scholarly journals  A survey on current practice of informed consent process in surgical specialties of a tertiary teaching hospital center: What is the state of play?

Author(s):  
Ana Luísa Vieira ◽  
Cândida Infante ◽  
Sérgio Santos ◽  
Mariana Asseiro ◽  
Celine Ferreira

Abstract Background Informed consent is essential in current medical practice and should be a global standard to be sought at all instances when doctors interact with patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate compliance to the guidelines of the Portuguese health entity regarding the correct filling process of informed consent. Methods A prospective observational survey was conducted upon arrival of the patient at the operating room of a tertiary teaching hospital center in Portugal, in march 2021, to verify the presence of informed consent in the clinical process. A sample of 202 clinical files was randomly collected. Results Only 47% of the patients had the informed consent document in the clinic process and only 45% of the total clinical files had the informed consent signed by the patient. Merely 21.8% of the informed consents respected all the items recommended by the guidelines of the Portugal health entity. Most of the surgical informed consent (SIC) had only basic information and only a lower percentage had reports about the surgical procedure, information regarding the treatment, possible consequences of a missed treatment or complications and possible treatment alternatives. Those results didn’t conform to the standard regulations of the Portuguese health guidelines regarding SIC. Conclusion Even though improvements in SIC were attained in recent years, our study suggests that the implementation of SIC is still suboptimal in surgical practice. It is important to raise awareness for the obtention of SIC by the healthcare team, because complete information before an invasive procedure is an ethical requirement.

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S189
Author(s):  
I. Button ◽  
J. Bradley ◽  
R. Roberts-Thomson ◽  
B. Lorraine

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Soo Sheen ◽  
Ji Eun Choi ◽  
Rae Woong Park ◽  
Eun Yub Kim ◽  
Young Ho Lee ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (14) ◽  
pp. e25311
Author(s):  
Hsin-I. Shih ◽  
Yi-Ting Huang ◽  
Chih-Chia Hsieh ◽  
Tzu-Ching Sung

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 195-211
Author(s):  
Soumya Ranjan Behera ◽  
Manoranjan Behera ◽  
Sidhartha Das ◽  
Bhabani Prasad Panda ◽  
Saroj Kumar Tripathy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 239920262110627
Author(s):  
Roland Nnaemeka Okoro ◽  
Kasim Abdullahi ◽  
Dauda Ayuba Dayar

Background: Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) is a widely used medication class globally. Because of its good safety profile, there is a huge likelihood of inappropriate use. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of PPI use and indications, describe its pattern of usage, and identify factors associated with inappropriate prescriptions at a federal tertiary teaching hospital in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Methods: PPI prescriptions were retrospectively assessed in the General Outpatients’ Department (GOPD) and Gastroenterology Unit (GITU) of a teaching hospital. Relevant data for the study were extracted from the patients’ medical records. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests where appropriate were used to identify factors associated with inappropriate PPI prescriptions. A p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: PPIs were prescribed to 73.3% (220/300) of patients, while inappropriate prescriptions were noted in 91.4% (201/220) of these patients. Epigastric pain (49.5%) was the most common PPI indication, while omeprazole was the highest prescribed (53.4%). Nearly all inpatients (98.2%), those with epigastric pain (95.7%), and patients who were prescribed intravenous PPIs had more inappropriate PPI prescriptions compared to others. Conclusion: This study revealed a high prevalence of PPI use and inappropriate prescriptions at the study hospital. As a result, these findings highlight the importance PPI-based stewardship program at the study hospital.


Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abubakr Mohamed ◽  
Elkhidir Babikir ◽  
Mohamed Kamal Elbashir Mustafa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document