scholarly journals Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes in Open and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy with Modified Ureterosigmoidostomy (MainzII): A Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Yang He ◽  
Duo Zheng ◽  
Junyao Liu ◽  
Peng Qi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Urinary Diversion ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss

Abstract Background: To analyze perioperative conditions and long-term efficacy of open modified ureterosigmoidostomy urinary diversion (OMUUD) in patients with bladder cancer who underwent open radical cystectomy (ORC) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC).Methods: In this retrospective study, the clinical data of patients who underwent open and laparoscopic radical cystectomy plus open modified ureterosigmoidostomy urinary diversion in our hospital were collected from January 2011 to December 2019. In addition, perioperative data of 56 patients who underwent ORC and OMUUD were compared with those of 118 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) plus OMUUD. A long-term follow-up was performed to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rate between the two groups.Results: Results showed that there was no significant difference between ORC+OMUUD group and LRC+OMUUD group in terms of gender, age, body index, pre-operative ASA grade, history of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) before surgery, tumor T stage, lymph node dissection range, pathological grade, and positive postoperative surgical margin. The mean operation time in the open group was shorter than that in the laparoscopic group （P<0.001）. Moreover, the estimated intraoperative blood loss（P<0.001）and postoperative hospital stay（P=0.023）were better in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. The incidence of complications between 30 days (P=0.665) and 90 days (P=0.211) time-points after surgery was not significantly different. Similarly, the OS (P=0.237) and PFS (P=0.307) between the two groups were comparable.Conclusion: This study shows that the LRC group has long operation time, but less estimated intraoperative blood loss, short postoperative hospital stay, small trauma, and fast postoperative recovery compared to open surgery. Moreover, the incidence of complications at 30 - and 90-days postoperation, as well as the OS and PFS is not different between laparoscopy and open surgery.

scholarly journals Safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in the management of giant ovarian cysts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuzhen Chang ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Linyv Peng ◽  
Haiyan Zhou ◽  
HAN Li-ping
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Ovarian Cysts ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Analgesic Drugs ◽  
Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery ◽  
Single Site Surgery

Abstract Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in the treatment of giant ovarian cysts. Methods A total of 76 patients with giant ovarian cyst (diameter ≥ 10 cm) who received surgical treatment in our hospital from January 2018 to May 2021 were divided into experimental cohort (single-port laparoscopic cohort) (n = 30) and control cohort (traditional laparoscopic cohort) (n = 46).The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative cyst fluid spillage rate, application of postoperative analgesic drugs, postoperative first anus exhaust time, incidence rate of perioperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay and other clinical indicators were summarized and analyzed between the two cohorts. Results The LESS cohorts had an earlier onset of age[ (27.6 ± 8.4) ,years of age], shorter of operation time [(82.2 ± 16.0)min], less of intraoperative blood loss [( 17.5 (10-22.5) ml)] as compared with traditional laparoscopic cohort[ (40.9 ± 15.5 )years of age, (102.7 ± 26.2)min, (20 (18.7–35) )m,P ༜ 0.05]. The first postoperative exhaust time,the rate of postoperative analgesic drugs, incidence rate of perioperative complications and postoperative hospital stay in two cohorts were in the similar line. Conclusion After adequate evaluation and screening of patients, the size of ovarian cysts cannot be the reason for refusing LESS surgery. It is safe and feasible for clinical promotion in the management of giant ovarian cysts.

Ligation-free single scrotal incision orchiectomy with ultrasonic scalpel: Xinhua Zhang Procedure

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Complication ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Ultrasonic Scalpel ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: To explore the efficacy and safety of a new type of testicular excision with ultrasonic dissector. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 69 patients with advanced prostate cancer undergoing orchiectomy in our hospital between June 2017 and June 2019. All patients were divided into a traditional surgery group (n = 27) and an ultrasonic scalpel surgery group (n = 42). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rates were compared. Results: The ultrasonic scalpel surgery group had significantly shorter operation times and less intraoperative blood loss than the traditional surgery group (each P < 0.01). Moreover, the incidence of postoperative complication differed significantly between the traditional surgery group (18.52%) and the ultrasonic scalpel surgery group (0%) (P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The surgery time for testicular excision using the ultrasonic knife is short, the operation is simple and the complications are few and thus it may become a form of replacement for traditional testicular excision.

scholarly journals Radical Cystectomy Procedures in Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia: Preliminary Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Syamsu Hudaya ◽  
Karina Evelyn Sidabutar
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Urinary Diversion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion (UD) are among the most complex urological procedures with high postoperative morbidity, That caused only a few urologists are prepared to perform this operation. We dedicated to enroll this procedure since the number of bladder tumor cases is increasing in our third referral general hospital. We evaluate and analyze variables related to the surgical and direct post-operative outcomes of our initial experience of radical cystectomy.Methods: This retrospective descriptive study collected medical record of patients with RC in Fatmawati Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia from 2014-2016. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. Variables related to the surgical and postoperative outcomes and complications in the patients were analyzed.Results: There were 11 patients during this study period. The average age of the patients was 60.9 ± 9.6 years old with 7 male and 4 female patients. All patients underwent ileal conduit as urinary diversion. The mean operation time was 392.7 ± 117 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 1,272.7 ± 538.7 mL. No intraoperative death was recorded. The hospital stay length was 15.8 ± 8.3 days, visual analog scale (VAS) score in the first day after surgery was 2.7 ± 0.2, and the drain was kept in for 13.9 ± 7.4 days. All of the histopathology results were urothelial carcinomas.Conclusions: Our initial experience with radical cystectomy results in acceptable blood loss, manageable post-operative pain, and acceptable hospital stay. Therefore it is still a treatment of choice for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in our hospital.  

scholarly journals Intelligent Algorithm-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radical Gastrectomy under Laparoscope

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Wenkui Mo ◽  
Cansong Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Intelligent Algorithm ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Laparoscopy Group ◽  
Significant Difference

The study focused on the influence of intelligent algorithm-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on short-term curative effects of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A convolutional neural network- (CNN-) based algorithm was used to segment MRI images of patients with gastric cancer, and 158 subjects admitted at hospital were selected as research subjects and randomly divided into the 3D laparoscopy group and 2D laparoscopy group, with 79 cases in each group. The two groups were compared for operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, exhaust time, time to get out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. The results showed that the CNN-based algorithm had high accuracy with clear contours. The similarity coefficient (DSC) was 0.89, the sensitivity was 0.93, and the average time to process an image was 1.1 min. The 3D laparoscopic group had shorter operation time (86.3 ± 21.0 min vs. 98 ± 23.3 min) and less intraoperative blood loss (200 ± 27.6 mL vs. 209 ± 29.8 mL) than the 2D laparoscopic group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). The number of dissected lymph nodes was 38.4 ± 8.5 in the 3D group and 36.1 ± 6.0 in the 2D group, showing no statistically significant difference ( P > 0.05 ). At the same time, no statistically significant difference was noted in postoperative exhaust time, time to get out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of complications ( P > 0.05 ). It was concluded that the algorithm in this study can accurately segment the target area, providing a basis for the preoperative examination of gastric cancer, and that 3D laparoscopic surgery can shorten the operation time and reduce intraoperative bleeding, while achieving similar short-term curative effects to 2D laparoscopy.

scholarly journals Comparison of early clinical results for the femoral neck system and cannulated screws in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqiang Zhou ◽  
Zhiqiang Li ◽  
Renjie Xu ◽  
Yuanshi She ◽  
Xiangxin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Femoral Head Necrosis ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss

Abstract Objective: To compare early clinical effects of the femoral neck system (FNS) and three cannulated screws for the treatment of patients with unstable femoral neck fractures.Methods: A retrospective analysis with pair matching of 81 patients who received FNS or cannulated screw internal fixation for Pauwels type-3 femoral neck fracture in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2019 was conducted. Patients who received FNS were the test group, and those who received cannulated screws comprised the control group. Matching requirements were as follows: same sex, similar age and similar body mass index (BMI). A total of 30 pairs were successfully matched, and the average age was 53.84 years. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization cost, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, time to walking without crutches, Harris score, femoral head necrosis rate and complication rate were compared between the groups.Results: Postoperative re-examination of radiographs showed satisfactory reduction in all patients, and all patients were followed up for 10-22 months. Those in the FNS group had lower postoperative VAS scores, earlier times to walking without crutches, higher Harris scores at the last follow-up and lower complication rates (P<0.05). However, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization costs were greater in the FNS group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference in operation time, hospital stay or femoral head necrosis rate was observed between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: For patients with unstable femoral neck fractures, FNS has better clinical efficacy than cannulated screws, though it is also more expensive. The excellent biomechanical performance and clinical efficacy of FNS make it a new choice for the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.

Open cystectomy is still alive and well: Outcomes from a single-centre 6-year review

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-245
Author(s):  
Alexios Dosis ◽  
Blessing Dhliwayo ◽  
Patrick Jones ◽  
Iva Kovacevic ◽  
Jonathan Yee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Objectives: To compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a single-centre setting. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective cohort (level 2b evidence) non-randomised review of 228 radical cystectomies that were performed between January 2010 and February 2016. Primary outcome measures were operative time, complications, blood loss and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS v21.0. Quantitative values were compared with Student’s t-test; categorical variables with the chi-square test. Statistical significance was considered a result of an alpha value less than 0.05. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also conducted. Results: Intraoperative blood loss was lower in laparoscopic surgery (855±673 vs. 716±570 mL, P=0.15), which had a significant impact on transfusion rates ( P=0.02). Operative times were lower in open surgery (339±52.9 vs. 353.1±67.1 minutes, P=0.10), while hospital stay was lower in the laparoscopic group (14.2±11.2 vs. 16.0±13.6 days, P=0.28). Five-year survival rates were superior for patients who underwent an open procedure but were not statistically significant ( P=0.10). Conclusion: This is, so far, the largest cohort to compare laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy. The laparoscopic approach can reduce the need for transfusion; however, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay or intraoperative blood loss, survival and margin positivity. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

scholarly journals Laparoscopy assisted minilaparotomy in the present uterine surgery

1998 ◽  
Vol 47 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
G. A. Savitskiy ◽  
N. N. Volkov ◽  
R. D. Ivanova ◽  
S. M. Gorbushin
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Coagulative Necrosis ◽  
Operative Method ◽  
Uterine Surgery

It has been created the new technology of uterine surgery based on laparoscopy assisted suprapubical middle minilaparotomy. This operative method allows to minimize the surgical injure in the cases when laparoscopy itself may be difficult because of some reasons and typical laparotomy is undesirable. The first experience of these operations has shown that using of this technology does allow to decrease intraoperative blood loss considerably, reduce very much postoperative hospital stay of patients in comparison with laparotomy, minimize the necessity of analgetics, optimize the suture of the uterus in myomectomy and diminish the zone of coagulative necrosis of tissues.

scholarly journals TO EVALUATE EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSPERITONEAL PYELOLITHOTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF RENAL PELVIC STONES IN TERM OF POSTOPERATIVE HOSPITAL STAY

2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivek Mohan ◽  
Ankit Panwar ◽  
Bharat Thakur ◽  
Ved Kumar Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Gandhi Medical College ◽  
Laparoscopic Transperitoneal ◽  
Return To Activity

Background: To evaluate efficacy of laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy for management of renal pelvic stones in term of postoperative hospital stay Methods: This study has been conducted in the Department of General surgery, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla on selected patients of Renal pelvis stones admitted in institution Results: Mean hospital stay was 6.66 days in laparoscopic group and it was 8 days in laparoscopic completed by open method. Maximum no. of patients was discharged within 5 days.  6 (75 %) patients returned to normal activity in less than 30 days which included only successful laparoscopic group and 2 patients returned to normal activity in 40 days which included lap completed by open group. Conclusion: In the present study of Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyelolithotomy at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, the procedure showed a definite decrease hospital stay, early return to activity than who have undergone open surgery Keywords: Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyelolithotomy, Pelvic stone, Hospital stay.

scholarly journals Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Emergency Surgery for Colorectal Perforation: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kensuke Kudou ◽  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
Sho Nambara ◽  
Yasuo Tsuda ◽  
Eiji Kusumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Colorectal Perforation

Abstract Background This study aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal perforation by comparing the clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and open emergency surgery for colorectal perforation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 100 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal perforation. The patients were categorized into two groups: the open group included patients who underwent laparotomy, and the laparoscopic group included those who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Clinical and operative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Results The open and laparoscopic groups included 58 and 42 patients, respectively. More than half of the patients in both groups developed perforation in the sigmoid colon (open, 55.2%; laparoscopic, 59.5%). The most common cause of perforation was diverticulum, followed by colorectal cancer. The mean intraoperative blood loss tended to be lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (78.8 mL versus 160.1 mL; P=0.0756). Hospital stay tended to be shorter in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (42.5 versus 55.7 days; P=0.0965). There were no significant differences in either the short- or long-term outcomes between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the choice of surgical approach (open versus laparoscopic) did not affect overall survival in patients with colorectal perforation. Conclusions The laparoscopic approach for colorectal perforation in an emergency setting is a safe procedure compared with the open approach. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a decrease in intraoperative blood loss and a shorter length of hospital stay.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Complications Between Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Dai ◽  
Zhou Yu
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Lower Rectal Cancer ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Stay Time

Aim: To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer with open surgery. Methods: The multiple databases including PubMed, Springer, EMBASE, EMBASE, OVID were adopted to search for the relevant studies, and full-text articles involving the comparison of unilateral and bilateral PVP surgery were reviewed. Review Manager 5.0 was adopted to estimate the effects of the results among the selected articles. Forest plots, sensitivity analysis and bias analysis for the articles included were also conducted. Results: Finally, 1186 patients were included in the 10 studies, which eventually satisfied the eligibility criteria, and laparoscopic and open surgery group were 646 and 540, respectively. The meta-analysis suggested that there was no significant difference of the operation time between laparoscopic and open surgery group, while the time to solid intake, hospital stay time, blood loss and complication rate of laparoscopic group are much less than those of open surgery. Conclusion: Although both these two punctures provide similar operation time, we encourage the use of the laparoscopic surgery as the preferred surgical technique for treatment of lower rectal cancer due to less time to solid intake, hospital stay time, blood loss and lower complication rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document