scholarly journals Operative versus nonoperative treatment in children with painful rigid flatfoot and talocalcaneal coalition. Results from a retrospective comparative study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Luigi Di Gennaro ◽  
Stefano Stallone ◽  
Eleonora Olivotto ◽  
Paola Zarantonello ◽  
Marina Magnani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Operative Strategy ◽  
Talocalcaneal Coalition ◽  
Subtalar Arthroereisis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Nonoperative Group ◽  
Graft Interposition

Abstract Background: The management of painful rigid flatfoot (RFF) with talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) is controversial. We aimed to compare operative and nonoperative treatment in children with RFF and TCC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records and radiographs of children with RFF and TTC treated between 2005 and 2015. The nonoperative treatment consisted of manipulation under anesthesia, cast immobilization and shoe insert after cast removal. The operative treatment consisted of combined TCC resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis. Results: Thirty-four Children (47 feet) in the nonoperative group and twenty-one children (34 feet) in the operative group were included. No differences were found between groups, concerning baseline characteristics. The mean age at treatment was 11.8 years (9-17): 11.6 (9-17) for the nonoperative group, 12.2 (10-15) for the operative group. The mean follow-up averaged 6.6 (3-12) years and was significantly longer in the nonoperative group (7.8 versus 4.7 years; p < 0.0005), since the operative procedure was increasingly practiced in the latest years. There were no complications in either groups, but 6 patients (7 feet) in the nonoperative group were unsatisfied and required surgery. At the latest follow-up, the AOFAS-AHS improved in both groups, although the operative group showed significantly better improvement. The operative group reported also significantly better FADI score, after adjustment for follow-up and baseline variables. Conclusions: The operative treatment showed better results compared to the nonoperative treatment. Symptomatic RFF with TCC in children can be effectively treated in one step with resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings and to identify the best operative strategy in this condition.

scholarly journals Operative versus nonoperative treatment in children with painful rigid flatfoot and talocalcaneal coalition. Results from a retrospective comparative study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Luigi Di Gennaro ◽  
Stefano Stallone ◽  
Eleonora Olivotto ◽  
Paola Zarantonello ◽  
Marina Magnani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Operative Strategy ◽  
Talocalcaneal Coalition ◽  
Subtalar Arthroereisis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Nonoperative Group ◽  
Graft Interposition

Abstract Background: The management of painful rigid flatfoot (RFF) with talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) is controversial. We aimed to compare operative and nonoperative treatment in children with RFF and TCC.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records and radiographs of children with RFF and TTC treated between 2005 and 2015. The nonoperative treatment consisted of manipulation under anesthesia, cast immobilization and shoe insert after cast removal. The operative treatment consisted of combined TCC resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis. Results: Thirty-four Children (47 feet) in the nonoperative group and twenty-one children (34 feet) in the operative group were included. No differences were found between groups, concerning baseline characteristics. The mean age at treatment was 11.8 years (9-17): 11.6 (9-17) for the nonoperative group, 12.2 (10-15) for the operative group. The mean follow-up averaged 6.6 (3-12) years and was significantly longer in the nonoperative group (7.8 versus 4.7 years; p < 0.0005), since the operative procedure was increasingly practiced in the latest years.There were no complications in either groups, but 6 patients (7 feet) in the nonoperative group were unsatisfied and required surgery. At the latest follow-up, the AOFAS-AHS improved in both groups, although the operative group showed significantly better improvement. The operative group reported also significantly better FADI score, after adjustment for follow-up and baseline variables.Conclusion: The operative treatment showed better results compared to the nonoperative treatment. Symptomatic RFF with TCC in children can be effectively treated in one step with resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings and to identify the best operative strategy in this condition.

scholarly journals Operative versus nonoperative treatment in children with painful rigid flatfoot and talocalcaneal coalition. Results from a retrospective comparative study.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Luigi Di Gennaro ◽  
Stefano Stallone ◽  
Eleonora Olivotto ◽  
Paola Zarantonello ◽  
Marina Magnani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Cast Immobilization ◽  
Manipulation Under Anesthesia ◽  
Talocalcaneal Coalition ◽  
Subtalar Arthroereisis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Graft Interposition

Abstract Background: The management of painful rigid flatfoot (RFF) with talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) is controversial. We aimed to compare operative and nonoperative treatment in children with RFF and TCC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records and radiographs of children with RFF and TTC treated between 2005 and 2015. The nonoperative treatment consisted of manipulation under anesthesia, cast immobilization and shoe insert after cast removal. The operative treatment consisted of combined TCC resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis. Results: Thirty-four Children (47 feet) in the nonoperative group and twenty-one children (34 feet) in the operative group were included. No differences were found between groups, concerning baseline characteristics. The mean age at treatment was 11.8 years (9-17). The mean follow-up averaged 6.6 (3-12) years. There were no complications in either groups. At the latest follow-up, the AOFAS-AHS improved in both groups, although the operative group showed significantly better improvement. The operative group reported also significantly better FADI score, after adjustment for follow-up and baseline variables. Conclusions: The operative treatment showed better results compared to the nonoperative treatment. Symptomatic RFF with TCC in children can be effectively treated in one step with resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis. Keywords: tarsal coalition, talocalcaneal; flatfoot; child; surgical treatment; manipulation under anesthesia; allograft; arthroereisis.

Endoscopic Resection of Different Types of Talocalcaneal Coalition

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1082-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael Aldahshan ◽  
Adel Hamed ◽  
Faisal Elsherief ◽  
Ashraf Mohamed Abdelaziz
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Talocalcaneal Coalition ◽  
Short Term Study ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic

Background: The purpose of this study was to describe the technique of endoscopic resection of talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) by using 2 posterior portals and to report the outcomes of endoscopic resection of different types and sites of TCC. Methods: An interventional prospective study was conducted on 20 feet in 18 consecutive patients who were diagnosed by computed tomography to have TCC for which nonoperative treatment had failed and endoscopic resection was performed. The patients were divided into groups according to the site of the coalition (middle facet or posterior facet) and according to type (fibrous, cartilage, or bony). The mean follow-up period was 26 months (range, 6-36). Results: The average preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score was 57.7 (range, 40-65), and the average preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score was 7.8 (range, 6-8). The average postoperative AOFAS hindfoot score was 92.4 (range, 85-98; P < .01). The average postoperative VAS score was 2.4 (range, 1-4). All patients showed no recurrence on postoperative lateral and Harris-Beath X-ray until the end of the study. Conclusions: Endoscopic resection of TCC was an effective and useful method for the treatment of talocalcaneal coalition. It provided excellent outcomes with no recurrence in this short-term study. Resection of the fibrous type had a better outcome than resection of cartilage and bony types. Endoscopic resection of the posterior coalition had a better outcome than resection of the middle coalition. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.

Operative vs. Nonoperative Treatment of Intra-Articular Fractures of the Calcaneus: A Prospective Randomized Trial

1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Thordarson ◽  
Lauren Eric Krieger
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Excellent Result ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Prospective Randomized Trial ◽  
Functional Score ◽  
Articular Fractures ◽  
Nonoperative Group

Thirty patients with displaced, intra-articular calcaneus fractures were randomized to operative or nonoperative treatment. All patients had two or three major articular fragments of the posterior facet (Sanders type II or III). Nonoperative treatment included early mobilization and delayed weightbearing. Operative treatment involved open reduction and rigid internal fixation with a plate and screws through an extensile, L-shaped lateral approach followed by early mobilization and delayed weightbearing. Fifteen operative patients were evaluated at an average of 17 months follow-up and 11 nonoperative patients were seen at 14 months average follow-up. In the operative group, there were 7 excellent results, 5 good results, 2 fair results, and 1 poor result, and in the nonoperative group there was 1 excellent result, 3 good results, 1 fair result, and 6 poor results (difference significant at P < 0.01). A functional scoring system of 0–100 points was developed based upon the responses to an outcome assessment questionnaire. The average functional score for the operative group was far superior at 86.7, compared with 55.0 for the nonoperative group ( P < 0.0001). Subtalar range of motion averaged 20° for the operative group and 17° for the nonoperative group with pain on extremes of motion of 25% of the operative patients compared with 100% of the nonoperative patients. This study is the first prospective, randomized trial to demonstrate the superior results of current operative treatment with early mobilization compared with nonoperative treatment.

scholarly journals Pilot report: non-operative treatment of Mayo Type II olecranon fractures in any-age adult patient

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Putnam ◽  
Christy M. Christophersen ◽  
Julie E. Adams
Keyword(s):  
Supportive Care ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Post Injury ◽  
Active Motion ◽  
Non Union ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Elbow Motion ◽  
Olecranon Fractures

Background We report on the non-operative treatment of Mayo Type II olecranon fractures. Methods Fourteen isolated Mayo Type II olecranon fractures were treated non-operatively, followed to discharge, and retrospectively reviewed. Treatment was splinting in extension followed by protected active motion beginning 3 weeks to 4 weeks post-injury. Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores were available in 86% and 64% of cases, respectively. Follow-up radiographs were obtained. Results At discharge, the mean (SD) MEPI score was 95 (5). The mean (SD) elbow motion arc was 121° (21°). One patient re-fractured his elbow after discharge by falling on the ice. He recovered after open reduction and internal fixation. One patient (documented Marfan syndrome) developed an asymptomatic non-union. Excepting the patient who fell, no patient received additional care. Conclusions In this pilot report, Mayo Type II olecranon fractures were treated non-operatively to discharge. Good to excellent results were obtained in all patients according to the MEPI. Supportive care of these fractures should be comparatively studied. A downside risk to providing supportive care for these fractures was not identified.

scholarly journals Twenty-Year Follow-up Study Comparing Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures in High-Level Athletes

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1129-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daan T. van Yperen ◽  
Max Reijman ◽  
Eline M. van Es ◽  
Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra ◽  
Duncan E. Meuffels
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
High Level ◽  
Nonoperative Group

Background: An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture has major consequences at midterm follow-up, with an increasing chance of developing an old knee in a young patient. The long-term (≥20 years) effects of the operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL ruptures are still unclear. Purpose: To compare the long-term treatment outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment of ACL ruptures in high-level athletes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Fifty patients with an ACL rupture were eligible for participation, and they were treated either nonoperatively (n = 25) in 1992, consisting of structured rehabilitation and lifestyle adjustments, or operatively (n = 25) between 1994 and 1996 with an arthroscopic transtibial bone–patellar tendon–bone technique. The patients in the nonoperative group were drawn from those who responded well to 3 months of nonoperative treatment, whereas the patients in the operative group were drawn from those who had persistent instability after 3 months of nonoperative treatment. Both groups were pair-matched and assessed at 10- and 20-year follow-up regarding radiological knee osteoarthritis, functional outcomes (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), meniscal status, and knee stability (KT-1000 arthrometer, pivot-shift test, Lachman test, 1-legged hop test). Results: All 50 patients (100%) were included in the current study for follow-up. After 20 years, we found knee osteoarthritis in 80% of the operative group compared with 68% of the nonoperative group ( P = .508). There was no difference between groups regarding functional outcomes and meniscectomy performed. The median IKDC subjective score was 81.6 (interquartile range [IQR], 59.8-89.1) for the operative group and 78.2 (IQR, 61.5-92.0) for the nonoperative group ( P = .679). Regarding the IKDC objective score, 21 patients (84%) in the operative group had a normal or near normal score (A and B) compared with 5 patients (20%) in the nonoperative group ( P < .001). The pivot-shift test finding was negative in 17 patients (68%) versus 3 patients (13%) for the operative and nonoperative groups, respectively ( P < .001), and the Lachman test finding was negative in 12 patients (48%) versus 1 patient (4%), respectively ( P = .002). Conclusion: In this retrospective pair-matched follow-up study, we found that after 20-year follow-up, there was no difference in knee osteoarthritis between operative versus nonoperative treatment when treatment was allocated on the basis of a patient’s response to 3 months of nonoperative treatment. Although knee stability was better in the operative group, it did not result in better subjective and objective functional outcomes.

Operative Treatment for Hallux Valgus With Moderate to Severe Metatarsus Adductus

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Shima ◽  
Ryuzo Okuda ◽  
Toshito Yasuda ◽  
Katsunori Mori ◽  
Momoko Kizawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Significant Correction ◽  
Metatarsus Adductus ◽  
The Mean

Background: Operative treatment is indicated for patients who have symptomatic hallux valgus (HV) with moderate to severe metatarsus adductus (MA). However, there is limited information available on the operative procedures and outcomes for the treatment of HV with MA. We aimed to investigate the average 10-year follow-up clinical and radiologic outcomes. Methods: Seventeen patients (21 feet, average age: 60.1 years) with symptomatic HV with moderate to severe MA were operatively treated. Mean postoperative follow-up duration was 114.4 (24-246) months. All feet had metatarsus adductus angle ≥20 degrees on dorsoplantar weight-bearing radiograph. The procedure included a proximal crescentic osteotomy of the first metatarsal and abduction osteotomy of the proximal third of the second and third metatarsals. Results: The mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scale score improved significantly postoperatively ( P < .001). The mean postoperative visual analog scale score (17 feet) was 2.0 (0-6). Preoperative metatarsalgia was severe in 2 feet, moderate in 17, and mild in 2. At the most recent follow-up evaluation, 11 feet had no pain, 9 had mild pain, and 1 had moderate pain. The mean hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, and metatarsus adductus angle significantly decreased postoperatively ( P < .001 for all). Recurrence of HV (HV angle ≥ 20 degrees) was observed in 4 feet. Conclusion: The clinical and radiologic results indicated that our novel operative treatment for HV with moderate to severe MA can achieve significant correction of HV with MA deformities and significant improvement in pain and function. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

scholarly journals Treatment of Pectoralis Major Tendon Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0041
Author(s):  
Blake Bodendorfer ◽  
Brian McCormick ◽  
David Wang ◽  
Christine Conroy ◽  
Caroline Fryar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Pectoralis Major ◽  
Isokinetic Strength ◽  
Tendon Tears

Objectives: The incidence of pectoralis major tendon tears is rising, and repair is generally considered, but there is a paucity of comparative data to demonstrate the superiority of operative treatment. We sought to compare the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of pectoralis major tendon tears. We hypothesized that repair would result in superior outcomes compared to nonoperative treatment. Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was completed using MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science databases. English-language studies were included with a minimum of 6 months average follow-up and 5 cases per study. Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies was utilized to assess the quality of the existing literature. Meta-analysis of pooled mechanisms of injury and outcomes was completed. Pooled effect-sizes were calculated from random effects models. Continuous variables were assessed using mixed model analysis with the individual study designated as a random effect and the desired treatment for comparison as a fixed effect. Bivariate frequency data was transformed using the Freeman-Tukey log-linear transformation for variance stabilization and then assessed using a mixed model with a study-level random effect and subsequently back-transformed. Significance was set at P<.05. Results: Twenty-three articles with 664 injuries met the inclusion criteria for comparison (Figure 1). All patients were male with 63.2% of injuries occurring during weight training, with an average age of 31.48 years and follow-up of 37.02 months. Included studies had moderately high methodological quality. Operative treatment was significantly superior to nonoperative treatment with a relative improvement of functional outcome by 0.70 (P=.027), full isometric strength by 77.07% (P<.001), isokinetic strength by 28.86% (P<.001) compared to the uninjured arm, cosmesis satisfaction by 13.79% (P=.037), and resting deformity by 98.85% (P<.001) (Table 1). There was an overall complication rate of 14.21%, including a 3.08% rate of rerupture, for operative treatment. Conclusion: Pectoralis major tendon repair resulted in significantly superior outcomes as compared to nonoperative treatment with an associated 14.21% complication rate. There was a statistically significant improvement in functional outcome, isokinetic strength, isometric strength, cosmesis, and resting deformity. [Figure: see text][Table: see text]

scholarly journals Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Few Patients Require Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0005
Author(s):  
Seung-Hwan Park ◽  
Sang Gyo Seo ◽  
Ho Seong Lee
Keyword(s):  
Osteochondral Lesion ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Sports Activity ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Analogue Scales

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The frequency of progression of osteoarthritis and persistence of symptoms in untreated osteochondral lesion of the talus (OCL) is not well known. We report the outcome of a nonoperative treatment for symptomatic OCL. Methods: This study included 142 patients with OCLs from 2003 to 2013. The patients did not undergo immobilization and had no restrictions of physical activities. The mean follow-up time was 6 (3–10) years. Initial MRI and CT confirmed OCL and showed lesion size, location, and stage of the lesion. Progression of osteoarthritis was evaluated by standing radiographs. In 83 patients, CT was performed at the final follow-up for analyses of the lesion size. We surveyed patients for limitations of sports activity, and Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), AOFAS, and SF-36 were assessed. Results: No patients had progression of osteoarthritis. The lesion size as determined by CT did not change in 69/83 patients, decreased in 5, and increased in 9. The mean VAS score of the 142 patients decreased from 3.8 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), the mean AOFAS ankle–hindfoot score increased from 86 to 93 (p < 0.001), and the mean SF-36 score increased from 52 to 72 (p < 0.001). Only 9 patients reported limitations of sports activity. The size and location of the lesion did not correlate with any of the outcome scores. Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment can be considered a good option for patients with OCL.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes of Scaphoid Malunion

Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blake P. Gillette ◽  
Peter C. Amadio ◽  
Sanjeev Kakar
Keyword(s):  
Nonoperative Management ◽  
Corrective Osteotomy ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Surgical Evaluation ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The Mean

Background: The optimal treatment of patients with a scaphoid malunion remains controversial. The long-term outcomes of operative and nonoperative management have not been established. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the outcomes of all scaphoid malunions treated at single institution over a 30-year period. This included patients who underwent corrective osteotomy, salvage procedures (ie, dorsal cheilectomy, radial styloidectomy, and scaphoidectomy with midcarpal fusion), and those who refused operative intervention. The Mayo Wrist Score was determined at the time of surgical evaluation. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) surveys were sent to all patients for long-term follow-up. Results: Seventeen patients had follow-up at a mean 21.4 years (range, 12-30 years). The mean initial lateral intrascaphoid angle was 58°. Of the 17 patients, 11 proceeded with surgery and 6 opted for nonoperative management. A corrective osteotomy was performed in 4 patients. Of the remaining 7 surgical patients, 5 patients underwent procedures such as cheilectomy and radial styloidectomy, whereas 2 patients had a scaphoidectomy with midcarpal fusion. The final mean PRWE and QuickDASH scores for corrective osteotomy, salvage procedures, and nonoperative treatment were 23 and 6, 18 and 10, and 33 and 22, respectively. Conclusion: Long-term outcomes were similar between operative and nonoperative management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document