scholarly journals Bionic Innovative Design of Pipeline Disinfection Robot Based on Biological Text Information

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Chen ◽  
Huo Zhang ◽  
Xiao-Min Liu ◽  
De-Hua Fan
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Design ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Bionic Design ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Innovative Design ◽  
Design Scheme ◽  
Engineering Design Problems ◽  
Text Information ◽  
Processing And Storage ◽  
Bio Engineering

Abstract The traditional bionic innovative design method relies too much on the designer's own experience and inspiration, and the design method could be limited by designer’s own thinking. This paper presents a new bionic design method, proposing one kind of special model for the engineering design problem, through obtaining biological text information, after processing and storage in the database, combined with engineering design problems, obtains the corresponding bionic design prototype, and generates the bionic design scheme through bio-engineering mapping. This design method can effectively avoid trapping designers into their own thinking, and this method is helpful for the generation of innovative design scheme. Finally, the meta design of innovative pipeline disinfection robot is shown as an example to verify the feasibility of the method proposed in this paper.

Preferences and Correlated Uncertainties in Engineering Design

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonori Honda ◽  
Erik K. Antonsson
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Design ◽  
Design Variable ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Performance Variables ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Engineering Design Problems ◽  
Engineering Problems ◽  
And Performance

The Method of Imprecision (MOI) is a multi-objective design method that maximizes the overall degree of both design and performance preferences. Sets of design variables are iteratively selected, and the corresponding performances are approximately computed. The designer’s judgment (expressed as preferences) are combined (aggregated) with the customer’s preferences, to determine the overall preference for sets of points in the design space. In addition to degrees of preference for values of the design and performance variables, engineering design problems also typically include uncertainties caused by uncontrolled variations, for example, measuring and fabrication limitations. This paper illustrates the computation of expected preference for cases where the uncertainties are uncorrelated, and also where the uncertainties are correlated. The result is a “best” set of design variable values for engineering problems, where the overall aggregated preference is maximized. As is illustrated by the examples shown here, where both preferences and uncontrolled variations are present, the presence of uncertainties can have an important effect on the choice of the overall best set of design variable values.

Standards, Codes of Practice and Expert Systems

1988 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
E G McCluskey ◽  
S Thompson ◽  
D M G McSherry
Keyword(s):  
Expert System ◽  
Expert Systems ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Codes Of Practice ◽  
Engineering Design Problems ◽  
And Performance

Many engineering design problems require reference to standards or codes of practice to ensure that acceptable safety and performance criteria are met. Extracting relevant data from such documents can, however, be a problem for the unfamiliar user. The use of expert systems to guide the retrieval of information from standards and codes of practice is proposed as a means of alleviating this problem. Following a brief introduction to expert system techniques, a tool developed by the authors for building expert system guides to standards and codes of practice is described. The steps involved in encoding the knowledge contained in an arbitrarily chosen standard are illustrated. Finally, a typical consultation illustrates the use of the expert system guide to the standard.

Biologically Inspired Design: A Macrocognitive Account

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swaroop S. Vattam ◽  
Michael Helms ◽  
Ashok K. Goel
Keyword(s):  
Biological Sciences ◽  
Information Processing ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Design Patterns ◽  
Information Processing Model ◽  
Biologically Inspired ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Engineering Design Problems ◽  
Other Information ◽  
Biologically Inspired Design

Biologically inspired engineering design is an approach to design that espouses the adaptation of functions and mechanisms in biological sciences to solve engineering design problems. We have conducted an in situ study of designers engaged in biologically inspired design. Based on this study we develop here a macrocognitive information-processing model of biologically inspired design. We also compare and contrast the model with other information-processing models of analogical design such as TRIZ, case-based design, and design patterns.

scholarly journals Lévy-Flight Moth-Flame Algorithm for Function Optimization and Engineering Design Problems

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiming Li ◽  
Yongquan Zhou ◽  
Sen Zhang ◽  
Junmin Song
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Design ◽  
Function Optimization ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Local Optimum ◽  
Lévy Flight ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Levy Flight ◽  
Spiral Path ◽  
Straight Line ◽  
Engineering Design Problems

The moth-flame optimization (MFO) algorithm is a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. The main inspiration of this algorithm is the navigation method of moths in nature called transverse orientation. Moths fly in night by maintaining a fixed angle with respect to the moon, a very effective mechanism for travelling in a straight line for long distances. However, these fancy insects are trapped in a spiral path around artificial lights. Aiming at the phenomenon that MFO algorithm has slow convergence and low precision, an improved version of MFO algorithm based on Lévy-flight strategy, which is named as LMFO, is proposed. Lévy-flight can increase the diversity of the population against premature convergence and make the algorithm jump out of local optimum more effectively. This approach is helpful to obtain a better trade-off between exploration and exploitation ability of MFO, thus, which can make LMFO faster and more robust than MFO. And a comparison with ABC, BA, GGSA, DA, PSOGSA, and MFO on 19 unconstrained benchmark functions and 2 constrained engineering design problems is tested. These results demonstrate the superior performance of LMFO.

scholarly journals Performance Comparison of Recent Population-Based Metaheuristic Optimisation Algorithms in Mechanical Design Problems of Machinery Components

Machines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
Bugra Alkan ◽  
Malarvizhi Kaniappan Chinnathai
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Design ◽  
Mechanical Design ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Component Design ◽  
Engineering Design Problems ◽  
Optimisation Algorithms

The optimisation of complex engineering design problems is highly challenging due to the consideration of various design variables. To obtain acceptable near-optimal solutions within reasonable computation time, metaheuristics can be employed for such problems. However, a plethora of novel metaheuristic algorithms are developed and constantly improved and hence it is important to evaluate the applicability of the novel optimisation strategies and compare their performance using real-world engineering design problems. Therefore, in this paper, eight recent population-based metaheuristic optimisation algorithms—African Vultures Optimisation Algorithm (AVOA), Crystal Structure Algorithm (CryStAl), Human-Behaviour Based Optimisation (HBBO), Gradient-Based Optimiser (GBO), Gorilla Troops Optimiser (GTO), Runge–Kutta optimiser (RUN), Social Network Search (SNS) and Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA)—are applied to five different mechanical component design problems and their performance on such problems are compared. The results show that the SNS algorithm is consistent, robust and provides better quality solutions at a relatively fast computation time for the considered design problems. GTO and GBO also show comparable performance across the considered problems and AVOA is the most efficient in terms of computation time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document