Variability in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Resident Case Log System Practices Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. e22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dane Salazar ◽  
Adam Schiff ◽  
Erika Mitchell ◽  
William Hopkinson
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Accreditation Council ◽  
Graduate Medical

scholarly journals Subspecialty Rotation Exposure Across Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-Accredited Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. e088
Author(s):  
Hayley A. Sacks ◽  
Jeffrey G. Stepan ◽  
Karla Felix ◽  
Todd J. Albert ◽  
Mathias P. Bostrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Accreditation Council ◽  
Graduate Medical

scholarly journals Integrating Mental Practice into a COVID-19 Appropriate Virtual Reality Cataract Surgery Course for Ophthalmology Residents

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. e298-e300
Author(s):  
John C. Lin ◽  
Alfred A. Paul ◽  
Ingrid U. Scott ◽  
Paul B. Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Mental Practice ◽  
Accreditation Council ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Control And Prevention

AbstractTo present a revised, publicly available virtual reality cataract surgery course for ophthalmology residents that integrates a novel mental practice program into the curriculum, fulfills the six core competencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and adheres to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention educational recommendations for the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

scholarly journals Entrustable Professional Activities in Hematopathology Pathology Fellowship Training: Consensus Design and Proposal

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237428952199082
Author(s):  
Kristie White ◽  
Julianne Qualtieri ◽  
Elizabeth L. Courville ◽  
Rose C. Beck ◽  
Bachir Alobeid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Entrustable Professional Activities ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Accreditation Council ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Professional Activities ◽  
Constructive Feedback ◽  
Delphi Approach

Hematopathology fellowship education has grown in complexity as patient-centered treatment plans have come to depend on integration of clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, molecular, and cytogenetic variables. This complexity is in competition with the need for timely hematopathology care with stewardship of patient, laboratory, and societal resources. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones provide a guidance document for hematopathology training, but fellows and their educators are in need of a simple framework that allows assessment and feedback of growth toward independent hematopathology practice. Entrustable professional activities provide one such framework, and herein, we provide proposed Hematopathology Fellowship Entrustable Professional Activities based on review of pertinent guidelines and literature, with multiple rounds of expert and stakeholder input utilizing a modified mini-Delphi approach. Ten core entrustable professional activities deemed essential for graduating hematopathology fellows were developed together with skills and knowledge statements, example scenarios, and corresponding Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones. Application of these entrustable professional activities in program design, fellow evaluation, and decisions regarding level of supervision is discussed with consideration of benefits and barriers to implementation. These entrustable professional activities may be used by hematopathology fellowship directors and faculty to provide fellows with timely constructive feedback, determine entrustment decisions, provide the Clinical Competency Committee with granular data to support Milestone evaluations, and provide insight into areas of potential improvement in fellowship training. Fellows will benefit from a clear roadmap to independent hematopathology practice with concrete and timely feedback.

scholarly journals Entrustable Professional Activities for Pathology

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 237428951771428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy B. McCloskey ◽  
Ronald E. Domen ◽  
Richard M. Conran ◽  
Robert D. Hoffman ◽  
Miriam D. Post ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Clinical Pathology ◽  
Entrustable Professional Activities ◽  
Professional Activity ◽  
Entrustable Professional Activity ◽  
Accreditation Council ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Professional Activities

Competency-based medical education has evolved over the past decades to include the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Accreditation System of resident evaluation based on the Milestones project. Entrustable professional activities represent another means to determine learner proficiency and evaluate educational outcomes in the workplace and training environment. The objective of this project was to develop entrustable professional activities for pathology graduate medical education encompassing primary anatomic and clinical pathology residency training. The Graduate Medical Education Committee of the College of American Pathologists met over the course of 2 years to identify and define entrustable professional activities for pathology graduate medical education. Nineteen entrustable professional activities were developed, including 7 for anatomic pathology, 4 for clinical pathology, and 8 that apply to both disciplines with 5 of these concerning laboratory management. The content defined for each entrustable professional activity includes the entrustable professional activity title, a description of the knowledge and skills required for competent performance, mapping to relevant Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestone subcompetencies, and general assessment methods. Many critical activities that define the practice of pathology fit well within the entrustable professional activity model. The entrustable professional activities outlined by the Graduate Medical Education Committee are meant to provide an initial framework for the development of entrustable professional activity–related assessment and curricular tools for pathology residency training.

scholarly journals Evaluating Practice-Based Learning and Improvement: Efforts to Improve Acceptance of Portfolios

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 638-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Y. Fragneto ◽  
Amy Noel DiLorenzo ◽  
Randall M. Schell ◽  
Edwin A. Bowe
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Accreditation Council ◽  
Portfolio Evaluation ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Faculty Advisors ◽  
Review Form ◽  
Intensive Education

Abstract Introduction The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recommends resident portfolios as 1 method for assessing competence in practice-based learning and improvement. In July 2005, when anesthesiology residents in our department were required to start a portfolio, the residents and their faculty advisors did not readily accept this new requirement. Intensive education efforts addressing the goals and importance of portfolios were undertaken. We hypothesized that these educational efforts improved acceptance of the portfolio and retrospectively audited the portfolio evaluation forms completed by faculty advisors. Methods Intensive education about the goals and importance of portfolios began in January 2006, including presentations at departmental conferences and one-on-one education sessions. Faculty advisors were instructed to evaluate each resident's portfolio and complete a review form. We retrospectively collected data to determine the percentage of review forms completed by faculty. The portfolio reviews also assessed the percentage of 10 required portfolio components residents had completed. Results Portfolio review forms were completed by faculty advisors for 13% (5/38) of residents during the first advisor-advisee meeting in December 2005. Initiation of intensive education efforts significantly improved compliance, with review forms completed for 68% (26/38) of residents in May 2006 (P < .0001) and 95% (36/38) in December 2006 (P < .0001). Residents also significantly improved the completeness of portfolios between May and December of 2006. Discussion Portfolios are considered a best methods technique by the ACGME for evaluation of practice-based learning and improvment. We have found that intensive education about the goals and importance of portfolios can enhance acceptance of this evaluation tool, resulting in improved compliance in completion and evaluation of portfolios.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document