scholarly journals Comparison of outcomes following minimally invasive and open posterior cervical foraminotomy: description of minimally invasive technique and review of literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Platt ◽  
Carter S. Gerard ◽  
John E. O’Toole
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e230166
Author(s):  
Kwang Kiat Sim ◽  
Amanda Foster

Foramen of Winslow hernias is a rare and challenging diagnosis as signs and symptoms are usually non-specific. CT imaging has become the method of choice in diagnosing such conditions preoperatively. Traditionally managed via laparotomy, there has been an increase in the use of the minimally invasive technique in recent times, though experience remains sparse. This is a case of a 73-year-old woman with hepatic flexure herniation through the foramen of Winslow who was managed by the traditional laparotomy approach. A review of the literature was performed to learn key techniques in the use of laparoscopy to manage future cases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 693-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A Ross ◽  
Kelly J Bridges

Abstract BACKGROUND Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a long utilized and commonly performed procedure, but has been supplanted in many cases by anterior procedures. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, posterior foraminotomy may again deserve a prominent place in the treatment of cervical foraminal stenosis. OBJECTIVE To report in detail a successfully utilized minimally invasive technique and the results in a large series of patients, by a single author. METHODS The technique is described and illustrated in detail. A retrospective review of the use of this technique in a large series is reported. RESULTS Precise details of the technique are described with specific attention to complication avoidance. In over 360 cases, there have been no nerve root injuries other than idiopathic C5 palsies, no wound infections, and a single durotomy that required no specific treatment. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy is a well-tolerated and effective procedure which can be performed with minimal complications when attention to detail is maintained.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062098822
Author(s):  
Eirini Giovannopoulou ◽  
Anastasia Prodromidou ◽  
Nikolaos Blontzos ◽  
Christos Iavazzo

Objective. To review the existing studies on single-site robotic myomectomy and test the safety and feasibility of this innovative minimally invasive technique. Data Sources. PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar (from their inception to October 2019), as well as Clinicaltrials.gov databases up to April 2020. Methods of Study Selection. Clinical trials (prospective or retrospective) that reported the outcomes of single-site robotic myomectomy, with a sample of at least 20 patients were considered eligible for the review. Results. The present review was performed in accordance with the guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Four (4) studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 267 patients were included with a mean age from 37.1 to 39.1 years and BMI from 21.6 to 29.4 kg/m2. The mean operative time ranged from 131.4 to 154.2 min, the mean docking time from 5.1 to 5.45 min, and the mean blood loss from 57.9 to 182.62 ml. No intraoperative complications were observed, and a conversion rate of 3.8% was reported by a sole study. The overall postoperative complication rate was estimated at 2.2%, and the mean hospital stay ranged from 0.57 to 4.7 days. No significant differences were detected when single-site robotic myomectomy was compared to the multiport technique concerning operative time, blood loss, and total complication rate. Conclusion. Our findings support the safety of single-site robotic myomectomy and its equivalency with the multiport technique on the most studied outcomes. Further studies are needed to conclude on the optimal minimally invasive technique for myomectomy.


1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHENIE R. LONG ◽  
RALPH V. CLAYMAN ◽  
STEPHEN M. DIERKS ◽  
SHIMON MERETYK ◽  
TERRY BUELNA

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 761-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego I. Ramos-Valadez ◽  
Chirag B. Patel ◽  
Madhu Ragupathi ◽  
Malak B. Bokhari ◽  
T. Bartley Pickron ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document