Calculations of Temperature, Conductive Heat Flux, and Heat Wave Velocities Due to Radiant Heating of Opaque Materials

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Cohen
AIAA Journal ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 2180-2186 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAX A. HEASLET ◽  
BARRETT BALDWIN

1995 ◽  
Vol 41 (137) ◽  
pp. 174-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Konzelmann ◽  
Roger J. Braithwaite

AbstractA meteorological and glaciological experiment was carried out in July 1993 at the margin of the Greenland ice sheet in Kronprins Christian Land, eastern north Greenland. Within a small area (about 100 m2) daily measurements were made on ten ablation stakes fixed in “light” and “dark” ice and were compared to each other. Simultaneously, the components of the energy balance, including net radiation, sensible-heat flux, latent-heat flux and conductive-heat flux in the ice were determined. Global radiation, longwave incoming radiation and albedo were measured, and longwave outgoing radiation was calculated by assuming that the glacier surface was melting. Sensible-and latent-heat fluxes were calculated from air temperature, humidity and wind speed. Conductive-heat flux in the ice was estimated by temperature-profile measurements in the uppermost ice layer. Net radiation is the major source of ablation energy, and turbulent fluxes are smaller energy sources by about three times, while heat flux into the ice is a substantial heat sink, reducing energy available for ice melt. Albedo varies from 0.42 to 0.56 within the experimental site and causes relatively large differences in ablation at stakes close to each other. Small-scale albedo variations should therefore be carefully sampled for large-scale energy-balance calculations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (75pt1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiechen Zhao ◽  
Bin Cheng ◽  
Qinghua Yang ◽  
Timo Vihma ◽  
Lin Zhang

ABSTRACT The seasonal cycle of fast ice thickness in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica, was observed between March and December 2012. In March, we observed a 0.16 m thickness gain of 0.22 m-thick first-year ice (FYI), while 1.16 m-thick second-year ice (SYI) nearby simultaneously ablated by 0.59 m. A 1-D thermodynamic sea-ice model was applied to identify the factors that led to the simultaneous growth of FYI and melt of SYI. The different evolutions were explained by the difference in the conductive heat flux between the FYI and SYI. As the FYI was thin, there was a large temperature gradient between the ice base and the colder ice surface. This generated an upward conductive heat flux, which was larger than the heat flux from the ocean to the ice base, yielding basal growth of ice. In the case of the thicker SYI the temperature gradient and, hence, the conductive heat flux were smaller, and not sufficient to balance the oceanic heat flux at the ice base, yielding basal ablation. Penetration of solar radiation affected the conductive heat flux in both cases, and the model results were sensitive to the initial ice temperature profile and the uncertainty of the oceanic heat flux.


1995 ◽  
Vol 41 (137) ◽  
pp. 174-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Konzelmann ◽  
Roger J. Braithwaite

AbstractA meteorological and glaciological experiment was carried out in July 1993 at the margin of the Greenland ice sheet in Kronprins Christian Land, eastern north Greenland. Within a small area (about 100 m2) daily measurements were made on ten ablation stakes fixed in “light” and “dark” ice and were compared to each other. Simultaneously, the components of the energy balance, including net radiation, sensible-heat flux, latent-heat flux and conductive-heat flux in the ice were determined. Global radiation, longwave incoming radiation and albedo were measured, and longwave outgoing radiation was calculated by assuming that the glacier surface was melting. Sensible-and latent-heat fluxes were calculated from air temperature, humidity and wind speed. Conductive-heat flux in the ice was estimated by temperature-profile measurements in the uppermost ice layer. Net radiation is the major source of ablation energy, and turbulent fluxes are smaller energy sources by about three times, while heat flux into the ice is a substantial heat sink, reducing energy available for ice melt. Albedo varies from 0.42 to 0.56 within the experimental site and causes relatively large differences in ablation at stakes close to each other. Small-scale albedo variations should therefore be carefully sampled for large-scale energy-balance calculations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document