal cancer patients who underwent resection with primary anastomosis. The participants were divided into non-elderly (≤75 years) and elderly (> 75 years) groups. Short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were investigated. Results In total 738 (82%) and 162 (18%) patients were allocated to non-elderly and elderly groups, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was less prevalent in the elderly (42.6% vs 52.7%, p = 0.024) and a higher proportion of these suffered severe or lethal complications (15.4% vs 9.8%, p = 0.040). MIS decreased the odds for postoperative complications (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.19–0.89, p = 0.038). The rate of anastomotic leakage was similar (8.5% vs 11.7%, p = 0.201), although, in the case of leakage 21.1% of elderly patients died within 90-days after surgery. Overall- and disease-free survival was impaired in the elderly. MIS increased the odds for long-term survival. Conclusions Elderly patients suffer more severe complications after resection with primary anastomosis for left-sided CRC. The risk of anastomotic leakage in the elderly and non-elderly is similar, although, leakages in the elderly seem to be associated with a higher 90-day mortality rate. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with decreased morbidity in the elderly.

696 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 2958 CASES IN SINGLE CANCER CENTER

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-feng Leng ◽  
Kexun Li ◽  
Qifeng Wang ◽  
Wenwu He ◽  
Kun Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Open Esophagectomy ◽  
Single Cancer

Abstract   Esophageal cancer is the fourth primary cause of cancer-related death in the male in China.The cornerstone of treatment for resectable esophageal cancer is surgery. With the development of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), it is gradually adopted as an alternative to open esophagectomy (OE) in real-world practice. The purpose of this study is to explore whether MIE vs. OE will bring survival benefits to patients with the advancement of treatment techniques and concepts. Methods Data were obtained from the Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute Esophageal Cancer Case Management Database (SCH-ECCM Database). We retrospective analyzed esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy from Jan. 2010 to Nov. 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: MIE and OE groups. Clinical outcome and survival data were compared using TNM stages of AJCC 8th edition. Results After 65.3 months of median follow-up time, 2958 patients who received esophagectomy were included. 1106 of 2958 patients (37.4%) were underwent MIE, 1533 of 2958 patients (51.8%) were underwent OE. More than half of the patients (56.7%, 1673/2958) were above stage III. The median overall survival (OS) of 2958 patients was 51.6 months (95% CI 45.2–58.1). The MIE group's median OS was 74.6 months compared to 42.4 months in the OE group (95% CI 1.23–1.54, P &lt; 0.001). The OS at 1, 3, and 5 years were 90%, 68%, 58% in the MIE group; 85%, 54%, 42% in the OE group,respectively (P&lt;0.001). Conclusion The nearly 8-year follow-up data from this single cancer center suggests that with the advancement of minimally invasive surgical technology, MIE can bring significant benefits to patients' long-term survival compared with OE. Following the continuous progression of minimally invasive surgery and establishing a mature surgical team, MIE should be encouraged.

Long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to open esophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Eivind Gottlieb-Vedi ◽  
Joonas H. Kauppila ◽  
Fredrik Mattsson ◽  
Mats Lindblad ◽  
Magnus Nilsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Open Esophagectomy

623 MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS OPEN MCKEOWN FOR PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zheng ◽  
Wenqun Xing ◽  
Xianben Liu ◽  
Haibo Sun
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Group 14 ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Open Esophagectomy ◽  
Surgery Department

Abstract   McKeown Minimally invasive esophagectomy(McKeown-MIE) offers advantages in short-term outcomes compared with McKeown open esophagectomy(McKeown-OE). However, debate as to whether MIE is equivalent or better than OE regarding survival outcomes is ongoing. The aim of this study was to compare long-term survival between McKeown-MIE and McKeown-OE in a large cohort of esophageal cancer(EC) patients. Methods We used a prospective database of the Thoracic Surgery Department at our Cancer Hospital and included patients who underwent McKeown-MIE and McKeown-OE for EC during January 1, 2015, to January 6, 2018. The perioperative data and overall survival(OS) rate in the two groups were retrospectively compared. Results We included 502 patients who underwent McKeown-MIE (n = 306) or McKeown-OE (n = 196) for EC. The median age was 63 years. All baseline characteristics were well-balanced between two groups. There was a significantly shorter mean operative time (269.76 min vs. 321.14 min, P &lt; 0.001) in OE group. The 30-day and in hospital mortality were 0 and no difference for 90-day mortality (P = 0.116). The postoperative stay was shorter in MIE group, 14 days and 18 days in the MIE and OE groups(P &lt; 0.001). The OS at 32 months was 76.82% and 64.31% in the MIE and OE groups (P = 0.001); hazard ratio(HR) (95% CI): 2.333 (1.384–3.913). Conclusion These results showed the McKeown-MIE group was associated with a better long-term survival, compared with open-MIE for patients with resectable EC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document