scholarly journals Non-weight-bearing short knee radiographs to evaluate coronal alignment before total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Sheng Pan ◽  
Chaoran Huang ◽  
Xingchen Zhang ◽  
Ruxin Ruan ◽  
Ziwen Yan ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Hideki Mizu-uchi ◽  
Hidehiko Kido ◽  
Tomonao Chikama ◽  
Kenta Kamo ◽  
Satoshi Kido ◽  
...  

AbstractThe optimal placement within 3 degrees in coronal alignment was reportedly achieved in only 60 to 80% of patients when using an extramedullary alignment guide for the tibial side in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This probably occurs because the extramedullary alignment guide is easily affected by the position of the ankle joint which is difficult to define by tibial torsion. Rotational direction of distal end of the extramedullary guide should be aligned to the anteroposterior (AP) axis of the proximal tibia to acquire optimal coronal alignment in the computer simulation studies; however, its efficacy has not been proven in a clinical setting. The distal end of the guide can be overly displaced from the ideal position when using a conventional guide system despite the alignment of the AP axis to the proximal tibia. This study investigated the effect of displacement of the distal end of extramedullary guide relative to the tibial coronal alignment while adjusting the rotational alignment of the distal end to the AP axis of the proximal tibia in TKA. A total of 50 TKAs performed in 50 varus osteoarthritic knees using an image-free navigation system were included in this study. The rotational alignment of the proximal side of the guide was adjusted to the AP axis of the proximal tibia. The position of the distal end of the guide was aligned to the center of the ankle joint as viewed from the proximal AP axis (ideal position) and as determined by the navigation system. The tibial intraoperative coronal alignments were recorded as the distal end was moved from the ideal position at 3-mm intervals. The intraoperative alignments were 0.5, 0.9, and 1.4 degrees in valgus alignment with 3-, 6-, and 9-mm medial displacements, respectively. The intraoperative alignments were 0.7, 1.2, and 1.7 degrees in varus alignment with 3-, 6-, and 9-mm lateral displacements, respectively. In conclusion, the acceptable tibial coronal alignment (within 2 degrees from the optimal alignment) can be achieved, although some displacement of the distal end from the ideal position can occur after the rotational alignment of the distal end of the guide is adjusted to the AP axis of the proximal tibia.


The Knee ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1262-1271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monther A. Gharaibeh ◽  
Elizabeth Monk ◽  
Darren B. Chen ◽  
Samuel J. MacDessi

Author(s):  
Kartik M. Varadarajan ◽  
Angela Moynihan ◽  
Darryl D’Lima ◽  
Clifford W. Colwell ◽  
Harry E. Rubash ◽  
...  

Accurate knowledge of in vivo articular contact kinematics and contact forces is required to quantitatively understand factors limiting life of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants, such as polyethylene component wear and implant loosening [1]. Determination of in vivo tibiofemoral contact forces has been a challenging issue in biomechanics. Historically, instrumented tibial implants have been used to measure tibiofemoral forces in vitro [2] and computational models involving inverse dynamic optimization have been used to estimate joint forces in vivo [3]. Recently, D’Lima et al. reported the first in vivo measurement of 6DOF tibiofemoral forces via an instrumented implant in a TKA patient [4]. However this technique does not provide a direct estimation of tibiofemoral contact forces in the medial and lateral compartments. Recently, a dual fluoroscopic imaging system has been used to accurately determine tibiofemoral contact locations on the medial and lateral tibial polyethylene surfaces [5]. The objective of this study was to combine the dual fluoroscope technique and the instrumented TKAs to determine the dynamic 3D articular contact kinematics and contact forces on the medial and lateral tibial polyethylene surfaces during functional activities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Moewis ◽  
Hagen Hommel ◽  
Adam Trepczynski ◽  
Leonie Krahl ◽  
Philipp von Roth ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Michel P. Bonnin ◽  
Lucas Beckers ◽  
Augustin Leon ◽  
Jules Chauveau ◽  
Jacobus H. Müller ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (2) ◽  
pp. 170-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lam Tin Cheung ◽  
B. A. Lanting ◽  
R. W. McCalden ◽  
X. Yuan ◽  
S. J. MacDonald ◽  
...  

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term inducible displacement of cemented tibial components ten years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods A total of 15 patients from a previously reported prospective trial of fixation using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) were examined at a mean of 11 years (10 to 11) postoperatively. Longitudinal supine RSA examinations were acquired at one week, one year, and two years postoperatively and at final follow-up. Weight-bearing RSA examinations were also undertaken with the operated lower limb in neutral and in maximum internal rotation positions. Maximum total point motion (MTPM) was calculated for the longitudinal and inducible displacement examinations (supine versus standing, standing versus internal rotation, and supine versus standing with internal rotation). Results All patients showed some inducible displacement. Two patients with radiolucent lines had greater mean standing-supine MTPM displacement (1.35; sd 0.38) compared with the remaining patients (0.68; sd 0.36). These two patients also had a greater mean longitudinal MTPM at ten years (0.64; sd 0.50) compared with the remaining patients (0.39; sd 0.13 mm). Conclusion Small inducible displacements in well-fixed cemented tibial components were seen ten years postoperatively, of a similar magnitude to that which has been reported for well-fixed components one to two years postoperatively. Greater displacements were found in components with radiolucent lines. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:170–5.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1013-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
De‐si Ma ◽  
Zhi‐wei Wang ◽  
Liang Wen ◽  
Shi‐xiang Ren ◽  
Yuan Lin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document