scholarly journals Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in the splenic hilum of gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Du ◽  
Yangchao Shen ◽  
Wenwu Yan ◽  
Jinguo Wang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Splenic Hilum ◽  
Node Metastasis

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether splenic hilum lymph nodes (SHLNs) should be excised in radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. In this study, we evaluated the role of clinicopathological features in patients with gastric cancer in predicting splenic hilum lymph nodes metastasis.Methods We searched the Medline, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception to May 2020 and consulted related references. 15 articles with a total of 4377 patients were included finally. The odds ratios (ORs) of each risk factor and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined using Revman 5.3 software. Results Meta-analysis showed that tumor size greater than 5 cm (p < 0.01), tumor localization in the greater curvature (p < 0.01), diffuse type (Lauren’s type) (p < 0.01), Borrman type 3–4 (p < 0.01), poor differentiation and undifferentiation (p < 0.01), depth of invasion T3–T4 (p < 0.01), number of lymph node metastases N2–N3 (p < 0.01), distance metastasis M1 (p < 0.01), TNM stage 3–4 (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p = 0.01), and lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01) were risk factors of SHLNs metastasis. Moreover, No. 1-, 2-, 3-, 4sa-, 4sb-, 4d-, 6-, 7-, 9-, 11-, and 16-positive lymph node metastasis are strongly associated with splenic hilum lymph nodes metastasis.Conclusions Tumor size, tumor location, Lauren’s type, Borrman type, degree of differentiation, T stage, N stage, M stage, TNM stage, vascular invasion, lymphatic infiltration, and other positive lymph nodes metastasis were risk factors for SHLNs.

scholarly journals Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in the splenic hilum of gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Du ◽  
Yangchao Shen ◽  
Wenwu Yan ◽  
Jinguo Wang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diffuse Type ◽  
Splenic Hilum ◽  
Borrmann Type

Abstract BackgroundThe issue of whether or not splenic hilum lymph nodes (SHLN) should be excised in radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection remains controversial. In this study, we identified the clinicopathological features in patients with gastric cancer that could serve as predictive risk factors of SHLN metastasis. MethodsWe searched Medline, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception to May 2020 and consulted the related references. Overall, 15 articles evaluating a total of 4377 patients were included for study. The odds ratios (OR) of each risk factor and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined using Revman 5.3 software.ResultsOur meta-analysis revealed tumor size greater than 5 cm (p < 0.01), tumor localization in the greater curvature (p < 0.01), diffuse type (Lauren’s classification) (p < 0.01), Borrmann type 3–4 (p < 0.01), poor differentiation and undifferentiation (p < 0.01), depth of invasion T3–T4 (p < 0.01), number of lymph node metastases N2–N3 (p < 0.01), distant metastasis M1 (p < 0.01), TNM stage 3–4 (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p = 0.01), and lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01) as potential risk factors of SHLN metastasis. Moreover, positivity of Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4sa, 4sb, 4d, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 16 lymph nodes for metastasis was strongly associated with SHLN metastasis.ConclusionsTumor size, tumor location, Lauren’s diffuse type, Borrmann type, degree of differentiation, T stage, N stage, M stage, TNM stage, vascular invasion, lymphatic infiltration, and other positive lymph nodes are risk factors for SHLN metastasis.

scholarly journals Predictors of lymph node metastasis and residual tumor in early gastric cancer patients after noncurative endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628482093503
Author(s):  
Bolun Jiang ◽  
Li Zhou ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
Yizhi Wang ◽  
Junchao Guo
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Early Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Node Metastasis

Background: It is challenging to identify the prevalence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and residual tumor in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who underwent noncurative endoscopic resection (ER). This present meta-analysis was aimed to establish imperative potential predictive factors in order to select the optimal treatment method. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed through 1 February 2019 to identify relevant studies, which investigated risk factors for LNM and residual tumor in patients with EGC who underwent noncurative ER. Eligible data were systematically reviewed through a meta-analysis. Results: Overall, 12 studies investigating the risk factor of LNM were included, totaling 3015 patients, 7 of which also involved cancer residues. After the present meta-analysis, six predictors, including tumor size >30 mm, tumor invasion depth (⩾500 μm from the muscularis mucosae), macroscopic appearance, undifferentiated histopathological type, positive vertical margin, and presence of lymphovascular invasion (including lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion) were significantly associated with LNM, whereas tumor size >30 mm, positive horizontal margin, and positive vertical margin were identified as significant predictors for the risk of residual tumor. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusions: Six and three variables were established as significant risk factors for LNM and residual tumor in patients with EGC who underwent noncurative ER, respectively. Patients with EGC who present these risk factors after noncurative ER are strongly suggested to receive additional surgery, while others might be suitable for strict follow-up. This might shed some new light on the selection of follow-up treatment for noncurative ER.

scholarly journals Clinicopathological and prognostic features of early gastric cancer patients after surgery: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Qi ◽  
Congbo Zhu ◽  
Weihang Liu ◽  
Sheng Liu ◽  
Gaoqiang Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Early Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Despite the decline in the incidence of gastric cancer, the incidence of early gastric cancer has increased. Hence, understanding the clinicopathological and prognostic features of early gastric cancers could help us understand the development of gastric cancer and improve the prognosis of early gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 244 patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer after surgery at Xiangya Hospital Central South University were retrospectively analyzed. Results: General data showed that in patients with a mean age of 54.30±10.68 years (M:F = 1.6:1), the median tumor size was 2.203±1.245 cm. A total of 15.6% of patients had lymph node metastasis. By univariate analysis, the longest diameter of the tumor, T stage, total number of dissected lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, metastatic-to-total dissected lymph node (LN) ratio, vascular invasion, NLRc, and MLRc were associated with disease-free survival; tumor size, invasive depths, vascular invasion, NLRc, MLRc, NWRc and LWRc were associated with lymph node metastasis. Additionally, the longest diameter of tumor and total number of dissected lymph nodes were independent factors for early gastric cancer patients; tumor size, invasive depths, vascular invasion and NLRc were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in EGC. Conclusion: The longest diameter of the tumor and total number of dissected LNs were independent prognostic factors for EGC patients. Additionally, the longest diameter of the tumor, tumor invasive depths, vascular invasion and NLRc were the independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in EGC patients.

scholarly journals Development and Validation a Nomogram for Predicting the Third Station Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Wang ◽  
Cong Li ◽  
Mengjie Fang ◽  
Liwen Zhang ◽  
Lianzhen Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Clinical Risk Factors ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Clinical Risk

Abstract Background:This study aimed to evaluate the value of radiomic nomogram in predicting lymph node metastasis in T1-2 gastric cancer according to the No. 3 station lymph nodes.Methods:A total of 159 T1-2 gastric cancer (GC) patients who had undergone surgery with lymphadenectomy between March 2012 and November 2017 were retrospectively collected and divided into a primary cohort (n = 80) and a validation cohort (n = 79). Radiomic features were extracted from both tumor region and No. 3 station lymph nodes (LN) based on computed tomography (CT) images per patient. Then, key features were selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and fed into two radiomic signatures, respectively. Meanwhile, the predictive performance of clinical risk factors was studied. Finally, a nomogram was built by merging radiomic signatures and clinical risk factors and evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) as well as decision curve.Results: Two radiomic signatures, reflecting phenotypes of the tumor and LN respectively, were significantly associated with LN metastasis. A nomogram incorporating two radiomic signatures and CT-reported LN metastasis status showed good discrimination of LN metastasis in both the primary cohort (AUC: 0.915; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.832-0.998) and validation cohort (AUC: 0.908; 95%CI: 0.814-1.000). The decision curve also indicated its potential clinical usefulness.Conclusions:The nomogram received favorable predictive accuracy in predicting No.3 station LN metastasis in T1-2 GC, and could assist the choice of therapy.

scholarly journals Indications of Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival Analysis in T1N+M0 Gastric Cancer: a Population-Based Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Jin ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Shuai Ma ◽  
Wenzhe Kang ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Invasion Depth ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Background Since the definition of early gastric cancer (EGC) was first proposed in 1971, the treatment of gastric cancer with or without lymph node metastasis (LNM) has changed a lot. The present study aims to identify risk factors for LNM and prognosis, and to further evaluate the indications for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in T1N + M0 gastric cancer. Methods A total of 1291 patients with T1N + M0 gastric cancer were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for LNM. The effect of LNM on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was compared with patients grouped into T1N0-1 and T1N2-3, as the indications for AC. Results The rate of LNM was 19.52%. Multivariate analyses showed age, tumor size, invasion depth, and type of differentiation and retrieved LNs were associated with LNM (p < 0.05). Cox multivariate analyses indicated age, sex, tumor size, N stage were independent predictors of OS and CSS (p < 0.05), while race was indicator for OS (HR 0.866; 95%CI 0.750–0.999, p = 0.049), but not for CSS (HR 0.878; 95% CI 0.723–1.065, p = 0.187). In addition, survival analysis showed the proportion of patients in N+/N0 was better distributed than N0-1/N2-3b. There were statistically significant differences in OS and CSS between patients with and without chemotherapy in pT1N1M0 patients (p༜0.05). Conclusions Both tumor size and invasion depth are associated with LNM and prognosis. LNM is an important predictor of prognosis. pT1N + M0 may be appropriate candidates for AC. Currently, the treatment and prognosis of T1N0M0/T1N + M0 are completely different. An updated definition of EGC, taking into tumor size, invasion depth and LNM, may be more appropriate in an era of precision medicine.

Identification of risk factors associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18005-e18005
Author(s):  
Ping Jiang ◽  
Jing Cai ◽  
Xiaoqi He ◽  
Hongbo Wang ◽  
Weihong Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Parametrial Invasion ◽  
Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Internal Iliac

e18005 Background: Evaluation the distribution of nodal metastases in the stage IB1 cervical cancer and the risk factors associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) at each anatomic location. Methods: 728 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomies and systemic pelvic lymphadenectomies from January 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively studied. All removed pelvic lymph nodes were pathologically examined, and the risk factors for LNM at the obturator, internal iliac, external iliac, and common iliac regions were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: 20,134 lymph nodes were analysed with the average number of 27.80 (± SD 9.43) lymph nodes per patient. Nodal metastases were present in 266 (14.6%) patients. The obturator was the most common site for nodal metastasis (42.5%) followed by the internal iliac nodes (20.3%) and the external iliac nodes (19.9%), while the common iliac (9.8%) and parametrial (7.5%) nodes were the least likely to be involved. Tumor size more than 2 cm, histologically proven lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) and parametrial invasion correlated independently significantly with the higher risk of the lymphatic metastasis. Obesity (BMI≥25) was independently significantly negatively correlated with the risk of lymphatic metastases. All the positive common iliac nodes were found in patients with tumors greater than 2 cm. The multivariate analysis showed that tumor size greater than 3 cm was associated with a 16.6-fold increase in the risk for common iliac LNM. Interestingly, tumor size was not an independent risk factor for pelvic LNM in the lower regions, i.e., the obturator, internal iliac and external iliac areas, where LVSI was the most significant predictor for LNM. In addition, parametrial invasion was related to external and internal iliac LNM; deep stromal invasion and age less than 50 years were associated with obturator LNM. Conclusions: The incidence of lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer is low but prognostically relevant. The data offer the opportunity for tailored individual treatment in selected patients with small tumors and obesity.

scholarly journals Integrating No.3 lymph nodes and primary tumor radiomics to predict lymph node metastasis in T1-2 gastric cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Wang ◽  
Cong Li ◽  
Mengjie Fang ◽  
Liwen Zhang ◽  
Lianzhen Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Clinical Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Training Cohort ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Clinical Risk

Abstract Background This study aimed to develope and validate a radiomics nomogram by integrating the quantitative radiomics characteristics of No.3 lymph nodes (LNs) and primary tumors to better predict preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1-2 gastric cancer (GC) patients. Methods A total of 159 T1-2 GC patients who had undergone surgery with lymphadenectomy between March 2012 and November 2017 were retrospectively collected and divided into a training cohort (n = 80) and a testing cohort (n = 79). Radiomic features were extracted from both tumor region and No. 3 station LNs based on computed tomography (CT) images per patient. Then, key features were selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and fed into two radiomic signatures, respectively. Meanwhile, the predictive performance of clinical risk factors was studied. Finally, a nomogram was built by merging radiomic signatures and clinical risk factors and evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) as well as decision curve. Results Two radiomic signatures, reflecting phenotypes of the tumor and LNs respectively, were significantly associated with LN metastasis. A nomogram incorporating two radiomic signatures and CT-reported LN metastasis status showed good discrimination of LN metastasis in both the training cohort (AUC 0.915; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.832–0.998) and testing cohort (AUC 0.908; 95% CI 0.814–1.000). The decision curve also indicated its potential clinical usefulness. Conclusions The nomogram received favorable predictive accuracy in predicting No.3 LNM in T1-2 GC, and the nomogram showed positive role in predicting LNM in No.4 LNs. The nomogram may be used to predict LNM in T1-2 GC and could assist the choice of therapy.

scholarly journals Early Gastric Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis Model and Prognostic Survival Prediction Model in Western Population

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huakai Tian ◽  
Zuo Zhang ◽  
Zitao Liu ◽  
Cegui Hu ◽  
Jiang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Early Gastric Cancer ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Western Population ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Cox Analysis

Abstract Objective This study analyzed the characteristics of early gastric cancer lymph node metastasis and survival prognosis after surgical resection in western population, and established a predictive model.MethodsPatients with stage T1a and T1b gastric cancer from 2010 to 2015 were screened from the surveillance, epidemiology and final outcome databases. Patients with multiple in situ tumors, distant metastases, and incomplete data were excluded. The risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer were analyzed by binary logistic regression and the chi-square test. Multivariate Cox analysis and the Kaplan-Meier test were used to evaluate the prognostic factors and survival rates of patients with early gastric cancer after surgical resection. The prediction model of lymph node metastasis and survival rate of early gastric cancer was established and verified by R software.ResultsIn 2294 patients, the lymph node metastasis rate was 14.5% (333/2294). Binary logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor size (>2cm), tumor grade (III/IV), and stage T1b were risk factors for lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer. Area under the curve (AUC) is 0.782.A predictive model was developed based on risk factors, and the model C index was 0.771, indicating that the model has good predictive ability. In addition, survival analysis of 2294 patients showed that the 5-year OS and CSS (75.4% and 88.7%) in patients without EGC were significantly higher than those with lymph node metastasis (64.3% and 72.8%) (P<0.05). Multivariate COX analysis showed that age, sex, race, tumor size, submucosal invasion and lymph node metastasis were independent factors influencing the prognosis of early gastric cancer. A cancer-specific survival (CSS) prediction model was constructed based on prognostic risk factors. The 3-year area under the CSS curve (AUC) was 0.706, and the 5-year area under the CSS curve (AUC) was 0.710. The prediction model is more consistent with the actual situation.ConclusionsWe established a reliable prediction model for lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer and a prognostic model for early gastric cancer, which provided a good basis for clinical treatment decision.

scholarly journals Clinicopathological Significance of Neuropilin 1 Expression in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hui Cao ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Limin Huang ◽  
Banjun Bai ◽  
Zhong Xu
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Tnm Stage ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Neuropilin 1

Background. Neuropilin 1 (NRP1) is involved in tumorigenesis, development, invasion, and metastasis by promoting angiogenesis of tumors. The study is aimed at evaluating the correlation between the expression of NRP1 protein and clinicopathological features of gastric cancer by meta-analysis. Methods. The published studies were searched in databases including CNKI, Wanfang, Chongqing VIP, Web of Science, and PubMed online. Clinical case studies were included to compare the correlation between NRP1 protein expression and clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer. The quality of the included literatures was evaluated by NOS scale. Meta-analysis was performed by Stata software to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results. A total of 12 studies were included in this analysis, involving 1,225 patients with gastric cancer. The analysis indicated that the expression of NRP1 protein in gastric cancer tissues was lower in the group of early stage versus advanced stage (OR=0.128, 95%CI=0.059−0.277, P≤0.001), tumor size less than 5 cm versus more than 5 cm (OR=0.443, 95%CI=0.310−0.632, P≤0.001), TNM stage I-II group versus stage III-IV patients (OR=0.736, 95%CI=0.589−0.919, P=0.007), well to medium differentiation group versus poor differentiation group (OR=0.735, 95%CI=0.632−0.854, P≤0.001), and nonlymph node metastasis group versus lymph node metastasis group (OR=0.667, 95%CI=0.522−0.854, P≤0.001). The expression of NRP1 protein in gastric cancer was not related to gender, age, and Laurèn’s classification. Conclusion. The expression of NRP1 protein in gastric cancer is closely correlated to clinical stage, tumor size, TNM stage, differentiation, and lymph node metastasis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document