MCDM Approach for Identifying Urban Flood Vulnerability under Social Environment and Climate Change

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyumin Lee ◽  
Jinwon Choi ◽  
Kyung Soo Jun
2021 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 102786
Author(s):  
Heejun Chang ◽  
Arun Pallathadka ◽  
Jason Sauer ◽  
Nancy B. Grimm ◽  
Rae Zimmerman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sampei Yamashita ◽  
Sadanori Matsuda ◽  
Ryoichi Watanabe ◽  
Yukihiro Shimatani ◽  
Toshiyuki Moriyama ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 939-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Len Wright ◽  
Paul Chinowsky ◽  
Kenneth Strzepek ◽  
Russell Jones ◽  
Richard Streeter ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Shahabul Alam ◽  
◽  
Patrick Willems ◽  
Md. Masud Alam ◽  
◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 308 ◽  
pp. 01004
Author(s):  
Shuangchen Du ◽  
Zichuan Zhang

In the context of global warming and rising sea levels, as urbanization continues to increase, the risk situation of urban systems facing floods has become more severe. Therefore, we constructed a vulnerability assessment model for urban flood disasters in Jiangsu Province, focusing on using GIS technology to classify the land use of each city in Jiangsu Province for supervised learning. We also established a flood disaster vulnerability model to evaluate the Vulnerability of 13 cities in Jiangsu Province. Evaluation and analysis of the changes in land use vulnerability use flood disasters in Jiangsu Province from 2000 to 2020. The results show that from 2000 to 2020, the Vulnerability to flooding disasters is on the rise as a whole. Yancheng has the lowest average Vulnerability to flooding disasters due to the low population density and high greening rate in the built-up area. On the other hand, Nantong City has the most heightened average flood vulnerability due to excessive population density. The low greening rate in built-up areas has led to a worsening of flood vulnerability. Suggestions have been made to reduce the Vulnerability of urban floods in Jiangsu Province, such as vigorously developing the local economy, reasonably adjusting the rate of urbanization, and building drainage infrastructure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Souza Mattos ◽  
Paulo Tarso S. Oliveira ◽  
Leonardo de Souza Bruno ◽  
Nilo Dinis de Oliveira ◽  
Jose G. Vasconcelos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 551-571
Author(s):  
M. Y. Safiah Yusmah ◽  
L. J. Bracken ◽  
Z. Sahdan ◽  
H. Norhaslina ◽  
M. D. Melasutra ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (15) ◽  
pp. 8295-8302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcy Rockman ◽  
Carrie Hritz

Climate science has outlined targets for reductions of greenhouse gas emissions necessary to provide a substantial chance of avoiding the worst impacts of climate change on both natural and human systems. How to reach those targets, however, requires balancing physical realities of the natural environment with the complexity of the human social environment, including histories, cultures, and values. Archaeology is the study of interactions of natural and social environments through time and across space. As well, the field of cultural resources management, which includes archaeology, regularly engages with values such as site significance and allocation of funding that the modern social environment ascribes to its own history. Through these two approaches, archaeology has potential to provide both data for and methods of addressing challenges the global community faces through climate change. To date, however, archaeology and related areas of cultural heritage have had relatively little role in the global climate response. Here, we assess the social environment of archaeology and climate change and resulting structural barriers that have limited use of archaeology in and for climate change with a case study of the US federal government. On this basis, we provide recommendations to the fields of archaeology and climate response about how to more fully realize the multiple potential uses of archaeology for the challenges of climate change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document