scholarly journals Mid-term Outcomes of Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement Versus the Bentall Procedure for Middle-aged Chinese Patients with Acute DeBakey I Aortic Dissection: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingsong Wu ◽  
Zhisheng wang ◽  
Zhihuang Qiu ◽  
Yue Shen ◽  
Xiaodong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Root Replacement ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Bentall Procedure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Valve Sparing

Abstract Background: The mid-term and long-term efficacies of valve preservation in acute DeBakey I aortic dissection(AD) are controversial. Thus, it is unclear whether middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I AD should undergo valve-sparing procedures or the Bentall procedure in an emergency setting.Methods: This study included 213 middle-aged Chinese patients(30-60 years old) who were treated for acute DeBakey I AD between January 2009 and June 2015. The treatments involved valve-sparing aortic root replacement(VSARR)(117 patients) or the Bentall procedure(96 patients). Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Echocardiography and thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography(CTA) findings were reviewed at 3 months, 1 year, and then annually after surgery. Results: No significant differences were observed in terms of the preoperative, intraoperative, in-hospital mortality, and postoperative parameters. There were also no significant differences in aortic regurgitation(AR). However, follow-up examinations using CTA revealed that 6 patients had endoleakage at the distal end of the triple-branched stent(0/110 patients [0.0%] vs. 6/90 patients [6.7%], P=0.022). The anticoagulation-related thromboembolism/bleeding events was significantly lower in group A than in group B(0/110 patients [0.0%] vs. 11/90 patients [11.1%], P=0.001). And postoperative aortic valve re-operation rate was significantly lower in group A (1/110 patients [0.9%] vs. 8/90 patients [8.9%], P=0.020). There was no significant difference in survival during the follow-up period (log-rank P>0.05).Conclusion: For middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I AD, VSARR were associated with a lower rate of endoleakage at the distal end of the triple-branched stent, thromboembolism/bleeding events and aortic valve re-operation(vs. the Bentall procedure) .

scholarly journals Mid-term outcomes of modified valve-sparing aortic root replacement versus the Bentall procedure for middle-aged Chinese patients with acute DeBakey I aortic dissection: a single-center retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingsong Wu ◽  
Zhisheng Wang ◽  
Zhihuang Qiu ◽  
Yue Shen ◽  
Xiaodong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Root Replacement ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Bentall Procedure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Valve Sparing

Abstract Background The mid-term and long-term efficacies of valve preservation in acute DeBakey I aortic dissection (AD) are controversial. Thus, it is unclear whether middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I AD should undergo modified valve-sparing procedures or the Bentall procedure in an emergency setting. Methods This study included 213 middle-aged Chinese patients (under 60 years old) who were treated for acute DeBakey I AD between January 2009 and June 2015. The treatments involved modified valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) (117 patients) or the Bentall procedure (96 patients). Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Echocardiography and thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings were reviewed at 3 months, 1 year, and then annually after surgery. Results No significant differences were observed in terms of the preoperative, intraoperative, in-hospital mortality, and postoperative parameters. There were also no significant differences in aortic regurgitation (AR). However, follow-up examinations using CTA revealed that 6 patients had endoleakage at the distal end of the triple-branched stent (0/110 patients [0.0%] vs. 6/90 patients [6.7%], P = 0.022). The anticoagulation-related thromboembolism/bleeding events was significantly lower in group A than in group B (0/110 patients [0.0%] vs. 11/90 patients [11.1%], P = 0.001). And postoperative aortic valve re-operation rate was significantly lower in group A (1/110 patients [0.9%] vs. 8/90 patients [8.9%], P = 0.020). There was no significant difference in survival during the follow-up period (log-rank P > 0.05). Conclusion For middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I AD, VSARR were associated with a lower rate of endoleakage at the distal end of the triple-branched stent, thromboembolism/bleeding events and aortic valve re-operation (vs. the Bentall procedure).

scholarly journals Early and Midterm Outcomes of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement—Reimplantation Technique

Aorta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (05) ◽  
pp. 113-117
Author(s):  
Marisa Cevasco ◽  
Siobhan McGurk ◽  
Maroun Yammine ◽  
Lokesh Sharma ◽  
Julius Ejiofor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Root ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Connective Tissue Disorder ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Aortic Root Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Prosthetic Valves ◽  
Valve Sparing

Background Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an increasingly popular alternative to traditional aortic root replacement for aortic root aneurysm disease with a normal aortic valve. We evaluated the early and midterm outcomes of VSARR—reimplantation technique (VSARR-RT) done at a single institution over a decade. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent VSARR-RT between January 2004 and July 2014. Results A total of 85 patients underwent VSARR-RT. Median time to latest echocardiographic follow-up was 4 years (range: 15–72 months). Total observation time was 491 patient years. Mean age was 44.6 ± 14.3 years, and 13 (15%) were women. Thirty-nine (46%) patients had a connective tissue disorder and 6 (7%) had a bicuspid aortic valve. Thirty-three (39%) patients underwent concomitant procedures, including coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 9, 11%), mitral valve repair (n = 8, 9%), and aortic hemi-arch replacement (n = 7, 8%). There were no operative deaths or in-house mortality and no postoperative strokes. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated survival of 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97–100%) at 2 years and 98% (95% CI: 97–100%) at 8 years. Freedom from reoperation was 95.8% (95% CI: 91.2–100%) at 8 years. Freedom from endocarditis was 100% at 8 years. At the last echocardiographic follow-up, 95% of patients were free of severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and 82% free of moderate AR. Of the four patients who had severe AR, three underwent reoperations and received prosthetic valves and one is being clinically monitored. Conclusion This study reports early and midterm outcomes after VSARR-RT at our institution, including those patients who underwent a VSARR-RT procedure combined with other procedures. Further follow-up remains necessary to determine long-term outcomes.

scholarly journals Additional cusp reconstruction does not compromise valve durability and mid-term survival after the David procedure: results from 449 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 1072-1079
Author(s):  
Markus Liebrich ◽  
Efstratios Charitos ◽  
Charlotte Stadler ◽  
Detlef Roser ◽  
Denis R Merk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
General Population ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Aortic Root Replacement ◽  
Aortic Valves ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Valve Sparing ◽  
And Gender

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate whether additional cusp interventions and valve types affect aortic valve-related reoperation and mortality rates after the David procedure. METHODS Between 1997 and 2018, a total of 449 patients {372 males; mean age 54.2 [standard deviation (SD) 15.2] years, range: 12.7–79.9 years} underwent elective valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure) for aortic regurgitation and were prospectively followed up clinically and echocardiographically. RESULTS The follow-up was 94% complete. Cumulative follow-up time was 2268 patient-years [mean follow-up time 5.1 (4.3 SD) years]. Thirty-day mortality was 2.2% (n = 10). Late (>30 days) survival did not differ from that of the age- and gender-matched general population. Freedom from reoperation in patients without additional cusp reconstruction was 94% [95% confidence interval (CI) 91–98] and 92% (95% CI 88–97) at 5 and 10 years, respectively, which was not significantly different (P = 1) for patients who did require additional cusp reconstruction 98% (95% CI 95–100) and 89% (95% CI 81–99). In patients with tricuspid aortic valves (n = 338), freedom from reoperation was 96% (95% CI 94–99) and 93% (95% CI 88–97) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Patients with bicuspid aortic valves (n = 111) had a freedom from reoperation of 94% (95% CI 89–99) at 5 years and 88% (95% CI 79–98) at 10 years (P = 0.021 for the comparison to tricuspid aortic valve). Overall, 23 patients (5%; 1%/patient-year) required reoperation with a mean interval of 4.5 (4.8 SD) months. CONCLUSIONS The David procedure revealed low mid-term reoperation risk and excellent survival independent of adjunctive cusp interventions/valve morphology and is comparable with that of the age- and gender-matched general population.

Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative and Traumatic Tears in Middle-Aged Patients With No or Mild Osteoarthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2412-2419
Author(s):  
Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla ◽  
Francisco A. Miralles-Muñoz ◽  
Santiago Gonzalez-Parreño ◽  
Fernando A. Lopez-Prats
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Partial Meniscectomy ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Female Sex

Background: There is controversy about the benefit of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for degenerative lesions in middle-aged patients. Purpose: To compare satisfaction with APM between middle-aged patients with no or mild knee osteoarthritis (OA) and a degenerative meniscal tear and those with a traumatic tear. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A comparative prospective study at 5 years of middle-aged patients (45-60 years old) with no or mild OA undergoing APM for degenerative (n = 115) or traumatic (n = 143) tears was conducted. Patient satisfaction was measured by a 5-point Likert scale and functional outcomes by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify factors correlating with patient-reported satisfaction at 5 years postoperatively. Results: Baseline patient characteristics were not different between groups. At the 5-year evaluation, the satisfaction rate in the traumatic and degenerative groups was 68.5% versus 71.3%, respectively ( P = .365). Patient satisfaction was significantly associated with functional outcomes ( r = 0.69; P = .024). In the degenerative group, 43 patients (37.4%) had OA progression to Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 2 or 3, but only 24 patients (20.8%) had a symptomatic knee at final follow-up. Multivariate regression analysis for patient dissatisfaction at 5-year follow-up showed the following significant independent factors: female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.3]; P = .018), body mass index >30 kg/m2 (OR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.7-4.9]; P = .035), lateral meniscal tears (OR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.1-0.9]; P = .039), and OA progression to K-L grade ≥2 at final follow-up (OR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.2-2.6]; P = .014). At the final evaluation, there were no significant differences between groups in pain scores ( P = .648), WOMAC scores ( P = .083), or KOOS-4 scores ( P = .187). Likewise, there were no significant differences in the KOOS subscores for Pain ( P = .144), Symptoms ( P = .097), or Sports/Recreation ( P = .150). Although the degenerative group had significantly higher subscores for Activities of Daily Living ( P = .001) and Quality of Life ( P = .004), the differences were considered not clinically meaningful. Conclusion: There were no meaningful differences in patient satisfaction or clinical outcomes between patients with traumatic and degenerative tears and no or mild OA. Predictors of dissatisfaction with APM were female sex, obesity, and lateral meniscal tears. Our findings suggested that APM was an effective medium-term option to relieve pain and recover function in middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tears, without obvious OA, and with failed prior physical therapy.

Contemporary Midterm Echocardiographic Outcomes of Bentall Procedure and Aortic Valve Sparing Root Replacement

2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 590-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Toeg ◽  
Vincent Chan ◽  
Rajeev V. Rao ◽  
Kwan-Leung Chan ◽  
Marc Ruel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bentall Procedure ◽  
Valve Sparing

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes after surgical and non-surgical treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions in middle-aged patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Pihl ◽  
Olof Skoldenberg ◽  
Hans Nasell ◽  
Sven Jonhagen ◽  
Paula Kelly Pettersson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Hamstring Injury ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Proximal Hamstring ◽  
Non Surgical Treatment

ObjectivesIn the literature on proximal hamstring avulsions, only two studies report the outcomes of non-surgically treated patients. Our objective was to compare subjective recovery after surgical and non-surgical treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions in a middle-aged cohort.MethodsWe included 47 patients (33 surgically and 14 non-surgically treated) with a mean (SD) age of 51 (±9) years in a retrospective cohort study. Follow-up time mean (SD) of 3.9 (±1.4) years. The outcome variables were the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and questions from the Proximal Hamstring Injury Questionnaire. Outcome variables were adjusted in regression models for gender, age, American Society of Anestesiologits (ASA) classification and MRI findings at diagnosis.ResultsThe baseline characteristics showed no differences except for the MRI result, in which the surgically treated group had a larger proportion of tendons retracted ≥ 2 cm. The mean LEFS score was 74 (SD±12) in the surgically treated cohort and 72 (SD±16) in the non-surgically treated cohort. This was also true after adjusting for confounders. The only difference in outcome at follow-up was the total hours performing physical activity per week, p=0.02; surgically treated patients reported 2.5 hours or more (5.2 vs 2.7).ConclusionThis study on middle-aged patients with proximal hamstring avulsions was unable to identify any difference in patient-reported outcome measures between surgically and non-surgically treated patients. The vast majority of patients treated surgically had complete proximal hamstring avulsions with ≥ 2 cm of retraction. We conclude that to obtain an evidence-based treatment algorithm for proximal hamstring avulsions studies of higher scientific level are needed.

scholarly journals Aortic valve-sparing root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: long-term outcome with the David I procedure over 20 years

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Beckmann ◽  
Andreas Martens ◽  
Heike Krüger ◽  
Wilhelm Korte ◽  
Tim Kaufeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valves ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valves ◽  
Valve Sparing

Abstract OBJECTIVES Aortic valve-sparing root replacement is an excellent treatment option for patients with intact tricuspid aortic valves. However, the durability in patients with bicuspid aortic valves is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to analyse the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. METHODS Between July 1993 and October 2015, a total of 582 patients underwent the David I procedure, 50 of whom had a bicuspid aortic valve. In these patients, the mean age was 46 ± 13 years, and 80% (n = 40) were men. Follow-up was complete for 100% of patients and comprised a total of 552 patient-years with a mean follow-up time of 11 ± 5.2 years. RESULTS In addition to the David procedure, cusp plication was performed in 34% (n = 17) of patients and commissure repair in 8% (n = 4) of patients. There were no in-hospital deaths, and 1 patient (2%) had a perioperative stroke. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year survival rates of patients after discharge were 98%, 94%, 88% and 84%, respectively. The rates for freedom from valve-related reoperation at 1, 5, 10 and 20 years after initial surgery were 98%, 88%, 79% and 74%, respectively. Long-term freedom from reoperation was comparable to that of patients with tricuspid aortic valves (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS The David procedure has excellent short-term results in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve. In this study, the long-term durability of reimplanted bicuspid aortic valves was comparable to that of tricuspid valves. However, careful patient selection might have contributed to this, and further studies might be needed to definitely clarify this issue.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document