A phase I study of a dual PI3-Kinase/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

Abstract Background Combined inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes may be an efficient treatment for acute leukemia. The primary objective of this phase I single center open label study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the dual pan-class I PI3K and mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with advanced leukemia. Methods Herein patients > 18 years of age who had relapsed or showed refractory leukemia were treated with BEZ235 (orally at 300-400 mg BID (cohort -1/1)) to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK). Adverse events data and serious adverse events were analyzed and haematological and clinical biochemistry toxicities were assessed from laboratory test parameters. Response was assessed for the first time at the end of cycle 1 (day 29) and after every subsequent cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of BEZ235 were also included (BEZ235 plasma levels, phosphorylation of AKT, S6 and 4EBP1). On statistics this trial is a multiple ascending dose study in which a following variant of the 3+3 rule (“Rolling Six”), a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 12 patients was recruited for the dose escalation and another 5 were planned for the expansion phase.Results Twenty-four patients with ALL (n=11) or AML (n=12) or CML-BP (n=1) were enrolled. All patients had failed one (n=5) or more lines of therapy (n=5) and 14 patients were in refractory / refractory relapse. No formal MTD was defined, stomatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity at 400 mg BID dose was considered incompatible with prolonged treatment. The RP2D of BEZ235 was defined as 300 mg BID. Four of 24 patients showed clinical benefit. Twenty-two of 24 patients discontinued because of progression, (median time to progression 27 days (4d-112d). There was no association between PK parameters and efficacy or tolerability. Conclusions Combined inhibition of PI3K and mTOR inhibits a clinically meaningful driver pathway in a small subset of patients with ALL, with no benefit in patients with AML.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01756118. retrospectively registered 19th December 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01756118.

Download Full-text

A phase I study of a dual PI3-Kinase/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

10.21203/rs.2.20890/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Fabian Lang ◽

Lydia Wunderle ◽

Susanne Badura ◽

Eberhard Schleyer ◽

Monika Brüggemann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Acute Leukemia ◽

Phase I ◽

Mtor Inhibitor ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Prolonged Treatment ◽

Small Subset ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Efficient Treatment

Abstract Background Combined inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes may be an efficient treatment for acute leukemia. The primary objective of this phase I single center open label study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the dual pan-class I PI3K and mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with advanced leukemia. Methods Herein patients > 18 years of age who had relapsed or showed refractory leukemia were treated with BEZ235 (orally at 300-400 mg BID (cohort -1/1)) to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK). Adverse events data and serious adverse events were analyzed and haematological and clinical biochemistry toxicities were assessed from laboratory test parameters. Response was assessed for the first time at the end of cycle 1 (day 29) and after every subsequent cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of BEZ235 were also included (BEZ235 plasma levels, phosphorylation of AKT, S6 and 4EBP1). On statistics this trial is a multiple ascending dose study in which a following variant of the 3+3 rule (“Rolling Six”), a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 12 patients was recruited for the dose escalation and another 5 were planned for the expansion phase.Results Twenty-four patients with ALL (n=11) or AML (n=12) or CML-BP (n=1) were enrolled. All patients had failed one (n=5) or more lines of therapy (n=5) and 14 patients were in refractory / refractory relapse. No formal MTD was defined, stomatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity at 400 mg BID dose was considered incompatible with prolonged treatment. The RP2D of BEZ235 was defined as 300 mg BID. Four of 24 patients showed clinical benefit. Twenty-two of 24 patients discontinued because of progression, (median time to progression 27 days (4d-112d). There was no association between PK parameters and efficacy or tolerability. Conclusions Combined inhibition of PI3K and mTOR inhibits a clinically meaningful driver pathway in a small subset of patients with ALL, with no benefit in patients with AML.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01756118. registered 19th December 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01756118

Download Full-text

A phase I study of a dual PI3-Kinase/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

10.21203/rs.2.20890/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Fabian Lang ◽

Lydia Wunderle ◽

Susanne Badura ◽

Eberhard Schleyer ◽

Monika Brüggemann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Acute Leukemia ◽

Phase I ◽

Mtor Inhibitor ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Prolonged Treatment ◽

Small Subset ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Efficient Treatment

Abstract Background: Combined inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes may be an efficient treatment for acute leukemia. The primary objective of this phase I single center open label study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the dual pan-class I PI3K and mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with advanced leukemia.Methods: Herein patients > 18 years of age who had relapsed or showed refractory leukemia were treated with BEZ235 (orally at 300-400 mg BID (cohort -1/1)) to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK). Adverse events data and serious adverse events were analyzed and haematological and clinical biochemistry toxicities were assessed from laboratory test parameters. Response was assessed for the first time at the end of cycle 1 (day 29) and after every subsequent cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of BEZ235 were also included (BEZ235 plasma levels, phosphorylation of AKT, S6 and 4EBP1). On statistics this trial is a multiple ascending dose study in which a following variant of the 3+3 rule (“Rolling Six”), a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 12 patients was recruited for the dose escalation and another 5 were planned for the expansion phase.Results: Twenty-four patients with ALL (n=11) or AML (n=12) or CML-BP (n=1) were enrolled. All patients had failed one (n=5) or more lines of therapy (n=5) and 14 patients were in refractory / refractory relapse. No formal MTD was defined, stomatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity at 400 mg BID dose was considered incompatible with prolonged treatment. The RP2D of BEZ235 was defined as 300 mg BID. Four of 24 patients showed clinical benefit. Twenty-two of 24 patients discontinued because of progression, (median time to progression 27 days (4d-112d). There was no association between PK parameters and efficacy or tolerability.Conclusions: Combined inhibition of PI3K and mTOR inhibits a clinically meaningful driver pathway in a small subset of patients with ALL, with no benefit in patients with AML.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01756118. retrospectively registered 19th December 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01756118.

Download Full-text

A phase I study of a dual PI3-Kinase/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

10.21203/rs.2.20890/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Fabian Lang ◽

Lydia Wunderle ◽

Susanne Badura ◽

Eberhard Schleyer ◽

Monika Brüggemann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Acute Leukemia ◽

Phase I ◽

Mtor Inhibitor ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Prolonged Treatment ◽

Small Subset ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Efficient Treatment

Abstract Background Combined inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes may be an efficient treatment for acute leukemia. The primary objective of this phase I single centre open lable study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the dual pan-class I PI3K and mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with advanced leukemia.Methods Herein patients > 18 years of age who had relapsed or showed refractory leukemia were treated with BEZ235 (orally at 300-400 mg BID (cohort -1/1)) to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmakokinetic (PK). Adverse events data and serious adverse events were analyzed and haematological and clinical biochemistry toxicities were assessed from laboratory test parameters. Response was assessed for the first time at the end of cycle 1 (day 29) and after every subsequent cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of BEZ235 were also included (BEZ235 plasma levels, phosphorylation of AKT, S6 and 4EBP1). On statistics this trial is a multiple ascending dose study in which a following variant of the 3+3 rule (“Rolling Six”), a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 12 patients was recruited for the dose escalation and another 5 were planned for the expansion phase. Results Twenty-four patients with ALL (n=11) or AML (n=12) or CML-BP (n=1) were enrolled. All patients had failed one (n=5) or more lines of therapy (n=5) and 14 patients were in refractory / refractory relapse. No formal MTD was defined, stomatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity at 400 mg BID dose was considered incompatible with prolonged treatment. The RP2D of BEZ235 was defined as 300 mg BID. Four of 24 patients showed clinical benefit. Twenty-two of 24 patients discontinued because of progression, (median time to progression 27 days (4d-112d). There was no association between PK parameters and efficacy or tolerability. Conclusions Combined inhibition of PI3K and mTOR inhibits a clinically meaningful driver pathway in a small subset of patients with ALL, with no benefit in patients with AML. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01756118. registered 19th Decembre 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01756118

Download Full-text

A phase I study of a dual PI3-kinase/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology ◽

10.1186/s40360-020-00446-x ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Fabian Lang ◽

Lydia Wunderle ◽

Susanne Badura ◽

Eberhard Schleyer ◽

Monika Brüggemann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Acute Leukemia ◽

Phase I ◽

Mtor Inhibitor ◽

Prolonged Treatment ◽

Small Subset ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Efficient Treatment ◽

Link Type

Abstract Background Combined inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes may be an efficient treatment for acute leukemia. The primary objective of this phase I single center open label study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the dual pan-class I PI3K and mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with advanced leukemia. Methods Herein patients > 18 years of age who had relapsed or showed refractory leukemia were treated with BEZ235 (orally at 300–400 mg BID (cohort − 1/1)) to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK). Adverse events data and serious adverse events were analyzed and haematological and clinical biochemistry toxicities were assessed from laboratory test parameters. Response was assessed for the first time at the end of cycle 1 (day 29) and after every subsequent cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of BEZ235 were also included (BEZ235 plasma levels, phosphorylation of AKT, S6 and 4EBP1). On statistics this trial is a multiple ascending dose study in which a following variant of the 3 + 3 rule (“Rolling Six”), a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 12 patients was recruited for the dose escalation and another 5 were planned for the expansion phase. Results Twenty-four patients with ALL (n = 11) or AML (n = 12) or CML-BP (n = 1) were enrolled. All patients had failed one (n = 5) or more lines of therapy (n = 5) and 14 patients were in refractory / refractory relapse. No formal MTD was defined, stomatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity at 400 mg BID dose was considered incompatible with prolonged treatment. The RP2D of BEZ235 was defined as 300 mg BID. Four of 24 patients showed clinical benefit. Twenty-two of 24 patients discontinued because of progression, (median time to progression 27 days (4d-112d). There was no association between PK parameters and efficacy or tolerability. Conclusions Combined inhibition of PI3K and mTOR inhibits a clinically meaningful driver pathway in a small subset of patients with ALL, with no benefit in patients with AML. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01756118. retrospectively registered 19th December 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01756118.

Download Full-text

Phase I trial of intratumoral PVSRIPO in patients with unresectable, treatment-refractory melanoma

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer ◽

10.1136/jitc-2020-002203 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (4) ◽

pp. e002203

Author(s):

Georgia M Beasley ◽

Smita K Nair ◽

Norma E Farrow ◽

Karenia Landa ◽

Maria Angelica Selim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Clinical Investigation ◽

Objective Response ◽

Complete Response ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events

BackgroundWhile programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antagonists have improved the prognosis for many patients with melanoma, around 60% fail therapy. PVSRIPO is a non-neurovirulent rhinovirus:poliovirus chimera that facilitates an antitumor immune response following cell entry via the poliovirus receptor CD155, which is expressed on tumor and antigen-presenting cells. Preclinical studies show that oncolytic virus plus anti-PD-1 therapy leads to a greater antitumor response than either agent alone, warranting clinical investigation.MethodsAn open-label phase I trial of intratumoral PVSRIPO in patients with unresectable melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer V.7 stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV) was performed. Eligible patients had disease progression on anti-PD-1 and V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF)/mitogen activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors (if BRAF mutant). The primary objective was to characterize the safety and tolerability of PVSRIPO. Twelve patients in four cohorts received a total of 1, 2 or 3 injections of PVSRIPO monotherapy, with 21 days between injections.ResultsPVSRIPO injections were well tolerated with no serious adverse events (SAEs) or dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) reported. All adverse events (AEs) were grade (G) 1 or G2 (G1 pruritus most common at 58%); all but two PVSRIPO-treatment related AEs were localized to the injected or adjacent lesions (n=1 G1 hot flash, n=1 G1 fatigue). Four out of 12 patients (33%) achieved an objective response per immune-related response criteria (two observations, 4 weeks apart), including 4/6 (67%) who received three injections. In the four patients with in-transit disease, a pathological complete response (pCR) was observed in two (50%) patients. Following study completion, 11/12 patients (92%) reinitiated immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy, and 6/12 patients (50%) remained without progression at a median follow-up time of 18 months.ConclusionIntratumoral PVSRIPO was well tolerated. Despite the limited number of PVSRIPO treatments relative to the overall lesion burden (67% patients>5 lesions), intratumoral PVSRIPO showed promising antitumor activity, with pCR in injected as well as non-injected lesions in select patients.Trial registration numberNCT03712358

Download Full-text

A phase I/Ib study of crenolanib with ramucirumab (RAM)/paclitaxel (PTX) as second-line therapy (2L tx) for advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.116 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 116-116

Author(s):

Megan Greally ◽

Sujata Jha ◽

Sam S. Yoon ◽

Jia Li ◽

Avni Mukund Desai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Phase I ◽

Objective Response ◽

Study Drug ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Ecog Ps ◽

Higher Doses

116 Background: PTX/RAM as 2L tx for patients (pts) with EGA is a standard-of-care based on the RAINBOW trial (Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1224). However, benefit is modest. Upregulation of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)/PDGF receptor-β (PDGFR-β) pathway causes resistance to VEGF inhibition. Crenolanib is a selective inhibitor of PDGFR-β. We report initial results of the dose escalation phase of a study of crenolanib plus RAM/PTX in pts with previously treated advanced EGA. Methods: This phase I/Ib study is enrolling ECOG PS 0-1 EGA pts with progression on first-line chemo. PTX 80 mg/m2/ day on day 1, 8, 15 and RAM 8mg/kg q 14 days were administered with escalating doses of crenolanib (60, 80, 100 mg BID) after a 7 day “run-in” of crenolanib to assess crenolanib-related toxicities. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of crenolanib plus RAM/PTX. Safety and preliminary efficacy were examined. Results: 15 pts were treated; 12 male, median age 58 (32-73), 66% were ECOG PS 1. Primary site was gastric in nine pts, GEJ in 4 pts and esophageal in two pts. Three pts each received crenolanib 60mg BID and 80mg BID, six pts received 100mg BID and three pts received higher doses. At data cutoff, eight pts continued on treatment. 12 pts have completed the DLT evaluation period across 3 dose levels (60 to 100 mg BID). Median treatment duration was 76 days (35-191). The combination was well tolerated, with no DLTs or serious adverse events (SAEs) attributed to study drug. Treatment related adverse events occurred in two pts (17%), all grade 1. These were fatigue, nausea, vomiting and hypertension. Disease progression was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation; no pt discontinued due to study drug related AEs. Nine pts were evaluable for response. One pt had objective response; the disease control rate was 78%. Median PFS and OS were 4.1 and 11.9 months respectively. Conclusions: Crenolanib plus RAM/PTX appears well tolerated at a dose level of 100mg BID. Further evaluation is needed to determine efficacy. Accrual is ongoing at higher doses. Once the MTD is defined, the dose expansion phase will enroll 25 pts. Updated data with pharmacokinetics and biomarkers will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03193918.

Download Full-text

A phase I trial of a local delivery of siRNA against k-ras in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4037 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4037-4037 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Talia Golan ◽

Ayala Hubert ◽

Amotz Shemi ◽

Amiel Segal ◽

Alan Dancour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Phase I ◽

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Primary Study ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Line Setting

4037 Background:K-Ras mutation G12D is most prevalent in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). siRNA against the K-RasG12D(siG12D) mutant had showed significant preclinical anti-tumor effects. siG12D LODER - miniature biodegradable polymeric matrix that encompasses anti-K-RasG12D siRNA drug, is placed with Endoscopic US biopsy and designed to continuously release the drug regionally over a period of 4 months. Methods: Open label phase I study of patients with locally advanced non-operable PDAC in the first-line setting. Patients were assigned to receive siG12D LODERs in dose escalation cohorts: 0.025mg, 0.75mg and 3.0mg. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2IV was given weekly, following siG12D LODER insertion. The RP2D (recommended phase II dose) was further examined in 3.0 mg dose cohort in combination with modified Folfirinox (Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2, Irinotecan 150mg/m2, Fluorouracil infusion 2,400mg/m2 46 hours, every 2 weeks). Follow up period was 8 weeks and survival follow up until death. Primary study objectives were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated doses (MTD). Results:15 patients have been enrolled. 2 patients were omitted from study due to metastatic disease detected on day 1 post siG12D LODER implant imaging . Median age = 70 (range 52-85); male:female 8:7. Among 13 treated patients, the most frequent adverse events observed in the study were typically grade 1- 2 in severity; 4 patients experienced serious adverse events (SAE), one procedure related. No DLTs were observed. MTD was not reached. CT performed 8-10 weeks following the procedure showed stable disease in all patients. Reduction in tumor marker CA 19-9 was observed in 64% (7/11) of patients. The median survival of 13 patients was 16 months ( 8/13 patients still alive at analysis). Conclusions: The combination of siG12D LODER and chemotherapy is well tolerated. The combination has demonstrated promising efficacy in locally advanced PDAC with durable responses. Phamocodynamic endpoints are currently being examined in an expansion cohort in operable patients. A phase II randomized trial is planned in order to investigate efficacy of siG12D LODER in locally advanced non-operable PDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT01188785.

Download Full-text

A Phase I/II randomized trial of H56:IC31 vaccination and adjunctive cyclooxygenase-2-inhibitor treatment in tuberculosis patients

Nature Communications ◽

10.1038/s41467-021-27029-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Synne Jenum ◽

Kristian Tonby ◽

Corina S. Rueegg ◽

Morten Rühwald ◽

Max P. Kristiansen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Phase I ◽

Cyclooxygenase 2 ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Tuberculosis Patients ◽

Therapy Strategy ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Therapy Strategies ◽

Inhibitor Treatment

AbstractHost-directed-therapy strategies are warranted to fight tuberculosis. Here we assess the safety and immunogenicity of adjunctive vaccination with the H56:IC31 candidate and cyclooxygenase-2-inhibitor treatment (etoricoxib) in pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis patients in a randomized open-label phase I/II clinical trial (TBCOX2, NCT02503839). A total of 222 patients were screened, 51 enrolled and randomized; 13 in the etoricoxib-group, 14 in the H56:IC31-group, 12 in the etoricoxib+H56:IC31-group and 12 controls. Three Serious Adverse Events were reported in the etoricoxib-groups; two urticarial rash and one possible disease progression, no Serious Adverse Events were vaccine related. H56:IC31 induces robust expansion of antigen-specific T-cells analyzed by fluorospot and flow cytometry, and higher proportion of seroconversions. Etoricoxib reduced H56:IC31-induced T-cell responses. Here, we show the first clinical data that H56:IC31 vaccination is safe and immunogenic in tuberculosis patients, supporting further studies of H56:IC31 as a host-directed-therapy strategy. Although etoricoxib appears safe, our data do not support therapy with adjunctive cyclooxygenase-2-inhibitors.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Safety and Tolerability of Deutetrabenazine During Titration and Maintenance in Patients with Tardive Dyskinesia

CNS Spectrums ◽

10.1017/s1092852920002643 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 26 (2) ◽

pp. 164-180

Author(s):

Amanda Wilhelm ◽

Karen E. Anderson ◽

Hubert H. Fernandez ◽

Hadas Barkay ◽

Nayla Chaijale ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Suicidal Ideation ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Tardive Dyskinesia ◽

Dry Mouth ◽

Fixed Dose ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Open Label Extension ◽

Pharmaceutical Industries ◽

Flexible Dose

AbstractBackgroundDeutetrabenazine is approved to treat tardive dyskinesia (TD) in adults and is titrated weekly by 6 mg/day, from 12 to 48 mg/day, based on dyskinesia control and tolerability. This analysis compared the safety of deutetrabenazine during titration versus maintenance.MethodsSafety was assessed during titration versus maintenance using integrated data from two 12-week placebo-controlled studies (ARM-TD and AIM-TD) and the open-label extension study. Rates were compared for overall and serious adverse events (AEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, treatment-related AEs, common AEs (≥4%), and specific AEs (parkinsonism, suicidal ideation, akathisia, restlessness).ResultsIn titration versus maintenance, AE rates with placebo (n=130) were: overall, 43.1% vs 25.4%; serious, 4.6% vs 2.3%; leading to discontinuation, 3.1% vs 0; treatment-related, 26.9% vs 10.0%. For placebo, common AEs during titration were somnolence, headache, nausea, fatigue, and dry mouth; none occurred during maintenance. In titration versus maintenance, AE rates in fixed-dose deutetrabenazine 12–36 mg (n=216) were: overall, 33.3–38.9% vs 22.2–29.2%; serious, 2.8–6.9% vs 0–1.4%; leading to discontinuation, 2.8–5.6% vs 0; treatment-related, 8.3–16.7% vs 8.3–13.9%. For fixed-dose deutetrabenazine, common AEs during titration were headache, diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, depression, hypertension, and dry mouth; headache was the only common AE during maintenance. In titration versus maintenance, AE rates with flexible-dose deutetrabenazine (n=168) were: overall, 49.4% vs 32.7%; serious, 3.6% vs 2.4%; leading to discontinuation, 2.4% vs 0.6%. For flexible-dose deutetrabenazine, the only common AE during titration was somnolence; none occurred during maintenance. Rates of parkinsonism, suicidal ideation, akathisia, and restlessness were low and comparable in titration and maintenance.ConclusionsDeutetrabenazine was well-tolerated, with AE rates similar to placebo during both phases; AE rates were higher during titration and decreased during maintenance.FundingTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petach Tikva, Israel

Download Full-text

Allopurinol dose escalation to achieve serum urate below 6 mg/dL: an open-label extension study

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211873 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 76 (12) ◽

pp. 2065-2070 ◽

Cited By ~ 33

Author(s):

Lisa K Stamp ◽

Peter T Chapman ◽

Murray Barclay ◽

Anne Horne ◽

Christopher Frampton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Serum Urate ◽

Extension Study ◽

Open Label ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Open Label Extension ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

Kidney Impairment

ObjectivesTo determine the long-term safety and efficacy of allopurinol dose escalation (DE) to achieve target serum urate (SU) in gout.MethodsPeople, including those with chronic kidney disease, who completed the first 12 months of a randomised controlled trial continued into a 12-month extension study. Participants randomised to continue current dose for the first 12 months began allopurinol DE at month 12 if SU was ≥6 mg/dL (control/DE). Immediate DE participants who achieved target SU maintained allopurinol dose (DE/DE). The primary endpoints were reduction in SU and adverse events (AEs) at month 24.ResultsThe mean (SE) change in SU from month 12 to 24 was −1.1 (0.2) mg/dL in control/DE and 0.1 (0.2) mg/dL in DE/DE group (p<0.001). There was a significant reduction in the percentage of individuals having a gout flare in the month prior to months 12 and 24 compared with baseline in both groups and in mean tophus size over 24 months, but no difference between randomised groups. There were similar numbers of AEs and serious adverse events between groups.ConclusionsThe majority of people with gout tolerate higher than creatinine clearance-based allopurinol dose and achieve and maintain target SU. Slow allopurinol DE may be appropriate in clinical practice even in those with kidney impairment.Trial registration numberACTRN12611000845932

Download Full-text