scholarly journals Bilateral International Health Programs of the United States

1951 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1473-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Van Zile Hyde
Author(s):  
Joseph Cornelius Spears, Jr. ◽  
Sean T. Coleman

The COVID-19 pandemic assumed an international health threat, and in turn, spotlighted the distinct disparities in civil rights, opportunity, and inclusion witnessed by lived experiences of African Americans. Although these harsh disparities have existed through the United States of America's history, the age of technology and mass media in the 21st century allows for a deeper and broader look into the violation of African Americans civil liberties in virtual real time. Also, historically, the sports world has been instrumental in fighting for the civil rights of African Americans; athletes such as Jesse Owens and Muhammed Ali led by example. This chapter will showcase how the sports world continues to support social justice overall and specifically during this international pandemic. The authors will examine contemporary events like the transition in support for Colin Kaepernick's protest against police brutality and the NBA play-off (Bubble) protest in 2020.


Author(s):  
Theodore F. Schoenborn

It is a pleasure to be here today to speak to you about the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, which is landmark legislation by any measure applied to it. The Act applies to every employer affecting commerce in the United States and its territories which was not covered by other Federal occupational safety and health laws, such as the Metal and Non-metallic Mine Act, the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act and the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. By 1973 a study is to be completed containing recommendations for combining all Federal occupational safety and health programs. Paper published with permission.


2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer B. Unger ◽  
Claradina Soto ◽  
Natalie Thomas

1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria da Gloria Miotto Wright ◽  
Charles Godue ◽  
Maricel Manfredi ◽  
Denise M. Korniewicz

2017 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Archer

This brief essay will begin to address the feasibility of operating a Catholic healthcare system without reimbursement from government healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. This question stems from the recent ACA/HHS “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities” final rule. Summary The average hospital in the United States receives 40-50 percent of its net revenues from governmental sources. Participation in Medicare is contingent upon the hospital having a Medicare provider agreement. Participation in other governmental programs (Medicaid) as well as most commercial insurance is also contingent upon that agreement. Hospitals, including “Catholic” hospitals, cannot survive without a Medicare provider agreement. That agreement may be terminated for non-compliance with Medicare and other governmental regulations such as the recent ACA/HHS “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities” final rule, which could require “Catholic” hospitals to provide services which violate moral principals of the Church.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document