scholarly journals Mild Moxibustion for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author(s):  
Zhaoqin Wang ◽  
Manwen Xu ◽  
Zheng Shi ◽  
Chunhui Bao ◽  
Huirong Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To evaluate the effects of mild moxibustion (MM) for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) through comparisons with those of placebo moxibustion. Patients and Methods: This was a single-site, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian in China and enrolled 76 participants who met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for IBS-D between May 2017 and December 2019. 76 participants were randomized to either mild moxibustion (MM) or placebo moxibustion group (PM) in a 1:1 ratio. 18 sessions of MM or PM were implemented over the course of 6 weeks (3 times per week). The primary outcome was adequate relief after 6 weeks of treatment. Results Of 76 patients with IBS-D who were randomized (38 in the MM group and 38 in the PM group) were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set. After treatment at week 6, the response rate was significantly higher in the MM group than the PM group (81.58% vs. 36.84%,) with an estimated difference of 44.74 (95% CI, 23.46 to 66.02, P < 0.001). No participant reported severe adverse effects. Conclusion The findings suggest that mild moxibustion may be more effective than placebo moxibustion for the treatment of IBS-D, with effects lasting up to 12 weeks. Trial Registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2100046852. Registered 29 May 2021 - Retrospectively registered, URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=127000

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-wen Sun ◽  
Zhi-gang Li ◽  
Ming-liang Sun ◽  
Da Li ◽  
Jun Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain, diarrhea or constipation, and changes in defecation patterns. No organic disease has been found to explain these symptoms by routine clinical examination. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for IBS patients based on conventional treatments. We also want to explore the optimal acupoint combination recommended for IBS and clarify the clinical advantage of "multi-acupoint co-effect and synergistic effect".Methods and analysis: A total of 204 eligible patients who meet the Rome IV criteria for IBS will be randomly allocated to receive different acupuncture. Each patient will receive 12 acupuncture treatments over four weeks and will be followed up for four weeks. The primary outcome is the IBS-symptom severity score (IBS-SSS). The secondary outcomes include the Bristol stool form scale(BSFS), the work and social adjustment score (WSAS), the IBS-quality of life (IBS-QOL), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and the self-rating depression scale (SDS). Both the primary outcome and the secondary outcomes measures are collected at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks of the intervention, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks after the intervention.Ethics and dissemination: The entire project has been approved by the ethics committee of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine ( 2020BZYLL0903 ) .Discussion: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial for IBS in China. This may shed light on the efficacy of acupuncture as an alternative to IBS. The results of the trial will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Register, ID: ChiCTR2000041215.First registered on 12 December 2020. http://www.chictr.org.cn/.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Hyun Lee ◽  
Joong Il Kim ◽  
Myong Ki Baeg ◽  
Yun-Young Sunwoo ◽  
Kwangsun Do ◽  
...  

Conventional and herbal drugs are frequently used together to treat many disorders. Samryungbaekchul-san (SRS, a herbal formula) and otilonium bromide (OB, an antispasmodic agent) are widely used to treat diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS) in Eastern Asian countries. However, there have been no studies on the co-administration of SRS and OB. Therefore, we aimed to preliminarily assess the feasibility of SRS combined with OB for D-IBS treatment in a pilot double-blind, four-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT), including 80 patients diagnosed with D-IBS according to the Rome III criteria. The patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups and were administered drugs for eight weeks after a two-week preparatory period. Follow-up was conducted four weeks after the administration period. The primary outcome was evaluated by using a global D-IBS symptom improvement score; no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. However, multiple logistic regression analysis of primary outcome scores shows that SRS significantly improved D-IBS symptoms (p < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, better results were observed in the SRS + OB group, in terms of symptoms, including abdominal pain, discomfort, frequency of abdominal pain, and stool form than in OB alone or placebo groups (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the co-administration of SRS and OB might be an effective and safe strategy for the treatment of D-IBS. Large-scale RCTs are warranted to further confirm and clarify these findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document