scholarly journals The midline approach for endotracheal intubation with GlideScope video laryngoscopy could provide a better glottis exposure in adults:A randomised controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianxiang Jiang ◽  
Shulin Qiu ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Weidong Yao ◽  
Yan Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Midline Approach ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Background: Previous studies demonstrated that the common laryngoscopic approach (right-sided) and midline approach are both used for endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy. Although a midline approach is commonly recommended for video laryngoscopy (VL) in clinical, lacking of published evidences to support it. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of different video laryngoscopic approach on intubation. Methods: Two hundred and sixty-two patients aged 18 years who underwent elective surgery in general anesthesia, requiring endotracheal intubation, were included in the prospective, randomized, controlled study. Participants were randomly and equally allocated to right approach (Group R) or midline approach (Group M). All intubations were conducted with GlideScope video laryngoscopy by experienced anaesthetists. The primary outcomes were Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic views (CLV) and first-pass success (FPS) rate. The secondary outcomes were time to glottis exposure, time to tracheal intubation, hemodynamic response and other adverse events. Comparative analysis was performed between the both groups. Results: All patients ultimately were successfully intubated. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics and airway assessments (P＞0.05). Compared with Group R, Group M had a better CLV (χ2=14.706, P=0.001) and shorter time to glottis exposure (8.82±2.04 vs 12.38±1.81, t=14.94, P<0.001) and tracheal intubation (37.19±5.01 vs 45.23±4.81, t=13.25, P<0.001), but no difference in FPS rate (70.2% vs 71.8%, χ2=0.074, P=0.446). Between groups, the rates of hoarseness or sore throat, minor injury, hypoxemiaand changes of SBP and HR were noted no significant difference (P＞0.05). Conclusion: Although FPS rate did not differ based upon laryngoscopic approach type; however, the midline approach could provide a better glottis exposure, shorter time to glottis exposure and intubation. The midline approach should be recommended for teaching in VL-assisted endotracheal intubation. Trial registration: The study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-RNC-13003898). Keywords: endotracheal intubation; video laryngoscopic; laryngoscopic approach

scholarly journals The midline approach for endotracheal intubation using GlideScope video laryngoscopy could provide better glottis exposure in adults： A randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianxiang Jiang ◽  
Shulin Qiu ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Weidong Yao ◽  
Yan Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Midline Approach ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that the common laryngoscopic approach (right-sided) and midline approach are both used for endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy. Although the midline approach is commonly recommended for video laryngoscopy (VL) in the clinic, there is a lack of published evidences to support this practice. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different video laryngoscopic approaches on intubation. Methods: Two hundred sixty-two patients aged 18 years who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia and required endotracheal intubation were included in the present prospective, randomized, controlled study. The participants were randomly and equally allocated to the right approach (Group R) or midline approach (Group M). All the intubations were conducted by experienced anaesthetists using GlideScope video laryngoscopy. The primary outcomes were Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic views (CLVs) and first-pass success (FPS) rates. The secondary outcomes were the time to glottis exposure, time to tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses and other adverse events. Comparative analysis was performed between the groups. Results: Finally, 262 patients completed the study, and all the tracheas were successfully intubated. No significant differences were observed in the patient characteristics and airway assessments ( P >0.05). Compared with Group R, Group M had a better CLV ( χ2 =14.706, P =0.001) and shorter times to glottis exposure (8.82±2.04 vs 12.38±1.81; t =14.94; P <0.001) and tracheal intubation (37.19±5.01 vs 45.23±4.81; t =13.25; P <0.001), but no difference was found in the FPS rate (70.2% vs 71.8%; χ2 =0.074; P =0.446) and intubation procedure time (29.86±2.56 vs 30.46±2.97, t =1.75, P =0.081). Between the groups, the rates of hoarseness or sore throat, minor injury, hypoxemia and changes in SBP and HR showed no significant difference ( P >0.05). Conclusion: Although the FPS rate did not differ based on the laryngoscopic approach, the midline approach could provide better glottis exposure and shorter times to glottis exposure and intubation. The midline approach should be recommended for teaching in VL-assisted endotracheal intubation. Trial registration: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR-RNC-1900023252 ).

scholarly journals The midline approach for endotracheal intubation using GlideScope video laryngoscopy could provide better glottis exposure in adults： A randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianxiang Jiang ◽  
Shulin Qiu ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Weidong Yao ◽  
Yan Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Midline Approach ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that the common laryngoscopic approach (right-sided) and midline approach are both used for endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy. Although the midline approach is commonly recommended for video laryngoscopy (VL) in the clinic, there is a lack of published evidences to support this practice. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different video laryngoscopic approaches on intubation. Methods: Two hundred sixty-two patients aged 18 years who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia and required endotracheal intubation were included in the present prospective, randomized, controlled study. The participants were randomly and equally allocated to the right approach (Group R) or midline approach (Group M). All the intubations were conducted by experienced anaesthetists using GlideScope video laryngoscopy. The primary outcomes were Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic views (CLVs) and first-pass success (FPS) rates. The secondary outcomes were the time to glottis exposure, time to tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses and other adverse events. Comparative analysis was performed between the groups. Results: Finally, 262 patients completed the study, and all the tracheas were successfully intubated. No significant differences were observed in the patient characteristics and airway assessments ( P >0.05). Compared with Group R, Group M had a better CLV ( χ2 =14.706, P =0.001) and shorter times to glottis exposure (8.82±2.04 vs 12.38±1.81; t =14.94; P <0.001) and tracheal intubation (37.19±5.01 vs 45.23±4.81; t =13.25; P <0.001), but no difference was found in the FPS rate (70.2% vs 71.8%; χ2 =0.074; P =0.446) and intubation procedure time (29.86±2.56 vs 30.46±2.97, t =1.75, P =0.081). Between the groups, the rates of hoarseness or sore throat, minor injury, hypoxemia and changes in SBP and HR showed no significant difference ( P >0.05). Conclusion: Although the FPS rate did not differ based on the laryngoscopic approach, the midline approach could provide better glottis exposure and shorter times to glottis exposure and intubation. The midline approach should be recommended for teaching in VL-assisted endotracheal intubation. Trial registration: The study was registered on May 18, 2019 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900023252).

scholarly journals The midline approach for endotracheal intubation using GlideScope video laryngoscopy could provide better glottis exposure in adults: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianxiang Jiang ◽  
Shulin Qiu ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Weidong Yao ◽  
Yan Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Midline Approach ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the common laryngoscopic approach (right-sided) and midline approach are both used for endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy. Although the midline approach is commonly recommended for video laryngoscopy (VL) in the clinic, there is a lack of published evidences to support this practice. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different video laryngoscopic approaches on intubation. Methods Two hundred sixty-two patients aged 18 years who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia and required endotracheal intubation were included in the present prospective, randomized, controlled study. The participants were randomly and equally allocated to the right approach (Group R) or midline approach (Group M). All the intubations were conducted by experienced anaesthetists using GlideScope video laryngoscopy. The primary outcomes were Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic views (CLVs) and first-pass success (FPS) rates. The secondary outcomes were the time to glottis exposure, time to tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses and other adverse events. Comparative analysis was performed between the groups. Results Finally, 262 patients completed the study, and all the tracheas were successfully intubated. No significant differences were observed in the patient characteristics and airway assessments (P > 0.05). Compared with Group R, Group M had a better CLV (χ2 = 14.706, P = 0.001) and shorter times to glottis exposure (8.82 ± 2.04 vs 12.38 ± 1.81; t = 14.94; P < 0.001) and tracheal intubation (37.19 ± 5.01 vs 45.23 ± 4.81; t = 13.25; P < 0.001), but no difference was found in the FPS rate (70.2% vs 71.8%; χ2 = 0.074; P = 0.446) and intubation procedure time (29.86 ± 2.56 vs 30.46 ± 2.97, t = 1.75, P = 0.081). Between the groups, the rates of hoarseness or sore throat, minor injury, hypoxemia and changes in SBP and HR showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion Although the FPS rate did not differ based on the laryngoscopic approach, the midline approach could provide better glottis exposure and shorter times to glottis exposure and intubation. The midline approach should be recommended for teaching in VL-assisted endotracheal intubation. Trial registration The study was registered on May 18, 2019 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900023252).

scholarly journals The midline approach for endotracheal intubation using GlideScope video laryngoscopy could provide better glottis exposure in adults： A randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianxiang Jiang ◽  
Shulin Qiu ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Weidong Yao ◽  
Yan Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Midline Approach ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that the common laryngoscopic approach (right-sided) and midline approach are both used for endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy. Although the midline approach is commonly recommended for video laryngoscopy (VL) in the clinic, there is a lack of published evidences to support this practice. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different video laryngoscopic approaches on intubation. Methods: Two hundred sixty-two patients aged 18 years who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia and required endotracheal intubation were included in the present prospective, randomized, controlled study. The participants were randomly and equally allocated to the right approach (Group R) or midline approach (Group M). All the intubations were conducted by experienced anaesthetists using GlideScope video laryngoscopy. The primary outcomes were Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic views (CLVs) and first-pass success (FPS) rates. The secondary outcomes were the time to glottis exposure, time to tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses and other adverse events. Comparative analysis was performed between the groups. Results: Finally, 262 patients completed the study, and all the tracheas were successfully intubated. No significant differences were observed in the patient characteristics and airway assessments ( P >0.05). Compared with Group R, Group M had a better CLV ( χ2 =14.706, P =0.001) and shorter times to glottis exposure (8.82±2.04 vs 12.38±1.81; t =14.94; P <0.001) and tracheal intubation (37.19±5.01 vs 45.23±4.81; t =13.25; P <0.001), but no difference was found in the FPS rate (70.2% vs 71.8%; χ2 =0.074; P =0.446) and intubation procedure time (29.86±2.56 vs 30.46±2.97, t =1.75, P =0.081). Between the groups, the rates of hoarseness or sore throat, minor injury, hypoxemia and changes in SBP and HR showed no significant difference ( P >0.05). Conclusion: Although the FPS rate did not differ based on the laryngoscopic approach, the midline approach could provide better glottis exposure and shorter times to glottis exposure and intubation. The midline approach should be recommended for teaching in VL-assisted endotracheal intubation. Trial registration: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR-RNC-1900023252 ).

scholarly journals Ketorolac tromethamine pretreatment suppresses sufentanil-induced cough during general anesthesia induction: a prospective randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Tian ◽  
Bei Hu ◽  
Min Miao ◽  
Lulu Zhang ◽  
Lin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Ketorolac Tromethamine ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: To observe the effect about pretreatment of ketorolac tromethamine on sufentanil-induced cough in general anesthesia patients. Methods: 102 patients were screened, and a total of 90 patients were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. 90 patients were randomly divided into two groups: the control group（C group）and the observation group（KT group）. 5 minutes before anesthesia induction, observation group were given ketorolac tromethamine 0.5mg/kg intravenously within 3 s, while the control group were given the same amount of normal saline intravenously. All patients were given a sufentanil bolus of 0.5 ug/kg（within 3 s）intravenously,1 minute later, propofol 2.5mg/kg, vecuronium 0.15mg/kg were injected intravenously, and endotracheal intubation was guided by laryngoscope. The number of coughs that occurred within 1 min after sufentanil injection were recorded. The mean arterial pressure (MAP)，heart rate (HR) and pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2) were recorded at T0 (immediately before pretreatment), T1 (5 minutes after pretreatment), T2（before intubation），T3 (1 min after intubation) and T4 (5 min after intubation).The incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed. Results: Within 1 min after sufentanil injection, the incidence and severity of cough in KT group was significantly lower than that in C group ( P < 0.05). At the time points of T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4, there was no significant difference in MAP, HR and SpO2 between the two groups ( P > 0.05). And there was no significant difference in the dosage of sufentanil, propofol, remifentanil and vecuronium, incidence of nausea and vomiting, delay of recovery, dizziness, drowsiness and respiratory depression between the two groups( P > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in the number of restlessness during waking period ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: Pretreatment of intravenous ketorolac tromethamine can significantly reduce the incidence of sufentanil-induced cough during induction period of general anesthesia patients, and can also significantly reduce the restlessness during recovery period of patients. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number# ChiCTR2000030287; date of registration: 27/02/2020).

scholarly journals Preprocedural ultrasound versus landmark techniques for spinal anesthesia performed by novice residents in elderly: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwan S. Rizk ◽  
Carine A. Zeeni ◽  
Joanna N. Bouez ◽  
Nathalie J. Bteich ◽  
Samia K. Sayyid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Midline Approach ◽  
Number Of Passes

Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia using the midline approach might be technically difficult in geriatric population. We hypothesized that pre-procedural ultrasound (US)-guided paramedian technique and pre-procedural US-guided midline technique would result in a different spinal anesthesia success rate at first attempt when compared with the conventional landmark-guided midline technique in elderly patients. Methods In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, one hundred-eighty consenting patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomized into the conventional surface landmark-guided midline technique (group LM), the pre-procedural US-guided paramedian technique (group UP), or the pre-procedural US-guided midline technique (group UM) with 60 patients in each group. All spinal anesthesia were performed by a novice resident. Results The successful dural puncture rate on first attempt (primary outcome) was higher in groups LM and UM (77 and 73% respectively) than in group UP (42%; P < 0.001). The median number of attempts was lower in groups LM and UM (1 [1] and 1 [1–1.75] respectively) than in group UP (2 [1, 2]; P < 0.001). The median number of passes was lower in groups LM and UM (2 [0.25–3] and 2 [0–4]; respectively) than in group UP (4 [2–7.75]; P < 0.001). The time taken to perform the spinal anesthesia was not different between groups LM and UM (87.24 ± 79.51 s and 116.32 ± 98.12 s, respectively) but shorter than in group UP (154.58 ± 91.51 s; P < 0.001). Conclusions A pre-procedural US scan did not improve the ease of midline and paramedian spinal anesthesia as compared to the conventional landmark midline technique when performed by junior residents in elderly population. Trial registration Retrospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number NCT02658058, date of registration: January 18, 2016.

scholarly journals A randomized controlled study of intravenous esmolol to attenuate the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 1103
Author(s):  
Ninad Deepak Chodankar ◽  
Bhagyashree Shivde
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Cardiovascular Responses ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Control Group Group

Background: Objective is to compare the efficacy of intravenous Esmolol to attenuate the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with control group.Methods: Study was done on 60 adults, ASA grade I or II normotensive patients, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia and willing to participate. These patients where be randomly allocated in to either group C (Control) or E (Esmolol). Group ‘C’ Control group. Group ‘E’, patients were given intravenous Esmolol 1.5 mg/kg 2 minutes before start of laryngoscopy. All patients were premedicated, induced and intubated using Thiopentone and Succinyl Choline as per the protocol. Heart Rate (HR), SBP, DBP and MAP were recorded at baseline (taken half an hour prior to anaesthesia), Before sedation, After induction but before intubation, Immediately after endotracheal intubation and Thereafter at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 minutes.Results: Heart rate was lower in Group E as compared to Group C, and there was statistically significant difference immediately after intubation till 4 minutes after intubation. While Blood pressure was lower in Group E as compared to Group C, and there was statistically significant difference only immediately after intubation.Conclusions: In Normotensive patients requiring general anaesthesia with laryngoscopy and intubation, authors conclude that intravenous Esmolol 1.5 mg/kg attenuated Heart rate response but fails to satisfactorily prevent rise in blood pressure.

scholarly journals The Effect of Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Dental Procedure on Neurodevelopment in Children: A Prospective, Equivalence, Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinping Zhou ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Guijin Huang ◽  
Yuan Hu ◽  
Wenzhu Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
General Anesthesia Group ◽  
Anesthesia Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Dental procedures under general anesthesia (DGA) was found to improve the oral health-related quality of children's life. However, some parents and pediatricians expressed concern about the neurotoxicity of general anesthesia. The purpose of this trial was to investigate whether DGA in children has an adverse effect on neurodevelopment.Methods: In this prospective, assessor-masked, controlled, equivalence trial, we recruited 340 children younger than 7 years who were undergoing caries treatment between Feb 1, 2019, and Aug 31, 2019, without factors affecting neurodevelopment. They received either sevoflurane-based general anesthesia or awake-local anesthesia. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition was used to evaluate the neurodevelopment of children at six months after surgery, and the Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) was selected as the primary outcome. Predefine the 95% CI of a difference in means within five (1/3 SD) as the equivalence margin.Results: The outcome data were obtained from 129 children in the general anesthesia group and 144 in the local anesthesia group. The median length of general anesthesia was 130 min (IQR 110 – 160). There was equivalence in means of FSIQ score between the general anesthesia group and the local anesthesia group (local minus general anesthesia 0.46, 95% CI -2.35 to 1.61). There was no significant difference in FSIQ scores between different age groups and different anesthesia durations. Only the mother's education could affect the primary outcome.Conclusions: In this trial, prolonged DGA with a sevoflurane-only anesthetic in preschool children, does not adversely affect neurodevelopment at six months after surgery compared with awake-local anesthesia. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800015216. Registered Mar 15 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=24830.

scholarly journals Faecal microbiota transplantation alters gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: results from a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 2107-2115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Ingdam Halkjær ◽  
Alice Højer Christensen ◽  
Bobby Zhao Sheng Lo ◽  
Patrick Denis Browne ◽  
Stig Günther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Faecal Microbiota ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Faecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Faecal Samples ◽  
Significant Difference

ObjectiveIBS is associated with an intestinal dysbiosis and faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been hypothesised to have a positive effect in patients with IBS. We performed a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to investigate if FMT resulted in an altered gut microbiota and improvement in clinical outcome in patients with IBS.DesignWe performed this study in 52 adult patients with moderate-to-severe IBS. At the screening visit, clinical history and symptoms were assessed and faecal samples were collected. Patients were randomised to FMT or placebo capsules for 12 days and followed for 6 months. Study visits were performed at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months, where patients were asked to register their symptoms using the IBS-severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) and IBS-specific quality of life (IBS-QoL). Prior to each visit, faecal samples were collected.ResultsA significant difference in improvement in IBS-SSS score was observed 3 months after treatment (p=0.012) favouring placebo. This was similar for IBS-QoL data after 3 months (p=0.003) favouring placebo. Patients receiving FMT capsules had an increase in faecal microbial biodiversity while placebos did not.ConclusionIn this randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled study, we found that FMT changed gut microbiota in patients with IBS. But patients in the placebo group experienced greater symptom relief compared with the FMT group after 3 months. Altering the gut microbiota is not enough to obtain clinical improvement in IBS. However, different study designs and larger studies are required to examine the role of FMT in IBS.Trial registration numberNCT02788071.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document