scholarly journals Stochastic Nonlinear Ground Response Analysis Considering Existing Boreholes Locations by the Geostatistical Method

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.H. Amjadi ◽  
Ali johari
Keyword(s):  
Random Field ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Soil Parameters ◽  
Seismic Responses ◽  
Ground Response ◽  
Ground Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Geostatistical Method ◽  
Stationary Random Field

Abstract The field and laboratory evidence of nonlinear soil behavior, even at small strains, emphasizes the ‎importance of employing nonlinear methods in seismic ground response analysis. Additionally, ‎determination of dynamic characteristics of soil layers always includes some degree of uncertainty. Most of ‎previous stochastic studies of ground response analysis have focused only on uncertainties of soil ‎parameters, and the effect of soil sample location has been mostly ignored. This study attempts to couple ‎nonlinear time-domain ground response analysis with uncertainty of soil parameters considering existing ‎boreholes’ ‎location through a geostatistical method using a program written in MATLAB. To evaluate ‎the efficiency of the proposed method, stochastic seismic ground responses at construction location were compared with those of the non-stationary random ‎field method‎ through real site data. The ‎results demonstrate that applying the boreholes’ ‎location significantly affects not only the ground ‎responses but also their Coefficient Of Variation (COV). Furthermore, the mean value of the seismic ‎responses is affected more considerably by the values of soil parameters at the vicinity of the construction location. It is also inferred that considering boreholes’ location may reduce the COV of the seismic ‎responses. Among the surface responses in the studied site, the values of Peak Ground Displacement (PGD) ‎and Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) reflect the highest and ‎lowest dispersion due to uncertainties of soil ‎properties through both non-stationary random field and geostatistical methods.

Seismic Ground Response Analysis of Some Typical Sites of Guwahati City

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiv Shankar Kumar ◽  
A. Murali Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Amplitude Ratio ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Response ◽  
Ground Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Surface Level ◽  
Guwahati City

In this study, one dimensional equivalent–linear ground response analyses were performed for some typical sites in the Guwahati city, India. Six bore locations covering about 250 km2 area of the city were considered for the analyses. As the strong motion significantly influences the ground response, seven different recorded ground motions, varying in magnitude (6.1 to 8.1) and other ground motion parameters, were adopted. Seismic site analyses were carried out for all layers of borelogs using all the seven earthquakes. Results are presented in terms of surface acceleration histories, strain and shear stress ratio variation, response spectrum, Fourier amplitude ratio versus frequency. The results indicate that accelerations were amplified the most at the surface level. The range of peak ground acceleration (PGA) values obtained at the ground surface is about 0.2 g to 0.79 for a range of PGA considered at bedrock level (rigid half space at bottom of borelog) of 0.1 g to 0.34 g. The Fourier amplifications of ground motion at surface are in the range of 4.14 – 8.99 for a frequency band of 1.75 Hz to 3.13 Hz. The maximum spectral acceleration at six locations varies in the range of 1.0 g – 4.71 g for all the seven earthquakes. The study clearly demonstrated the role for site effect and the type of ground motion on the ground response. For a given earthquake motion, amplification factors at surface level change by almost about 20% to 70% depending on local site conditions.

Study on the Comparison of Ground Response Analysis for Class І Site

2014 ◽  
Vol 919-921 ◽  
pp. 1031-1034
Author(s):  
Xiao Fei Li ◽  
Rui Sun
Keyword(s):  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Acceleration Response ◽  
Seismic Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Response ◽  
Real Situation ◽  
Ground Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Maximum Shear Strain

In order to test the applicable of the two equivalent linear seismic response analysis procedures SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 for class І site, 21 underground strong motion records were selected from 11 stations of KiK-net as input earthquake motions. By using these two programs to calculate the peak ground acceleration, soil maximum shear strain and acceleration response spectra. By comparing the results of the two procedures and the measured results to evaluate the proximity of these two methods and then judge which program is closer to the real situation. Studies have shown that in class І site, the results of SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 differ little; but according to the measured records, there are some differences between the two programs results and the measured records. While no matter comparing from which side, SHAKE2000 is closer to the earthquake records.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Dynamic Properties and Ground-Response Analysis of Soil Reinforced with Cement and Biopolymer

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-296
Author(s):  
Seongnoh Ahn ◽  
Kwangkuk Ahn ◽  
Changho Lee ◽  
Jun-Dae Lee ◽  
Jongwon Jung
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Damping Ratio ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Response ◽  
Ground Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Design Earthquake ◽  
Earthquake Damages

In Korea, earthquakes have continued to occur even after the occurrence of Gyeongju and Pohang earthquakes of 2016 and 2017, respectively, raising awareness of earthquakes. Because earthquakes cause damage to not only structures but also humans, it is essential to improve the seismic performance and design earthquake-resistant structures to minimize earthquake damages. If the seismic performance of a structure is improved through ground improvement and reinforcement, ground response analysis should be performed considering the dynamic properties of the site of the structure. In addition, cement has been widely used as a material for ground improvement, but recently, ground improvement methods in which biopolymers are utilized for ecofriendly construction have been investigated extensively. However, studies on the changes in the dynamic properties of ground improved using biopolymers, and the ground-response analysis has not been investigated in detail. In this study, resonant column tests were performed using samples mixed with cement and sodium alginate to evaluate the effects o f ground improvement using a biopolymer. In addition, the dynamic properties of the improved samples were adopted in performing the ground response analysis, which demonstrated confirmed the ground stability after ground improvement. From the results, the ground dynamic properties, shear modulus, and damping ratio were influenced when the biopolymer and cement were mixed with the soil. Furthermore, the ground response analysis confirmed that the maximum ground acceleration on the surface decreased.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF EQUIVALENT LINEAR AND NON LINEAR METHODS ON GROUND RESPONSE ANALYSIS: CASE STUDY AT WEST BANGKA SITE

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Eko Rudi Iswanto ◽  
Eric Yee
Keyword(s):  
Linear Method ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Peak Strain ◽  
Ground Response ◽  
Ground Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Equivalent Linear ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Short Time

COMPARISON OF EQUIVALENT LINEAR AND NON LINEAR METHODS ON GROUND RESPONSE ANALYSIS: CASE STUDY AT WEST BANGKA SITE. Within the framework of identifying NPP sites, site surveys are performed in West Bangka (WB), Bangka-Belitung Island Province. Ground response analysis of a potential site has been carried out using peak strain profiles and peak ground acceleration. The objective of this research is to compare Equivalent Linear (EQL) and Non Linear (NL) methods of ground response analysis on the selected NPP site (West Bangka) using DeepSoil software. Equivalent linear method is widely used because requires soil data in simple way and short time of computational process. On the other hand, non linear method is capable of representing the actual soil behaviour by considering non linear soil parameter.  The results showed that EQL method has similar trends to NL method. At surface layer, the acceleration values for EQL and NL methods are resulted as 0.425g and 0.375g respectively. NL method is more reliable in capturing higher frequencies of spectral acceleration compared to EQL method.    

scholarly journals Evaluation of Seismic Site Amplification Using 1D Site Response Analyses at Ba Dinh Square Area, Vietnam

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Ngoc-Long Tran ◽  
Muhammad Aaqib ◽  
Ba-Phu Nguyen ◽  
Duy-Duan Nguyen ◽  
Viet-Linh Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Site Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Response ◽  
Ground Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Design Spectrum ◽  
Equivalent Linear

This study presents a case study on ground response analysis of one of the important cultural heritages in Hanoi, Vietnam. One-dimensional nonlinear and equivalent linear site response analyses which are commonly applied to solve the problem of seismic stress wave propagation are performed at the Ba Dinh square area. A measured in-situ shear wave velocity profile and corresponding geotechnical site investigation and laboratory test data are utilized to develop the site model for site-specific ground response analysis. A suite of earthquake records compatible with Vietnamese Design Code TCVN 9386: 2012 rock design spectrum is used as input ground motions at the bedrock. A few concerns associated with site-specific ground response evaluation are analyzed for both nonlinear and equivalent linear procedures, including shear strains, mobilized shear strength, and peak ground acceleration along with the depth. The results show that the mean maximum shear strains at any soil layer are less than 0.2% in the study area. A deamplification portion within the soil profile is observed at the layer interface with shear wave velocity reversal. The maximum peak ground acceleration (PGA) at the surface is about 0.2 g for equivalent linear analysis and 0.16 g for nonlinear analysis. The ground motions are amplified near the site natural period 0.72 s. The soil factors calculated in this study are 1.95 and 2.07 for nonlinear and equivalent linear analyses, respectively. These values are much different from the current value of 1.15 for site class C in TCVN 9386: 2012. A comparison of calculated response spectra and amplification factors with the local standard code of practice revealed significant discrepancies. It is demonstrated that the TCVN 9386: 2012 soil design spectrum is unable to capture the calculated site amplification in the study area.

scholarly journals Preliminary Amplification Studies of Some Sites using Different Earthquake Motions

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 1906-1921
Author(s):  
Manish Bhutani ◽  
Sanjeev Naval
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motions ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
Ground Response ◽  
Ground Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Earthquake Resistant Design ◽  
Earthquake Resistant

Stability of infrastructure during earthquakes demands ground response analysis to be carried out for a particular region as the ground surface may suffer from amplified Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) as compared to bedrock PGA causing instability. Many studies have been carried out the world over using different techniques but very few studies have been carried out for the northern part of India, Punjab situated at latitude of 31.326° N and longitude of 75.576° E, which is highly seismic and lies in seismic zone IV as per IS:1893-2016. In this paper 1-D equivalent non-linear ground response analysis has been conducted for sixteen sites of Jalandhar region, Punjab (India) by using five earthquake motions. Input ground motions are selected from the worldwide-recorded database based on the seismicity of the region. Based on the average SPT-N values, all the sites have been classified as per the guidelines of National Earthquake Hazard Reduction program (NEHRP). Shear modulus (G) was calculated using correlation between G and SPT–N Value. The ground surface PGA varies from 0.128 to 0.292 g for the sites of Jalandhar region with Amplification Factor values varying from 1.08 to 2.01. Hence the present study will be useful to the structural designers as an input towards suitable earthquake resistant design of structures for similar sites.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document