scholarly journals School-Based Health Centers: Cost–Benefit Analysis and Impact on Health Care Disparities

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
pp. 1617-1623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff J. Guo ◽  
Terrance J. Wade ◽  
Wei Pan ◽  
Kathryn N. Keller
2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 367-371
Author(s):  
B. Larijani ◽  
O. Ameli ◽  
K. Alizadeh ◽  
S. R. Mirsharifi

We aimed to provide a prioritized list of preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and their appropriate classification based on a cost-benefit analysis. Functional benchmarking was used to select a rationing model. Teams of qualified specialists working in community hospitals scored procedures from CPTTM according to their cost and benefit elements. The prioritized list of services model of Oregon, United States of America was selected as the functional benchmark. In contrast to its benchmark, our country’s prioritized list of services is primarily designed to help the government in policy-making with the rationing of health care resources, especially for hospitals


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2333794X1988419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayley Love ◽  
Nirmita Panchal ◽  
John Schlitt ◽  
Caroline Behr ◽  
Samira Soleimanpour

Telehealth is a growing model of delivering health care. School-based health centers (SBHCs) provide access to health care for youth in schools and increasingly use telehealth in care delivery. This article examines the recent growth of telehealth use in SBHCs, and characteristics of SBHCs using telehealth, including provider types, operational characteristics, and schools and students served. The percentage of SBHCs using telehealth grew from 7% in 2007-2008 to 19% in 2016-2017. Over 1 million students in over 1800 public schools have access to an SBHC using telehealth, which represents 2% of students and nearly 2% of public schools in the United States. These SBHCs are primarily in rural communities and sponsored by hospitals. This growing model presents an opportunity to expand health care access to youth, particularly in underserved areas in the United States and globally. Further research is needed to fully describe how telehealth programs are implemented in school settings and their potential impacts.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Stryckman ◽  
Thomas L. Grace ◽  
Peter Schwarz ◽  
David Marcozzi

AbstractObjectiveTo demonstrate the application of economics to health care preparedness by estimating the financial return on investment in a substate regional emergency response team and to develop a financial model aimed at sustaining community-level disaster readiness.MethodsEconomic evaluation methods were applied to the experience of a regional Pennsylvania response capability. A cost-benefit analysis was performed by using information on funding of the response team and 17 real-world events the team responded to between 2008 and 2013. By use of the results of the cost-benefit analysis as well as information on the response team’s catchment area, a risk-based insurance-like membership model was built.ResultsThe cost-benefit analysis showed a positive return after 6 years of investment in the regional emergency response team. Financial modeling allowed for the calculation of premiums for 2 types of providers within the emergency response team’s catchment area: hospitals and long-term care facilities.ConclusionThe analysis indicated that preparedness activities have a positive return on their investment in this substate region. By applying economic principles, communities can estimate their return on investment to make better business decisions in an effort to increase the sustainability of emergency preparedness programs at the regional level. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:344–348)


1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Johannesson

AbstractThe costs included in economic evaluations of health care vary from study to study. Based on the theory of cost-benefit analysis, the costs that should be included in an economic evaluation are those not already included in the measurement of willingness to pay (net willingness to pay above any treatment costs paid by the individual) in a cost-benefit analysis or in the easurement of effectiveness in a cost-effectiveness analysis. These costs can be defined as the onsumption externality of the treatment (the change in production minus consumption for those included in the treatment program). For a full economic evaluation, the consequences for those included in the treatment program and a caring externality (altruism) should also be added.


2016 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T. Koenig ◽  
Mary M. Ramos ◽  
Tara T. Fowler ◽  
Kristin Oreskovich ◽  
Jane McGrath ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
Mary Huang

Since the 1980s, the number of school-based health centers has increased due to funding that lead to recognition by policy makers and health organizations. The mission was to provide comprehensive pediatric health care to children with limited access to health care and the uninsured. The goal was to decrease school absenteeism and missed work days by providing convenient primary and acute care while children are in school. For sponsoring organizations managing school-based clinics, allowing parents to be absent during clinic visits met its mission. However, the ease of young children receiving health care in the school setting without being accompanied by their parents has positioned nurse practitioners in an ethical and legal dilemma. Asking a young child significant health history during a physical examination or having them describe their chief complaints during an acute visit may not be the best way to provide good care to our young patients. Additionally, what are the legal responsibilities of a nurse practitioner when caring for a child without active participation of the parent? Little has been documented in the past about the dilemmas nurse practitioners face in school clinic settings. With increasing use and recognition of school-based health centers in the United States, the need for more discussion is required to explore solutions to provide quality comprehensive care for patients and their families.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document