A New Experimental Method for Measuring Improved Oil Recovery in Shales

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zach Quintanilla ◽  
Rod Russell ◽  
Mukul Sharma

Abstract Improved Oil Recovery, IOR, in shales is a topic of growing interest due to the low oil recovery observed in shales. Evaluating different IOR chemicals at the lab scale has proved difficult and time consuming due to their ultra-low permeability and low porosity. Conventional core procedures (such as core floods) are often not practical to use with such samples since they take too long. In this study, we introduce a new laboratory method for measuring the oil recovery in a huff-and-puff IOR process in shales. In huff-and-puff IOR, a treatment additive and a gas are typically injected in combination into the reservoir. Oil production is initiated after a shut-in period. Our experimental protocol starts by saturating preserved shales with oil by exposing them to the reservoir oil under pressure for an extended time. To speed up this process the preserved shale sample is crushed and sieved to 5-10 mesh. The pressure vessels are then loaded with these oil-saturated 5-10 mesh shale particles and the desired IOR fluid is injected into the pressure vessel. The vessel is rotated to ensure full contact with the shale. The samples are heated to ensure that the fluid is at reservoir pressure and temperature. Several tests were done to ensure that the fluid temperature and pressure inside the vessels were at the desired conditions throughout the 72-hour test period. T2 NMR scans were carried out before and after treatment to determine the amount of incremental oil recovery from the treatment. In tests where the two fluid phases were indistinguishable, deuterium was used in the treatment fluid in lieu of water. Excellent reproducible results were obtained with this method. This new method has been used to test a number of different treatment fluids, gases and solvents under a variety of conditions. The test can be completed in a matter of a few days as compared to several weeks that would be required for a core flood. Several tests can be run simultaneously, further speeding up the process. The results of the laboratory tests can be scaled to the field by using suitable surface-to-volume ratios in the lab and comparing them to the field. With this new method we have a fast and robust method for conducting these huff-and-puff experiments in a repeatable, and precise manner. This allows us to quickly evaluate different IOR fluids for a particular shale-fluid system at reservoir conditions.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Tinuola Udoh ◽  
Jan Vinogradov

In this study, we have investigated the effects of brine and biosurfactant compositions on crude-oil-rock-brine interactions, interfacial tension, zeta potential, and oil recovery. The results of this study show that reduced brine salinity does not cause significant change in IFT. However, addition of biosurfactants to both high and low salinity brines resulted in IFT reduction. Also, experimental results suggest that the zeta potential of high salinity formation brine-rock interface is positive, but oil-brine interface was found to be negatively charged for all solutions used in the study. When controlled salinity brine (CSB) with low salinity and CSB with biosurfactants were injected, both the oil-brine and rock-brine interfaces become negatively charged resulting in increased water-wetness and, hence, improved oil recovery. Addition of biosurfactants to CSB further increased electric double layer expansion which invariably resulted in increased electrostatic repulsion between rock-brine and oil-brine interfaces, but the corresponding incremental oil recovery was small compared with injection of low salinity brine alone. Moreover, we found that the effective zeta potential of crude oil-brine-rock systems is correlated with IFT. The results of this study are relevant to enhanced oil recovery in which controlled salinity waterflooding can be combined with injection of biosurfactants to improve oil recovery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Asyimah Asri ◽  
Rashidah M. Pilus ◽  
Ahmad Kamal Idris ◽  
Ismail Mohd Saaid ◽  
Zakaria Man ◽  
...  

Foam stability is unfavorably influenced by crude oil and this situation has been a main obstacle for the foam injection application for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) (1, 2). The presence of additives to surfactant solution could improve foam stability (3, 4). In this work, effectiveness of the common ionic liquid (IL) and newly developed eutectic-based IL or known as Deep Eutectic solvent (DES) were determined to evaluate their use as co-surfactant in stabilizing foam in the presence of oil. The novelty of the new chemicals in EOR application is in its capability to enhance the surfactant performance in foam stability while being cheap, biodegradable and easy to produce for bulk application. Several formulation of IL/surfactant mass ratio were investigated based on bulk foam stability test in the presence of oil to find the optimum formulation. A fixed concentration of an in-house-surfactant, MFOMAX (M) was utilized. Core flood experiments were performed to evaluate mobility reduction factor (MRF) and incremental oil recovery. The overall results demonstrated that the addition of ILs in surfactant solution were found to improve foam stability. Increment in MRF value and additional oil recovery (AOR) were also reported.


1964 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Shamash ◽  
A Rimon

SummaryA new method for the assay of plasmin inhibitors in human plasma is described. The method consists of determination of the caseinolytic activity of a standard plasmin solution before and after incubation with the inhibitor, with lysine added to the mixture as a stabilizer of plasmin. Using this method, it was found that plasma contains enough inhibitors to inactivate 30 caseinolytic units of plasmin, or 10 times the normal amount of plasminogen in human plasma.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
А.V. Аntuseva ◽  
Е.F. Kudina ◽  
G.G. Pechersky ◽  
Y.R. Kuskildina ◽  
А.V., Melgui ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 116-119
Author(s):  
R.N. Fakhretdinov ◽  
◽  
D.F. Selimov ◽  
A.A. Fatkullin ◽  
S.A. Tastemirov ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hala Abdulkareem Rasheed ◽  
Mohammed Abdulmunem Abdulhameed ◽  
Rasha Al Sahlanee

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Caviedes-Bucheli ◽  
Nestor Rios-Osorio ◽  
Diana Usme ◽  
Cristian Jimenez ◽  
Adriana Pinzon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in canal volume after root canal preparation in vivo with 3 different single-file techniques (Reciproc-Blue®, WaveOne-Gold® and XP-EndoShaper®), with a new method using CBCT and 3D reconstruction. Methods In this prospective study, thirty human lower premolars from healthy patients were used, in which extraction was indicated for orthodontic reasons. All the teeth used were caries- and restoration-free with complete root development, without signs of periodontal disease or traumatic occlusion, and with only one straight canal (up to 25º curvature). Teeth were randomly divided into three different groups: Reciproc-Blue, WaveOne-Gold and XP-EndoShaper. CBCT scans before root canal preparation were used to create a 3D reconstruction with RHINOCEROS 5.0 software to assess the initial canal volume, and then compared with 3D reconstructions after canal preparation to measure the increase in canal volume. Student’s t test for paired data were used to determine statistically significant differences between the before and after canal volumes. Anova test was used to determine statistically significant differences in the percentage of canal volume increase between the groups and Tukey's post-hoc test were used to paired comparison. Results Reciproc-Blue showed the higher increase in canal volume, followed by WaveOne-Gold and XP-EndoShaper (p = 0.003). XP-EndoShaper did not show a statistically significant increase in canal volume after root canal preparation (p = 0.06). Conclusion With this model, Reciproc-Blue showed higher increase in root canal volume, followed by WaveOne-Gold, while XP-EndoShaper did not significantly increase root canal volume during preparation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document