The Role of Laboratory Analysis In Horizontal Well Evaluation

10.2118/95-18 ◽  
1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.G. Gruber ◽  
R. Gardner ◽  
R. Bujnowicz
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Well ◽  
Laboratory Analysis

The Role of Semiochemicals in Benthic Community Relationships of the Lotic Amphipod Gammarus pseudolimnaeus: A Laboratory Analysis

Oikos ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 280 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Dudley Williams ◽  
Kathryn A. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Benthic Community ◽  
Laboratory Analysis ◽  
Gammarus Pseudolimnaeus ◽  
Community Relationships

The role of nonspecific immune protection in the development of disease in workers GUP «Moscow metro»

2020 ◽  
pp. 798-799
Author(s):  
E. S. Tsidilkovskaya ◽  
A. S. Likontseva ◽  
A. V. Karpushina
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Industrial Ecology ◽  
Laboratory Analysis ◽  
Immune Protection ◽  
Blood Monocytes ◽  
Peripheral Blood Monocytes ◽  
Modern Methods ◽  
The Impact

With the help of modern methods of laboratory analysis, peripheral blood monocytes and their production of TNF were evaluated as informative diagnostic criteria for the intensity of nonspecific immune protection in employees of sue «Moscow metro», experiencing the impact of adverse factors of industrial ecology.

scholarly journals Sources of Bias in Specimens for Research About Molecular Markers for Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 698-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Ransohoff ◽  
Margaret L. Gourlay
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Difference ◽  
Laboratory Analysis ◽  
Observational Research ◽  
Central Idea ◽  
Subject Selection ◽  
Prognostic Accuracy ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Improve Reliability

Claims about the diagnostic or prognostic accuracy of markers often prove disappointing when “discrimination” found between cancers versus normals is due to bias, a systematic difference between compared groups. This article describes a framework to help simplify and organize current problems in marker research by focusing on the role of specimens as a source of bias in observational research and using that focus to address problems and improve reliability. The central idea is that the “fundamental comparison” in research about markers (ie, the comparison done to assess whether a marker discriminates) involves two distinct processes that are “connected” by specimens. If subject selection (first process) creates baseline inequality between groups being compared, then laboratory analysis of specimens (second process) may erroneously find positive results. Although both processes are important, subject selection more fundamentally influences the quality of marker research, because it can hardwire bias into all comparisons in a way that cannot be corrected by any refinement in laboratory analysis. An appreciation of the separateness of these two processes—and placing investigators with appropriate expertise in charge of each—may increase the reliability of research about cancer biomarkers.

Role of dactinomycin in the improved survival of children with Wilms' tumor

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  
Wilms Tumor

Role of the allergist in diagnosis and management of patients with uveitis

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre
Keyword(s):  
Diagnosis And Management

The power of norms to sway fused group members

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnifred R. Louis ◽  
Craig McGarty ◽  
Emma F. Thomas ◽  
Catherine E. Amiot ◽  
Fathali M. Moghaddam
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Anthropology ◽  
Normative Systems ◽  
Violent Extremism ◽  
Identity Fusion ◽  
Group Members

AbstractWhitehouse adapts insights from evolutionary anthropology to interpret extreme self-sacrifice through the concept of identity fusion. The model neglects the role of normative systems in shaping behaviors, especially in relation to violent extremism. In peaceful groups, increasing fusion will actually decrease extremism. Groups collectively appraise threats and opportunities, actively debate action options, and rarely choose violence toward self or others.

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

The role of affect in feelings of obligation

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefen Beeler-Duden ◽  
Meltem Yucel ◽  
Amrisha Vaish
Keyword(s):  
Positive Emotions ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Sense Of Obligation

Abstract Tomasello offers a compelling account of the emergence of humans’ sense of obligation. We suggest that more needs to be said about the role of affect in the creation of obligations. We also argue that positive emotions such as gratitude evolved to encourage individuals to fulfill cooperative obligations without the negative quality that Tomasello proposes is inherent in obligations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document