DEVELOPING GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP: TOOLS FOR MEASURING THE IMPACT OF ACADEMIC STUDY ABROAD PROGRAMS

Author(s):  
Carolyn Matheus ◽  
Kevin Gaugler ◽  
Jenna Ficula ◽  
Lauren Oreilly
Author(s):  
Brian Whalen

This volume of Frontiers contains articles covering a broad range of study abroad topics that I hope readers will find both stimulating and useful. Taken as a whole, this volume provides information and tools that can be used to improve and enhance study abroad programs.  Rexeisen, Anderson, Lawton, and Hubbard utilized the Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI) to assess the impact of a semester study abroad program on the development of cross-cultural sensitivity. Their article, “Study Abroad and Intercultural Development: A Longitudinal Study,” provides evidence that a student’s integration and adaptation to cultural experiences continue after a student returns home after study abroad. In general, this article supports the conclusion that study abroad has positive impact on the intercultural development of students. However, it also found that some of the gains found immediately after study abroad diminish over time.  In his article “Service-Learning in Context: An International Perspective,” Michael Woolf explores the definition and goals of service-learning and its value within a study abroad context. Drawing on his long experience in developing and managing study abroad programs, Woolf advocates for adopting several “strategic objectives” that emphasize the “learning” dimension of service-learning, including parity of esteem with other academic courses and academic credibility. He then argues for and outline approaches to defining learning objectives before offering conclusions about dangers and pitfalls as well as benefits to service-learning within the study abroad context.  Paus and Robinson present a general model of the determinants of study abroad participation and then apply it to isolate the factors that are most important at their home institution, Mount Holyoke College. Their model provides a tool to assess the effectiveness of some of the institutional policies for expanding study abroad participation, and to identify new areas for policy invention. Specifically, their analysis identifies parent and faculty encouragement as key determinants of a student’s study abroad decision. Based on their analysis, the authors discuss the specific role that faculty play to increase study abroad participation.  Nadine Dolby’s “Global Citizenship and Study Abroad: A Comparative Study of American and Australian Undergraduates,” examines how both Australians and Americans undergraduates negotiate their national and global identities in the context of study abroad. Dolby demonstrates the nuances of “global citizenship” as students experience and describe it, and argues for a more complex understanding of the dynamics of nation and globe, and for a paradigm of “global citizenship” grounded in critical self-awareness, mutual respect, and reciprocity. Based on her research, she proposes that global citizenship is inflected differently in diverse national contexts, as demonstrated by the contrasting experiences of the Americans and Australians abroad.’  Harrison and Voelker’s study assess the effectiveness of study abroad programs by identifying and evaluating the factors that contribute to students’ success. Their research, “Two Personality Variables and the Cross-cultural Adjustment of Study Abroad Students,” utilized self-assessments by semester study abroad students to examine the impact of both “emotional intelligence” and “entrepreneurial attitude orientation” on the student’s adjustment to their host culture. The results of the study indicated that sub-dimensions of emotional intelligence is significantly related to both general and interaction adjustment in a host culture, and that entrepreneurial attitude orientation is significantly related to interaction adjustment.  Hoff and Paige’s article, “A Strategies-Based Approach to Culture and Language Learning in Education Abroad Programming,” discusses the results of a study that researched the use of two study abroad guides by study abroad advisors, and resident directors in their pre-departure and on-site programming. The participants in this project were interviewed and discussed the challenges and successes in using the Maximizing Study Abroad Program Professionals Guide and the Students’ Guide. The article presents suggestions for using these guides effectively to impact student learning.  In their article, “Does Language Matter? The Impact of Language of Instruction on Study Abroad Outcomes,” Norris and Steinberg present their study of the impact of students taking courses in the target language versus those who take some or all of their courses in English. Mining data from nearly 50 years of study abroad programming, they conclude that each language environment has its distinctive merits, and that all yield benefits to participants. Drawing on a survey of over 17,000 IES alumni, their research helps us to recognize the value of the various study abroad models.  “Study Abroad and Career Paths of Business Students,” by Orahood, Woolf, and Kruze, assesses the impact of study abroad on business students’ post-graduation career paths by surveying alumni who were five to ten years into their careers. While the authors did not find a causal link showing that study abroad significantly impacts business students’ career paths, they did find that alumni consider the transferable skills (communication, flexibility, adaptation, etc.) that they gained while abroad are valuable life skills. The authors also sought to compare the career paths of alumni who studied abroad to those who did not. They found that, although business students who studied abroad tend to have a significantly greater interest in working for a company with an international component, the number of alumni who found work with international clients/customers was greater for those who did not study abroad.  Together these articles provide important insights and useful information about a number of important areas of study abroad. I would like to thank the authors of these articles as well as the many colleagues who served as manuscript reviewers for this volume.  I would also like to acknowledge the continued support of the institutional sponsors of Frontiers, especially Dickinson College, which has been the home of Frontiers for the past eight years. The sponsors make it possible for Frontiers to continue to serve the needs of the study abroad field and disseminate the journal widely.  Brian Whalen, Editor  Dickinson College  The Forum on Education Abroad 


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingjie Liu ◽  
Thomas Shirley

While all higher education was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, study abroad programs were uniquely challenged by the associated restrictions and limitations. This case study integrates a Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) pedagogy approach and virtual reality (VR) technologies into the curriculum redesign process to transform a business study abroad course into an online format. Using VR technology, U.S. students and their international partners in Germany, Brazil, and India created and shared cultural exchange virtual tours. The redesigned online study abroad course engaged students in active learning activities and cultivated students’ intercultural competence development.


Author(s):  
Scott L. Roberts ◽  
Kristina Rouech

This chapter presents and discusses the experience of two university professors' participation in two different study abroad programs. Within the first two years of employment at the university, one professor went to Oaxaca and the other went to Ireland with groups of pre-student teachers. The chapter discusses previous literature and the impact of study abroad programs on teacher education, program basics from the authors' university, the authors' personal experiences travelling with students for the first time, commonalities and differences among the two programs, benefits from their experiences, and ideas for further development of effective study abroad programs for education students.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette M. Racicot ◽  
Diane L. Ferry

<p>The current study used a time-lagged design to examine the effects of Metacognitive and Motivational Cultural Intelligence (CQ) prior to studying abroad on the experiential behavior of students during their study abroad trip and their future interest in work and study abroad opportunities. Using Hayes’ conditional process analysis, results indicated that Motivational CQ predicted Metacognitive CQ which predicted cultural experiences pursued while studying abroad which in turn predicted future interest in working/studying abroad. Implications for improving the study abroad experience and training of students for study abroad programs are discussed.</p>


2019 ◽  
pp. 102831531988738
Author(s):  
Stephen B. DeLoach ◽  
Mark R. Kurt ◽  
Neal H. Olitsky

Study abroad participation has increased dramatically over the past two decades, primarily through the growth of short-term study abroad experiences. Given this, it is logical to ask whether short-term experiences are capable of delivering student learning outcomes equivalent to those of long-term experiences. The research presented in this article addresses this question by asking if program duration (i.e., temporal length of the academic program) or depth (i.e., focused and reflective interaction with the destination culture) has a greater impact on changes in students’ global awareness. A longitudinal study across 80 study abroad programs from a single institution, measured global awareness pre- and post-abroad experience. This design controlled for preexisting differences (self-selection) and allowed us to rigorously estimate the relative effects of depth and duration across four dimensions of global awareness. Results show that a longer duration was associated with significant changes in three out of the four global awareness dimensions measured. The only depth measure that positively and significantly impacted global awareness was when the study abroad destination was a non-English speaking country. Even in this instance, the impact non-English speaking destination was increased further for longer durations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-93
Author(s):  
Nicole Laliberté ◽  
Charlene Waddell

The terms ‘solidarity’ and ‘ethical travel’ were used to frame a one-week study abroad program to Guatemala. The students involved came from a Canadian university and were primed through pre-trip meetings and program materials to expect their trip to produce good feelings of connection and support. However, many of the students experienced bad feelings that were variously described as frustration, disappointment, shame, and guilt. In this paper, we take the ‘bad feelings’ of this trip seriously to understand the relationship between this study abroad program and the (re)production of privilege. Based on interviews with student participants, we identify a trio of emotional responses –shame/guilt, frustration/anger, and critical empathy– that highlight the variability of student responses and their political implications. We argue that this critical analysis of emotional politics is an underutilized tool for examining how study abroad programs can simultaneously (re)produce and challenge privilege.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khuc The Anh ◽  
Le Thi Thanh Dang ◽  
Nhu Vu Bich Ngoc ◽  
Ngo Thanh Dat ◽  
Tran Thi Ngoc Anh

This research aims to examine the relationship among cultural intelligence (CQ), perceived value (PV) and students’ intention to study abroad. By using data gathered in 739 university students, along with statistical analysis, the carrying out results show that there is a positive correlation between CQ and the intention to study abroad through the mediating role of PV. In particular, CQ and PV have positive influence on students’ intention to study abroad and CQ is an antecedent of PV. This study focuses on the influence of specific factors on the intention to study abroad. Meanwhile, this research contributes to the educational field CQ, which is a totally new factor in Vietnam. With a view to helping students in deciding to participate in study abroad programs and improving the quality of education, advice is given to students and related educational organizations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Stemler ◽  
Toshie Imada ◽  
Carolyn Sorkin

One of the most frequently cited aims of higher education institutions is to help students develop intercultural competence. Study abroad programs are a primary vehicle for helping to achieve this goal; however, it has been difficult to quantify their impact as most existing measures of intercultural competence rely on subjective self-report methods that are easy to fake and that suffer from ceiling effects when attempting to measure change over time. Building on Bennett’s (1986) developmental theory, the current paper describes a new test–the Wesleyan Intercultural Competence Scale (WICS)–that uses a situational judgment testing approach to measure the development of intercultural competence within the context of a study-abroad experience. A total of 97 study-abroad students from Wesleyan took the WICSalong with eight external validation measures and a background questionnaire. Thirty participants took the test at two time points–once at the beginning of a study-abroad program and once at the end. The results indicate that the WICShad strong evidence in support of its content, construct, and criterion-related validity. In addition, the WICSwas capable of detecting changes in the development of intercultural competence over time in a way that none of the other validation measures were. The substantive findings revealed that the amount of time spent speaking the local language and the number of different situations experienced were strong predictors of the development of intercultural competence. Implications and future directions are discussed.


Author(s):  
Steven J. Bigatti ◽  
Emily Sirk ◽  
Michael M. Bigatti ◽  
Silvia M. Bigatti

This chapter explores the reality of the modern workplace: the demand for global citizens well-exceeds the supply, and while a manager in the 21st century must increasingly be a global citizen manager, this goal is seldom attained. The skills can be learned, but training has not been broadly implemented in schools or businesses, and typically considered the purview solely of study abroad programs or foreign assignments. The chapter presents some key tools on the technology roadmap for use in educating global citizens and training the 21st century manager.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Di Pietro

Using data on a large sample of recent Italian graduates, this paper investigates the extent to which participation in study abroad programs during university studies impacts subsequent employment likelihood. To address the problem of endogeneity related to participation in study abroad programs, I use a combination of fixed effects and instrumental variable estimation where the instrumental variable is exposure to international student exchange schemes. My estimates show that studying abroad has a relatively large and statistically meaningful effect on the probability of being in employment three years after graduation. This effect is mainly driven by the impact that study abroad programs have on the employment prospects of graduates from disadvantaged (but not very disadvantaged) backgrounds, though positive but imprecise effects are also found for graduates from advantaged backgrounds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document