Is the Effect of Intervertebral Foramen Endoscopic Surgery on Adjacent Segmental Degeneration Better Than That of Open Surgery?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
wang shunmin ◽  
kaiqiang sun ◽  
aigang liu ◽  
rongzi chen ◽  
xi luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Endoscopic Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Intervertebral Foramen ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy

Abstract Background To compare the clinical outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of postoperative adjacent segment degeneration in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Methods From 2014 to 2017, 87 patients who were diagnosed with single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and received surgery of TLIF (group X, n = 43) or endoscopic discectomy (group F, n = 44) were retrospectively analyzed. X-ray, MRI, CT and clinical symptoms were recorded before operation and at the last follow-up. The neurological function was originally evaluated by the (JOA) score of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Radiological evaluation included the height of intervertebral space (HIS), intervertebral foramen height (FH), intervertebral foramen area (FA), lumbar lordosis (CA) and intervertebral disc degeneration pfirrmann score.Results There was no significant difference in average operation age, JOA improvement rate, reoperation rate and complications between the two groups. The average blood loss, average hospital stays and average operation time in group F were lower than those in group X. During the last follow-up, HIS, CA and FA decreased in both groups, and the changes in group X were more significant than those in group X (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative FH between the two groups, but it decreased more in group X (P < 0.05).Conclusion Both TLIF and endoscopic surgery can achieve good results in the treatment of LDH, but the risk of lumbar adjacent segment degeneration after intervertebral foraminal surgery is lower.

Comparison of Outcomes Postoperation between Straight Leg Raising Test Negative and Positive Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feilong Wei ◽  
Haoran Gao ◽  
Yifang Yuan ◽  
Shu Qian ◽  
Quanyou Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Straight Leg Raising ◽  
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Relevant Factors

Abstract Background: Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is used increasingly in patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation. There is little knowledge on the related factors including SLR test influencing the operation. Therefore, we designed this prospective study to explore the relevant factors influencing postoperative effect of PTED surgery.Methods: Consecutive patients with LDH who came to our hospital from August 2015 to September 2016 and received PTED surgery. 4 kinds of scales including VAS (lumbar/leg), ODI and JOA were measured and reassessed at 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, 12months and 36 months after the PTED to assess their surgical outcomes. Results: All the patients had successful surgery. ODI and VAS (lumbar/leg) decreased in all patients and groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in each postoperative follow-up compared with that before surgery in every visit. In addition, the increase of JOA in postoperation was statistically significant compared with that before surgery. And, there is statistically significant difference between the three subpopulations (patients with SLR Positive (0°-30°), SLR Positive (31°-60°) and SLR Negative (61°-) in the changes of the scores of VAS(leg), ODI and JOA. However, there is no statistically significant difference between the three subpopulations (patients with SLR Positive (0°-30°), SLR Positive (31°-60°) and SLR Negative (61°--RRB- in the changes of the score of VAS(lumbar). Conclusions: PTED showed great effect on treating patients with lumbar disc herniation. And the main scale score such as VAS(leg). ODI and JOA showed that there is a statistically significant difference between the three subpopulations treated by PTED. Patients with SLR negative may get greater benefit from PTED.

scholarly journals A Follow-up Study on the Degeneration of Adjacent Segments After TLIF and Foraminal Endoscopy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
wang shunmin ◽  
xi luo ◽  
yuan wang ◽  
yongfei guo ◽  
jiangang shi
Keyword(s):  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Intervertebral Foramen ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy

Abstract Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of postoperative adjacent segment degeneration in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods From 2014 to 2017, 87 patients who were diagnosed with single-levelLDH and received surgery of TLIF (group X, n = 43) or endoscopic discectomy (group F, n = 44) were retrospectively analyzed. X-ray, MRI, CT and clinical symptoms were recorded before operation and at the last follow-up. The neurological function was originally evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Radiological evaluation included the height of intervertebral space (HIS), intervertebral foramen height (FH), intervertebral foramen area (FA), lumbar lordosis (CA) and intervertebral disc degeneration Pfirrmann score.Results There was no significant difference in average operation age, JOA improvement rate, reoperation rate and complications between the two groups. The average blood loss, average hospital stays and average operation time in group F were lower than those in group X. During the last follow-up, HIS, CA and FA decreased in both groups, and the changes in group X were more significant than those in group F (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative FH between the two groups, but it decreased more in group X (P < 0.05).Conclusion Both TLIF and endoscopic surgery can achieve good results in the treatment of LDH, but the risk of lumbar adjacent segment degeneration after intervertebral foraminal surgery is lower.

scholarly journals Analysis of curative effect: percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation with buttock pain as the main symptom

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Yan An ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Jiu-Ping Wu ◽  
Tong Yu ◽  
Wu Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Symptom ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Buttock Pain ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy

Abstract Background . Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common disease in spinal surgery which often causes acute radicular pain. However, LDH with buttock pain (BP) as the main clinical symptom is rare. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of LDH with the buttock as the primary clinical symptom. Methods . Totally 12 patients have LDH (L4-5) with BP who underwent PTED from January 2019 to June 2020 were enrolled. All patients performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and at follow-up. The pain relieve were evaluated by the Visual analog scale (VAS), the functional recovery was assessed by Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Roland-Morris questionnaire (RMQ). Parameters were evaluated preoperatively, immediately after surgery, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery, respectively. Moreover, the lumbar function was determined by modified MacNab criteria. Results . Pain relieve was found in 11 patients postoperatively. The VAS, ODI and RMQ scores were improved significantly at the latest follow up visit compared to preoperative (P < 0.05). One patient suffered from LDH recurrence one month after operation and received revision surgery, then achieved satisfied effect. Two patients experienced residual BP after operation and obtained good clinical outcomes by conservative treatment. No other surgical complications were found during follow up period. The average length of follow-up was 6.68 ± 0.67 months. Conclusion. PTED is a safe and efficacious method in treating LDH with BP.

scholarly journals Application of a targeted and quantificational foraminoplasty device in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for L5–S1 disc herniation: preliminary clinical outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinlong Liu ◽  
Junlong Wu ◽  
Honglei Zhang ◽  
Rui Zuo ◽  
Jiabin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Fluoroscopy Time ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy

Abstract Objective Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) is minimally invasive and has been widely used to treat patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) due to its safety and efficiency. However, due to the unique anatomy of the L5–S1 level, the PTED procedure is often difficult to perform in the region. ZESSYS, a targeted and quantificational foraminoplasty device, may help to overcome these anatomical limitations. In this study, we assessed the efficiency and the short-term effects of PTED with ZESSYS at the L5–S1 level. Methods Between January and August of 2018, fifty-six patients with lumbar disc herniation at the single level of L5–S1 and who underwent percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. They were segregated into the transforaminal endoscopic surgical system (TESSYS) group and the ZESSYS group. The puncture time, foraminoplasty time, decompression time, and fluoroscopy time were evaluated for operation efficiency. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. The MacNab criteria were used to evaluate patient subjective satisfaction at 12-month follow-up postoperatively. Results The average puncture time (5.29 ± 2.05 min), foraminoplasty time (12.82 ± 2.52 min), and fluoroscopy time (26.29 ± 5.96 s) were all significantly shorter in the ZESSYS group than in the TESSYS group (average puncture time 8.07 ± 3.13 min, p < 0.01; foraminoplasty time, 17.18 ± 2.92 min, p < 0.01; fluoroscopy time, 34.73 ± 6.86 s; p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the decompression time (p = 0.057). The VAS score of low back pain and leg pain, as well as the ODI score, improved at all time points postoperatively compared with preoperative, in both the TESSYS group and the ZESSYS group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the VAS score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, and ODI score between the TESSYS group and the ZESSYS group at the same time points (P > 0.05). According to the MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rate at 12-month follow-up postoperatively was 85.7% in the TESSYS group and 89.3% in the ZESSYS group (P > 0.05). Conclusion The targeted and quantificational foraminoplasty device named ZESSYS was more efficient in the puncture and foraminoplasty procedures, effectively protecting the exiting nerve and minimizing the level of radiation exposure. The device is efficient and safe for PTED in treating lumbar disc herniation at the L5–S1 level.

scholarly journals Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy in the treatment of multilevel disc herniations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denglu Yan ◽  
Zaiheng Zhang ◽  
Zhi Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage ◽  
Multiple Level ◽  
Endoscopic Procedures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Disc Herniations

Abstract Background There were no studies in literature of multiple level lumbar disc herniation treatment by endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic treatment multiple level lumbar disc herniation by compare to the one level disc herniation. Methods A total of 267 patients of lumbar disc herniation who had endoscopic surgery were categorized into three different groups depending on the level number of endoscopic procedures. 78 cases had one level procedure (OL group), 54 cases had couple level procedures (CL group), and 35 cases had triple level procedures (TL group). Endoscopic discectomy procedures was performed and the clinical outcomes were recorded. Results There was no intraoperative death in this series. The hospital day were no significant difference among three groups. The operational time and blood loss were biggest in triple levels procedures and lest in one level procedure. When take into the influence the numbers of disc herniation, there were no significant difference per level among three groups. The pain index and ODI score were better than preoperational in all patients, and there were no significant difference among three groups. The disk and foramen height, and lumbar lordosis were no significant difference compare to preoperative in all patients, and there were no significant difference among three groups. All patients achieved pain free accomplished all surgery procedures, no infection, and no dural tear of cerebrospinal fluid leakage complication. Conclusions Endoscopic lumbar discectomy was effective and safe procedures in the treatment of multilevel lumbar disc herniation.

scholarly journals Biportal endoscopic discectomy for high-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-365
Author(s):  
Taewook Kang ◽  
Si Young Park ◽  
Gun Woo Park ◽  
Soon Hyuck Lee ◽  
Jong Hoon Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Grade Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy

OBJECTIVEAlthough endoscopic procedures for lumbar disc herniation have improved greatly and offer many advantages, the indications are limited mostly to nonmigrated or low-grade migrated disc herniation. Endoscopic application in migrated disc herniation cases is still challenging and technically demanding. The goal in this study was to determine the feasibility of biportal endoscopic discectomy for removal of high-grade migrated disc herniation.METHODSA retrospective review was performed in 262 patients who had undergone biportal endoscopic discectomy after the diagnosis of lumbar herniated disc. According to preoperative MRI findings, disc herniation was classified into 5 zones based on the direction and distance from the disc space. Patients were divided into 2 groups—a high-grade migration group and a low-grade migration group. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), and modified Macnab criteria, and those outcomes and operation time were compared between the 2 groups.RESULTSThere were 10 patients with “high-grade up,” 8 with “low-grade up,” 98 with disc-level, 102 with “low-grade down,” and 44 with “high-grade down” herniation, thereby yielding 54 patients in the high-grade group and 208 in the low-grade group. Demographic data for the 2 groups showed no significant difference. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in ODI, VAS, and modified Macnab criteria. Operation time between the 2 groups was not significantly different (60.74 vs 65.63 minutes, p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONSBiportal endoscopic discectomy can be effective for high-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation with no prolonged operation time and satisfactory clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Clinical Effect of Lateral Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
Weiya Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Endoscopic Surgery ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of lateral transforaminal endoscopic surgery in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods: A total of 44 patients with lumbar disc herniation, treated in Yancheng No.1 People’s Hospital from January 2019 to June 2020, were randomly divided into two groups; the 24 patients in group A were treated by lateral transforaminal endoscopic surgery, while the 20 patients in group B were treated by routine lamina fenestration and nucleus pulposus surgery. Results: The curative effect of group A (91.67%) was higher than that of group B (85.0%), P > 0.05; there was no significant difference in the angle from straight leg raise between group A and group B (P > 0.05); the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of group A were lower than those of group B (P < 0.05); the incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay of the patients in group A were better than those in group B, P < 0.05. Conclusion: Lateral transforaminal endoscopic surgery can significantly reduce pain, improve symptoms, and help to restore normal function in the early stage for patients with lumbar disc herniation.

scholarly journals Endoscopic lumbar discectomy using side viewing conical working tube

2021 ◽  
pp. 108-113
Author(s):  
Mohammad Kaif ◽  
Kuldeep Yadav ◽  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Deepak Kumar Singh
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Lumbar Disc Prolapse ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Objective: The paradigm of surgical therapy for spinal disease especially for lumbar disc herniation has gradually shifted from traditional open surgeries to minimally invasive spinal surgeries. Endoscopic discectomy has been performed widely using various devices and techniques. In this study, we present our experience of endoscopic discectomy using a unique device with separate side viewing channel. Methods: 26 patients of lumbar disc herniation treated between March 2015 to April 2018 using the unique conical working tube with separate side-viewing endoscopic channel have been retrospectively analysed. Their preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Macnab scores were used to evaluate the outcome with a mean follow up of 37.04 months. Results: There were 18 males and 08 females with age ranging from 19-72 years (mean-38.4 years). The follow up ranged from 25 months to 60 months with a mean of 37.04 months. The mean preoperative ODI score was 72.4 which decreased to a mean of 7.6 and the outcome evaluated by Macnab criteria was 65.3% excellent, 19.2 % good, 11.5% fair, 3.8% poor. 1 patient underwent a second surgery. None of the patients had to change their occupation postoperatively. Complications occurred were dural tear in 1 patient and transient foot paresis in 1 which improved spontaneously. Conclusion: Endoscopic discectomy using conical working tube is a safe and effective technique for lumbar disc prolapse. The long term results are comparable to conventional techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document