Hemivertebra Resection Combined With Wedge Osteotomy for Treatment of Severe Rigid Congenital Kyphoscoliosis in Adolescence

Abstract Background There was a controversy about surgery approach of severe rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis in adolescence treatment. Aim of the study is to compare the clinical efficacy of surgical treatement by hemivertebra resection (HR) and hemivertebra resection combined with wedge osteotomy (HRWO) for severe rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis in adolescence. Methods Twenty-five patients with severe rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis between Jan 2006 and Dec 2011 were studied in our center. The patients were divided into hemivertebra resection group (group HR) or hemivertebra resection combined with wedge osteotomy group (group HRWO). The clinical and radiographic evaluation in terms of operation time, blood loss, correction rate, fusion time, hospital stay, complications and SRS-24 questionnaire score were compared between Group A and Group B. Results It is obvious that group HR achieved much better results in time of operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and hospital stay than group HRWO (P < 0.05). But meanwhile, group HRWO was significantly better than group HR in the times of coronal Cobb angle, kyphosis, the sagittal imbalance, coronal imbalance and SRS-24 questionnaire score (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the age, mean flexibility, follow-up time, fusion time, and complications in the last follow-up (P > 0.05). Conclusion The outcomes of follow-up showed that the hemivertebra resection combined with wedge osteotomy approach obtained better clinical outcomes hemivertebra resection surgery. It might be a better surgical treatment for severe rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis in adolescence patients, but it needs longer operation time, more intra-operative blood loss, and extended hospital stay.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of percutaneous short segment fixation on the treatment of Magerl A3 thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-31598/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

hongheng lin ◽

Xiaoting Ou ◽

Wenchao Li ◽

Minyuan Chen ◽

Caijun Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Operation Time ◽

Clinical Results ◽

Radiographic Evaluation ◽

Correction Loss ◽

Short Segment ◽

Significant Correction ◽

Short Segment Fixation

Abstract BackgroundThis is a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous short segment fixation (PSSF) with or without intermediate screws in Magerl A3 thoracolumbar (TL) fractures accompanied with low bone mineral density (BMD).Methods From January 2017 to December 2018, 30 patients diagnosed with Magerl A3 TL fractures having a BMD between 0.5/cm2 and 1g/cm2 in the lumbar vertebrae with intact neurological functions and a history of major trauma who underwent PSSF with or without intermediate screws were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups of those with intermediate screws (group F) or without (group S). The operation time and intra-operation blood loss were recorded. Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) were employed as clinical assessments and quantified. Radiographic follow-up assessed according to the Cobb angle (CA), Vertebral wedge angle (VWA), and anterior vertebral body height (AVBH).ResultsLoose screws were observed in 4 of the 30 enrolled patients. Significant differences were observed in operation time and intra-operative blood loss between the two groups. The enrolled patients’ clinical results (VAS and ODI scores) were good, however, no significant differences during all follow-up periods were present between the two groups. Radiographic evaluation (CA, VWA and AVBH) improved immediately after surgery, but significant correction loss was observed in the follow-up periods, especially in the first month. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups.Conclusion Although the patients’ clinical results were satisfactory, PSSF could not resist the correction loss in Magerl A3 TL fractures accompanied with BMD below 1g/cm2. Accordingly, the use of intermediate pedicle screws may be unnecessary due to their limited ability in resisting correction loss and increasing operation time as well as intra-operation blood loss.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Stand-Alone Oblique Lumber Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

10.21203/rs.3.rs-129865/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Run Peng Guo ◽

Xian Da Gao ◽

Pei Yu Du ◽

Wen Yuan Ding ◽

Lei Ma

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Operation Time ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Incision Length ◽

Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

Abstract Background: This study evaluated the clinical and imaging results of oblique lumber interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.Methods: The clinical data of 99 patients with degenerative lumbar diseases in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2016 to January 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. 49 cases were dealt with by OLIF (stand-alone) (OLIF group) and 50 cases with PLIF (PLIF group). Clinical and imaging data were collected before surgery and at each follow-up visit. Clinical data included operation time, blood loss, incision length, length of hospital stay, visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) scores and complications. imaging measurment included the height of segmental intervertebral space, lumbar lordotic angle, operative segmental lordotic angle and fusion rate. The relationship between clinical results and radiology was assessed by comparing the radiological results before and after operation.Results: 99 cases of interbody fusion were performed successfully, and all patients had clinical improvement. The follow-up time was 24-38 months. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length and hospital stay in OLIF group were significantly less than those in the PLIF group (p<0.05). The intervertebral disc height, lumbar lordotic angle and operative segmental lordotic angle in the two groups were significantly enhanced compared with those before operation, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). All of them achieved satisfactory fusion effect. Complications were found in 5 cases in OLIF group and 13 cases in PLIF group.Conclusion: Both OLIF and PLIF are effective in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Compared with PLIF, OLIF has a lot advantages in early stage after operation, However, similar clinical outcomes were achieved in the two approaches at mid-term follow-up visit.

Download Full-text

A Novel Surgical Approach for Type 2 Mirizzi Syndrome: Based on a Decade of Clinical Experience at a Teaching Hospital

Surgical Innovation ◽

10.1177/15533506211006057 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 155335062110060

Author(s):

Hong W Yu ◽

Guoqiang Zhang ◽

Yingjie Zhang ◽

Wanneng Yan

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Clinical Experience ◽

Postoperative Mortality ◽

Operation Time ◽

Mirizzi Syndrome ◽

Surgical Approaches ◽

The Mean

Background. The Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is a rare complication of cholecystolithiasis that is often accompanied by severe inflammation and fibrosis around Calot’s triangle. It is difficult to treat Type 2 MS surgically, and the treatment for this condition has not yet been standardized. The data on operative management are limited. The study aimed to review our institutional clinical experience regarding surgery and provide recommendations for treating Type 2 MS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 6 patients with MS who were surgically treated at our institution between January 2010 and December 2019. The classification of MS by McSherry CK, Ferstenberg H, Virshup M. The Mirizzi syndrome: Suggested classification and surgical therapy. Surg Gastroenterol. 1982;1:219-225 was used. Mucosal approach was used to treat Type 2 MS. The parameters for comparison included patient demographics, operative procedures, operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and follow-up. Results: There were 23 patients with MS among 10 386 cholecystectomies in our area. Six patients with Type 2 MS had successful surgery, and the mucosal approach was used. The average operative time was 253.3 ± 32.5 minutes. The average blood loss was 70.0 ± 14.1 mL. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 9.5 ± 3.9 days. There was no postoperative mortality. The most frequent postoperative complications were bile leakage (16.7%), and postoperative intra-abdominal collection (16.7%). The mean postoperative follow-up was 10 months, and all patients are asymptomatic. The mucosal approach may decrease the risk of bile duct injury, biliary tract infection, and blood loss more than other surgical approaches. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the mucosal approach is an effective surgical procedure for Type 2 MS.

Download Full-text

Nonstructural bone graft for single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: surgical indications, clinical efficacy, and preliminary experiences in 34 patients

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/0300060520982780 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 49 (1) ◽

pp. 030006052098278

Author(s):

Xing Du ◽

Yunsheng Ou ◽

Guanyin Jiang ◽

Yong Zhu ◽

Wei Luo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Bone Graft ◽

Cobb Angle ◽

Clinical Efficacy ◽

Operative Time ◽

Bone Grafts ◽

Surgical Indications ◽

Operative Blood Loss ◽

The Mean

Objective This study was performed to evaluate the surgical indications, clinical efficacy, and preliminary experiences of nonstructural bone grafts for lumbar tuberculosis (TB). Methods Thirty-four patients with lumbar TB who were treated with nonstructural bone grafts were retrospectively assessed. The operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, bone graft fusion time, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment grade, and Cobb angle were recorded and analyzed. Results The mean operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, Cobb angle correction, and Cobb angle loss were 192.59 ± 42.16 minutes, 385.29 ± 251.82 mL, 14.91 ± 5.06 days, 9.02° ± 3.16°, and 5.54° ± 1.09°, respectively. During the mean follow-up of 27.53 ± 8.90 months, significant improvements were observed in the ESR, CRP concentration, VAS score, ODI, and ASIA grade. The mean bone graft fusion time was 5.15 ± 1.13 months. Three complications occurred, and all were cured after active treatment. Conclusions Nonstructural bone grafts may achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy for appropriately selected patients with lumbar TB.

Download Full-text

Microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for the treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation: report of the surgical technique, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

BMC Surgery ◽

10.1186/s12893-021-01255-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Chunxiao Wang ◽

Yao Zhang ◽

Xiaojie Tang ◽

Haifei Cao ◽

Qinyong Song ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Learning Curve ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽

Disc Herniation ◽

Lumbar Disc ◽

Operation Time ◽

Operation Duration ◽

The Mean

Abstract Background The area which located at the medial pedicle, posterior vertebral body and ventral hemilamina is defined as the hidden zone. Surgical management of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation (HZLDH) is technically challenging due to its difficult surgical exposure. The conventional interlaminar approach harbors the potential risk of post-surgical instability, while other approaches consist of complicated procedures with a steep learning curve and prolonged operation time. Objective To introduce microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) technique for treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation and present clinical outcomes. Methods Between Jan 2016 to Jan 2018, twenty one patients (13 males) with HZLDH were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent MELS (19 patients underwent sequestrectomy only, 2 patients underwent an additional inferior discectomy). The nerve root and fragment were visually exposed using MELS. The operation duration, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrences were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative stability was evaluated both radiologically and clinically. Results The mean follow-up period was 20.95 ± 2.09 (18–24) months. The mean operation time was 32.43 ± 7.19 min and the mean blood loss was 25.52 ± 5.37 ml. All patients showed complete neurological symptom relief after surgery. The VAS and ODI score were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to those before operation (7.88 ± 0.70 vs 0.10 ± 0.30, 59.24 ± 10.83 vs 11.29 ± 3.59, respectively, p < 0.05). Seventeen patients (81%) obtained an “excellent” outcome and the remaining four (19%) patients obtained a “good” outcome based the MacNab criteria. One patient suffered reherniation at the same level one year after the initial surgery and underwent a transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. No major complications and postoperative instability were observed. Conclusions Our observation suggest that MELS is safe and effective in the management of HZLDH. Due to its relative simplicity, it comprises a flat surgical learning curve and shorter operation duration, and overall results in reduced disturbance to lumbar stability.

Download Full-text

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with Virtual Basket mode: faster and better control on bleeding

BMC Urology ◽

10.1186/s12894-021-00797-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Giorgio Bozzini ◽

Matteo Maltagliati ◽

Umberto Besana ◽

Lorenzo Berti ◽

Albert Calori ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Operative Time ◽

Randomized Study ◽

Urine Volume ◽

Holmium Laser ◽

Laser Enucleation ◽

Holmium Laser Enucleation ◽

Irrigation Volume

Abstract Background To compare clinical intra and early postoperative outcomes between conventional Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using the Virtual Basket tool (VB-HoLEP) to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods This prospective randomized study enrolled consecutive patients with BPH, who were assigned to undergo either HoLEP (n = 100), or VB-HoLEP (n = 100). All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, with particular attention to catheterization time, operative time, blood loss, irrigation volume and hospital stay. We also evaluated the patients at 3 and 6 months after surgery and assessed maximum flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Quality of Life score (QOLS). Results No significant differences in preoperative parameters between patients in each study arm were found. Compared to HoLEP, VB-HoLEP resulted in less hemoglobin decrease (2.54 vs. 1.12 g/dl, P = 0.03) and reduced operative time (57.33 ± 29.71 vs. 42.99 ± 18.51 min, P = 0.04). HoLEP and VB-HoLEP detrmined similar catheterization time (2.2 vs. 1.9 days, P = 0.45), irrigation volume (33.3 vs. 31.7 l, P = 0.69), and hospital stay (2.8 vs. 2.7 days, P = 0.21). During the 6-month follow-up no significant differences in IPSS, Qmax, PVR, and QOLS were demonstrated. Conclusions HoLEP and VB-HoLEP are both efficient and safe procedures for relieving lower urinary tract symptoms. VB-HoLEP was statistically superior to HoLEP in blood loss and operative time. However, procedures did not differ significantly in catheterization time, hospital stay, and irrigation volume. No significant differences were demonstrated in QOLS, IPSS, Qmax and PVR throughout the 6-month follow-up. Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN72879639; date of registration: June 25th, 2015. Retrospectively registred.

Download Full-text

Haemostatic devices in parotid surgery: a systematic review

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology ◽

10.1017/s0022215121001973 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

L Allen ◽

C MacKay ◽

M H Rigby ◽

J Trites ◽

S M Taylor

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Facial Nerve ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Operating Time ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Operative Blood Loss ◽

Parotid Surgery

Abstract Objective The Harmonic Scalpel and Ligasure (Covidien) devices are commonly used in head and neck surgery. Parotidectomy is a complex and intricate surgery that requires careful dissection of the facial nerve. This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes in parotidectomy using these haemostatic devices with traditional scalpel and cautery. Method A systematic review of the literature was performed with subsequent meta-analysis of seven studies that compared the use of haemostatic devices to traditional scalpel and cautery in parotidectomy. Outcome measures included: temporary facial paresis, operating time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative drain output and length of hospital stay. Results A total of 7 studies representing 675 patients were identified: 372 patients were treated with haemostatic devices, and 303 patients were treated with scalpel and cautery. Statistically significant outcomes favouring the use of haemostatic devices included operating time, intra-operative blood loss and post-operative drain output. Outcome measures that did not favour either treatment included facial nerve paresis and length of hospital stay. Conclusion Overall, haemostatic devices were found to reduce operating time, intra-operative blood loss and post-operative drain output.

Download Full-text

Is It Necessary to Reduce Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures with Intermediate Screws in the Fractured Vertebra?

10.21203/rs.3.rs-542387/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

ZeJun Xing ◽

Shuai Hao ◽

XiaoFei Wu

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Body Height ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Operation Time ◽

Short Segment ◽

Compression Fractures ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Before And After ◽

Screw Group

Abstract PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous short-segment pedicle screws fixation (PPSF) with or without intermediate screws (IS) for the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures.MethodsFrom January 2016 to March 2019, a retrospective study of 38 patients with thoracolumbar compression fractures conducted. The patients were divided into a 4-screw group (without IS) and a 6-screw group (with IS) according to whether pedicle screws were placed in the fractured vertebrae. Combined positional reduction effects with the technique of pre-contoured lordotic rods were used to reduce the fracture by lengthening the anterior column of the fractured vertebrae. The posterior structure of the fractured vertebrae was undertaken as the fulcrum point for both groups. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), segment kyphosis（SK）before and after operation and complications were recorded.ResultsAlthough the operation time and blood loss in the 6-screw group were higher than in the 4-screw group, difference was not significant (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS, AVBH and SK between the two groups (P＞0.05). Nevertheless, these results were significant differences between the preoperative and the immediate postoperative, between preoperative and follow-up groups (P < 0.001). No neurologic injury was observed in either groups. ConclusionsIn the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures, percutaneous short-segment pedicle screws fixation without intermediate screws in the 4-screw construct may obtain the same clinical effect as that in the 6-screw construct.

Download Full-text

Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches in the treatment of tibia intramedullary nailing ： A retrospective cohort study

10.21203/rs.2.15560/v2 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Yiliang Cui ◽

Xingyi Hua ◽

Florian Schmidutz ◽

Jian Zhou ◽

Zongsheng Yin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Intramedullary Nailing ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Operation Time ◽

Tibial Shaft ◽

Shaft Fractures ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Special Surgery ◽

Tibial Shaft Fractures

Abstract Background: Tibial shaft fractures are routinely managed with intramedullary nailing (IMN). An increasingly accepted technique is the suprapatellar (SP) approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of knee joint after tibia IMN through an suprapatellar (SP) or traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in patients with tibial shaft fractures that were treated with IMN through a SP or IP approach between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2016. The clinical and functional outcomes of the knee were assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score. Secondary outcomes included the operation time and intraoperative blood loss. Results: A total of 50 patients/fractures (26 IP and 24 SP) with a minimum follow-up of 15 months were evaluated. All fractures were OTA 42. No significant differences were found between the two groups in age, gender, side of fractures, operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and follow-up time. No significant difference was seen in HSS score ( P = 0.62) between them. Sub analysis of all the HSS components scores revealed no significant differences between pain ( P = 0.57), the stand and walk ( P = 0.54), the need for walking stick ( P = 0.60) and extension lag ( P = 0.60). The other HSS components showed full scores (IP 10 vs. SP 10) in both approaches, including muscle force, flexion deformity and stability components. The range of motion (ROM) component score was superior in the IP group ( P = 0.04) suggesting a higher ROM. Conclusions: Both SP and IP approach results in equivalent overall HSS knee scores. However, for the HSS component, the IP approach was superior to SP approach regarding the ROM.

Download Full-text

Comparison of early clinical results for the femoral neck system and cannulated screws in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures

10.21203/rs.3.rs-129837/v2 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Xiaoqiang Zhou ◽

Zhiqiang Li ◽

Renjie Xu ◽

Yuanshi She ◽

Xiangxin Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femoral Head ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Clinical Efficacy ◽

Operation Time ◽

Femoral Neck Fractures ◽

Femoral Head Necrosis ◽

Cannulated Screws ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss

Abstract Objective: To compare early clinical effects of the femoral neck system (FNS) and three cannulated screws for the treatment of patients with unstable femoral neck fractures.Methods: A retrospective analysis with pair matching of 81 patients who received FNS or cannulated screw internal fixation for Pauwels type-3 femoral neck fracture in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2019 was conducted. Patients who received FNS were the test group, and those who received cannulated screws comprised the control group. Matching requirements were as follows: same sex, similar age and similar body mass index (BMI). A total of 30 pairs were successfully matched, and the average age was 53.84 years. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization cost, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, time to walking without crutches, Harris score, femoral head necrosis rate and complication rate were compared between the groups.Results: Postoperative re-examination of radiographs showed satisfactory reduction in all patients, and all patients were followed up for 10-22 months. Those in the FNS group had lower postoperative VAS scores, earlier times to walking without crutches, higher Harris scores at the last follow-up and lower complication rates (P<0.05). However, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization costs were greater in the FNS group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference in operation time, hospital stay or femoral head necrosis rate was observed between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: For patients with unstable femoral neck fractures, FNS has better clinical efficacy than cannulated screws, though it is also more expensive. The excellent biomechanical performance and clinical efficacy of FNS make it a new choice for the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.

Download Full-text