faecal microbiota
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

934
(FIVE YEARS 441)

H-INDEX

63
(FIVE YEARS 16)

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-114
Author(s):  
David Inglis ◽  
Mohammed Nabil Quraishi ◽  
Christopher Green ◽  
Tariq Iqbal

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
Blair Merrick ◽  
Aravind Gokul Tamilarasan ◽  
Raphael Luber ◽  
Patrick F. K. Yong ◽  
Kuldeep Cheent ◽  
...  

There is limited evidence to guide successful treatment of recurrent Campylobacter infection in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) already managed on regular immunoglobulin therapy. The role of faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is uncertain. We report a case of recurrent Campylobacter jejuni infection in a patient with CVID treated with repeated FMT with 18 months of symptom resolution prior to relapse.


2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Ding ◽  
Cong He ◽  
Xueyang Li ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
Yupeng Lei ◽  
...  

Aims: We investigated whether faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) decreases intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and improves gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and infectious complications in acute pancreatitis (AP).Methods: In this first randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled study, we recruited and enrolled consecutive patients with AP complicated with GI dysfunction. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive faecal transplant (n = 30) or normal saline (n = 30) via a nasoduodenal tube once and then again 2 days later. The primary endpoint was the rate of IAP decline; secondary endpoints were GI function, infectious complications, organ failure, hospital stay and mortality. Analyses were based on intention to treat.Results: We enrolled 60 participants and randomly assigned them to the FMT (n = 30) or control (n = 30) group. Baseline characteristics and disease severity were similar for both groups. IAP decreased significantly 1 week after intervention in both groups, with no difference in the IAP decline rate between FMT and Control group [0.1 (−0.6, 0.5) vs. 0.2 (−0.2, 0.6); P = 0.27]. Normal gastrointestinal failure (GIF) scores were achieved in 12 (40%) patients in the FMT group and 14 (47%) in the control group, with no significant difference (P = 0.60). However, D-lactate was significantly elevated in the FMT group compared to the control group, as calculated by the rate of decline [−0.3 (−3.7, 0.8) vs. 0.4 (−1.1, 0.9); P = 0.01]. Infectious complications occurred in 15 (50%) and 16 (53.33%) patients in the FMT and control groups, respectively (P = 0.80). However, interleukin-6 (IL-6) was significantly elevated in the FMT group compared to the control group, as calculated by the rate of decline [0.4 (−3.6, 0.9) vs. 0.8 (−1.7, 1.0); P = 0.03]. One participant experienced transient nausea immediately after FMT, but no serious adverse events were attributed to FMT.Conclusion: FMT had no obvious effect on IAP and infectious complications in AP patients, though GI barrier indictors might be adversely affected. Further multi-centre studies are needed to confirm our findings. The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02318134).


2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-118
Author(s):  
Bingna Cai ◽  
Xiangxi Yi ◽  
Qian Han ◽  
Jianyu Pan ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Lenardon

Candida albicans colonises the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract of over 60% of the population. In severely ill or immune compromised patients, this fungus can escape the gut, disseminate through the body and cause systemic disease. Most research in the field has focused on defining traits that contribute directly to virulence; there are comparatively few studies which have addressed how C. albicans colonises and persists in the gut. Furthermore, such studies have typically been performed mouse models devoid of resident GI bacteria, completely neglecting the major impact of the local microbiota on GI colonisation. How, then, does C. albicans persist in the GI tract in the presence of the normal gut microbiota? To address this question, a novel in vitro two-phase anaerobic fermentation system that simulates the human colon microenvironment has been developed. This “colon microcosm” supports the growth of human faecal microbiota in liquid anaerobic colon medium (phase 1) and C. albicans growth on agar plugs which are added to the medium to mimic the epithelial surface (phase 2). The impact of C. albicans upon the faecal microbiota is monitored by examining the planktonic phase (phase 1), whilst the effect of the microbiota on the growth of C. albicans is monitored after extracting C. albicans cells from the agar plugs (phase 2). The results of assays carried out to validate the model will be presented, as will data from pilot studies which illustrate the potentially exploitable impact of the human GI microbiota from healthy individuals on C. albicans growth.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianquan He ◽  
Xingxiang He ◽  
Yonghui Ma ◽  
Luxi Yang ◽  
Haiming Fang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective therapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infections and chronic gastrointestional infections. However, the risks of FMT and the selection process of suitable donors remain insufficiently characterized. The eligibility rate for screening, underlying microbial basis, and core ethical issues of stool donors for FMT are yet to be elucidated in China. Results The potential stool donors were screened from December 2017 to December 2019 with the help of an online survey, clinical assessments, and stool and blood testing. Bioinformatics analyses were performed, and the composition and stability of gut microbiota in stool obtained from eligible donors were dynamically observed using metagenomics. Meanwhile, we build a donor microbial evaluation index (DoMEI) for stool donor screening. In the screening process, we also focused on ethical principles and requirements. Of the 2071 participants, 66 donors were selected via the screening process (3.19% success rate). Although there were significant differences in gut microbiota among donors, we found that the changes in the gut microbiota of the same donor were typically more stable than those between donors over time. Conclusions DoMEI provides a potential reference index for regular stool donor re-evaluation. In this retrospective study, we summarised the donor recruitment and screening procedure ensuring the safety and tolerability for FMT in China. Based on the latest advances in this field, we carried out rigorous recommendation and method which can assist stool bank and clinicians to screen eligible stool donor for FMT.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanyang Liu ◽  
Tingting Zhang ◽  
Jiahui Sun ◽  
Jianhua Fu ◽  
Hao Li

INTRODUCTION: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) therapeutic strategy has been associated with positive outcomes in multiple diseases. We conducted an umbrella review of the meta-analysis to summarize the available evidence and assess its credibility. METHODS: We evaluated a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of FMT for any condition. We used the random-effects model to obtain estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals, heterogeneity estimates, and small-study effects. We used AMSTAR 2 to assess methodological quality and GRADE tools to grade the evidence. RESULTS: Seven meta-analyses with a total of 33 outcomes were included in the current umbrella review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT. Overall, there is a moderate certainty of evidence supporting the associations of the use of FMT with better clinical remission in patients with Clostridium difficile infection (RR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.37-2.22) and inflammatory bowel disease (RR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.12-2.56). A very low certainty evidence supports the use of FMT to treat antibiotic-resistant bacteria (RR = 5.67; 95% CI: 2.20-14.63) and functional constipation (RR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.14-1.60) but does not support irritable bowel syndrome (RR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.65-1.77). DISCUSSION: The umbrella review of the current meta-analysis demonstrates that FMT intervention is associated with positive outcomes for several diseases. However, the credibility of the evidence is not high. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials should be carried out to improve the strength and credibility of the evidence base.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document