scholarly journals Effect of different types of cerebral perfusion for acute type A aortic dissection undergoing aortic arch procedure, unilateral versus bilateral

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengqin Liu ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Xiquan Zhang ◽  
Shuming Wu ◽  
Changcun Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Type A ◽  
Neurological Complications ◽  
Neurological Dysfunction ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Neurologic Dysfunction ◽  
Ventilation Time

Abstract Background: Antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP), including unilateral and bilateral, is most commonly used for cerebral protection in aortic surgery. There is still no consensus on the superiority of the two methods. Our research aimed to investigate the clinical effects of u-ACP and b-ACP. Methods: 321 of 356 patients with type A aortic dissection were studied retrospectively. 124 patients (38.6%) received u-ACP, and 197 patients (61.4%) received b-ACP. We compared the incidence of postoperative neurological complications and other collected data between two groups. Besides, we also analyzed perioperative variables to find the potential associated factors for neurological dysfunction (ND). Results: For u-ACP group, 54 patients (43.5%) had postoperative neurological complications, including 22 patients (17.7%) with permanent neurologic dysfunction (PND) and 32 patients (25.8%) with temporary neurologic dysfunction (TND). For b-ACP group, 47 patients (23.8%) experienced postoperative neurological complications, including 16 patients (8.1%) of PND and 31 patients (15.7%) of TND. The incidence of PND and TND were significantly different between two groups along with shorter CPB time (p=0.016), higher nasopharyngeal temperature (p≦0.000), shorter ventilation time (p=0.018), and lower incidence of hypoxia (p=0.022). Furthermore, multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis confirmed that preoperative neurological dysfunction (OR=1.20, P= 0.028), CPB duration (OR=3.21, P=0.002), and type of cerebral perfusion (OR=1.48, P=0.017) were strongly associated with postoperative ND. Conclusions: In our study, it was observed that b-ACP procedure exhibited shorter CPB time, milder hypothermia, shorter ventilation time, lower incidence of postoperative hypoxia, and neurological dysfunction compared to u-ACP. Meanwhile, the incidence of ND was independently associated with three factors: preoperative neurological dysfunction, CPB time, and type of cerebral perfusion.

scholarly journals Effect of different types of cerebral perfusion for acute type A aortic dissection, unilateral versus bilateral

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
zhengqin liu ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Xiquan Zhang ◽  
Shuming Wu ◽  
changcun fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Type A ◽  
Neurological Complications ◽  
Neurological Dysfunction ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Neurologic Dysfunction ◽  
Ventilation Time

Abstract Background: Antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP), including unilateral and bilateral, is most commonly used way for cerebral protection in aortic surgery. There is still no consensus on the superiority of the two methods. Our research was aimed to investigate the clinical effects between u-ACP and b-ACP. Methods: 321 of 356 patients with type A aortic dissection were studied retrospectively. 124 patients (38.6%) received u-ACP and 197 patients(61.4%) received b-ACP. We compared the incidence of postoperative neurological complications and other collected data between two groups. We also analyzed perioperative variables in order to find the potential associated factors for neurolocial dysfunction (ND). Results: For u-ACP group, 54 patients (43.5%) had postoperative neurological complications including 22 patients (17.7%) with permanent neurologic dysfunction (PND) and 32 patients (25.8%) with temporary neurologic dysfunction (TND). For b-ACP group, 47 patients (23.8%) experienced postoperative neurological complications including 16 patients (8.1%) of PND and 31 patients (15.7%) of TND. The incidence of PND and TND were significantly different between two groups along with shorter CPB time (p=0.016), higher nasopharyngeal temperature (p≦0.000), shorter ventilation time (p=0.018) and lower incidence of hypoxia (p=0.022). Furthermore, multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis confirmed that preoperative neurological dysfunction (OR=1.20, P= 0.028), CPB duration (OR=3.21, P=0.002 ) and type of cerebral perfusion (OR=1.48, P=0.017) were strongly associated with postoperative ND. Conclusions: In our study, we found that b-ACP procedure had shorter CPB time, milder hypothermia, shorter ventilation time, lower incidence of postoperative hypoxia and neurological dysfunction compared to u-ACP. Meanwhile, we discovered the incidence of ND was independently associated with there factors, including preoperative neurological dysfunction, CPB time and type of cerebral perfusion.

scholarly journals Effect of different types of cerebral perfusion for acute type A aortic dissection undergoing aortic arch procedure, unilateral versus bilateral

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengqin Liu ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Xiquan Zhang ◽  
Shuming Wu ◽  
Changcun Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Type A ◽  
Neurological Complications ◽  
Neurological Dysfunction ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Neurologic Dysfunction ◽  
Ventilation Time

Abstract Background Antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP), including unilateral and bilateral, is most commonly used for cerebral protection in aortic surgery. There is still no consensus on the superiority of the two methods. Our research aimed to investigate the clinical effects of u-ACP and b-ACP. Methods 321 of 356 patients with type A aortic dissection were studied retrospectively. 124 patients (38.6%) received u-ACP, and 197 patients (61.4%) received b-ACP. We compared the incidence of postoperative neurological complications and other collected data between two groups. Besides, we also analyzed perioperative variables to find the potential associated factors for neurological dysfunction (ND). Results For u-ACP group, 54 patients (43.5%) had postoperative neurological complications, including 22 patients (17.7%) with permanent neurologic dysfunction (PND) and 32 patients (25.8%) with temporary neurologic dysfunction (TND). For b-ACP group, 47 patients (23.8%) experienced postoperative neurological complications, including 16 patients (8.1%) of PND and 31 patients (15.7%) of TND. The incidence of PND and TND were significantly different between two groups along with shorter CPB time (p = 0.016), higher nasopharyngeal temperature (p≦0.000), shorter ventilation time (p = 0.018), and lower incidence of hypoxia (p = 0.022). Furthermore, multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis confirmed that preoperative neurological dysfunction (OR = 1.20, p = 0.028), CPB duration (OR = 3.21, p = 0.002), and type of cerebral perfusion (OR = 1.48, p = 0.017) were strongly associated with postoperative ND. Conclusions In our study, it was observed that b-ACP procedure exhibited shorter CPB time, milder hypothermia, shorter ventilation time, lower incidence of postoperative hypoxia, and neurological dysfunction compared to u-ACP. Meanwhile, the incidence of ND was independently associated with three factors: preoperative neurological dysfunction, CPB time, and type of cerebral perfusion.

scholarly journals Effect of different types of cerebral perfusion for acute type A aortic dissection, unilateral versus bilateral

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
zhengqin liu ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Xiquan Zhang ◽  
Shuming Wu ◽  
changcun fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Type A ◽  
Neurological Complications ◽  
Neurological Dysfunction ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Neurologic Dysfunction

Abstract Background Antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP), including unilateral and bilateral, is most commonly used way for cerebral protection in aortic surgery. There is still no consensus on the superiority of the two methods. Our research was aimed to investigate the clinical effects between u-ACP and b-ACP. Methods 321 patients with type A aortic dissection were studied retrospectively. 124 patients (38.6%) received u-ACP and 197 patients(61.4%) received b-ACP. We compared the incidence of postoperative neurological complications and other collected data between two groups. We also analyzed perioperative variables in order to find the potential associated factors for neurolocial dysfunction (ND). Results For u-ACP group, 54 patients (43.5%) had postoperative neurological complications including 22 patients (17.7%) with permanent neurologic dysfunction (PND) and 32 patients (25.8%) with temporary neurologic dysfunction (TND). For b-ACP group, 47 patients (23.8%) experienced postoperative neurological complications including 16 patients (8.1%) of PND and 31 patients (15.7%) of TND. The incidence of PND and TND were significantly different between two groups along with shorter CPB time (p = 0.016), higher nasopharyngeal temperature (p ≦ 0.000), shorter awakening time (p = 0.030) and lower incidence of hypoxia (p = 0.022). Furthermore, multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis confirmed that preoperative neurological dysfunction (OR = 1.20, P = 0.028), CPB duration (OR = 3.21, P = 0.002 ) and type of cerebral perfusion (OR = 1.48, P = 0.017) were strongly associated with postoperative ND. Conclusions In our study, we found that b-ACP procedure had many advantages compared to u-ACP and we inferred that b-ACP may be more suitable for patients with type A AD undergoing total arch replacement.

scholarly journals Double Arterial Cannulation Versus Right Axillary Artery Cannulation for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: a Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
He Zhang ◽  
Wei Xie ◽  
Yuzhou Lu ◽  
Tuo Pan ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Axillary Artery ◽  
Type A ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Arterial Cannulation ◽  
Blood Gas ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Cannulation strategy in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains controversial. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of double arterial cannulation (DAC) compared with right axillary cannulation (RAC) for ATAAD.Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, 431 ATAAD patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into DAC group (n=341) and RAC group (n=90). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the early and mid-term outcomes between these two groups. To confirm the organ protection effect by DAC, intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters were compared between the two groups.Results: Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were comparable between two groups, while patients in DAC group were younger than RAC group (51.55±13.21 vs. 56.07±12.16 years, P＜0.001 ) . DAC had a higher incidence of limb malperfusion (18.2% vs. 10.0%, P=0.063) and lower incidence of coronary malperfusion (5.3% vs. 12.2%, P=0.019). No significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time was found between the two groups. The in-hospital mortality was 13.5% (58/431), while there was no difference between the two groups (13.5% vs. 13.3%; P=0.969). Patients who underwent DAC had higher incidence of postoperative stroke (5.9% vs. 0%, P=0.019) and lower incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) (24.7% vs. 40.3%; P=0.015). During a mean follow-up period of 31.8 (interquartile range, 25-45) months, the overall survival was 81.5% for DAC group and 78.0% for RAC group (P=0.560). Intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters showed that DAC group had more intraoperative urine output volume than RAC group (P=0.05), and the time of cooling (P=0.04) and rewarming (P=0.04) were shorter in DAC group.Conclusions: DAC will not increase the surgical risks compared to RAC, but could reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI which may be benefit for renal protection.

scholarly journals Unilateral versus bilateral anterograde cerebral perfusion in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis T. Tasoudis ◽  
Dimitrios N. Varvoglis ◽  
Evangelos Vitkos ◽  
John Ikonomidis ◽  
Thanos Athanasiou
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Neurological Deficit ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Type A ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection

Objectives: The aim of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of unilateral anterograde cerebral perfusion (UACP) and bilateral anterograde cerebral perfusion (BACP) for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (last search: August 7 , 2021) was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Studies directly comparing UACP versus BACP for ATAAD were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Results: Eight retrospective cohort studies were identified, incorporating 2416 patients (UACP: 843, BACP: 1573). No statistically significant difference was observed regarding in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]:1.05 [95% Confidence Interval (95%CI):0.70-1.57]), permanent neurological deficit (PND) (OR: 0.94 [95%CI:0.52-1.70]), transient neurological deficit (TND) (OR: 1.37 [95%CI:0.98-1.92]), renal failure (OR: 0.96 [95%CI:0.70-1.32]), and re-exploration for bleeding (OR: 0.77 [95%CI:0.48-1.22]). Meta-regression analysis revealed that PND and TND were not influenced by differences in rates of total arch repair, Bentall procedure and concomitant CABG in UACP and BACP groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (Standard Mean Difference [SMD]:-0.11 [95%CI:-0.22, 0.44]), Cross clamp time (SMD:-0.04 [95%CI:-0.38, 0.29]) and hypothermic circulatory arrest time (SMD:-0.12 [95%CI:-0.55, 0.30]) were comparable between UACP and BACP. Intensive care unit stay was shorter in BACP arm (SMD:0.16 [95%CI:0.01, 0.31]), however, length of hospital stay was shorter in UACP arm (SMD:-0.25 [95%CI:-0.45, -0.06]). Conclusions: UACP and BACP had similar results in terms of in-hospital mortality, PND, TND, renal failure and re-exploration for bleeding rate in patients with ATAAD. ICU stay was shorter in the BACP arm while LOS was shorter in the UACP arm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document