scholarly journals Efficacy of the erector spinae plane block in lumbar spinal surgery patients: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Qiu ◽  
Teng-jiao Zhang ◽  
Ling-bing Meng ◽  
Zhen Hua
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Lumbar Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scores

Abstract Background: Erector spinae palne block (ESPB) as a new trunk fascia block technique was proposed in 2016. Because of its clear analgesic effect and simple operation, it has aroused the interest of many nerve block experts. However, there are few clinical studies on ESPB for lumbar surgery, and its benefits are controversial. The goal of this review paper is to summarize the use of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery in order to better understand and promote this technique.Methods: Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrial.gov databases were searched up to July 30, 2019. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established in advance, “lumbar spine surgery” and “ESPB” related MesH terms, free-text words were used. Data on pain scores, analgesic consumptions and adverse effects were reported. All processes follow PRISMA statement guidelines.Results: A total of 171 participants from 11 publications were identified, including two randomized controlled trials, one retrospective cohort study, four case report, four cases series. Block operation plane from T8 to L4. The main anesthetics used in block are bupivacaine, ropivacaine and lidocaine. There was evidence for reducing postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumptions.Conclusion: ESPB in lumbar spine surgery have the potential to relieve lumbar postoperative pain and reduce the use of analgesic drugs. Randomized controlled trials of high quality and large samples are needed to further clarify the benefits of ESPB in lumbar surgery patients.

scholarly journals Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for postoperative analgesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiao Huang ◽  
Jing Chen Liu
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Erector Spinae Plane Block ◽  
Pain Scores

Abstract Background: Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) has been increasingly applied in patients for postoperative analgesia. Its safety and effectiveness remain uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the clinical safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided ESPB in adults undergoing general anesthesia (GA) surgeries.Methods: A systematic databases search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB with control or placebo. Primary outcome was iv. opioid consumption 24 h after surgery. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a random-effects model. Results: A total of 11 RCTs consisting of 540 patients were included. Ultrasound -guided ESPB showed a reduction of iv. opioid consumption 24 h after surgery (SMD=-2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.76 to -1.5,p<0.00001), pain scores at 1st hour (SMD=-0.97;95% CI -1.84 to -0.1,p=0.03) and pain scores at 6th hour (SMD=-0.64,95% CI -1.05 to -0.23,p=0.002), Also, it lessened the number of patients who required postoperative analgesia ( RR=0.41,95% CI 0.25 to 0.66,p=0,0002) and time to first rescue analgesia (SMD=4.56,95% CI 1.89 to 7.22, p=0.0008). Differences were not significant with the pain score at 12th hour,24th hour and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided ESPB provides postoperative analgesic efficacy in adults undergoing GA surgeries with no increase in PONV.

scholarly journals General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Vertebral Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Alessandro De Cassai ◽  
Federico Geraldini ◽  
Annalisa Boscolo ◽  
Laura Pasin ◽  
Tommaso Pettenuzzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Lumbar Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Vertebral lumbar surgery can be performed under both general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia. A clear benefit from spinal anesthesia (SA) remains unproven. The aim of our meta-analysis was to compare the early analgesic efficacy and recovery after SA and GA in adult patients undergoing vertebral lumbar surgery. A systematic investigation with the following criteria was performed: adult patients undergoing vertebral lumbar surgery (P); single-shot SA (I); GA care with or without wound infiltration (C); analgesic efficacy measured as postoperative pain, intraoperative hypotension, bradycardia, length of surgery, blood loss, postoperative side effects (such as postoperative nausea/vomiting and urinary retention), overall patient and surgeon satisfaction, and length of hospital stay (O); and randomized controlled trials (S). The search was performed in Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar up to 1 November 2020. Eleven studies were found upon this search. SA in vertebral lumbar surgery decreases postoperative pain and the analgesic requirement in the post anesthesia care unit. It is associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and a higher patient satisfaction. It has no effect on urinary retention, intraoperative bradycardia, or hypotension. SA should be considered as a viable and efficient anesthetic technique in vertebral lumbar surgery.

scholarly journals Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for postoperative analgesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiao Huang ◽  
Jing Chen Liu
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Erector Spinae Plane Block ◽  
Pain Scores

Abstract Background Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) has been increasingly applied in patients for postoperative analgesia. Its safety and effectiveness remain uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the clinical safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided ESPB in adults undergoing general anesthesia (GA) surgeries. Methods A systematic databases search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB with control or placebo. Primary outcome was iv. opioid consumption 24 h after surgery. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a random-effects model.Results A total of 11 RCTs consisting of 540 patients were included. Ultrasound -guided ESPB showed a reduction of iv. opioid consumption 24 h after surgery (SMD=-2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.76 to -1.5,p<0.00001), pain scores at 1st hour (SMD=-0.97;95% CI -1.84 to -0.1,p=0.03) and pain scores at 6th hour (SMD=-0.64,95% CI -1.05 to -0.23,p=0.002), Also, it lessened the number of patients who required postoperative analgesia (RR=0.41,95% CI 0.25 to 0.66,p=0,0002) and time to first rescue analgesia (SMD=4.56,95% CI 1.89 to 7.22, p=0.0008). Differences were not significant with the pain score at 12th hour,24th hour and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Conclusions Ultrasound-guided ESPB provides postoperative analgesic efficacy in adults undergoing GA surgeries with no increase in PONV.

scholarly journals Usefulness of surgical pleth index-guided analgesia during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 4386-4398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Ju Won ◽  
Byung Gun Lim ◽  
Young Sung Kim ◽  
Mido Lee ◽  
Heezoo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Intergroup Difference ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Extubation Time

Objective Previous studies comparing surgical pleth index (SPI)-guided and conventional analgesia have shown differing results. Therefore, we compared the intraoperative opioid requirement, extubation time, postoperative pain scores, and perioperative adverse events between these two modalities. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the intraoperative opioid requirement and other outcomes between the two modalities. The mean difference (MD) or the pooled risk ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for analysis. A heterogeneity (I2) assessment was performed. Results Six randomized controlled trials comparing 463 patients were included. Intraoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the SPI-guided than conventional analgesia group (standardized MD, −0.41; 95% CI, −0.70 to −0.11; I2 = 53%). No significant intergroup difference was observed in the pain score on the first postoperative day or the incidence of perioperative adverse events. The extubation time was considerably shorter in the SPI-guided than conventional analgesia group (MD, −1.91; 95% CI, −3.33 to −0.49; I2 = 67%). Conclusions Compared with conventional analgesia, SPI-guided analgesia can reduce intraoperative opioid consumption and facilitate extubation. Moreover, no intergroup difference was observed in the degree of postoperative pain or incidence of perioperative adverse events.

scholarly journals The Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Terms of Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2928
Author(s):  
Chang-Hoon Koo ◽  
Jin-Young Hwang ◽  
Hyun-Jung Shin ◽  
Jung-Hee Ryu
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Erector Spinae Plane Block ◽  
Pain Scores

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), a recent regional analgesic technique, has been used to manage acute pain after surgery. The aim of this meta-analysis is to identify the benefits of ESPB in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of Science to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of ESPB on postoperative pain after LC. Primary outcome was defined as 24 h cumulative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We estimated mean differences (MD) and odds ratio (OR) using a random-effects model. A total of 8 RCTs, including 442 patients, were included in the final analysis. Postoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the ESPB group than in the control group (MD −4.72, 95% CI −6.00 to −3.44, p < 0.001). Compared with the control group, the ESPB group also showed significantly lower pain scores and incidence of PONV. A separate analysis of RCTs comparing ESPB with oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block showed that the analgesic efficacy of ESPB was similar to that of OSTAP block. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that ESPB may provide effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing LC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document