scholarly journals Effects of Abdominal Aortic Calcification and Facet Joint Arthritis On Lumbar Bone Mineral Density Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

Author(s):  
Minjoon Cho ◽  
Hong Seok Kim ◽  
Byung Sun Choi ◽  
Jae Hyup Lee

Abstract Background Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) may overestimate lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) examined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); however, the degree of effect of AAC on lumbar BMD has not been quantified. In particular, no study has quantitatively compared and analysed segmental BMD and AAC using computed tomography (CT) scan. Thus, this study aimed to quantify the effect of AAC on BMD measurements using DXA via multiple linear regression analysis. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed participants >30 years of age who underwent DXA and spinal CT scans between 2014 and 2016. Variables that significantly affected the BMD of each lumbar segment were identified. Additionally, segmental facet joint arthritis (FJA) and AAC volume were evaluated using CT. Results A total of 620 subjects (153 males and 467 females) were included. The mean age was 71.6 ± 9.1 years (range, 31–89 years). AAC had the highest prevalence in L3 (45.2%), followed by L4 (41.1%). The average volume of AAC was the highest in L4 at 213.67 ± 443.82 mm3, followed by L3 at 161.95 ± 338.09 mm3. Our regression model found that Ln (L4BMD) was significantly correlated with age, BMI, FJA, and AAC volume in female subjects. Additionally, L4 BMD might be overestimated by approximately 0.90% for every 100 mm3 increase in AAC volume. The results for Ln (L3BMD) were almost identical. However, these relationships were not observed in males. Conclusion According to this model, AAC may overestimate lumbar BMD examined by DXA in a dose-dependent manner in females.

1991 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirokazu Tsukahara ◽  
Tetsuo Nakashima ◽  
Masahiro Yoshimoto ◽  
Masanori Kuriyama ◽  
Yosuke Shigematsu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 227.2-228
Author(s):  
D. Claire ◽  
M. Geoffroy ◽  
L. Kanagaratnam ◽  
C. Isabelle ◽  
A. Hittinger ◽  
...  

Background:Dual energy X-ray absoprtiometry is the reference method to mesure bone mineral density (1). Loss of bone mineral density is significant if it exceeds the least significant change. The threshold value used in general population is 0,03 g/cm2 (2). Patients with obesity are known for having a higher bone mineral density due to metabolism and physiopathology characteristics (3,4).Objectives:The aim of our study was to determine the least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity.Methods:We conducted an interventionnal study in 120 patients with obesity who performed a bone densitometry. We measured twice the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, the femoral neck and the total hip in the same time (5,6). We determined the least significant change in bone densitometry from each pair of measurements, using the Bland and Altman method. We also determined the least significant change in bone densitometry according to each stage of obesity.Results:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is 0,046g/cm2 at the lumbar spine, 0.069 g/cm2 at the femoral neck and 0.06 g/cm2 at the total hip.Conclusion:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is higher than in general population. These results may improve DXA interpretation in this specific population, and may personnalize their medical care.References:[1]Lees B, Stevenson JC. An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. mai 1992;2(3):146-52.[2]Briot K, Roux C, Thomas T, Blain H, Buchon D, Chapurlat R, et al. Actualisation 2018 des recommandations françaises du traitement de l’ostéoporose post-ménopausique. Rev Rhum. oct 2018;85(5):428-40.[3]Shapses SA, Pop LC, Wang Y. Obesity is a concern for bone health with aging. Nutr Res N Y N. mars 2017;39:1-13.[4]Savvidis C, Tournis S, Dede AD. Obesity and bone metabolism. Hormones. juin 2018;17(2):205-17.[5]Roux C, Garnero P, Thomas T, Sabatier J-P, Orcel P, Audran M, et al. Recommendations for monitoring antiresorptive therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Jt Bone Spine Rev Rhum. janv 2005;72(1):26-31.[6]Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C. Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res. août 1999;14(8):1449-56.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-148
Author(s):  
Ryuzou Takaya ◽  
Masakuni Tokuda ◽  
Tatsuya Oguni ◽  
Haruki Tanaka ◽  
Kazutaka Konishi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document