The Laminaria field, located offshore in the Timor Sea, is one of Australia’s premier oil developments operated for many years by Woodside Energy Ltd. First production was achieved in 1999 using a state-of-the-art floating production storage and offloading vessel, the largest deployed in Australian waters. As is typical, dynamic reservoir simulation was used to predict reservoir performance and forecast production and ultimate recovery. Initial models, using special core analysis (SCAL) laboratory data and pseudos, covered a range of approaches, field and conceptual models. Initial coarser models also used straight-line relative permeability curves. These models were later refined during history matching.
The success of simulation studies depends critically on optimal gridding, particularly vertical definition. An objective of the study presented is to demonstrate the importance of optimal and detailed vertical zonation using Routine Core Analysis data and a range of Hydraulic Flow Zone Unit models. In this regard, the performance of a fine-scale model is compared with three alternative, more traditional and coarse models. Secondly the choice of SCAL rock parameters may also have a significant impact, particularly relative permeability. This paper discusses the use of the more recently developed Carman-Kozeny based SCAL models, the Modified Carman-Kozeny Purcell (MCKP) model for capillary pressure and the 2-phase Modified Carman-Kozeny (2p-MCK) model for relative permeability. These models compare favourably with industry standard approaches, the use of Leverett J-functions for capillary pressure and the Modified Brooks-Corey model for relative permeability. The benefit of the MCK-based models is that they have better functionality and far better adherence to actual laboratory data.
