scholarly journals Emergency-Department Initiated Buprenorphine: Impact on Quality of Life Factors

Author(s):  
Caleb Carroll ◽  
Delissa Hand ◽  
Whitney Covington ◽  
Joel Rodgers ◽  
Lauren A. Walter

Abstract Background: Emergency department (ED)-initiated medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) have emerged as an effective strategy against the opioid epidemic. Opioid use disorder (OUD) patients engaged in ED-initiated MOUD programs have higher retention in treatment programs and improved outcomes with regard to overdose rates and mortality. It is unclear however, how engagement in ED-initiated MOUD programs might affect quality of life (QoL). We sought to describe demographic characteristics and QoL factors reported by patients engaged in ED-initiated MOUD and referral services. Methods: An ED MOUD-initiation program was launched in July 2019, with subsequent referral to definitive services. Enrolled patients were interviewed at intake, 3-months, and 6-months to ascertain QoL indices via the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures. Descriptive statistics and Fisher’s Exact were utilized to assess the data. Results: Through 12/2020, 89 participants were enrolled. The majority were white (85.4%), male (61.8%), and between the ages of 25-44 (75.3%). To-date, 31 participants (43.7% eligible) have completed 3-month follow-up and 28 (45.2% eligible) have competed 6-month follow-up. With regards to assessed QoL factors, over half demonstrated significant improvement, including 5 of 7 psychosocial factors, to include satisfaction with personal relationships, QoL self-rating, satisfaction with personal health, energy for everyday life, and satisfaction with self (p <.05). Financial needs met was the only objective QoL factor to demonstrate significant improvement during the follow-up time period. While not significant, homelessness also decreased, specifically 14 (15.7%) identified as homeless at intake as compared to one (3.7%) at 6-month follow-up. Additional trends toward decreased violence exposure and increased employment rates were also noted.Conclusions: In addition to decreasing illicit opioid drug use, maintenance of ED-initiated MOUD may positively impact broad QoL measures.

Author(s):  
Alireza Faridi ◽  
◽  
Farhad Taremian ◽  
Robert W Thatcher ◽  
Mohsen Dadashi ◽  
...  

Background: Previous studies have shown that conventional neurofeedback and cognitive modification treatments have led to numerous psychological improvements in patients suffering from substance use disorders. However, effectiveness of LORETA (Low-Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography) Z score neurofeedback (LZNFB) and Cognitive rehabilitation therapy on reducing of opium craving has yet to be investigated. Thus, aim of the present study was to compare effectiveness of LZNFB and Cognitive rehabilitation therapy with methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in reduction of opium craving in patients with opioid use disorder. Methods: Thirty patients with opioid use disorder undergoing MMT were randomly assigned into three groups: LZNFB with MMT, Cognitive rehabilitation with MMT (as experimental groups), and MMT alone Control group. The LZNFB and Cognitive rehabilitation groups received 20 and 15 sessions of treatment, respectively. The three groups were assessed using a number of questionnaires as well as Dot-Probe Task at pre-test, post-test, and one-month follow-up. Results: The results showed that both experimental groups accomplished significantly greater reduction in opium craving than MMT alone group at post-test and follow up (P<0.05). The LZNFB with MMT group showed higher decrease in opioid craving than the Cognitive rehabilitation with MMT group. In addition, Cognitive rehabilitation group experienced greater improvement on attentional bias towards craving cues than LZNFB with MMT group at post-test and follow up. Finally, LZNFB with MMT group and Cognitive rehabilitation with MMT group got higher scores on the recovery assessment scale than MMT alone group at post-test and follow up. According to results of this study, LZNFB training is more effective than Cognitive Rehabilitation in decreasing of craving and improving quality of life in addiction to opioids. Conclusion: The findings of the current study provided preliminary support for the effectiveness of LZNFB and Cognitive rehabilitation on reduction of opium craving, improvement of attentional bias towards craving cues and quality of life among Iranian opioids use patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 88-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy W. Bray ◽  
Brandon Aden ◽  
Ashley A. Eggman ◽  
Leah Hellerstein ◽  
Eve Wittenberg ◽  
...  

Healthcare ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Assaf Gottlieb ◽  
Christine Bakos-Block ◽  
James R. Langabeer ◽  
Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer

Background: The Houston Emergency Opioid Engagement System was established to create an access pathway into long-term recovery for individuals with opioid use disorder. The program determines effectiveness across multiple dimensions, one of which is by measuring the participant’s reported quality of life (QoL) at the beginning of the program and at successive intervals. Methods: A visual analog scale was used to measure the change in QoL among participants after joining the program. We then identified sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with changes in QoL. Results: 71% of the participants (n = 494) experienced an increase in their QoL scores, with an average improvement of 15.8 ± 29 points out of a hundred. We identified 10 factors associated with a significant change in QoL. Participants who relapsed during treatment experienced minor increases in QoL, and participants who attended professional counseling experienced the largest increases in QoL compared with those who did not. Conclusions: Insight into significant factors associated with increases in QoL may inform programs on areas of focus. The inclusion of counseling and other services that address factors such as psychological distress were found to increase participants’ QoL and success in recovery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-509
Author(s):  
Claire E. Blevins ◽  
Ana M. Abrantes ◽  
Megan E. Kurth ◽  
Alan L. Gordon ◽  
Michael D. Stein

Pain ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Stijn Veldman ◽  
Maria van Beek ◽  
Steffie van Rijswijk ◽  
Hannah Ellerbroek ◽  
Hans Timmerman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document