scholarly journals Self-management Support in Primary Care Practice: the Development of a Conceptual Model Using a Qualitative Approach

Author(s):  
Lotte Timmermans ◽  
Dagje Boeykens ◽  
Mustafa Muhammed Sirimsi ◽  
Peter Decat ◽  
Veerle Foulon ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundCoping with a chronic disease can be really challenging. Self-management represents a promising strategy to improve daily life experiences. The role of primary healthcare professionals cannot be underestimated in supporting self-management. Due to a shortage of theory, implementation of self-management support is hindered in primary care practice. The aim of this study is to create a conceptual model for self-management support by analysing patients’ care experiences towards self-management support. MethodsAn explorative-descriptive qualitative study was conducted in Flanders, Belgium. Semi-structured interviews were performed with 16 patients and their informal caregiver (dyads) using a purposive sampling strategy and processed by an inductive content analysis. ResultsInterviews revealed in-depth insights into patients’ care experiences. A conceptual model was developed for primary care practice, including five fundamental tasks for healthcare professionals - Supporting, Involving, Listening, Coordinating and Questioning (SILCQ) – contributing to the support of self-management of chronic patients.ConclusionThis qualitative paper emphasises the use of the SILCQ-model to develop optimal roadmaps and hands-on toolkits for healthcare professionals to support self-management. The model needs to be further explored by all stakeholders to support the development of self-management interventions in primary care practice.

Author(s):  
Mohan Thanikachalam ◽  
G Shanmugasundar ◽  
Muthuswamy Ravikiran ◽  
Vijaykumar Harivanzan ◽  
Sripriya Ravi

Background: Several chronic care models (CCMs) for diabetes management and cardiovascular disease prevention have been implemented, but outcomes have been marginal. Traditionally, CCMs have been offered within the trusted primary care practice environment, but self-management support is episodic, cost ineffective and difficult to scale. Alternate CCMs that offer self-management support mostly through telephone coaching or virtual (web/mobile platforms) interventions, enable easy access, scalability and cost effectiveness, yet are impaired by the limits of isolated self-management support when provided outside the context of the trusted, therapeutic relationship of a primary care practice. We hypothesize that an integrated model taking advantage of positive aspects of traditional and alternate CCMs will lead to positive behavioral change (empowerment), sustained patient participation and better outcomes. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we implemented the Empowerment and Participatory Care Model (EPCM) in a study center in Chennai, India by integrating face-to-face support with customized telephone, Internet and mobile phone enabled interventions within a primary care setting. Patients who participated in the traditional CCM formed the control group. Results: In the participents in traditional CCM (n=422), there was an average reduction of 0.57% in HbA1c, 16 mg/dl in fasting blood sugar, 30 mg/dl in post prandial blood sugar and 16 mg/dl of LDL at the end of year-one. In comparison, among the patients (66% men; mean age 52 yrs) who participated in the EPCM and had completed one-year in the program (n=112) there was average reduction of 1.6% in HbA1c, 57 mg/dl in fasting blood sugar, 80 mg/dl in post prandial blood sugar and 18 mg/dl of LDL (p<0.01). Figure 1 shows the difference in percent reduction of the various biochemical parameters between the EPCM and the control group. The total cost of care (other than medication) per patient per year in the EPCM, after taking into consideration purchasing power parity between USA and India, was 900 USD. Conclusion: The persons with diabetes who participated in the EPCM had better quality of metabolic control, but long-term follow up is required to assess overall reduction in the risk of cardiovascular complications and cost effectiveness.


2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. Siminerio ◽  
Gretchen Piatt ◽  
Janice C. Zgibor

Purpose The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the impact of implementing elements of the chronic care model (CCM; decision support, self-management, and delivery system redesign) on providers' diabetes care practices and patient outcomes in a rural practice setting. Methods In this pilot study, 104 patients with type 2 diabetes and 6 providers in a rural primary care practice were involved in an intervention that included a certified diabetes educator (CDE) who educated and supported providers on diabetes management and adherence to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Care over the year of the project. The CDE also provided diabetes self-management education (DSME) at the office site for 29 of the 104 patients who received their care in the practice. The following variables were evaluated: provider perceived barriers to care and adherence to ADA standards of care and patient A1C, blood pressure, cholesterol, knowledge, and empowerment levels. Results Provider adherence to ADA Standards of Care increased significantly across all process measures. Patients who received DSME at point of service in the primary care practice setting gained improvements in knowledge, empowerment, A1C, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Conclusions Implementing systems to support decision support, selfmanagement education, and delivery system redesign has a positive influence on practices and patient outcomes in outlying rural communities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Allory ◽  
Hélène Lucas ◽  
Arnaud Maury ◽  
Ronan Garlantezec ◽  
Candan Kendir ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an effective intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); nevertheless, patient participation in this type of programme is low. Implementation of DSME programmes in primary care practices by the local multi-professional team is a potential strategy to improve access to DSME for T2DM patients. The aim of this study was to identify perceived facilitators and barriers by patients to participation in local DSME delivered by primary care professionals in France. Method T2DM patients, informed and recruited during consulting with their usual care provider, who had attended a structured and validated DSME programme delivered by 13 primary care providers within a multi-professional primary care practice in a deprived area of 20,000 inhabitants, were invited to participate in this study. A qualitative study with semi-structured, in-depth interviews was conducted with study participants, between July 2017 and February 2018. A reflexive thematic analysis of the interviews was carried out. Coding schemes were developed to generate thematic trends in patient descriptions of facilitators and barriers to DSME participation. Results Nineteen interviews (mean length 31 min; [20–44 min]) were completed with T2DM patients. Four themes on facilitators for programme participation emerged from the data: geographical proximity of a DSME programme held in the local multi-professional primary care practice; effective promotion of the DSME programme by the local multi-professional team; pre-existing relationship between patients and their healthcare providers; and potential to establish new social interactions within the neighbourhood by participating in the programme. Three themes on barriers to attendance emerged: integrating the DSME programme into their own schedules; difficulties in expressing themselves in front of a group; and keeping the motivation for self-managing their T2DM. Conclusions From the patient perspective, the programme geographical proximity and the pre-existing patient-healthcare provider relationship were important factors that contributed to participation. Healthcare providers should consider these factors to improve access to DSME programmes and diabetes self-management in deprived populations. Longitudinal studies should be performed to measure the impact of these programmes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 388
Author(s):  
Vellyna Sumarno ◽  
Meredith J. Temple-Smith ◽  
Jade E. Bilardi

Miscarriage can cause significant psychological morbidity. Women frequently report dissatisfaction with healthcare professionals’ support following miscarriage. This pilot study aimed to explore the views and practices of GPs in providing emotional support to women experiencing miscarriage. Eight GPs participated in semi-structured interviews. GPs considered women’s physical care their top priority at the time of miscarriage; however, acknowledged miscarriage could result in significant emotional sequelae. Most GPs felt it was their role to provide emotional support, including expressing empathy, listening and normalising miscarriage to mitigate guilt and self-blame. GPs preferred an individualised approach to emotional support and mostly offered follow-up appointments if a patient requested it or was considered ‘high risk’ for mental health issues. Some GPs believed miscarriage support was within the scope of primary care practice; however, others felt it was the role of social networks and pregnancy loss support organisations. GPs identified several structural and external barriers that precluded enhanced emotional support. Further tools and resources to enhance support care may be of benefit to some GPs. The feasibility of GPs providing follow-up support remains uncertain. Further research is required to determine whether support is best placed within primary care or better served through external organisations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-297
Author(s):  
Tyanna C. Snider ◽  
Whitney J. Raglin Bignall ◽  
Cody A. Hostutler ◽  
Ariana C. Hoet ◽  
Bethany L. Walker ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document