scholarly journals Esophageal cancer patients’ information management: cross-cultural differences between Dutch and Italian patients in perceived quality of provided oncological information

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 5123-5130
Author(s):  
Luca M. Saadeh ◽  
Annelijn E. Slaman ◽  
Eleonora Pinto ◽  
Suzanne S. Gisbertz ◽  
Francesco Cavallin ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S1226
Author(s):  
Luca Maria Saadeh ◽  
Annelijn E. Slaman ◽  
Eleonora Pinto ◽  
Suzanne S. Gisbertz ◽  
Francesco Cavallin ◽  
...  

Autism ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 1993-2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Gillespie-Lynch ◽  
Nidal Daou ◽  
Maria-Jose Sanchez-Ruiz ◽  
Steven K Kapp ◽  
Rita Obeid ◽  
...  

Although stigma negatively impacts autistic people globally, the degree of stigma varies across cultures. Prior research suggests that stigma may be higher in cultures with more collectivistic orientations. This study aimed to identify cultural values and other individual differences that contribute to cross-cultural differences in autism stigma (assessed with a social distance scale) between college students in Lebanon ( n = 556) and those in the United States ( n = 520). Replicating prior work, stigma was lower in women than men and in the United States relative to Lebanon. Heightened autism knowledge, quality of contact with autistic people, openness to experience, and reduced acceptance of inequality predicted lower stigma. Collectivism was not associated with heightened stigma. Findings highlight the need to address structural inequalities, combat harmful misconceptions, and foster positive contact to combat stigma.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Lucchetti ◽  
Rodolfo Furlan Damiano ◽  
Lisabeth F. DiLalla ◽  
Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti ◽  
Ivana Lúcia Damásio Moutinho ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice

Abstract The argument against innatism at the heart of Cognitive Gadgets is provocative but premature, and is vitiated by dichotomous thinking, interpretive double standards, and evidence cherry-picking. I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation and mindreading, the relevance of twin studies, and the meaning of cross-cultural differences in theory of mind development. Reaching an integrative understanding of genetic inheritance, plasticity, and learning is a formidable task that demands a more nuanced evolutionary approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document