The Role of Semiochemicals in Benthic Community Relationships of the Lotic Amphipod Gammarus pseudolimnaeus: A Laboratory Analysis

Oikos ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 280 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Dudley Williams ◽  
Kathryn A. Moore

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 775-786
Author(s):  
I Ketut Sudarsana ◽  
I Nyoman Ananda ◽  
Ni Nengah Selasih ◽  
I Made Suta ◽  
Ni Gusti Ayu Agung Nerawati

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to find the role of magibung in maintaining community relationships. The implementation of magibung in the belief system is one form of local wisdom in the middle of the Hindu community, especially in Bali. Magibung which is supported by the community through religious ceremonies is one way to strengthen relationships in the Hindu community. It does not only has an impact on the successful implementation of religious ceremonies but also unity and foster "meyama braya" attitude meyama braya.Keywords : Tradition, Local Wisdom, and relationship in Hindu community AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan peranan kearifan lokal magibung dalam menjaga persaudaraan masyarakat. Pelaksanaan tradisi magibung pada sistem kepercayaan merupakan salah satu bentuk kearifan lokal di tengah masyarakat Hindu khususnya di Bali. Tradisi magibung yang didukung oleh masyarakat melalui kegiatan upacara keagamaan merupakan salah satu jalan untuk mempererat persaudaraan masyarakat Hindu. Hal ini tidak hanya berdampak pada suksesnya pelaksanaan upacara keagamaan, tetapi juga persatuan dan menumbuhkan sikap meyama braya.Kata Kunci : Tradisi, Kearifan Lokal, dan Persaudaraan Umat Hindu 



10.2118/95-18 ◽  
1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.G. Gruber ◽  
R. Gardner ◽  
R. Bujnowicz


Author(s):  
E. S. Tsidilkovskaya ◽  
A. S. Likontseva ◽  
A. V. Karpushina

With the help of modern methods of laboratory analysis, peripheral blood monocytes and their production of TNF were evaluated as informative diagnostic criteria for the intensity of nonspecific immune protection in employees of sue «Moscow metro», experiencing the impact of adverse factors of industrial ecology.





2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 698-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Ransohoff ◽  
Margaret L. Gourlay

Claims about the diagnostic or prognostic accuracy of markers often prove disappointing when “discrimination” found between cancers versus normals is due to bias, a systematic difference between compared groups. This article describes a framework to help simplify and organize current problems in marker research by focusing on the role of specimens as a source of bias in observational research and using that focus to address problems and improve reliability. The central idea is that the “fundamental comparison” in research about markers (ie, the comparison done to assess whether a marker discriminates) involves two distinct processes that are “connected” by specimens. If subject selection (first process) creates baseline inequality between groups being compared, then laboratory analysis of specimens (second process) may erroneously find positive results. Although both processes are important, subject selection more fundamentally influences the quality of marker research, because it can hardwire bias into all comparisons in a way that cannot be corrected by any refinement in laboratory analysis. An appreciation of the separateness of these two processes—and placing investigators with appropriate expertise in charge of each—may increase the reliability of research about cancer biomarkers.



1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-70
Author(s):  
Melanie Goldman ◽  
Catalina Laserna


Coral Reefs ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 705-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Emslie ◽  
M. S. Pratchett ◽  
A. J. Cheal ◽  
K. Osborne


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document