TurfPQ, A Pesticide Runoff Model For Turf

2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 701-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Haith
2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Haith

2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1033-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Haith

2003 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue‐Ren Li ◽  
Yi‐Fan Li ◽  
John Struger ◽  
Bing Chen ◽  
Gordon H. Huang

1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (3-5) ◽  
pp. 205-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billy Hipp ◽  
Susan Alexander ◽  
Tim Knowles

Runoff from typical urban and suburban landscapes may contain significant levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, and a broad spectrum of various pesticides (mainly herbicides and insecticides) due to excessive application rates of these chemicals and high irrigation requirements of most commonly used landscape plant species. Preliminary water quality data (runoff) from a comparative study of 20 microwatersheds using 4 different levels of maintenance, show reductions in these types of pollutants in runoff for microwatersheds planted to resource efficient plants. Utilization of plants indigenous to an ecoregion (and other resource efficient plants) in landscape design and management allows considerable reduction in inputs from fertilizer, water, and pesticides. This results in lower pollutant concentrations in runoff and is estimated to result in lower total pollutant loadings from such systems. Installation of native or resource efficient plants in new developments (commercial and residential) and replacement of existing landscapes with these plants as older plants die or neighborhoods are updated could provide cities and suburban areas with a cost-effective, low-maintenance, and aesthetically-pleasing pollution control technology. Data from the comparative study should provide municipalities charged with meeting the new requirements of the National Pollutant Elimination Discharge System with a way to compare the pollution prevention effectiveness of resource-efficient landscapes with more traditional structural urban runoff controls.


2021 ◽  
pp. 126268
Author(s):  
Menberu B. Meles ◽  
Dave C. Goodrich ◽  
Hoshin V. Gupta ◽  
I. Shea Burns ◽  
Carl L. Unkrich ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (20) ◽  
pp. 3089-3107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thea I. Piovano ◽  
Doerthe Tetzlaff ◽  
Pertti Ala-aho ◽  
Jim Buttle ◽  
Carl P. J. Mitchell ◽  
...  

Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Sebastian Rößler ◽  
Marius S. Witt ◽  
Jaakko Ikonen ◽  
Ian A. Brown ◽  
Andreas J. Dietz

The boreal winter 2019/2020 was very irregular in Europe. While there was very little snow in Central Europe, the opposite was the case in northern Fenno-Scandia, particularly in the Arctic. The snow cover was more persistent here and its rapid melting led to flooding in many places. Since the last severe spring floods occurred in the region in 2018, this raises the question of whether more frequent occurrences can be expected in the future. To assess the variability of snowmelt related flooding we used snow cover maps (derived from the DLR’s Global SnowPack MODIS snow product) and freely available data on runoff, precipitation, and air temperature in eight unregulated river catchment areas. A trend analysis (Mann-Kendall test) was carried out to assess the development of the parameters, and the interdependencies of the parameters were examined with a correlation analysis. Finally, a simple snowmelt runoff model was tested for its applicability to this region. We noticed an extraordinary variability in the duration of snow cover. If this extends well into spring, rapid air temperature increases leads to enhanced thawing. According to the last flood years 2005, 2010, 2018, and 2020, we were able to differentiate between four synoptic flood types based on their special hydrometeorological and snow situation and simulate them with the snowmelt runoff model (SRM).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document