scholarly journals Tim-3 protein expression with MGMT methylation status in glioblastoma and association with survival

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
ji zhang ◽  
Xiaoli Wang ◽  
Shengquan Ye ◽  
Lijiao Liang ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Expression ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Abstract Background Understanding the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly crucial for its therapy. Immune checkpoint molecules motivated the emergence of immune checkpoint-targeting therapeutic strategies. However, the prognostic significance of the immune checkpoint molecule T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (Tim-3) on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status remains to be fully elucidated. We aimed to develop an MGMT methylation status-associated immune prognostic signature for predicting prognosis in GBMs.Patients and Methods: A total of 84 patients with newly diagnosed GBM were involved. MGMT methylation status was retrospectively analyzed and the expression level of Tim-3 protein was investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The correlation between Tim-3 protein expression and MGMT methylation status, and the prognosis was explored.Results The obtained data showed that Tim-3 protein was expressed at different levels in GBMs. Mesenchymal expression of Tim-3 protein in these tissues was 73.81% (62/84), including low 15.48% (13/84), moderate 7.14% (6/84) and strong expression 51.19% (43/84), respectively. Of the 48 patients whose tumors tested positive for MGMT methylation, the remaining 36 patients was negative.Conclusions We profiled the immune status in GBM with MGMT promoter methylation and established a local immune signature for GBM, which could independently identify patients with a favorable prognosis, indicating the relationship between prognosis and immune. MGMT promoter methylation with lower Tim-3 protein expression was statistically significantly associated with better survival.

scholarly journals Methylation of MGMT promoter does not predict response to temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma in Donostia Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larraitz Egaña ◽  
Jaione Auzmendi-Iriarte ◽  
Joaquin Andermatten ◽  
Jorge Villanua ◽  
Irune Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status has been considered a prognostic factor in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with glioblastoma in Donostia Hospital. Surprisingly, methylation of MGMT promoter did not predict response to temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma in Donostia Hospital. Specifically, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly by MGMT methylation status in our cohort. In contrast, both were longer in patients who received treatment, received more TMZ cycles, had a better general status and perform at least a partial resection. No association was detected between methylation of MGMT promoter and molecular markers such as ATRX, IDH, p53 and Ki67. These results indicate that MGMT methylation did not influence in patient survival in our cohort.

THE CORRELATION AND PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MGMT PROMOTER METHYLATION AND MGMT PROTEIN IN GLIOBLASTOMAS

Neurosurgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Van Thang Cao ◽  
Tae-Young Jung ◽  
Shin Jung ◽  
Shu-Guang Jin ◽  
Kyung-Sub Moon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Immunohistochemical Staining ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Expression ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Abstract OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation and prognostic significance of MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression in patients with glioblastoma. METHODS Eighty-three patients with glioblastoma underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy between October 2000 and June 2008. To investigate the correlation between MGMT methylation and MGMT expression, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and immunohistochemical staining was performed. To analyze the correlation between MGMT methylation and MGMT expression according to location, biopsies were obtained from 37 different sites within the tumors in 12 patients. Age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale status, extent of removal, chemotherapeutic methods, and MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression were analyzed as prognostic factors. RESULTS The total median survival was 15.8 months (range, 12.6–19.1 months). The results of MSP were the same at various sites in 12 patients. A correlation between MSP and immunohistochemical staining was observed in 50% of the patients. In 73 patients, negative MGMT expression was detected in 70.5% of 44 patients with MGMT promoter methylation, and positive expression was observed in 55.2% of the 29 patients with unmethylated promoters. Multivariate analysis revealed that the extent of removal (P = 0.001) and the combination of MGMT promoter methylation and negative MGMT expression (median survival, 20.06 months; P = 0.006) were significantly associated with longer survival. CONCLUSION We report the feasibility of using MSP combined with immunohistochemical staining as a prognostic factor. The results of the present study suggest that MGMT promoter methylation in combination with negative MGMT expression might be a good prognostic factor in patients with glioblastoma.

scholarly journals XGBoost Improves Classification of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in IDH1 Wildtype Glioblastoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le ◽  
Duyen Thi Do ◽  
Fang-Ying Chiu ◽  
Edward Kien Yee Yapp ◽  
Hui-Yuan Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Promoter Methylation Status ◽  
Extreme Gradient Boosting ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation Status

Approximately 96% of patients with glioblastomas (GBM) have IDH1 wildtype GBMs, characterized by extremely poor prognosis, partly due to resistance to standard temozolomide treatment. O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is a crucial prognostic biomarker for alkylating chemotherapy resistance in patients with GBM. However, MGMT methylation status identification methods, where the tumor tissue is often undersampled, are time consuming and expensive. Currently, presurgical noninvasive imaging methods are used to identify biomarkers to predict MGMT methylation status. We evaluated a novel radiomics-based eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model to identify MGMT promoter methylation status in patients with IDH1 wildtype GBM. This retrospective study enrolled 53 patients with pathologically proven GBM and tested MGMT methylation and IDH1 status. Radiomics features were extracted from multimodality MRI and tested by F-score analysis to identify important features to improve our model. We identified nine radiomics features that reached an area under the curve of 0.896, which outperformed other classifiers reported previously. These features could be important biomarkers for identifying MGMT methylation status in IDH1 wildtype GBM. The combination of radiomics feature extraction and F-core feature selection significantly improved the performance of the XGBoost model, which may have implications for patient stratification and therapeutic strategy in GBM.

scholarly journals NCOG-29. O6-METHYLGUANINE DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE (MGMT) PROMOTER METHYLATION STATUS AND THE INCIDENCE OF TEMOZOLOMIDE-INDUCED HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY: AN ASSOCIATION STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii135-ii135
Author(s):  
Alyssa Strohbusch ◽  
Heather Pound ◽  
Patrick Regis ◽  
Robert Cavaliere
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation Status

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite the growing body of evidence demonstrating an increased clinical benefit of alkylating agents in glioblastoma patients with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, little is known regarding the effect of MGMT status on toxicity. The purpose of this investigation is to provide insight into the potential association between MGMT promoter methylation and the development of Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities in patients receiving temozolomide. METHODS A total of 63 patients with documented glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma diagnoses were evaluated retrospectively. A chi-square test of independence was utilized to evaluate the incidence of hematologic toxicities and patient overall survival was determined by univariate analysis estimated through use of Kaplan-Meier curves. Relative frequencies of treatment discontinuation secondary to myelosuppression were also compared. RESULTS At the time of study completion, 71.4% of patients with MGMT promoter hypermethylation had survived compared with 50% of patients with hypomethylation (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.05; P>0.05). The percentage of patients who experienced Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities during concurrent treatment was 20% and 5.1% within the hypermethylated and hypomethylated groups, respectively, and 26.7% and 17.9% throughout standard therapy. While a statistical difference was not found between the cumulative incidences of Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity events throughout both phases of treatment, a statistical difference was noted in the incidence of Grade 4 occurrences with ten events occurring in the hypermethylated group and zero in those with hypomethylated promoter regions (P< 0.01). Furthermore, use of temozolomide in hypermethylated patients resulted in fewer completed cycles of standard therapy and higher rates of treatment delays and drug discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS This study showed marked differences in the frequency of temozolomide-induced hematologic toxicities and treatment discontinuation based on tumor MGMT promoter methylation status. Further research is warranted in larger patient populations to both validate and determine the clinical significance of these findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document