Tectonic Criteria of Oil and GAS Potential at the Transitional Part of the Susha-sea Along the Western Coast of the South Caspian Depression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baylar Aslanov ◽  
Nurlan Jabizade ◽  
Arastun Khuduzadeh ◽  
Fidan Aslanzade

Abstract The southern part of the South Caspian oil and gas Basin (SCB) is one of the main oil and gas producing regions in the central part of Eurasian continent. The large number of offshore oil and gas fields is located here, therefore the basin considered as a promising direction for the further perspective zones survey. The basin is located between the uneven-aged mountain structures of the Lesser and Greater Caucasus in the west, the Great Balkhan and Kopet-Dag in the east, the Talish and Elbrus ridges in the south. In the north, it is limited by a sub-latitudinal regional deep fault, which fixes the northern slope of the complex Absheron-Balkhan zone of uplifts, which is part of the South Kura and Western Turkmenistan depressions. Among the structural elements of the second order, the South Absheron depression, the complex Abikh swell and the Javadkhan-Natevan zone in the west should be noted; Turkmen terrace, Ogurchinskaya step and Chikishlyar-Fersmanovskaya-Weber-Western zone in the east (Fig. 1). The central place in the structure of the basin is occupied by the South Caspian Mega Depression (SCMD), in the most submerged part of which - the pre Elbrus Basin - the basement lies at a depth of about 25 km, and the sedimentary stratum, including Mesozoic, Cenozoic and Quaternary formations, is largely represented by the Pliocene - post-Pliocene sediments, reaching a total thickness of 8–10 km and more in the troughs (Fig. 2, 3).

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (03) ◽  
pp. 178-182
Author(s):  
Alexander Prishchepa

The article analyzes the activities of the head of the Glavtyumenneftegazstroy department Alexey Barsukov during the industrial development of the West Siberian oil and gas province. The article analyzes the economic policy of accelerated hydrocarbon production in the north of the Tyumen region, draws attention to its negative consequences for the economy of the USSR, and focuses on the alternative strategy proposed by A. Barsukov for the development of oil and gas fields in Western Siberia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 775 ◽  
pp. 145485
Author(s):  
Yiqian Liu ◽  
Hao Lu ◽  
Yudong Li ◽  
Hong Xu ◽  
Zhicheng Pan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xiaozhi Wang ◽  
Booki Kim ◽  
Yanming Zhang ◽  
Ping Liao

Floating production, storage and offloading systems (FPSOs) have been widely used in the development of offshore oil and gas fields because of their many attractive features. These features include a large work area and storage capacity, mobility (if desired), relatively low construction cost and good stability. They are mostly ship shaped, either converted from existing tankers or purpose built. The hull structural scantling design for tankers may be applicable to FPSOs; however, FPSOs have their own unique characteristics. FPSOs are located at specific locations with a dynamic loading that is quite different from that arising from unrestricted ocean service conditions for tankers. It is also noted that the wave conditions in recent FPSO applications may be very complicated when operating in areas such as those offshore West Africa and offshore Brazil where both seas and swells exist and propagate in different directions. In this paper, the unique FPSO operational aspects, especially the load assessment due to on-site environments will be described. The methodology of handling complicated wave conditions in fatigue assessment will be addressed. Special considerations for converted FPSOs, which need to take into account their operational history as a trading tanker and low cycle fatigue due to FPSO operations, will also be introduced. Case studies will be presented and appropriate analysis methodology will be summarized. The methodology has also been adopted by ABS Guide, see ABS [1].


1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 357
Author(s):  
M. Thatcher ◽  
D.B. Marietta

Subsea production systems have been an accepted method of developing offshore oil and gas fields since the installation of the first subsea trees in the early 1960s offshore California. Generally subsea completions have been done from floating drilling vessels on wells with subsea wellhead equipment. A number of wells have been completed subsea by bottom supported jackup rigs on wells drilled using mudline suspension equipment. The subsea completion equipment and methods utilised to adapt mudline suspension wells for a subsea production tree are described. This method of completion offers important benefits as it allows completion of wildcat or delineation wells, it can be used in areas of small, scattered reservoirs, and it can be used in conjunction with floating production systems. The cost associated with these subsea completions is roughly equivalent to those of standard subsea completions from floating vessels. An overview of a typical completion system is presented and compared.


1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. P. Thiagarajan ◽  
S. Finch

Turret-moored floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels have found application in several offshore oil and gas fields in Australia’s North West Shelf (NWS). These vessels are either custom-built or converted tankers, with an internal or external turret. The position of an internal turret is decided based on a number of design considerations, primarily, available deck and interior space, and weathervaning capabilities. It is known that turret position can influence vertical motions and accelerations of a vessel, but this factor has not been given much importance, in comparison with the effects on the horizontal plane motions, primarily surge. This paper presents the results of a pilot study conducted at the Australian Maritime College, Tasmania, to study the vertical motions of a single-point moored FPSO model in waves, while systematically varying the mooring position across the length of the model. The displacement of the vessel was held constant at 50-percent-loaded condition. A single-point mooring system was designed and implemented on the model to simulate the prototype turret mooring system. Results show that the mooring location significantly affects the vertical motions and accelerations of the vessel. Astern turrets were found to produce higher heave and pitch than other locations tested. Although turrets positioned close to the longitudinal center of gravity produced the lowest overall motions, it is suggested that turret position forward of midships be preferred, as it provides a balance between lowering vertical motions and improving weathervaning characteristics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document