Surgical Repair Did Not Improve Functional Outcomes More Than Conservative Treatment for Degenerative Rotator Cuff Tears

2016 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiji Itoi
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears

Surgical repair versus conservative treatment and subacromial decompression for the treatment of rotator cuff tears

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (9) ◽  
pp. 1100-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Schemitsch ◽  
J. Chahal ◽  
M. Vicente ◽  
L. Nowak ◽  
P-H. Flurin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Subacromial Decompression ◽  
The Difference ◽  
One Year ◽  
Meta Analyses

Aims The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of surgical repair to conservative treatment and subacromial decompression for the treatment of chronic/degenerative tears of the rotator cuff. Materials and Methods PubMed, Cochrane database, and Medline were searched for randomized controlled trials published until March 2018. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality, and data were extracted for statistical analysis. The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results Six studies were included. Surgical repair resulted in a statistically significantly better Constant–Murley Score (CMS) at one year compared with conservative treatment (mean difference 6.15; p = 0.002) and subacromial decompression alone (mean difference 5.81; p = 0.0004). In the conservatively treated group, 11.9% of patients eventually crossed over to surgical repair. Conclusion The results of this review show that surgical repair results in significantly improved outcomes when compared with either conservative treatment or subacromial decompression alone for degenerative rotator cuff tears in older patients. However, the magnitude of the difference in outcomes between surgery and conservative treatment may be small and the ‘success rate’ of conservative treatment may be high, allowing surgeons to be judicious in choosing those patients who are most likely to benefit from surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1100–1106.

Comparing surgical repair with conservative treatment for degenerative rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1274-1281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik O. Lambers Heerspink ◽  
Jos J.A.M. van Raay ◽  
Rinco C.T. Koorevaar ◽  
Pepijn J.M. van Eerden ◽  
Robin E. Westerbeek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals The Impact of Smoking on Clinical Results Following the Rotator Cuff and Biceps Tendon Complex Arthroscopic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 599
Author(s):  
Jan Zabrzyński ◽  
Gazi Huri ◽  
Maciej Gagat ◽  
Łukasz Łapaj ◽  
Alper Yataganbaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Shoulder Arthroscopy ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Shoulder Injuries ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of smoking and functional outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of complex shoulder injuries: rotator cuff tears (RCTs) with biceps tendon (LHBT) tears. This retrospective case-control study has been conducted on a cohort of patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between 2015 and 2017 due to complex injury treatment. The outcomes were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score, need for non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) consumption and the visual analog scale (VAS). Complications and changes in smoking status were also noted. A cohort of 59 patients underwent shoulder arthroscopy, due to complex LHBT pathology and RCTs, and were enrolled in the final follow-up examination; with mean duration of 26.03 months. According to smoking status, 27 of patients were classified as smokers, and the remaining 32 were non-smokers. In the examined cohort, 36 patients underwent the LHBT tenotomy and 23 tenodesis. We observed a relationship between smoking status and distribution of various RCTs (p < 0.0001). The mean postoperative ASES and UCLA scores were 80.81 and 30.18 in the smoker’s group and 84.06 and 30.93 in the non-smoker’s group, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in pre/postoperative ASES and postoperative UCLA scores between smokers and non-smokers (p > 0.05). The VAS was significantly lower in the non-smokers’ group (p = 0.0021). Multi-tendon injuries of the shoulder are a serious challenge for surgeons, and to obtain an excellent functional outcome, we need to limit the negative risk factors, including smoking. Furthermore, there is a significant association between smoking and the occurrence of massive rotator cuff tears, and the pain level measured by the VAS. Simultaneous surgical treatment of RC and LHBT lesions in the smoker population allowed us to obtain the functional outcomes approximated to non-smokers in the long-term follow-up. Of course, we cannot assert that smoking is the real cause of all complications, however, we may assume that this is a very important, negative factor in shoulder arthroscopy.

Long-term survivorship and outcomes after surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Millett ◽  
Marilee P. Horan ◽  
Katie E. Maland ◽  
Richard J. Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness

scholarly journals Surgeon-operated ultrasonography in a one-stop shoulder clinic

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. 528-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Seagger ◽  
T Bunker ◽  
P Hamer
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Financial Cost ◽  
Time Saving ◽  
One Stop ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Portable Ultrasonography

INTRODUCTION Nearly 1 in 40 of the population seeks medical advice related to a shoulder problem every year. The majority pertain to rotator cuff pathology. Prior to intervention in such patients it is imperative to define whether the tendons are intact or torn. Ultrasonography has become an essential adjunct to clinical assessment in diagnosing rotator cuff tears. This study was designed to investigate if a surgeon using a portable ultrasonography machine in a one-stop shoulder clinic could significantly reduce the time a patient waited from initial outpatient presentation to the end of the treatment episode (be it surgery, injection or conservative management). METHODS A total of 77 patients were allocated to one of two groups: Group A, consisting of 37 patients who were assessed and had ultrasonography as outpatients, and Group B, consisting of 40 patients who were assessed and referred for departmental ultrasonography where appropriate. Three clear outcome groups were defined: those who required surgical repair, those who had irreparable tears and those who declined surgery. RESULTS For all outcomes (surgery, irreparable tears and conservative treatment), the patients in Group A all completed their clinical episodes significantly quicker than those in Group B (p<0.02). As well as the time saving benefits, there was a substantial financial saving for Group A. By performing ultrasonography in the outpatients department, those patients avoided the requirement of departmental imaging (£120) and subsequent follow-up appointments (£73) to discuss results and management, resulting in a saving of nearly £200 per patient. CONCLUSIONS The use of a portable ultrasonography machine by an orthopaedic surgeon can significantly reduce the time to treatment and the financial cost for patients with rotator cuff tears.

scholarly journals Superior Capsular Reconstruction Patients Have High Rates of Return to Sports and Similar Functional Outcomes Compared to a Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Matched Cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0027
Author(s):  
Brandon C. Cabarcas ◽  
Grant Hoerig Garcia ◽  
Joseph Liu ◽  
Gregory Louis Cvetanovich ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Superior Capsular Reconstruction ◽  
One Year

Objectives: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is a relatively new procedure to address irreparable rotator cuff tears and rotator cuff arthropathy. Biomechanical studies have produced favorable results on cadaveric models, but few studies have evaluated clinical outcomes, and none have addressed return to sport (RTS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of RTS and functional outcomes after SCR compared to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) matched cohort. Methods: A prospectively collected registry was queried retrospectively for consecutive patients who underwent SCR from 2015 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were ≥2 tendon irreparable rotator cuff tear by arthroscopic evaluation and minimum one-year follow up. All eligible SCR patients were matched by gender, age, handedness, and follow up time to patients that underwent rTSA with a similar preoperative diagnosis. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon at one institution with consistent operative techniques. Patients were evaluated with the ASES questionnaire, VAS Pain Scale, as well as VR/SF-12 and VR6D. Patients were also administered a detailed outcomes survey regarding surgical history and return to sport and work activities. Results: Overall 75.0% of 32 eligible patients were available at follow up. Average age at surgery and follow up did not significantly differ between cohorts (p>0.500 both). Postoperative outcome scores for ASES, VAS, VR/SF-12, and VR6D did not differ (p>0.310 for all) between cohorts. Overall RTS rate was 77.8% for SCR and 87.5% for rTSA (p > 0.610). Average months to return to sports was significantly greater after SCR (7.3 ± 3.0) compared to rTSA (3.5 ± 2.2; p = 0.032). Patients in both cohorts participated in golf, weight-lifting, gym activity, basketball and cycling postoperatively. Direct RTS for these sports are displayed in Fig. 1. Return to work rate was 71.4% (10/14) SCR and 50.0% (4/8) rTSA (p = 0.326) at average 2.7 ± 2.8 and 1.9 ± 1.9 months, respectively (p = 0.591). Stratified by duty status, rates of return to work were sedentary (100% both SCR and rTSA), light (100% both SCR and rTSA), moderate (0% SCR and 66.67% rTSA), and heavy (0% both SCR and rTSA). Overall, 85.71% SCR patients and 90.0% rTSA patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their general postoperative outcome. Conclusion: At short-term follow-up, SCR patients had RTS rates comparable to rTSA patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, time to RTS was more prolonged after SCR. Outcome scores did not significantly differ between the two cohorts, suggesting that SCR may achieve postoperative function and pain reduction similar to rTSA at one year. Return to work was also similar, although rates were not as high as return to sport. When stratified by duty status, return to more intense physical work demands was not consistent in either cohort. Despite this, over 85% of SCR and rTSA patients were satisfied postoperatively. The findings of this study demonstrate that SCR patients have high RTS levels, as well as similar functional outcomes and satisfaction compared to rTSA for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Clinicians can utilize this information for preoperative counseling, particularly with younger more athletic patients, considering SCR or rTSA for an irreparable rotator cuff tear.

scholarly journals Rotator cuff unloading versus loading exercise program in the conservative treatment of patients with rotator cuff tear: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e040820
Author(s):  
Larissa Pechincha Ribeiro ◽  
Ann Cools ◽  
Paula Rezende Camargo
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tear ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Fear Avoidance ◽  
Fear Avoidance Beliefs ◽  
Cuff Tear ◽  
Shoulder Range Of Motion

IntroductionAtraumatic and degenerative rotator cuff tears are common in individuals over 55 years of age. This condition can have a high impact on social life and is associated with chronic pain, weakness and dysfunction of the upper limb. There is evidence that conservative approaches should be the first treatment option. Conservative treatment usually addresses a variety of therapeutic behaviours without providing scientific arguments for the choice and progression of exercises.ObjectiveTo compare the effects of two different exercise programmes based on the load of the rotator cuff on a population with shoulder pain and rotator cuff tears.Methods and analysisThis is a controlled, randomised, blinded clinical trial. Seventy-eight individuals with shoulder pain and presence of atraumatic and degenerative rotator cuff tear will participate and will be randomly distributed between two groups. The primary outcome will be quality of life (The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index), and secondary outcomes will include pain, function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), fear avoidance beliefs (Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-Brazil), kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale), Pain Catastrophizing Scale, muscle strength of abductors, external and internal rotators of the shoulder, range of motion of arm elevation and patient satisfaction. The treatment will be performed for 12 weeks (2 x/week) acording to the selected group (Rotator Cuff Unloading x Rotator Cuff Loading Exercise Programme).Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board. The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.Trial registration numberNCT03962231.

scholarly journals In situ repair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a critical analysis review

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-144
Author(s):  
Luciano A. Rossi ◽  
Maximiliano Ranalletta
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Overhead Athletes ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Tendon Thickness ◽  
In Situ Repair

After failed conservative management, operative intervention is typically indicated for patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) with persistent pain and disability symptoms. For PTRCTs involving < 50% of the tendon thickness, debridement with or without acromioplasty resulted in favourable outcomes in most studies. For PTRCTs involving > 50% of the tendon thickness, in situ repair has proven to significantly improve pain and functional outcomes for articular and bursal PTRCTs. The few available comparative studies in the literature showed similar functional and structural outcomes between in situ repair and repair after conversion to full-thickness tear for PTRCTs. Most non-overhead athletes return to sports at the same level as previous to the injury after in situ repair of PTRCTs. However, rates of return to preinjury level of competition for overhead athletes have been generally poor regardless of the utilized technique. During long-term follow-up, arthroscopic in situ repair of articular and bursal PTRCTs produced excellent functional outcomes in most patients, with a low rate of revision. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:138-144. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190010

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document