scholarly journals Perspectives of deprived patients on diabetes self-management programmes delivered by the local primary care team: a qualitative study on facilitators and barriers for participation, in France

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Allory ◽  
Hélène Lucas ◽  
Arnaud Maury ◽  
Ronan Garlantezec ◽  
Candan Kendir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Geographical Proximity ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Improve Access

Abstract Background Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an effective intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); nevertheless, patient participation in this type of programme is low. Implementation of DSME programmes in primary care practices by the local multi-professional team is a potential strategy to improve access to DSME for T2DM patients. The aim of this study was to identify perceived facilitators and barriers by patients to participation in local DSME delivered by primary care professionals in France. Method T2DM patients, informed and recruited during consulting with their usual care provider, who had attended a structured and validated DSME programme delivered by 13 primary care providers within a multi-professional primary care practice in a deprived area of 20,000 inhabitants, were invited to participate in this study. A qualitative study with semi-structured, in-depth interviews was conducted with study participants, between July 2017 and February 2018. A reflexive thematic analysis of the interviews was carried out. Coding schemes were developed to generate thematic trends in patient descriptions of facilitators and barriers to DSME participation. Results Nineteen interviews (mean length 31 min; [20–44 min]) were completed with T2DM patients. Four themes on facilitators for programme participation emerged from the data: geographical proximity of a DSME programme held in the local multi-professional primary care practice; effective promotion of the DSME programme by the local multi-professional team; pre-existing relationship between patients and their healthcare providers; and potential to establish new social interactions within the neighbourhood by participating in the programme. Three themes on barriers to attendance emerged: integrating the DSME programme into their own schedules; difficulties in expressing themselves in front of a group; and keeping the motivation for self-managing their T2DM. Conclusions From the patient perspective, the programme geographical proximity and the pre-existing patient-healthcare provider relationship were important factors that contributed to participation. Healthcare providers should consider these factors to improve access to DSME programmes and diabetes self-management in deprived populations. Longitudinal studies should be performed to measure the impact of these programmes.

scholarly journals Challenging the status quo: results of an acceptability and feasibility study of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) management pathways in Indonesian primary care

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitriana Murriya Ekawati ◽  
Ova Emilia ◽  
Jane Gunn ◽  
Sharon Licqurish ◽  
Phyllis Lau
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Hypertensive Disorders Of Pregnancy ◽  
Hypertensive Disorders

Abstract Background Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the leading cause of maternal mortality in Indonesia. Focused HDP management pathways for Indonesian primary care practice have been developed from a consensus development process. However, the acceptability and feasibility of the pathways in practice have not been explored. This study reports on the implementation process of the pathways to determine their acceptability and feasibility in Indonesian practice. Methods The pathways were implemented in three public primary care clinics (Puskesmas) in Yogyakarta province for a month, guided by implementation science frameworks of Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM). The participating providers (general practitioners (GPs), midwives, and nurses) were asked to use recommendations in the pathways for a month. The pathway implementation evaluations were then conducted using clinical audits and a triangulation of observations, focus groups (FGs), and interviews with all of the participants. Clinical audit data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using a mix of the inductive-deductive approach of thematic analysis. Results A total of 50 primary care providers, four obstetricians, a maternal division officer in the local health office and 61 patients agreed to participate, and 48 of the recruited participants participated in evaluation FGs or interviews. All of the providers in the Puskesmas attempted to apply recommendations from the pathways to various degrees, mainly adopting preeclampsia risk factor screenings and HDP monitoring. The participants expressed that the recommendations empowered their practice when it came to HDP management. However, their practices were challenged by professional boundaries and hierarchical barriers among health care professionals, limited clinical resources, and regulations from the local health office. Suggestions for future scale-up studies were also mentioned, such as involving champion obstetricians and providing more patient education toolkits. Conclusion The HDP management pathways are acceptable and feasible in Indonesian primary care. A further scale-up study is desired and can be initiated with investigations to minimise the implementation challenges and enhance the pathways’ value in primary care practice.

Implementing the Chronic Care Model for Improvements in Diabetes Care and Education in a Rural Primary Care Practice

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. Siminerio ◽  
Gretchen Piatt ◽  
Janice C. Zgibor
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Chronic Care ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Practice Setting ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Rural Primary Care

Purpose The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the impact of implementing elements of the chronic care model (CCM; decision support, self-management, and delivery system redesign) on providers' diabetes care practices and patient outcomes in a rural practice setting. Methods In this pilot study, 104 patients with type 2 diabetes and 6 providers in a rural primary care practice were involved in an intervention that included a certified diabetes educator (CDE) who educated and supported providers on diabetes management and adherence to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Care over the year of the project. The CDE also provided diabetes self-management education (DSME) at the office site for 29 of the 104 patients who received their care in the practice. The following variables were evaluated: provider perceived barriers to care and adherence to ADA standards of care and patient A1C, blood pressure, cholesterol, knowledge, and empowerment levels. Results Provider adherence to ADA Standards of Care increased significantly across all process measures. Patients who received DSME at point of service in the primary care practice setting gained improvements in knowledge, empowerment, A1C, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Conclusions Implementing systems to support decision support, selfmanagement education, and delivery system redesign has a positive influence on practices and patient outcomes in outlying rural communities.

scholarly journals Facilitators and Barriers of Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions in the Community: A Qualitative Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Mun Foo ◽  
Meena Sundram ◽  
Helena Legido-Quigley
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Waiting Time ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background About one-third of all adults worldwide were diagnosed with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). Literature had found several challenges of providers and patients coping with managing MCCs in the community, and yet limited research studies that consider their viewpoints in combination. A qualitative study involving healthcare providers and users was thus conducted to examine facilitators and barriers of managing patients with MCCs in the community in Singapore. Methods This involves 26 semi-structured interviews with 10 physicians, 2 caregivers and 14 patients seeking treatment in the polyclinics that provides subsidised primary care services. Topic guides were developed with reference from literature review, Chronic Care Model (CCM) and Framework for patient-centred access to healthcare. Results Despite perceived affordable charges and availability of support system, some patients still encountered financial difficulties in managing care. These include inadequacy of the nation-wide medical savings scheme to cover outpatient treatment and medications. Half of the healthcare users did not know where to seek help. While patients could access comprehensive services in polyclinics, those that did not turn up might not receive timely care. Furthermore, patients reported long consultation waiting time. Physicians were able to propose and drive quality improvement projects to improve care quality. However, there were challenges of delivering safe and quality care with limited consultation duration due to the need to manage waiting time, inadequate communication with specialists to coordinate care, and resource constraints in managing complex patients. Although providers could equip patients with self-management and lifestyle related guidelines, patients’ actions are influenced by multiple factors including work nature, beliefs and environment. Conclusions There were barriers on care access, delivery and self-management as reported. It is crucial to adopt whole-of-society approach involving individuals, community, institutions and policymakers to improve and support MCCs management. This study has also highlighted the importance to consider different viewpoints of healthcare providers and users in policy formulation and community care planning.

scholarly journals Perceived facilitators and barriers to chronic disease management in primary care networks: a qualitative study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan De Foo ◽  
Shilpa Surendran ◽  
Chen Hee Tam ◽  
Elaine Qiao Ying Ho ◽  
David Bruce Matchar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Chronic Disease Management ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background The increasing chronic disease burden in developed countries has placed tremendous strain on tertiary healthcare infrastructure and resources. Therefore, there is an urgent need to shift chronic disease management from tertiary to primary care providers to mitigate the increase in demand for chronic care at hospitals. The organization of private general practitioners (GPs) into Primary Care Networks (PCNs) is a pragmatic move by Singapore, a developed and multi-ethnic urban city, to provide private GPs with team-based care capabilities and a platform to track care indicators for better management of chronic patients. As the PCN initiative is still in its embryonic stages, there is a void in research regarding its ability to empower private GPs to manage chronic patients effectively. This qualitative study aims to explore the facilitators and barriers for the management of chronic patients by private GPs in the PCN. Method: We conducted 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews with GPs enrolled in a PCN. Qualitative analysis of audio transcripts was performed to extract themes which highlighted the facilitators and barriers faced by PCN in the early stages of its development. Results Our results suggest that PCNs facilitated private GPs to more effectively manage chronic patients through 1) provision of ancillary services such as diabetic foot screening, diabetic retinal photography and nurse counselling to permit a “one-stop-shop”, 2) systematic monitoring of process and clinical outcome indicators through a chronic disease registry (CDR) to promote accountability for patients’ health outcomes and 3) funding streams for PCNs to hire additional manpower to oversee operations and to reimburse GPs for extended consultations. Barriers include high administrative load in maintaining the CDR due to the lack of a smart electronic clinic management system and financial gradient faced by patients seeking services from private GPs which incur higher out-of-pocket expenses than public primary healthcare institutions. Conclusion PCNs demonstrate great promise in empowering and motivating private GPs to manage chronic patients. However, barriers will need to be addressed to ensure the quality and comprehensiveness of PCNs in managing more chronic patients in the face of an ageing population.

scholarly journals Perceived facilitators and barriers to chronic disease management in primary care networks: a qualitative study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan De Foo ◽  
Shilpa Surendran ◽  
Chen Hee Tam ◽  
Elaine Qiao Ying Ho ◽  
David Bruce Matchar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Chronic Disease Management ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background: The increasing chronic disease burden in developed countries has placed tremendous strain on tertiary healthcare infrastructure and resources. Therefore, there is an urgent need to shift chronic disease management from tertiary to primary care providers to mitigate the increase in demand for chronic care at hospitals. The organization of private general practitioners (GPs) into Primary Care Networks (PCNs) is a pragmatic move by Singapore, a developed and multi-ethnic urban city, to provide private GPs with team-based care capabilities and a platform to track care indicators for better management of chronic patients. As the PCN initiative is still in its embryonic stages, there is a void in research regarding its ability to empower private GPs to manage chronic patients effectively. This qualitative study aims to explore the facilitators and barriers for the management of chronic patients by private GPs in the PCN. Method: We conducted 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews with GPs enrolled in a PCN. Qualitative analysis of audio transcripts was performed to generate themes which highlighted the facilitators and barriers faced by PCN in the early stages of its development. Results: Our results suggest that PCNs facilitated private GPs to more effectively manage chronic patients through 1) provision of ancillary services such as diabetic foot screening, diabetic retinal photography and nurse counselling to permit a “one-stop-shop”, 2) systematic monitoring of process and clinical outcome indicators through a chronic disease registry (CDR) to promote accountability for patients’ health outcomes and 3) funding streams for PCNs to hire additional manpower to oversee operations and to reimburse GPs for extended consultations. Barriers include high administrative load in maintaining the CDR due to the lack of a smart electronic clinic management system and financial gradient faced by patients seeking services from private GPs which incur higher out-of-pocket expenses than public primary healthcare institutions.Conclusion: PCNs demonstrate great promise in empowering and motivating private GPs to manage chronic patients. However, barriers will need to be addressed to ensure the quality and comprehensiveness of PCNs in managing more chronic patients in the face of an ageing population.

The Gene Pool: The Ethics of Genetics in Primary Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen J. Whitt ◽  
McKenna Hughes ◽  
Elizabeth (Betsy) S. Hopkins ◽  
Ann Maradiegue
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Ethical Principles ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Primary Research ◽  
Genetics And Genomics

Aim: The purpose of this integrative review is to critically analyze the research literature regarding ethical principles that surround the integration of genetics and genomics in primary care clinical practice. Background: Advanced practice nurses (APRNs) play an important role in the provision of primary care services, in the areas of obstetrics, pediatrics, family practice, and internal medicine. Advances in genetic and genomic science are infiltrating these day-to-day health-care systems and becoming an integral part of health-care delivery. It is imperative for primary care providers to understand the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetics and genomics. Methods: A comprehensive multistep search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify primary research articles published from 2003 to 2015 that evaluated ethical issues related to genetics and genomics in U. S. primary care practice. A sample of 26 primary research articles met the inclusion criteria. Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) revised framework for integrative reviews was used to guide the analysis and assess the quality of the studies. Key findings from the studies are discussed according to Beauchamp and Childress's (2009) ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Results: Research conducted to date is mainly qualitative and descriptive and the analysis revealed several ethical challenges to implementing genetics and genomics in primary care settings. Conclusion: The review suggests that there are several implications for research, education, and the development of primary care practice that support APRNs delivering genetic and genomic care while incorporating knowledge of ethical principles. More research needs to be conducted that evaluates the actual genetic/genomic ethical issues encountered by primary care providers.

scholarly journals Potential for Integrating Mental Health Specialist Video Consultations in Office-Based Routine Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study Among Family Physicians

10.2196/13382 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. e13382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariell Hoffmann ◽  
Mechthild Hartmann ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
Hans-Christoph Friederich ◽  
Markus W Haun
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mental Health Specialist ◽  
Health Specialist

Background Although real-time mental health specialist video consultations have been proposed as an effective care model for treating patients with mental health conditions in primary care, little is known about their integration into routine practice from the perspective of family physicians. Objective This study aimed to determine the degree to which family physicians advocate that mental health specialist video consultations can be integrated into routine primary care, where most patients with mental health conditions receive treatment. Methods In a cross-sectional qualitative study, we conducted 4 semistructured focus groups and 3 telephonic interviews in a sample of 19 family physicians from urban and rural districts. We conducted a qualitative content analysis applying the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework in a combined bottom-up (data-driven) and top-down strategy for deriving key domains. Results Family physicians indicated that mental health specialist video consultations are a promising and practical way to address the most pressing challenges in current practice, that is, to increase the accessibility and co-ordination of specialized care. Individual health professional factors were the most frequently discussed topics. Specifically, family physicians valued the anticipated clinical outcomes for patients and the anticipated resources set for the primary care practice as major facilitators (16/19, 84%). However, family physicians raised a concern regarding a lack of facial expressions and physical interaction (19/19, 100%), especially in emergency situations. Therefore, most family physicians considered a viable emergency plan for mental health specialist video consultations that clearly delineates the responsibilities and tasks of both family physicians and mental health specialists to be essential (11/19, 58%). Social, political, and legal factors, as well as guideline factors, were hardly discussed as prerequisites for individual family physicians to integrate mental health specialist video consultations into routine care. To facilitate the implementation of future mental health specialist video consultation models, we compiled a checklist of recommendations that covers (1) buy-in from practices (eg, emphasizing logistical and psychological relief for the practice), (2) the engagement of patients (eg, establishing a trusted patient-provider relationship), (3) the setup and conduct of consultations (eg, reliable emergency plans), and (4) the fostering of collaboration between family physicians and mental health specialists (eg, kick-off meetings to build trust). Conclusions By leveraging the primary care practice as a familiar environment for patients, mental health specialist video consultations provide timely specialist support and potentially lead to benefits for patients and more efficient processes of care. Integration should account for the determinants of practice as described by the family physicians. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00012487; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00012487

Building the Case: Changing Consumer Perceptions of the Value of Expanded Community Pharmacist Services

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Steckowych ◽  
Marie Smith ◽  
Susan Spiggle ◽  
Andrew Stevens ◽  
Hao Li
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Community Pharmacist ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Consumer Perceptions ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Pharmacist Services

Background: The role of the community pharmacist has traditionally been a medication dispenser; however, community pharmacists’ responsibilities must expand to include more direct patient care services in order to transform primary care practice. Objectives: Use case-based scenarios to (1) determine factors that contribute to positive and negative consumer perceptions of expanded community pharmacist patient care roles, (2) identify facilitators and barriers that contribute to consumer perceptions of the value of expanded community pharmacist patient care services, and (3) develop a successful approach and strategies for increasing consumer advocacy for the value of expanded community pharmacist patient care services. Methods: Two consumer focus groups used scenario-based guided discussions and Likert scale questionnaires to elicit consumer reactions, facilitators, and barriers to expanded community pharmacist services. Results: Convenience, timeliness, and accessibility were common positive reactions across all 3 scenarios. Team approach to care and trust were viewed as major facilitators. Participant concerns included uncertainty about pharmacist training and qualifications, privacy, pharmacists’ limited bandwidth to accept new tasks, and potential increased patient costs. Common barriers to service uptake included a lack of insurance payment and physician preference to provide the services. Conclusion: Consumer unfamiliarity with non-traditional community pharmacist services is likely an influencer of consumers’ hesitancy to utilize such services; therefore, an opportunity exists to engage consumers and advocacy organizations in supporting expanded community pharmacist roles. This study can inform consumers, advocates, community pharmacists, primary care providers, and community-based organizations on methods to shape consumer perceptions on the value of community pharmacist expanded services.

Abstract 226: Integration of Traditional and Alternate Chronic Care Models within a Primary Care Setting for Diabetes Management and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohan Thanikachalam ◽  
G Shanmugasundar ◽  
Muthuswamy Ravikiran ◽  
Vijaykumar Harivanzan ◽  
Sripriya Ravi
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Blood Sugar ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Care Models

Background: Several chronic care models (CCMs) for diabetes management and cardiovascular disease prevention have been implemented, but outcomes have been marginal. Traditionally, CCMs have been offered within the trusted primary care practice environment, but self-management support is episodic, cost ineffective and difficult to scale. Alternate CCMs that offer self-management support mostly through telephone coaching or virtual (web/mobile platforms) interventions, enable easy access, scalability and cost effectiveness, yet are impaired by the limits of isolated self-management support when provided outside the context of the trusted, therapeutic relationship of a primary care practice. We hypothesize that an integrated model taking advantage of positive aspects of traditional and alternate CCMs will lead to positive behavioral change (empowerment), sustained patient participation and better outcomes. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we implemented the Empowerment and Participatory Care Model (EPCM) in a study center in Chennai, India by integrating face-to-face support with customized telephone, Internet and mobile phone enabled interventions within a primary care setting. Patients who participated in the traditional CCM formed the control group. Results: In the participents in traditional CCM (n=422), there was an average reduction of 0.57% in HbA1c, 16 mg/dl in fasting blood sugar, 30 mg/dl in post prandial blood sugar and 16 mg/dl of LDL at the end of year-one. In comparison, among the patients (66% men; mean age 52 yrs) who participated in the EPCM and had completed one-year in the program (n=112) there was average reduction of 1.6% in HbA1c, 57 mg/dl in fasting blood sugar, 80 mg/dl in post prandial blood sugar and 18 mg/dl of LDL (p<0.01). Figure 1 shows the difference in percent reduction of the various biochemical parameters between the EPCM and the control group. The total cost of care (other than medication) per patient per year in the EPCM, after taking into consideration purchasing power parity between USA and India, was 900 USD. Conclusion: The persons with diabetes who participated in the EPCM had better quality of metabolic control, but long-term follow up is required to assess overall reduction in the risk of cardiovascular complications and cost effectiveness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document