Should optimal supportive care alone be the standard of care for brain metastases patients from non-small cell lung cancer, who are not eligible for radiosurgery or surgery?

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (S7) ◽  
pp. S1320-S1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
May N. Tsao
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Myelopreservation and reduced use of supportive care with trilaciclib in patients with small cell lung cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12096-12096
Author(s):  
Jared Weiss ◽  
Jerome Goldschmidt ◽  
Andric Zoran ◽  
Konstantin H. Dragnev ◽  
Yili Pritchett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

12096 Background: Chemotherapy (CT) is a mainstay of cancer treatment; however, its side effects, notably myelosuppression, cause significant suffering. Trilaciclib (T) is an IV CDK4/6 inhibitor that protects hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by preventing proliferation during CT administration. Results from three randomized, double-blind, placebo (P)-controlled phase II trials in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have previously been reported. Data from these studies were pooled to understand the effects of T on specific myelosuppression endpoints with greater statistical precision. Methods: All pts received standard CT (etoposide/carboplatin [E/C], E/C/atezolizumab, or topotecan) plus T or P. Analyses were conducted on pooled intent-to-treat datasets from three ES-SCLC studies (NCT02499770; NCT03041311; NCT02514447). Results: 123 pts were treated with T and 119 with P. Median age in both groups was 64 years. Addition of T decreased measures of myelosuppression and the need for supportive care interventions (Table). From the pooled dataset, median OS and PFS (months [95% CI]) were comparable between pts treated with T vs P (OS: 10.6 [9.1, 11.7] vs 10.6 [7.9, 12.8]; PFS: 5.3 [4.6, 6.1] vs 5.0 [4.4, 5.5], respectively). Fewer pts on T had grade 3/4 hematologic events (54 [44.3%]) vs P (91 [77.1%]). Among pts who continued after cycle 1, 11 pts (9.2%) treated with T had ≥1 CT dose reduction vs 36 (30.8%) with P. Conclusions: T significantly and meaningfully reduced both CT-induced myelosuppression and its consequences, with no detrimental effect on PFS or OS, thus improving the patient experience with CT in ES-SCLC. T has potential to become a new standard of care for preventing myelosuppression in SCLC. [Table: see text]

Landmark Studies of Targeted Therapies for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Guide for Pulmonologists

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Adrien Costantini ◽  
Theodoros Katsikas ◽  
Clementine Bostantzoglou
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma ◽  
Mutational Status

Over the past decade, major breakthroughs in the understanding of lung cancer histology and mutational pathways have radically changed diagnosis and management. More specifically, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), tumour characterisation has shifted from differentiating based solely on histology to characterisation that includes genetic profiling and mutational status of Epidermal Growth Factor (EGFR), Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) and BRAF. These genetic alterations can be targeted by specific drugs that result in improved progression-free survival, as well as higher response rates and are currently standard of care for NSCLC patients harbouring these mutations. In this a narrative, non-systematic review we aim to handpick through the extensive literature and critically present the ground-breaking studies that lead to the institution of tailored treatment options as the standard of care for the main targetable genetic alterations.

scholarly journals 38P Brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer in era of molecularly driven therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. S714-S715
Author(s):  
S. Rakshit ◽  
R. Bansal ◽  
A. Desai ◽  
K. Leventakos
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

scholarly journals Correlation of Clinical Parameters with Intracranial Outcome in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Pd-1/Pd-L1 Inhibitors as Monotherapy

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1562
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Rounis ◽  
Marcus Skribek ◽  
Dimitrios Makrakis ◽  
Luigi De Petris ◽  
Sofia Agelaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Small Cell Lung

There is a paucity of biomarkers for the prediction of intracranial (IC) outcome in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) with brain metastases (BM). We identified 280 NSCLC pts treated with ICIs at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden, and University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece. The inclusion criteria for response assessment were brain metastases (BM) prior to ICI administration, radiological evaluation with CT or MRI for IC response assessment, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as monotherapy, and no local central nervous system (CNS) treatment modalities for ≥3 months before ICI initiation. In the IC response analysis, 33 pts were included. Non-primary (BM not present at diagnosis) BM, odds ratio (OR): 13.33 (95% CI: 1.424–124.880, p = 0.023); no previous brain radiation therapy (RT), OR: 5.49 (95% CI: 1.210–25.000, p = 0.027); and age ≥70 years, OR: 6.19 (95% CI: 1.27–30.170, p = 0.024) were associated with increased probability of IC disease progression. Two prognostic groups (immunotherapy (I-O) CNS score) were created based on the abovementioned parameters. The I-O CNS poor prognostic group B exhibited a higher probability for IC disease progression, OR: 27.50 (95% CI: 2.88–262.34, p = 0.004). Age, CNS radiotherapy before the start of ICI treatment, and primary brain metastatic disease can potentially affect the IC outcome of NSCLC pts with BM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document