scholarly journals Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in the splenic hilum of gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Du ◽  
Yangchao Shen ◽  
Wenwu Yan ◽  
Jinguo Wang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diffuse Type ◽  
Splenic Hilum ◽  
Borrmann Type

Abstract BackgroundThe issue of whether or not splenic hilum lymph nodes (SHLN) should be excised in radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection remains controversial. In this study, we identified the clinicopathological features in patients with gastric cancer that could serve as predictive risk factors of SHLN metastasis. MethodsWe searched Medline, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception to May 2020 and consulted the related references. Overall, 15 articles evaluating a total of 4377 patients were included for study. The odds ratios (OR) of each risk factor and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined using Revman 5.3 software.ResultsOur meta-analysis revealed tumor size greater than 5 cm (p < 0.01), tumor localization in the greater curvature (p < 0.01), diffuse type (Lauren’s classification) (p < 0.01), Borrmann type 3–4 (p < 0.01), poor differentiation and undifferentiation (p < 0.01), depth of invasion T3–T4 (p < 0.01), number of lymph node metastases N2–N3 (p < 0.01), distant metastasis M1 (p < 0.01), TNM stage 3–4 (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p = 0.01), and lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01) as potential risk factors of SHLN metastasis. Moreover, positivity of Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4sa, 4sb, 4d, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 16 lymph nodes for metastasis was strongly associated with SHLN metastasis.ConclusionsTumor size, tumor location, Lauren’s diffuse type, Borrmann type, degree of differentiation, T stage, N stage, M stage, TNM stage, vascular invasion, lymphatic infiltration, and other positive lymph nodes are risk factors for SHLN metastasis.

scholarly journals Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in the splenic hilum of gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Du ◽  
Yangchao Shen ◽  
Wenwu Yan ◽  
Jinguo Wang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Splenic Hilum ◽  
Node Metastasis

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether splenic hilum lymph nodes (SHLNs) should be excised in radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. In this study, we evaluated the role of clinicopathological features in patients with gastric cancer in predicting splenic hilum lymph nodes metastasis.Methods We searched the Medline, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception to May 2020 and consulted related references. 15 articles with a total of 4377 patients were included finally. The odds ratios (ORs) of each risk factor and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined using Revman 5.3 software. Results Meta-analysis showed that tumor size greater than 5 cm (p < 0.01), tumor localization in the greater curvature (p < 0.01), diffuse type (Lauren’s type) (p < 0.01), Borrman type 3–4 (p < 0.01), poor differentiation and undifferentiation (p < 0.01), depth of invasion T3–T4 (p < 0.01), number of lymph node metastases N2–N3 (p < 0.01), distance metastasis M1 (p < 0.01), TNM stage 3–4 (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p = 0.01), and lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01) were risk factors of SHLNs metastasis. Moreover, No. 1-, 2-, 3-, 4sa-, 4sb-, 4d-, 6-, 7-, 9-, 11-, and 16-positive lymph node metastasis are strongly associated with splenic hilum lymph nodes metastasis.Conclusions Tumor size, tumor location, Lauren’s type, Borrman type, degree of differentiation, T stage, N stage, M stage, TNM stage, vascular invasion, lymphatic infiltration, and other positive lymph nodes metastasis were risk factors for SHLNs.

scholarly journals Predictors of lymph node metastasis and residual tumor in early gastric cancer patients after noncurative endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628482093503
Author(s):  
Bolun Jiang ◽  
Li Zhou ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
Yizhi Wang ◽  
Junchao Guo
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Early Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Node Metastasis

Background: It is challenging to identify the prevalence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and residual tumor in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who underwent noncurative endoscopic resection (ER). This present meta-analysis was aimed to establish imperative potential predictive factors in order to select the optimal treatment method. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed through 1 February 2019 to identify relevant studies, which investigated risk factors for LNM and residual tumor in patients with EGC who underwent noncurative ER. Eligible data were systematically reviewed through a meta-analysis. Results: Overall, 12 studies investigating the risk factor of LNM were included, totaling 3015 patients, 7 of which also involved cancer residues. After the present meta-analysis, six predictors, including tumor size >30 mm, tumor invasion depth (⩾500 μm from the muscularis mucosae), macroscopic appearance, undifferentiated histopathological type, positive vertical margin, and presence of lymphovascular invasion (including lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion) were significantly associated with LNM, whereas tumor size >30 mm, positive horizontal margin, and positive vertical margin were identified as significant predictors for the risk of residual tumor. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusions: Six and three variables were established as significant risk factors for LNM and residual tumor in patients with EGC who underwent noncurative ER, respectively. Patients with EGC who present these risk factors after noncurative ER are strongly suggested to receive additional surgery, while others might be suitable for strict follow-up. This might shed some new light on the selection of follow-up treatment for noncurative ER.

scholarly journals Clinicopathological and prognostic features of early gastric cancer patients after surgery: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Qi ◽  
Congbo Zhu ◽  
Weihang Liu ◽  
Sheng Liu ◽  
Gaoqiang Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Early Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Despite the decline in the incidence of gastric cancer, the incidence of early gastric cancer has increased. Hence, understanding the clinicopathological and prognostic features of early gastric cancers could help us understand the development of gastric cancer and improve the prognosis of early gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 244 patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer after surgery at Xiangya Hospital Central South University were retrospectively analyzed. Results: General data showed that in patients with a mean age of 54.30±10.68 years (M:F = 1.6:1), the median tumor size was 2.203±1.245 cm. A total of 15.6% of patients had lymph node metastasis. By univariate analysis, the longest diameter of the tumor, T stage, total number of dissected lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, metastatic-to-total dissected lymph node (LN) ratio, vascular invasion, NLRc, and MLRc were associated with disease-free survival; tumor size, invasive depths, vascular invasion, NLRc, MLRc, NWRc and LWRc were associated with lymph node metastasis. Additionally, the longest diameter of tumor and total number of dissected lymph nodes were independent factors for early gastric cancer patients; tumor size, invasive depths, vascular invasion and NLRc were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in EGC. Conclusion: The longest diameter of the tumor and total number of dissected LNs were independent prognostic factors for EGC patients. Additionally, the longest diameter of the tumor, tumor invasive depths, vascular invasion and NLRc were the independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in EGC patients.

scholarly journals Development and Validation a Nomogram for Predicting the Third Station Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Wang ◽  
Cong Li ◽  
Mengjie Fang ◽  
Liwen Zhang ◽  
Lianzhen Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Clinical Risk Factors ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Clinical Risk

Abstract Background:This study aimed to evaluate the value of radiomic nomogram in predicting lymph node metastasis in T1-2 gastric cancer according to the No. 3 station lymph nodes.Methods:A total of 159 T1-2 gastric cancer (GC) patients who had undergone surgery with lymphadenectomy between March 2012 and November 2017 were retrospectively collected and divided into a primary cohort (n = 80) and a validation cohort (n = 79). Radiomic features were extracted from both tumor region and No. 3 station lymph nodes (LN) based on computed tomography (CT) images per patient. Then, key features were selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and fed into two radiomic signatures, respectively. Meanwhile, the predictive performance of clinical risk factors was studied. Finally, a nomogram was built by merging radiomic signatures and clinical risk factors and evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) as well as decision curve.Results: Two radiomic signatures, reflecting phenotypes of the tumor and LN respectively, were significantly associated with LN metastasis. A nomogram incorporating two radiomic signatures and CT-reported LN metastasis status showed good discrimination of LN metastasis in both the primary cohort (AUC: 0.915; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.832-0.998) and validation cohort (AUC: 0.908; 95%CI: 0.814-1.000). The decision curve also indicated its potential clinical usefulness.Conclusions:The nomogram received favorable predictive accuracy in predicting No.3 station LN metastasis in T1-2 GC, and could assist the choice of therapy.

scholarly journals Indications of Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival Analysis in T1N+M0 Gastric Cancer: a Population-Based Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Jin ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Shuai Ma ◽  
Wenzhe Kang ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Invasion Depth ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Background Since the definition of early gastric cancer (EGC) was first proposed in 1971, the treatment of gastric cancer with or without lymph node metastasis (LNM) has changed a lot. The present study aims to identify risk factors for LNM and prognosis, and to further evaluate the indications for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in T1N + M0 gastric cancer. Methods A total of 1291 patients with T1N + M0 gastric cancer were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for LNM. The effect of LNM on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was compared with patients grouped into T1N0-1 and T1N2-3, as the indications for AC. Results The rate of LNM was 19.52%. Multivariate analyses showed age, tumor size, invasion depth, and type of differentiation and retrieved LNs were associated with LNM (p < 0.05). Cox multivariate analyses indicated age, sex, tumor size, N stage were independent predictors of OS and CSS (p < 0.05), while race was indicator for OS (HR 0.866; 95%CI 0.750–0.999, p = 0.049), but not for CSS (HR 0.878; 95% CI 0.723–1.065, p = 0.187). In addition, survival analysis showed the proportion of patients in N+/N0 was better distributed than N0-1/N2-3b. There were statistically significant differences in OS and CSS between patients with and without chemotherapy in pT1N1M0 patients (p༜0.05). Conclusions Both tumor size and invasion depth are associated with LNM and prognosis. LNM is an important predictor of prognosis. pT1N + M0 may be appropriate candidates for AC. Currently, the treatment and prognosis of T1N0M0/T1N + M0 are completely different. An updated definition of EGC, taking into tumor size, invasion depth and LNM, may be more appropriate in an era of precision medicine.

Identification of risk factors associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18005-e18005
Author(s):  
Ping Jiang ◽  
Jing Cai ◽  
Xiaoqi He ◽  
Hongbo Wang ◽  
Weihong Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Parametrial Invasion ◽  
Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Internal Iliac

e18005 Background: Evaluation the distribution of nodal metastases in the stage IB1 cervical cancer and the risk factors associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) at each anatomic location. Methods: 728 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomies and systemic pelvic lymphadenectomies from January 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively studied. All removed pelvic lymph nodes were pathologically examined, and the risk factors for LNM at the obturator, internal iliac, external iliac, and common iliac regions were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: 20,134 lymph nodes were analysed with the average number of 27.80 (± SD 9.43) lymph nodes per patient. Nodal metastases were present in 266 (14.6%) patients. The obturator was the most common site for nodal metastasis (42.5%) followed by the internal iliac nodes (20.3%) and the external iliac nodes (19.9%), while the common iliac (9.8%) and parametrial (7.5%) nodes were the least likely to be involved. Tumor size more than 2 cm, histologically proven lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) and parametrial invasion correlated independently significantly with the higher risk of the lymphatic metastasis. Obesity (BMI≥25) was independently significantly negatively correlated with the risk of lymphatic metastases. All the positive common iliac nodes were found in patients with tumors greater than 2 cm. The multivariate analysis showed that tumor size greater than 3 cm was associated with a 16.6-fold increase in the risk for common iliac LNM. Interestingly, tumor size was not an independent risk factor for pelvic LNM in the lower regions, i.e., the obturator, internal iliac and external iliac areas, where LVSI was the most significant predictor for LNM. In addition, parametrial invasion was related to external and internal iliac LNM; deep stromal invasion and age less than 50 years were associated with obturator LNM. Conclusions: The incidence of lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer is low but prognostically relevant. The data offer the opportunity for tailored individual treatment in selected patients with small tumors and obesity.

scholarly journals Study of Survival in Gastric Cancer with Emphasis on Lymph Node Status as an Independent Prognostic Factor

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-189
Author(s):  
Nicolae Suciu ◽  
Orsolya Bauer ◽  
Zalán Benedek ◽  
Radu Ghenade ◽  
Marius Coroș ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Lymph Node Ratio ◽  
Independent Prognostic Factor ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Node Ratio ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Lymph node status in gastric cancer is known as an independent prognostic factor that guides the surgical and oncological treatment and independently influences long-term survival. Several studies suggest that the lymph node ratio has a greater importance in survival than the number of metastatic lymph nodes. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and morphological factors that can influence the survival of gastric cancer patients, with an emphasis on nodal status and the lymph node ratio. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study in which 303 patients with gastric cancer admitted to the Department of Surgery of the Mureș County Hospital between 2008 and 2018 were screened for study enrolment. Data were obtained from the records of the department and from the histopathological reports. The examined variables included: age, gender, tumor localization, T stage, histological type, grade of differentiation, surgical procedure, lympho-vascular invasion, excised lymph nodes, metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio. After screening, the study included a total number of 100 patients, for which follow-up data was available. Results: The mean age of the study population was 66.43 ± 10 years, and 71% were males. The average survival period was 21.42 months. Statistical analysis showed that the localization of the tumor (p = 0.021), vascular invasion (p ---lt---0.001), T (p = 0.004) and N (p ---lt---0.001) stages, type of surgery (partial gastrectomy 59% vs. total gastrectomy 41%, p = 0.005), as well as the lymph node ratio (p ---lt---0.001) were prognostic factors for survival in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgical therapy. Conclusions: The survival of gastric cancer patients is significantly influenced by tumor localization, T stage, vascular invasion, type of surgery, N stage and the lymph node ratio based on univariate analysis. Also, the lymph node ratio proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival.

scholarly journals Necessity of prophylactic splenic hilum lymph node clearance for middle and upper third gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaozan Zheng ◽  
Jinqiang Liu ◽  
Yinghao Guo ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Shushang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Splenic Hilum ◽  
Upper Third
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document