scholarly journals Association Between Growth Differentiation Factor 5 rs143383 Genetic Polymorphism and the Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis Among Caucasian but Not Asian: A Meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42020168180)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
peng lei ◽  
Song Jin ◽  
Jiping Lu ◽  
Chao Ouyang ◽  
Jiang Gou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphism ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Differentiation Factor ◽  
Model C ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Growth Differentiation Factor 5

Abstract Background. A few months ago, the Bioscience Reports journal showed that Growth Differentiation Factor 5 (GDF5) rs143383 genetic polymorphism increases the susceptibility of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but previous studies’ results have debates about available data. Considering the availability of more recent data, we focus on clarifying the relationship of KOA and GDF5 rs143383 genetic polymorphism by a meta-analysis of case-control trial data.Methods. The eligible studies from the time of database established to Oct. 2019 were collected from PubMed, Springer, Cochrane library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang library.Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the association between these polymorphisms and KOA risk. The meta-analysis was completed by STATA 18.0 software. Results. A total of 196 studies were collected, 16 of them including in final meta-analysis (7997 cases and 12684 controls). There was significant association between GDF 5 rs143383 polymorphism and KOA in all genetic models (for Allele model (C versus T): OR = 0.84 (95% CI = 0.76-0.91); dominate model (CC+CT versus TT): OR = 0.80(95% CI = (0.72-0.90); recessive model (CC versus CT+TT): OR= 0.79 (95% CI = 0.68-0.92); heterozygote model (CT versus CC+TT): OR = 0.89 (95% CI=0.80-0.97 ); homozygous model (CC versus TT): OR = 0.71 (95% CI=0.60-0.85). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, we obtained the results is no significant among Asians.Conclusion. GDF5 rs143383 genetic polymorphism increases the risk of KOA among Caucasians; CC genotype and C allele are protective factors for the susceptibility of KOA among Caucasians.

scholarly journals Association between growth differentiation factor 5 rs143383 genetic polymorphism and the risk of knee osteoarthritis among Caucasian but not Asian: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Peng ◽  
Song Jin ◽  
Jiping Lu ◽  
Chao Ouyang ◽  
Jiang Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphism ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Differentiation Factor ◽  
Model C ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Growth Differentiation Factor 5

Abstract Background A few months ago, the Bioscience Reports journal showed that growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) rs143383 genetic polymorphism increases the susceptibility of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but previous studies’ results have debates about available data. Considering the availability of more recent data, we focus on clarifying the relationship of KOA and GDF5 rs143383 genetic polymorphism by a meta-analysis of case-control trial data. Methods The eligible studies from the time of database established to Oct. 2019 were collected from PubMed, Springer, Cochrane library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wan Fang library. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the association between these polymorphisms and KOA risk. The meta-analysis was completed by STATA 18.0 software. Results A total of 196 studies were collected, 16 of them included in final meta-analysis (7997 cases and 12,684 controls). There was significant association between GDF5 rs143383 polymorphism and KOA in all genetic models (for Allele model (C versus T): OR = 0.84 (95% CI = 0.76–0.91); dominate model (CC+CT versus TT): OR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.72–0.90); recessive model (CC versus CT+TT): OR = 0.79 (95% CI = 0.68–0.92); heterozygote model (CT versus CC+TT): OR = 0.89 (95% CI = 0.80–0.97); homozygous model (CC versus TT): OR = 0.71 (95% CI = 0.60–0.85)). In the subgroup analysis, we obtained the results that there is no significance among Asians. Conclusion GDF5 rs143383 genetic polymorphism increases the risk of KOA among Caucasians; CC genotype and C allele are protective factors for the susceptibility of KOA among Caucasians.

scholarly journals Association between Growth Differentiation Factor 5 rs143383 Genetic Polymorphism and the Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis among Caucasian But Not Asian: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
peng lei ◽  
Song Jin ◽  
Jiping Lu ◽  
Chao Ouyang ◽  
Jiang Gou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphism ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Trial Quality ◽  
Differentiation Factor ◽  
Growth Differentiation Factor 5

Abstract Background A few months ago, the Bioscience Reports journal showed that Growth Differentiation Factor 5 (GDF5) rs143383 genetic polymorphism increases the susceptibility of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but previous studies’ results have debates about available data. Considering the availability of more recent data, we focus on clarifying the relationship of KOA and GDF5 rs143383 genetic polymorphism by a meta-analysis of case-control trial data. Methods The eligible studies from the time of database established to Oct. 2019 were collected from PubMed, Springer, Cochrane library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang library. The meta-analysis was completed by STATA 18.0 software. Two independent authors extracted the data and assessed case-control trial quality. Results A total of 196 studies were collected, 16 of them including in final meta-analysis (7997 cases and 12684 controls). There was significant association between GDF 5 rs143383 polymorphism and KOA in all genetic models (for Allele model (C versus T): OR = 0.84 (95% CI = 0.76-0.91); dominate model (CC+CT versus TT): OR = 0.80(95% CI = (0.72-0.90); recessive model (CC versus CT+TT): OR= 0.79 (95% CI = 0.68-0.92); heterozygote model (CT versus CC+TT): OR = 0.89 (95% CI=0.80-0.97); homozygous model (CC versus TT): OR = 0.71 (95% CI=0.60-0.85). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, we obtained the results is no significant among Asians. Conclusion GDF5 rs143383 genetic polymorphism increases the risk of KOA among Caucasians; CC genotype and C allele are protective factors for the susceptibility of KOA among Caucasians.

scholarly journals Correlation between growth differentiation factor 5 (rs143383) gene polymorphism and knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Jia ◽  
Yaping Jiang ◽  
Yingxing Xu ◽  
Yingzhen Wang ◽  
Tao Li
Keyword(s):  
Gene Polymorphism ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Differentiation Factor ◽  
Genotype C ◽  
Growth Differentiation Factor 5 ◽  
Gdf5 Gene

AbstractBackgroundA great deal of evidence has supported that growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) is associated with the occurrence of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), while their results are not consistent. In the present study, we aimed to explore the association between GDF5 gene polymorphism and KOA for a more credible conclusion.MethodsComprehensive literature searches were carried out in English databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (WOS), and Cochrane, and Chinese databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG, and VIP database. After the data were extracted from the required studies, the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined to assess the correlation between GDF5 gene polymorphism and KOA. The publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot.ResultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 studies on the correlation between GDF5 gene polymorphism and KOA occurrence were eligible for meta-analysis. Among these articles, four studies showed no apparent correlation, while the other 11 studies indicated an obvious correlation. Meanwhile, we also carried out a subgroup analysis of the population. Due to the inevitable heterogeneity, three genetic models were finally selected for analysis. With the allele model (C versus T: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.73~0.87), recessive model (CC versus CT + TT: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.68~0.86), and homozygous model (CC versus TT: OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.58~0.76), GDF5 gene polymorphism decreased the risk of KOA. Besides, a significant association was observed in Caucasians, Asians, and Africans. Meanwhile, the protective effect of genotype C (or CC) in the Asian group was little obvious than that in the Caucasian group and the African group. Although the quality of the included studies was above medium-quality, we obtained results with a low level of evidence.ConclusionsThe results of the meta-analysis showed that the genotype C (or CC) of GDF5 protected against KOA occurrence in Caucasian, Asian, and African populations.

scholarly journals Effects and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA), alone and in combination, in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinlong Zhao ◽  
Hetao Huang ◽  
Guihong Liang ◽  
Ling-feng Zeng ◽  
Weiyi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Knee Pain ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Womac Function ◽  
Lequesne Index

Abstract Background Studies have shown that the combined application of hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can repair degenerated cartilage and delay the progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of PRP combined with HA in the treatment of KOA compared with intra-articular injection of PRP or HA alone. Methods The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched from inception to December 2019. Two orthopaedic surgeons conducted the literature retrieval and extracted the data. Outcome indicators include the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), the Lequesne Index, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and adverse events (AEs). Results Seven studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 2 cohort studies) with a total of 941 patients were included. In the VAS comparison after 6 months of follow-up, PRP combined with HA was more likely to reduce knee pain than PRP alone (standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.55 to -0.06; P=0.01 <0.05). PRP combined with HA for KOA achieved better improvement in WOMAC Function Score (SMD: -0.32; 95% CI: -0.54 to -0.10) and WOMAC Total Score (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.17) at the 12-month follow-up than the application of PRP alone. In a comparison of Lequesne Index scores at a 6-month follow-up, PRP combined with HA improved knee pain scores more than PRP alone (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.17). In terms of AEs, PRP combined with HA was not significantly different from PRP or HA alone (P>0.05). Conclusions Compared with intra-articular injection of PRP alone, PRP combined with HA can improve WOMAC Function Scores, WOMAC Total Score, 6-month follow-up VAS ratings, and Lequesne Index scores. However, in terms of the incidence of AEs, PRP combined with HA was not significantly different from PRP or HA alone.

scholarly journals Association between the polymorphism of MMP-1 gene with knee osteoarthritis risk: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feifan Lu ◽  
Pei Liu ◽  
Weiguo Wang ◽  
Qidong Zhang ◽  
Wanshou Guo
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
Allele Model

Abstract Background: The existing studies on the association between polymorphisms of Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) polymorphism and the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA, a complex multifactorial disease and a major degenerative form of arthritis) in different populations have yielded conflicting findings. Method: Literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, Google Scholar (From January 1990 to June 2019), and assessing this association by calculating odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses stratified by ethnicity were also conducted. Statistical heterogeneity was quantitatively evaluated by X 2 test with the significance set P<0.10 or I 2 >50%. Result: Five case-control based studies (924 cases and 928 controls) were included. The results suggested that the MMP-1 (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) gene polymorphisms were not associated with knee OA risk in all genetic models (Allele model OR =1.22, 95% CI: 0.72-1.76, p=0.615, Recessive model OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.70-2.15, p=0.486, and Dominant model OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.64-2.04, p=0.659, Figure 3-5) Conclusions: There is no association between the polymorphism of MMP-1 (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) polymorphism with the risk of knee osteoarthritis, a large number of studies may be necessary to verify this association in different populations and environmental factors.

scholarly journals Association between the polymorphism of MMP-1 gene with knee osteoarthritis risk: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feifan Lu ◽  
Qidong Zhang ◽  
weiguo wang ◽  
wanshou guo ◽  
pei liu
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
Allele Model

Abstract Background: The existing studies on the association between polymorphisms of Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) polymorphism and the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA, a complex multifactorial disease and a major degenerative form of arthritis) in different populations have yielded conflicting findings. Materials and Method: Literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of science, Google Scholar, CNKI, Wanfang database (last search update June 1st 2019), and assessing this association by calculating odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses stratified by ethnicity were also conducted. Statistical heterogeneity was quantitatively evaluated by X2 test with the significance set P<0.10 or I2>50%. Result: Five case-control based studies (924 cases and 928 controls) were included. The results show that in Allele model (1G1G vs. 2G2G: OR =1.22, 95% CI: 0.72-1.76), Recessive model (2G2G vs 1G2G+1G1G: OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.70-2.15) and Dominant model (2G2G+1G2G vs 1G1G: OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.64-2.04). Conclusions: There is no association between the polymorphism of MMP-1 (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) polymorphism with the risk of knee osteoarthritis.

scholarly journals Association between the polymorphism of MMP-1 gene with knee osteoarthritis risk: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feifan Lu ◽  
Qidong Zhang ◽  
weiguo wang ◽  
wanshou guo ◽  
pei liu
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
Allele Model

Abstract Background: The existing studies on the association between polymorphisms of Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) polymorphism and the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA, a complex multifactorial disease and a major degenerative form of arthritis) in different populations have yielded conflicting findings. Method: Literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of science, Google Scholar, CNKI and Wanfang database(From January 1990 to June 2019), and assessing this association by calculating odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses stratified by ethnicity were also conducted. Statistical heterogeneity was quantitatively evaluated by X2 test with the significance set P<0.10 or I2>50%. Result: Five case-control based studies (924 cases and 928 controls) were included. The results suggested that the MMP-1 (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) gene polymorphisms were not associated with knee OA risk in all genetic models (Allele model OR =1.22, 95% CI: 0.72-1.76, p=0.615, Recessive model OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.70-2.15, p=0.486, and Dominant model OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.64-2.04, p=0.659, Figure 3-5) Conclusions: There is no association between the polymorphism of MMP-1 (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) polymorphism with the risk of knee osteoarthritis, a large number of studies may be necessary to verify this association in different populations and environmental factors.

scholarly journals Is acupuncture effective for knee osteoarthritis? A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e052270
Author(s):  
Chuan-Yang Liu ◽  
Jian-Feng Tu ◽  
Myeong Soo Lee ◽  
Ling-Yu Qi ◽  
Fang-Ting Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Best Evidence Synthesis

IntroductionKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the leading causes of disability. The effectiveness of acupuncture for treating KOA remains controversial. This protocol describes the method of a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for treating KOA.Methods and analysisFour English databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and Web of Science) and four Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, and Wanfang) will be searched from the database inception to 1 September 2021. All randomised controlled trials related to acupuncture for KOA will be included. Extracted data will include publication details, basic information, demographic data, intervention details and patient outcomes. The primary outcome will be pain intensity. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Article selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers. If the meta-analysis is precluded, we will conduct a descriptive synthesis using a best-evidence synthesis approach. The strength of recommendations and quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation working group methodology.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required because individual patient data are not included. This protocol was registered in the international Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 25 February 2021. The systematic review and meta-analysis will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The findings will also be disseminated through conference presentations.Trial registration numberCRD42021232177.

scholarly journals Association Between The Polymorphism of MMP-1 Gene with Knee Osteoarthritis Risk: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feifan Lu ◽  
Xiaowei Sun ◽  
Weiguo Wang ◽  
Qidong Zhang ◽  
Wanshou Guo
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
Allele Model

Abstract Background: The existing studies on the association between polymorphisms of Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) polymorphism and the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA, a complex multifactorial disease and a major degenerative form of arthritis) in different populations have yielded conflicting findings. Method: Literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, Google Scholar (From January 1990 to June 2019), and assessing this association by calculating odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses stratified by ethnicity were also conducted. Statistical heterogeneity was quantitatively evaluated by X2 test with the significance set P<0.10 or I2>50%.Result: Five case-control based studies (924 cases and 928 controls) were included. The results suggested that the MMP-1 (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) gene polymorphisms were not associated with knee OA risk in all genetic models (Allele model OR =1.22, 95% CI: 0.72-1.76, p=0.615, Recessive model OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.70-2.15, p=0.486, and Dominant model OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.64-2.04, p=0.659, Figure 3-5)Conclusions: There is no association between the polymorphism of MMP-1 (-1607 1G/2G) (rs1799750) polymorphism with the risk of knee osteoarthritis, a large number of studies may be necessary to verify this association in different populations and environmental factors.

scholarly journals Associations between ERAP1 Gene Polymorphisms and Psoriasis Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Xiujuan Wu ◽  
Zongfeng Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Gene Polymorphisms ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
Relationship Of

This study is to investigate the relationship of endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1 (ERAP1) gene polymorphisms with psoriasis. Five databases of PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for potential studies until 25 December 2019. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed with PRISMA. A total of 9 case-control studies including 4858 psoriasis cases and 10,542 healthy controls were included. Three loci of ERAP1 gene polymorphisms (rs26653, rs30187, and rs27524) were evaluated in this meta-analysis. There was no significant association between rs26653 polymorphism and risk of psoriasis (C vs. G, OR = 1.01 , 95% CI: 0.80-1.28, P = 0.93 ). However, there was a significant association between rs30187 polymorphisms and psoriasis susceptibility (T vs. C, OR = 1.23 , 95% CI: 1.15-1.32, P < 0.00001 ) and a significant association between rs27524 polymorphisms and psoriasis susceptibility (A vs. G, OR = 1.17 , 95% CI: 1.09-1.25, P < 0.00001 ). For there were insufficient data of rs27044, rs151823, rs2248374, and rs2910686, we only conducted a systematic review for them. The rs30187 (C/T) and rs27524 (G/A) polymorphisms of ERAP1 are associated with increased risk of psoriasis. However, no significant association is observed between rs26653 (G/C) polymorphism and risk of psoriasis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document