scholarly journals Clinical characteristics and prediction model of long-term survival of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1439-1448
Author(s):  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Deruo Liu
1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1185-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Thomas ◽  
Christian Rübe ◽  
Michael Semik ◽  
Michael von Eiff ◽  
Lutz Freitag ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: The objective of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of an intensive trimodality approach in stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with NSCLC and biopsy-proven N2 nodes (IIIA; n = 25) or N3 nodes or T4 lesions (IIIB; n = 29) were administered two initial cycles of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide; subsequent radiotherapy (45 Gy, twice-daily 1.5 Gy) with concurrent carboplatin and vindesine; and surgery if the patient's disease was resectable or conventional radiotherapy (16 Gy, 2 Gy/d) if the patient's disease was not resectable or incompletely resectable. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (69%) responded to preoperative induction. Forty of 54 patients (74%) had disease that was resectable, with 34 (63%) complete resections (R0). A substantial pathologic response (tumor regression [TR] > 90%) was achieved in 27 of 54 patients (50%) and is revealed as an independent predictor for long-term survival after surgery. Five treatment-related deaths (9%) occurred. With a median follow-up period of 44 months, calculated survival rates at 3 years were 35% for patients with stage IIIA disease, 26% for patients with stage IIIB disease, and 56% for patients with R0 disease and TR > 90%. CONCLUSION: This trimodality approach is feasible and results in encouraging 3-year survival rates in prognostically unfavorable patients with stage III NSCLC. Patients experiencing a 90% degree of pathologic TR were most likely to achieve long-term survival.


2014 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myoung-Rin Park ◽  
Yeon-Hee Park ◽  
Jae-Woo Choi ◽  
Dong-Il Park ◽  
Chae-Uk Chung ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Bruni ◽  
Vieri Scotti ◽  
Paolo Borghetti ◽  
Stefano Vagge ◽  
Salvatore Cozzi ◽  
...  

IntroductionFor unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the standard therapy consists of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab maintenance for responding patients. The present study reports on the safety and outcome of durvalumab use after CRT in a real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort.MethodsTwo hundred thirty-eight patients have been included. We collected data on systemic therapy, radiation therapy, the timing between CRT and durvalumab, number of durvalumab cycles, reasons for non-starting or discontinuation, incidence and grade of adverse events (AEs), and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsOne hundred fifty-five patients out of 238 (65.1%) received at least one durvalumab dose: 91 (58.7%) after concomitant CRT (cCRT) and 64 (41.3%) after sequential CRT (sCRT). Programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status was unknown in 7/155 (4.5%), negative in 14 (9.1%), and positive ≥1% in 134/155 (86.4%). The main reasons for non-starting durvalumab were progression (10.1%), PD-L1 negativity (7.5%), and lung toxicity (4.6%). Median follow-up time was 14 months (range 2–29); 1-year PFS and OS were 83.5% (95%CI: 77.6–89.7) and 97.2% (95%CI: 94.6–99.9), respectively. No significant differences in PFS or OS were detected for cCRT vs. sCRT, but the median PFS was 13.5 months for sCRT vs. 23 months for cCRT. Potentially immune-related AEs were recorded in 76/155 patients (49.0%). Pneumonitis was the most frequent, leading to discontinuation in 11/155 patients (7.1%).ConclusionsDurvalumab maintenenace after concurrent or sequential chemoradiation for unresectable, stage III NSCLC showed very promising short-term survival results in a large, multicenter, restrospective, real-world study. Durvalumab was the first drug obtaining a survival benefit over CRT within the past two decades, and the present study contributes to validating its use in clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Ricciardi ◽  
Federico Davini ◽  
Carmelina C. Zirafa ◽  
Gaetano Romano ◽  
Franca M. A. Melfi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document