scholarly journals Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Limited Brain Metastasis using Three Different Techniques; Helical Tomotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and Cone-Based Linac Radiosurgery.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bongkot Jia-Mahasap ◽  
Chakri Madla ◽  
Patumrat Sri ◽  
Imjai Chitapanarux ◽  
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Radiation Dosimetry ◽  
Helical Tomotherapy ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Multiple Lesions ◽  
Linac Radiosurgery ◽  
Radiation Output ◽  
Arc Therapy

Abstract Background: Specific radiation delivered to the tumor by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become widely used in the treatment of brain metastasis. This study aimed to compare radiation dosimetry and its parameters from SRS using three different modalities: Helical Tomotherapy (HT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), and Cone-based Linac Radiosurgery (Cone-based). Methods: Patients who had experienced oligo-brain metastasis received SRS in our treatment center. Each contouring dataset was re-planned to create radiation dosimetry in all three treatment systems (HT, VMAT, and Cone-based). The parameters of conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), CI50, and gradient index (CGI) were analyzed to compare the effects of the three techniques. Results: A total of 21 patients with 39 lesions were included in this study. For single lesion, Cone-based and VMAT revealed statistically identical CI, CI50, and CGI values, while exhibiting the poorest HI value. For multiple lesions, Cone-based provided the best CI50 and CGI values. VMAT displayed better CI50 and CGI values than HT. Moreover, VMAT exhibited the lowest BrainV5Gy value and displayed the shortest beam on time (BoT) calculation. Lastly, Decision Score analysis demonstrated better performance in VMAT when compared to the Cone-based approach. Conclusions: Our data indicated the dosimetric comparison between three radiation techniques for single and multiple lesions. The Cone-based technique revealed the poorest HI value. On the other hand, VMAT provided the best estimated BoT value. Moreover, we have reported on the feasibility of SRS using HT, which has been associated with well-tolerability and an acceptable level of radiation output.Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) ID No. TCTR20200803006Date of registration: 24 July 2020 (Retrospectively registered)URL: http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20200803006

Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in hippocampus sparing in brain metastasis treated by whole-brain irradiation and simultaneous integrated boost

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehab Saad ◽  
Khaled Elshahat ◽  
Hussein Metwally
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Simultaneous Integrated Boost ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Whole Brain ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Integrated Boost

AbstractBackground:While treating brain metastasis with whole-brain radiotherapy incorporating a simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT-SIB), the risk of hippocampus injury is high. The aim of this study is to compare dosimetrically between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in sparing of hippocampus and organs at risk (OARs) and planning target volume (PTV) coverage.Methods:In total, 16 patients presenting with more than one brain metastases were previously treated and then retrospectively planned using VMAT and IMRT techniques. For each patient, a dual-arc VMAT and another IMRT (five beams) plans were created. For both techniques, 30 Gy in 10 fractions was prescribed to the whole brain (WB) minus the hippocampi and 45 Gy in 10 fractions to the tumour with 0·5 cm margin. Dose–volume histogram (DVH), conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) of PTV, hippocampus mean and maximum dose and other OARs for both techniques were calculated and compared.Results:A statistically significant advantage was found in WB-PTV CI and HI with VMAT, compared to IMRT. There were lower hippocampus mean and maximum doses in VMAT than IMRT. The maximum hippocampus dose ranged between 15·5 and 19·2 Gy and between 18·4 and 20·6 Gy in VMAT and IMRT, respectively. The mean dose of the hippocampus ranged between 11·5 and 17·7 Gy and between 13·2 and 18·3 Gy in VMAT and IMRT, respectively.Conclusion:Using WBRT-SIB technique, VMAT showed better PTV coverage with less mean and maximum doses to the hippocampus than IMRT. Clinical randomised studies are needed to confirm safety and clinical benefit of WBRT-SIB.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for small and very small tumours (≤1 to ≤3 cc): evaluation of the influence of volumetric-modulated arc therapy in comparison to dynamic conformal arc therapy and 3D conformal radiotherapy as a function of flattened and unflattened beam models

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gopinath Mamballikalam ◽  
S. Senthilkumar ◽  
R. C. Jaon Bos ◽  
P. M. Ahamed Basith ◽  
P. M. Jayadevan
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Small Volume ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Target Coverage ◽  
3D Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Delivery Techniques

Abstract Purpose: The objective of this article is to evaluate the dosimetric efficacy of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in comparison to dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for very small volume (≤1 cc) and small volume (≤3 cc) tumours for flattened (FF) and unflattened (FFF) 6 MV beams. Materials and methods: A total of 21 patients who were treated with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery, using either VMAT, DCAT or 3DCRT, were included in this study. The volume categorisation was seven patients each in <1, 1–2 and 2–3 cc volume. The treatment was planned with 6 MV FF and FFF beams using three different techniques: VMAT/Rapid Arc (RA) (RA_FF and RA_FFF), dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCA_FF and DCA_FFF) and 3DCRT (Static_FF and Static_FFF). Plans were evaluated for target coverage (V100%), conformity index, homogeneity index, dose gradient for 50% dose fall-off, total MU and MU/dose ratio [intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) factor], normal brain receiving >12 Gy dose, dose to the organ at risk (OAR), beam ON time and dose received by 12 cc of the brain. Result: The average target coverage for all plans, all tumour volumes (TVs) and delivery techniques is 96·4 ± 4·5 (range 95·7 ± 6·1–97·5 ± 2·9%). The conformity index averaged over all volume ranges <1, 2, 3 cc> varies between 0·55 ± 0·08 and 0·68 ± 0·04 with minimum and maximum being exhibited by DCA_FFF for 1 cc and Static_FFF/RA_FFF for 3 cc tumours, respectively. Mean IMRT factor averaged over all volume ranges for RA_FF, DCA_FF and Static_FF are 3·5 ± 0·8, 2·0 ± 0·2 and 2·0 ± 0·2, respectively; 50% dose fall-off gradient varies in the range of 0·33–0·42, 0·35–0·40 and 0·38–0·45 for 1, 2 and 3 cc tumours, respectively. Conclusion: This study establishes the equivalence between the FF and FFF beam models and different delivery techniques for stereotactic radiosurgery in small TVs in the range of ≤1 to ≤3 cc. Dose conformity, heterogeneity, dose fall-off characteristics and OAR doses show no or very little variation. FFF could offer only limited time advantage due to excess dose rate over an FF beam.

scholarly journals Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes: the advantage of dosimetric data and safety of toxicities

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 747-754
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Doi ◽  
Minoru Nakao ◽  
Hideharu Miura ◽  
Shuichi Ozawa ◽  
Masahiro Kenjo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Irradiation Dose ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Regional Lymph Nodes ◽  
Dosimetric Data ◽  
Arc Therapy

ABSTRACT To improve the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes, we planned Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which combines conventional tangential field mainly for the chest area and VMAT mainly for the supraclavicular area and marginal zone. In this study, we compared the dosimetric impact between traditional 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and Hybrid VMAT and observed toxicities following Hybrid VMAT. A total of 70 patients indicated between October 2016 and December 2017 were included. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy/25 fractions. For the dosimetric impact, 3DCRT and Hybrid VMAT plans were compared in each patient with respect to the dosimetric parameters. Toxicities were followed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The median follow-up duration was 319 days. For the dosimetric impact, the homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of PTV were significantly improved in the Hybrid VMAT plan compared with that in the 3DCRT plan (HI, 0.15 ± 0.07 in Hybrid VMAT vs 0.41 ± 0.19 in 3DCRT, P &lt; 0.001; CI, 1.61 ± 0.44 in Hybrid VMAT vs 2.10 ± 0.56 in 3DCRT, P &lt; 0.001). The mean irradiated ipsilateral lung dose was not significantly different in both plans (12.0 ± 2.4 Gy in Hybrid VMAT vs 11.8 ± 2.8 Gy in 3DCRT, P &lt; 0.533). Regarding toxicity, there were no patients who developed ≥grade 3 acute toxicity and ≥grade 2 pneumonitis during the follow-up. Hybrid VMAT for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes was a reasonable technique that improved the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose to the planning target volume while keeping the irradiation dose to organs at risk to a minimum.

scholarly journals Modern Rotational Radiation Techniques with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy or Helical Tomotherapy for Optimal Sparing of the Lung and Heart in Left-Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Plus Regional Nodal Irradiation: A Comparative Dosimetric Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5043
Author(s):  
Pei-Yu Hou ◽  
Chen-Hsi Hsieh ◽  
Le-Jung Wu ◽  
Chen-Xiong Hsu ◽  
Deng-Yu Kuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Helical Tomotherapy ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Contralateral Breast ◽  
Normal Organ ◽  
Regional Nodal Irradiation ◽  
Optimal Technique ◽  
Arc Therapy

Background: For advanced breast cancer with lymph node involvement, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) with regional nodal irradiation (RNI) has been indicated to reduce cancer recurrence and mortality. However, an extensive RT volume is associated with normal organ exposure, which increases the toxicity and affects patient outcomes. Modern arc RT techniques can improve normal organ sparing compared with conventional techniques. The aim of this study was to explore the optimal technique for left-breast RT with RNI. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving RT with RNI for left-breast cancer. We used modern arc RT techniques with either volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or helical tomotherapy (HT) with a novel block technique, and compared differences in dosimetry parameters between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of RNI with or without internal mammary node (IMN) volume was also performed. Results: A total of 108 eligible patients were enrolled between 2017 and 2020, of whom 70 received VMAT and 38 received HT. The median RT dose was 55 Gy. No significant differences were found regarding the surgery, RT dose, number of fractions, target volume, and RNI volume between the VMAT and HT groups. VMAT reduced the heart mean dose more than HT (3.82 vs. 5.13 Gy, p < 0.001), as well as the cardiac parameters of V5-V20, whole-lung mean dose, lung parameters of V5-V20, and contralateral-breast and esophagus mean dose. In the subgroup analysis of RNI with IMNs, the advantage of VMAT persisted in protecting the heart, lung, contralateral breast, and esophagus. HT was beneficial for lowering the thyroid mean dose. For RNI without IMN, VMAT improved the low-dose exposure of the heart and lung, but HT was similar to VMAT in terms of heart, whole-lung, and contralateral-breast mean dose. Conclusions: For patients with left-breast cancer receiving adjuvant RT with RNI, VMAT reduced the exposure dose to the heart, lung, contralateral breast, and esophagus compared with HT. VMAT was superior to HT in terms of normal organ sparing in the patients who underwent RNI with IMN irradiation. Considering the reduction in normal organ exposure and potential toxicity, VMAT is the optimal technique for patients receiving RNI when deep inspiration breath-hold is not available.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document