scholarly journals Prognostic significance of mean platelet volume in lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Sanjeev Kharel ◽  
Suraj Shrestha ◽  
Prafulla Shakya ◽  
Rohit Rawat ◽  
Ramila Shilpakar

Abstract Background Lung cancer is the most prevalent cancer globally with a grim prognosis alongside a very high number of cancer-related deaths. Mean platelet volume (MPV) is the measure of platelet size and is considered a surrogate marker of platelet activation. Low MPV indicates exhausted platelets causing worse outcomes in cancer patients. As the correlation between platelet count/platelet size and lung cancer prognosis still remains a topic of debate, this meta-analysis was done to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic significance of MPV among lung cancer patients.Methods A systematic search of electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Google scholar and additional sources for relevant studies were done with no language restrictions from inception to 7th May 2021. Overall Survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS)/Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were pooled to evaluate the relation of MPV with OS/DFS. Subgroup analysis based on cancer type, clinical stage, sample size, median age, cut-off value, and study region was done to identify the cause of significant heterogeneity.Results Eleven studies with 2421 lung cancer patients were included in our analysis. Our analysis showed no significant association between MPV levels with OS (H.R.:1.07, 95%C.I.:0.84–1.35, p = 0.60) and DFS/PFS (HR:1.04, 95%C.I.:0.68–1.60, p = 0.84). Under subgroup analysis, studies conducted in countries other than China (HR:1.53, 95% C.I.=1.14–2.03, p < 0.001, I2 = 42.11%) and studies with advanced-stage lung cancer patients (HR: 1.84, 95% C.I.=1.19–2.82, p-value = 0.01, I2 = 0%) showed significant association between MPV levels and worse DFS/PFS.Conclusion Pretreatment MPV levels did not show prognostic significance except in advanced lung cancer cases. Large multicentric studies with large samples and long follow-up times are necessary.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Hai Zhong ◽  
Liang Ye ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
rong su Fang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : The prognostic value of elevated pretreatment platelet counts remains controversial in lung cancer patients. We performed the present meta-analysis to determine its precise role in these patients. Methods: We employed a multiple search strategy in the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies. Disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were used as outcomes with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among the studies and publication bias were also evaluated. Results : A total of 40 studies including 16696 lung cancer patients were eligible for the analysis. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that compared with normal platelet counts, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were associated with poorer OS (HR= 1.54, 95% CI: 1.37-1.72, P<0.001) and poorer DFS/PFS/TTP (HR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.33-1.98, P<0.001) in patients with lung cancer. In subgroup analyses, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were also associated with poorer OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in most subgroups. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions : This meta-analysis revealed that elevated pretreatment platelet counts were an independent predictor of OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in lung cancer patients. Large-scale prospective studies and a validation study are warranted.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Hai Zhong ◽  
Liang Ye ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Rong Su Fang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : The prognostic value of pretreatment elevated platelet count remains controversial in lung cancer patients. We performed the present meta-analysis to determine the precise role of it in these patients.Methods: We performed a multiple search strategy in PubMed database, EMBASE and Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies. Disease-free survival (DFS) /Progress-free survival (PFS)/Time to progress(TTP) and Overall survival (OS) were used as outcomes with hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among studies and publication bias were also evaluated.Results : A total of 39 studies including 16696 lung cancer patients were eligible in the analysis. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that pretreatment elevated platelet count was associated with poorer OS (HR= 1.47, 95%CI: 1.31-1.66, P<0.001) and poorer DFS/PFS/TTP ((HR=1.63, 95%CI: 1.28-2.09, P<0.001) in patients with lung cancer compared with normal platelet count. In subgroup analyses, pretreatment elevated platelet count was also associated with poorer OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in most subgroups. There was no evidence of publication bias.Conclusions : This meta-analysis revealed that pretreatment elevated platelet count was an independent predictor of OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in lung cancer patients. Large scale prospective studies and a validation study are warranted.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Hai Zhong ◽  
Liang Ye ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
rong su Fang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : The prognostic value of elevated pretreatment platelet counts remains controversial in lung cancer patients. We performed the present meta-analysis to determine its precise role in these patients. Methods: We employed a multiple search strategy in the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies. Disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were used as outcomes with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among the studies and publication bias were also evaluated. Results : A total of 40 studies including 16696 lung cancer patients were eligible for the analysis. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that compared with normal platelet counts, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were associated with poorer OS (HR= 1.54, 95% CI: 1.37-1.72, P<0.001) and poorer DFS/PFS/TTP (HR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.33-1.98, P<0.001) in patients with lung cancer. In subgroup analyses, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were also associated with poorer OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in most subgroups. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions : This meta-analysis revealed that elevated pretreatment platelet counts were an independent predictor of OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in lung cancer patients. Large-scale prospective studies and a validation study are warranted.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuming Zhu ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Yubao Cui

Objective. Inflammation plays an extremely considerable role in the development and progression of malignancies. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and mean platelet volume (MPV) in blood are associated with various inflammatory conditions and resulted in independent prognostic factors for lung cancer. However, whether ANC and MPV can be diagnostic markers for lung cancer remains unknown. This retrospective study investigated the roles of ANC and MPV, either alone or combined, in diagnosing lung cancer. Methods. This study analyzed data from lung cancer patients and healthy individuals in Wuxi People’s Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University. The Mann–Whitney U-test was performed to compare differences between lung cancer patients and healthy individuals. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to assess correlations. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy. Results. 209 patients diagnosed with lung cancer and 236 healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. Levels of ANC and MPV increased in lung cancer patients compared with healthy individuals (P<0.001). ANC had statistically significant negative weak correlation with albumin concentrations (r=‐0.154, P=0.026), and MPV had statistically significant negative weak correlation with total protein concentrations (r=‐0.153, P=0.027) in lung cancer patients. ANC and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio had statistically significant positive correlation in both lung cancer patients (r=0.756, P<0.001) and healthy subjects (r=0.639, P<0.001). MPV and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio had statistically significant negative weak correlation in both lung cancer patients (r=‐0.242, P<0.001) and healthy subjects (r=‐0.325, P<0.001). ANC had sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) of 0.512 and 0.809, respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 0.656 (0.603-0.710). SEN and SPE of MPV were 0.928 and 0.708, respectively, and the AUC (95% CI) was 0.913 (0.889-0.938). When ANC and MPV were combined, SEN and SPE became 0.842 and 0.835, respectively, and the AUC (95% CI) became 0.919 (0.895-0.943). Conclusions. Compared with ANC or MPV alone, the combination of ANC and MPV can improve diagnostic ability to distinguish lung cancer patients from healthy subjects.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eszter Bartalis ◽  
Marin Gergics ◽  
Benedek Tinusz ◽  
Mária Földi ◽  
Szabolcs Kiss ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The prevalence of hyponatremia is highly variable among lung cancer patients. It is also an important predictive factor, according to numerous studies. However, its prevalence and prognostic significance in subgroups of lung cancer patients, e.g. in small cell and non-small cell lung cancers (SCLC and NSCLC, respectively), have not yet been evaluated in a meta-analysis.Methods We report this systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2009) Statement. We have registered our meta-analysis and review’s protocol to the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, with the following registration number: CRD42020167013. A systematic search was done in the following sources: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, a WHO Global Health Library. We extracted the effect measure for each outcome as the relative risk (RR) with the related 95% confidence interval (CI). Results We identified a total of 8127 potentially eligible studies and we included 25 studies in our evaluation. The prevalence of hyponatremia in lung cancer patients varied between 3% and 56.1% with an average of 23% without any significant differences between the following subgroups: cancer type (p=0.780), gender (p=0.223), age (p=0.773), ECOG state (p=0.317) and the extent of disease (p=0.999). Hyponatremia was more consistently an independent prognostic factor in NSCLC than in SCLC. The overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in hyponatremic compared to normonatremic patients at 10 months (RR: 0.59, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.74, p<0.001) and at 20 months (RR: 0.44, 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.59, p<0.001), with worse survival rates in NSCLC than in SCLC (27% vs 42%) (p<0.001). If hyponatremia was corrected, OS at 10 months was 1.83 times higher than in the uncorrected hyponatremia group (95% CI, 1.37 to 2.44, p<0.001), but at 20 months no statistically significant difference could be found between these subgroups (p=0.067).Conclusions Low serum sodium levels have a negative impact on mortality at 10 and 20 months, which is more pronounced among NSCLC patients. The correction of hyponatremia has a positive effect on OS rates at 10 months, but this advantage disappears by 20 months.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Hai Zhong ◽  
Liang Ye ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
rong su Fang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : The prognostic value of pretreatment elevated platelet count remains controversial in lung cancer patients. We performed the present meta-analysis to determine the precise role of it in these patients. Methods: We performed a multiple search strategy in PubMed database, EMBASE and Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies. Disease-free survival (DFS) /Progress-free survival (PFS)/Time to progress (TTP) and Overall survival (OS) were used as outcomes with hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among studies and publication bias were also evaluated. Results : A total of 40 studies including 16696 lung cancer patients were eligible in the analysis. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that pretreatment elevated platelet count was associated with poorer OS (HR= 1.54, 95%CI:1.37-1.72, P<0.001) and poorer DFS/PFS/TTP (HR=1.62, 95%CI: 1.33-1.98, P<0.001) in patients with lung cancer compared with normal platelet count. In subgroup analyses, pretreatment elevated platelet count was also associated with poorer OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in most subgroups. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions : This meta-analysis revealed that pretreatment elevated platelet count was an independent predictor of OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in lung cancer patients. Large scale prospective studies and a validation study are warranted.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Hai Zhong ◽  
Liang Ye ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
rong su Fang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : The prognostic value of elevated pretreatment platelet count s remains controversial in lung cancer patients. We performed the present meta-analysis to determine its precise role in these patients. Methods: We employed a multiple search strategy in the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies. Disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were used as outcomes with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among the studies and publication bias were also evaluated. Results : A total of 40 studies including 16696 lung cancer patients were eligible for the analysis. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that compared with normal platelet counts, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were associated with poorer OS (HR= 1.54, 95% CI: 1.37-1.72, P<0.001) and poorer DFS/PFS/TTP (HR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.33-1.98, P<0.001) in patients with lung cancer. In subgroup analyses, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were also associated with poorer OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in most subgroups. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions : This meta-analysis revealed that elevated pretreatment platelet counts were an independent predictor of OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in lung cancer patients. Large-scale prospective studies and a validation study are warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document